Britishvolt collapse should spark debate on whether it was actually needed
The collapse into administration of Britishvolt will rekindle concerns for the long-term future of the British car-making industry.
The sector is under extreme pressure to pivot from making cars powered by the internal combustion engine to electric vehicles (EVs). To that end the UK government has decreed that, from 2030, no new petrol or diesel cars will be sold in the UK.
Central to that transition to EVs is the need for a number of new ‘gigafactories’ – plants that could produce electric car batteries at scale – and the Johnson government had targeted at least seven or eight of them.
The assumption among industry analysts is that, due to the weight of EV batteries and the expense of transporting them, they need to be located near to the carmakers. Hence the need to build them in the UK.
That need for local sourcing is amplified by ‘rules of origin’ provisions in the UK’s Brexit deal with the EU which require that 70% of a battery must be built in either the UK or the EU for the EV it powers to be sold tariff-free in the bloc. Four in every five British-built cars are exported and just over half of them are sold to countries in the EU.
It is why Britishvolt was promised £100m from the Automotive Transformation Fund, the £850m taxpayer-backed programme aimed at supporting the electrification of Britain’s automotive supply chain.
So the failure of Britishvolt will be seen as a severe setback to the country’s ambitions for EVs. It casts doubt over what is one of only two gigafactories in the UK towards which meaningful progress was being made, the other being built at Sunderland by the Chinese battery maker Envision, which is partnering Nissan locally.
Yet some will argue it is premature to extrapolate Britishvolt’s woes to wider prospects for gigafactories in the UK.
Britishvolt has been seemingly cursed from the off.
Its co-founder, Lars Carlstrom, left the company nearly three years ago after it emerged he had been convicted for tax offenses in his native Sweden. There was then confusion when the company announced its factory would not be in Bridgend in south Wales, as originally intended, but at Cambois near Blyth, in Northumberland, where it had been offered more attractive financial incentives to locate.
The original South Wales site was selected on the basis of access to key markets and a skilled local workforce
In the meantime, the company continued to rack up costs, with the monthly salary bill for its 300 employees reported to be £3m.
Britishvolt then pushed back the planned start date for production to 2025, blaming Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for pushing up costs, while a request for government support was made. It later emerged that management had put the company on what was described as ‘life support’ in July.
Then, in August last year, Mr Carlstrom’s co-founder, Orral Nadjari, unexpectedly resigned.
Orral Nadjari
The Guardian newspaper subsequently reported details of his extravagant spending, revealing that the company had leased a seven bedroom £2.8m mansion with a swimming pool and jacuzzi for executives, as well as hiring a Dubai-based fitness instructor to conduct yoga classes for staff remotely.
Lack of firm supply deals with carmakers
Graham Hoare, the respected former head of Ford of Britain, was hired in his place as an interim chief executive and, in November, the company secured an emergency lifeline from Glencore, the commodities trading and mining giant, which was one of its shareholders.
But at the heart of its problems was that it had never signed firm supply deals with carmakers sufficient to guarantee future revenues of the kind that potential investors would have wanted to see.
All it had were preliminary agreements with two luxury carmakers, Aston Martin and Lotus, to design batteries for their EVs.
The future for the Blyth site hangs in the balance
Last week, the company said it was in talks to sell a majority stake in itself to a consortium of investors in order to secure its future, but those came to nothing.
Today brought the news, which had seemed increasingly inevitable, of administration.
That need not be the end of the story.
Britishvolt’s main asset, the site at Cambois, is well-located close to a deep-water port and enjoys both good rail links and access to clean energy from Norway. It is highly likely to attract potential buyers.
India’s Tata Motors, the owner of Jaguar Land Rover, has been suggested as a possible buyer although it is hard to see why it would want to own a site in Blyth when a site in Coventry, much closer to the bulk of its manufacturing facilities elsewhere in the West Midlands, remains possible for development.
The bigger questions and concerns
Perhaps the bigger question – and concern – is how many car manufacturers will be in need of British-made EV batteries come the end of the decade.
Honda has already closed its plant at Swindon in Wiltshire while Stellantis, the Fiat, Peugeot and Citroen combine, is ending volume car production at Ellesmere Port in Cheshire and converting production there to electric vans and cars whose battery cells will be sourced on mainland Europe.
Mini’s owner, BMW, has confirmed the next generation of the model’s electric version will be built not at Cowley in Oxfordshire but in China. And it is not yet clear from where the luxury British carmakers Rolls-Royce and Bentley, respectively owned by BMW and Volkswagen, intend to source their batteries as they switch to EV production. Nor are Toyota’s intentions clear for its site at Burnaston in Derbyshire.
The biggest question of all concerns Jaguar Land Rover which, it seems, is likely to be relying on European production for at least some of the batteries powering its UK-built vehicles.
So perhaps the bigger worry is not the lack of gigafactories but whether they will actually be needed amid declining output from British-based volume car producers.
The government has signalled that plans to bring a second runway at Gatwick into regular use will get the green light if environmental conditions are met.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she was “minded to approve” the airport’s plans but the deadline for a decision had now been pushed back until the end of October.
The main stumbling blocks facing Gatwick’s proposals are related to its provisions for noise prevention and public transport.
