Connect with us

Published

on

Alex Mashinsky, founder and chief executive officer of Celcius Network Ltd., during a panel session at the Blockchain Week Summit in Paris, France, April 13, 2022.

Benjamin Girette | Bloomberg | Getty Images

New York Attorney General Letitia James sued former Celsius Network CEO Alex Mashinsky on Thursday, alleging that Mashinsky defrauded hundreds of thousands of investors out of billions of dollars at the now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange.

Mashinsky publicly assured his customers that investing with Celsius was both safer and more lucrative than leaving their investments in a traditional bank. At one point, deposits at the crypto exchange were valued at $20 billion, according to the complaint. But Mashinsky’s statements were false, James alleges, and became part of his efforts to hide deep losses on risky crypto-lending investments.

“As the former CEO of Celsius, Alex Mashinsky promised to lead investors to financial freedom but led them down a path of financial ruin,” James said in a statement.

The attorney general’s office is seeking to fine Mashinsky and levy monetary damages, and bar him from leading a company or working in the securities industry in New York.

The action is civil, not criminal, and was brought under the Martin Act, New York state’s wide-ranging securities law. The Martin Act gives prosecutors sweeping search and subpoena powers to investigate potential wrongdoing.

Celsius offered sky-high yields that lured investors in and swelled the exchange’s coffers. Celsius, like similarly bankrupt Voyager Digital, was able to pay out yields as high as 17% by lending customer assets to crypto hedge funds, including now-collapsed Three Arrows Capital, known as 3AC, and Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda Research.

The crash of cryptocurrencies terra and luna in 2022 forced 3AC into bankruptcy and deepened an ongoing “crypto winter.” Celsius was exposed to the fall of terra and luna both through loans to 3AC and through $935 million of direct investment in “highly speculative” terra bets, all funded by investor funds, the complaint said.

Mashinsky claimed that Celsius had “very small losses” and that the exchange had “basically reduced or eliminated any exposure” to borrowers with investments in terra or luna.

Those statements were false, James’ complaint alleges, and were part of a wider campaign to prevent user outflows that could have precipitated a run on the bank similar to what happened at FTX, another bankrupted exchange.

But Mashinsky made “materially false and misleading” statements designed to hide the actual extent of Celsius’ exposure, claiming that the crypto exchange had “billions in liquidity” just days before Celsius filed for bankruptcy on July 13, 2022, the complaint alleges.

Celsius investors were left bereft and so despondent that some considered suicide, CNBC previously reported.

“Mashinsky never disclosed that Celsius had close to a billion-dollar deficit,” the complaint alleges. Celsius entered bankruptcy proceedings with only $1.75 billion in crypto assets, a far cry from the $4.7 billion it owed users.

Mashinsky resigned from his position as CEO in September. At the time, he apologized for the “increasing distraction” that his leadership had caused.

“Alex Mashinsky is no longer employed by Celsius and is not involved in the management of the company,” a spokesperson for Celsius told CNBC.

Mashinsky did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky resigns, and FTX buys Voyager's assets for $1.4 billion: CNBC Crypto World

Continue Reading

Technology

Meta’s big antitrust win, Salesforce’s deal closure, and iPhone’s popularity in China

Published

on

By

Meta's big antitrust win, Salesforce's deal closure, and iPhone's popularity in China

Continue Reading

Technology

Meta wins FTC antitrust trial that focused on WhatsApp, Instagram

Published

on

By

Meta wins FTC antitrust trial that focused on WhatsApp, Instagram

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg appears at the Meta Connect event in Menlo Park, California, on Sept. 25, 2024.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Meta won its high-profile antitrust case against the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the company of holding a monopoly in social networking.

In a memorandum opinion released Tuesday, Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., said the FTC failed to prove its argument. The case, initially filed by the FTC five years ago, centered on Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.

“Whether or not Meta enjoyed monopoly power in the past, though, the agency must show that it continues to hold such power now,” Boasberg said in the filing. “The Court’s verdict today determines that the FTC has not done so. A judgment so stating shall issue this day.”

Boasberg dismissed the case in 2021, saying the agency didn’t have enough evidence to prove “Facebook holds market power.” In August of that year, the FTC filed an amended complaint with more details about the company’s user numbers and metrics relative to competitors like Snapchat, the now-defunct Google+ social network and Myspace.

After reviewing the amendments, Boasberg in 2022 ruled that the case could proceed, saying the FTC had presented more details than before.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, former operating chief Sheryl Sandberg, Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom and other current and former Meta executives all testified in the trial, which began in April.

Meta shares were little changed on Tuesday. The stock is up about 2% for the year, badly underperforming broader indexes and most of its megacap tech peers.

“The Court’s decision today recognizes that Meta faces fierce competition,” the company said in a statement. “Our products are beneficial for people and businesses and exemplify American innovation and economic growth. We look forward to continuing to partner with the Administration and to invest in America.” 

The FTC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.  

The ruling comes a little over two months after Google avoided the harshest possible penalty from an antitrust case it lost last year. While Google was found to hold an illegal monopoly in its core market of internet search, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta decided the company would not be forced to sell its Chrome browser, bucking the Department of Justice’s request. Google was, however, ordered to loosen its hold on search data.

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan on Meta antitrust trial regarding Instagram, WhatsApp ownership

In the Meta case, the FTC claimed the company shouldn’t have been allowed to buy Instagram for $1 billion in 2012 and WhatsApp for $19 billion in 2014, and the agency called for those units to be divested. The commission also alleged that there were no major alternatives for apps like Facebook and Instagram that people use to communicate with friends and family in a online, social space.

However, a major challenge for the FTC, according to the judge, was in proving that Meta is breaking antitrust law today, not years ago when the primary use of social networks was very different and based on sharing other kinds of content.

“To win the permanent injunction that it seeks here, the FTC must prove a current or imminent legal violation,” he wrote.

Boasberg ultimately sided with Meta’s argument that the technology industry has evolved since the early days of Facebook, and the company now faces a wide variety of competitors like TikTok.

“While each of Meta’s empirical showings can be quibbled with, they all tell a consistent story: people treat TikTok and YouTube as substitutes for Facebook and Instagram, and the amount of competitive overlap is economically important,” Boasberg wrote. “Against that unmistakable pattern, the FTC offers no empirical evidence of substitution whatsoever.”

Big changes in social

Much of Judge Boasberg’s conclusion was built on the transformation that’s taken place in the social media market in recent years and Meta’s changing position within it. User trends have moved heavily in the direction of video, where TikTok and YouTube have massive user bases and huge network effects.

“The most-used part of Meta’s apps is thus indistinguishable from the offerings on TikTok and YouTube,” Boasberg wrote.

President Trump signs TikTok deal: Here's what to know
FTC Chair on independence: Democracy requires Pres. Trump have power to remove board members at will

Continue Reading

Technology

Waymo says it will launch in more Texas and Florida cities in 2026

Published

on

By

Waymo says it will launch in more Texas and Florida cities in 2026

A Waymo autonomous self-driving Jaguar taxi drives along a street on March 14, 2024 in Los Angeles, California.

Mario Tama | Getty Images

Waymo on Tuesday said it will bring its robotaxi service to new cities in Texas and Florida in 2026.

The Alphabet-owned company said it plans to start operating its vehicles with no human driver assistants in Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Miami and Orlando in the coming weeks before opening service in those markets to the public next year, the company said in a blog.

“Waymo has entered a new phase of commercial scale, doubling the number of cities we operate without a human specialist in the car,” Waymo Chief Product Officer Saswat Panigrahi said in an emailed statement Tuesday.

Waymo had previously announced plans to launch its robotaxi service in Dallas and Miami in 2026, but Tuesday was the first time the company said it planned to launch service next year in the other cities. Waymo will first offer fully autonomous trips to its employees in those markets, a spokesperson said.

The company has been gearing up to expand its paid robotaxis service in 2026. The company previously announced plans to expand to Detroit, Las Vegas, Nashville, San Diego, Washington, D.C., and London in 2026.

Waymo has also begun testing vehicles in New York City and Tokyo.

Last week, Waymo began offering freeway routes in the San Francisco, Phoenix and Los Angeles markets. The Google sister company will gradually extend freeway trips to more riders and locations over time.

Already, Waymo operates its paid robotaxi service in Austin, San Francisco, Phoenix, Atlanta and Los Angeles. The company has provided more than 10 million paid rides since first launching in 2020, the company said in May.

Waymo’s Florida and Texas expansion announcement comes the same day that Amazon-owned Zoox began allowing select San Francisco users to hail its driverless vehicles. San Francisco is the second market where Zoox now offers a free service, after its launch in Las Vegas in September. Zoox has deployed a fleet of 50 robotaxis between San Francisco and Las Vegas, the company told CNBC in September.

WATCH: Waymo launches paid robotaxi rides on freeways

Watch: Waymo launches paid robotaxi rides on freeways

Continue Reading

Trending