The Planning Inspectorate had made recommendations in those two areas after initially rejecting the scheme.
Money latest: UK’s favourite DIY shops ranked
The airport welcomed the government’s statement but did not say whether it saw a need to adjust its plans to meet the conditions.
Gatwick has until April 24 to respond to the new proposals.
The northern runway already exists at the airport parallel to the main one, but cannot be used at the same time as it is too close.
It is currently limited to being a taxiway and only used for take-offs and landings if the main one has to shut.
Gatwick wants to move it 12 metres further away to solve this problem.
The northern runway is currently only used for emergencies or where the main one is closed. Pic: PA
It says being able to run both at the same time would allow around 100,000 more flights per year and create 14,000 jobs.
Gatwick says the £2.2bn project would not need government money, would be 100% privately funded, and could be complete by the end of the decade.
The airport is already the second busiest in the UK, and the busiest single runway airport in Europe.
Campaigners argue the additional traffic would be catastrophic for the environment and the local community in particular.
Today’s update comes after the chancellor said last month the government also supported a third runway at Heathrow as part of its wider effort to bolster UK economic growth.
However, the formal planning process is still to take place.
Gatwick’s additional runway would be unlikely to open until the end of the decade, assuming any legal challenges were swiftly overcome.
A government source told Sky News: “The transport secretary has set out a path to approving the expansion of Gatwick today following the Planning Inspectorate’s recommendation to refuse the original application.
“This is an important step forward and demonstrates that this government will stop at nothing to deliver economic growth and new infrastructure as part of our Plan for Change.
“Expansion will bring huge benefits for business and represents a victory for holidaymakers. We want to deliver this opportunity in line with our legal, environmental and climate obligations.
“We look forward to Gatwick’s response as they have indicated planes could take off from a new runway before the end of this Parliament.”
Stewart Wingate, Gatwick’s chief executive, said: “We welcome today’s announcement that the Secretary of State for Transport is minded to approve our Northern Runway plans and has outlined a clear pathway to full approval later in the year.
“It is vital that any planning conditions attached to the final approval enable us to make a decision to invest £2.2bn in this project and realise the full benefits of bringing the Northern Runway into routine use.
“We will of course engage fully in the extended process for a final decision.”
He added: “We stand ready to deliver this project which will create 14,000 jobs and generate £1bn a year in economic benefits. By increasing resilience and capacity we can support the UK’s position as a leader in global connectivity and deliver substantial trade and economic growth in the South East and more broadly.
“We have also outlined to government how we plan to grow responsibly to meet increasing passenger demand, while minimising noise and environmental impacts.”
A spokesperson for campaign group Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (Cagne) responded: “We welcome the extension by the secretary of state until October as she has obviously recognised the many holes in the Gatwick airport submissions during the planning hearings.
“Cagne do not believe Gatwick has been totally up front with their submissions, and the planning hearings left so many questions unanswered.”
Greenpeace UK’s policy director, Doug Parr, said of the process ahead: “By approving Gatwick’s expansion the government will hang a millstone the size of a 747 around the country’s neck.
“Such a decision would be one that smacks of desperation, completely ignoring the solid evidence that increasing air travel won’t drive economic growth. The only thing it’s set to boost is air pollution, noise, and climate emissions.”
Nvidia has signalled no drop in demand for its flagship chips among big artificial intelligence (AI) spenders despite the low-cost challenge posed by Chinese rival DeepSeek.
The leading AI chipmaker said it expected Blackwell sales to continue to grow after its latest earnings beat market expectations.
Nvidia forecast revenue of around $43bn (£34bn) for its first quarter after achieving a figure of $39.3bn (£31bn) over its last three months – up 12% from the previous quarter and 78% from one year ago.
Just a month ago, its shares took a hammering when it emerged DeepSeek‘s primary chatbot, which uses lower-cost chips, had become the most popular free application on Apple’s App Store across the US.
Nvidia’s shares lost almost $600bn in market value in a day.
It also prompted investors to question whether the AI-led stock market rally of recent years was overblown.
There was anxiety ahead of Nvidia’s earnings report though shares only fell fractionally in after-hours dealing.
Market analysts suggested demand from Microsoft, Amazon and other heavyweight tech companies racing to build
AI infrastructure remained robust, given Nvidia’s revenue guidance even though the bulk of it is accounted for through data centres.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Who will win the AI battle?
Read more: What is DeepSeek?
Nvidia founder Jensen Huang said Nvidia has ramped up the massive-scale production of Blackwell and achieved “billions of dollars in sales in its first quarter”.
“Demand for Blackwell is amazing as reasoning AI adds another scaling law – increasing compute for training makes models smarter and increasing compute for long thinking makes the answer smarter.
“AI is advancing at light speed as agentic AI and physical AI set the stage for the next wave of AI to revolutionise the largest industries,” he said.
Derren Nathan, head of equity research at Hargreaves Lansdown, said of the report: “The longer-term investment case for the driver of the AI train is looking difficult to pick holes in, with Meta’s $200bn just one of the latest mega investments in data centres to be unveiled recently.
“By virtue of scale, growth may be slowing a little but upgrades to analysts full-year numbers can be expected off the back of today’s results. At a around 30x forward earnings, the valuation still doesn’t look overcooked.”
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports11 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway