Connect with us

Published

on

More allegations against police officers are coming to light following the revelation that serial rapist police officer David Carrick got away with his crimes for years, despite opportunities to stop him.

Two women have told their stories to Sky News.

One says she was preyed on by the officer investigating her rape case, another claims her alleged rapist ex-partner worked in professional standards – the department that would investigate predatory police officers.

‘Amy’, not her real name, reported an alleged rape and says the male officer investigating began to make sexual advances towards her.

She says: “He started saying to me, ‘I have to say this to you now, or I’m never going to tell you. I really like you and I really want to take you out on a date’.

“To which I was obviously then quite vulnerable, I’d just had a baby, I’d been raped, I was in a very dark place. And this officer was quite confrontational face-to-face.”

She claims the officer suggested he come to see her at night, with a bottle of gin, even when she was living in a women’s refuge.

More on David Carrick

Amy says: “I was on edge, I thought ‘what if he does turn up? If he turns up, do I have to have sex with him? Is he going to make me have sex with him? If I don’t have sex with him, is my case going to get closed because of it?’

“To me, he had a lot of power.”

Amy says the unwanted advances continued for a year after the trial, and he also made them to a female witness.

Eventually, police turned up at Amy’s door, telling her that this man was being investigated for things he’d allegedly done to other women. But the damage was done.

“You just don’t trust the police anymore,” she says.

“I had to report an ex-partner for a domestic incident, and I honestly didn’t want to. I sat there and said to my sister ‘I’m not going back to the police.'”

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

She added: “But there was an incident where he’d attacked me, and the neighbours had rung the police. And the police turned up and it was two male officers.

“And the male officers asked me to go outside and said, ‘can you come outside and speak to us?’

“I said, ‘absolutely no way am I coming outside, I’m not going anywhere with you on my own.'”

‘A string of complaints’

‘Charlotte’, whose name we have also changed, reported her ex-partner for alleged rape.

He was working for professional standards within the police, the department that investigates abusive officers.

Read more:
Complaints against officers must be ‘taken more seriously’
Woman who reported police officer ex for rape says investigation ‘more traumatic’

Charlotte worked in the force too, and says he should never have had that job because he’d had a string of complaints against him.

She told Sky News: “I think to be fair the whole force was shocked that he had a job in the professional standards department, because it was common knowledge that he had been investigated so many times, that’s what he was known for.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Do the police need policing? – a Sky News special

Despite previous allegations from other women, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided not to prosecute.

In a letter to Charlotte, they gave various reasons for dismissing her case such as “you were laughing as you told the suspect to ‘stop’.”

Another section states: “You could have pushed him away, and again he might not have heard you say ‘no’.”

And about another allegation where she claimed he was hurting her and had asked him to stop, it says, “He might have interpreted ‘ow’ in a different way, he might have believed you too were aroused by the hitting.”

‘Like I’ve been raped again’

The letter concludes: “To my mind you had the freedom to make a choice which included reluctantly consenting.”

Charlotte is disgusted by the legal concept of reluctant consent and says: “It’s just left me feeling like I’ve been raped again – but by the justice system, the people who are supposed to be looking after us.”

The force, which we’ve decided not to name, said that despite no criminal charges, Charlotte’s ex-partner faced a gross misconduct hearing, was dismissed and now remains on the barred list.

The CPS said: “We understand that our decision not to bring charges will be a disappointing one. Our role is to make decisions based on the evidence and the law.

“After carefully considering all the evidence in the case, including the account given by the complainant, we concluded the evidential requirement to bring a prosecution was not met.

“This decision was upheld following a Victims’ Right to Review and a detailed letter was sent to the complainant explaining the full reasons for our decision.”

It said all cases are dealt with “fairly and with integrity” and that people should continue to report rape and sexual assault to the police.

Charlotte believes predatory police officers gain confidence in the knowledge that so few rape cases reach court and that the stigma of speaking out also helps abusers.

But after seeing how serial rapist PC David Carrick escaped detection for so long, more women are deciding to break their silence.

Continue Reading

UK

Police admit failures in Harry Dunn case after report finds officers prioritised suspect’s welfare

Published

on

By

Police admit failures in Harry Dunn case after report finds officers prioritised suspect's welfare

Northamptonshire Police has admitted it failed Harry Dunn and his family after a report found officers prioritised the welfare of the suspect in the case over the investigation.

The 19-year-old died in 2019 after US state department employee Anne Sacoolas – who was driving a car on the wrong side of the road – hit his motorbike near RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire.

However, Sacoolas was not immediately arrested following the crash and was able to flee the country, claiming diplomatic immunity, because police did not believe a “necessity test” had been met.

An independent report, published on Wednesday, has now criticised the force’s senior leadership for their handling of the case – including describing its former chief constable as having a “detrimental” impact.

Harry Dunn’s mother Charlotte Charles said she welcomed the findings.

She told Sky News: “Unfortunately, we were treated extremely poorly. All the authorities wanted to shut us down…

“This report does validate everything, of the way we felt and everything that we’ve been put through. To be treated as we were, as the victims of a serious crime, we were let down really, really badly.”

Following a long fight for justice by Mr Dunn’s family, Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey in December 2022.

She later received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From 2022: Anne Sacoolas pleads guilty

Following the report, Assistant Chief Constable Emma James said in a statement: “On behalf of Northamptonshire Police, I want to apologise to Harry’s family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him.

“The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts”.

She also added: “It was vitally important that Northamptonshire Police conducted this review into the most high-profile case in the force’s history, a case where clear and significant shortcomings have now been properly and independently unearthed.”

Assistant Chief Constable Emma James
Image:
Assistant Chief Constable Emma James

The report, which has 38 recommendations, found that Nick Adderley, who was sacked as head of the force last year after lying about his military record, had caused a breakdown in relations with Mr Dunn’s family.

It also revealed that his “erroneous statements” about Sacoolas’s immunity status led the Foreign Office to contact the force asking him not to repeat them.

Read more:
Harry Dunn’s family’s fight for justice never wavered
‘I couldn’t have asked for a better brother’, Harry’s twin tells inquest

Danielle Stone, the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire, said Mr Adderley’s behaviour was “unfathomable”.

She added that the report “makes really clear his culpability.”

Danielle Stone, the Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire
Image:
Danielle Stone said Mr Adderley’s behaviour was “unfathomable”

The report also said Northamptonshire Police potentially had a culture of not arresting suspects “in circumstances such as these, which could lead to evidence not being obtained”. It recommended that the force adopt an “investigative mindset” over serious road crashes.

Regarding the decision not to arrest Sacoolas, the report said the decision had not been “explained in enough detail”. It added: “The overriding factor in the decision appears to be the welfare of the suspect and her suffering from shock, with little to no consideration around the full necessity test under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act.

“A prompt and effective investigation was not considered or articulated. The view is that in these circumstances the suspect could and should have been arrested to assist the evidence-gathering process.”

A report into Northamptonshire Police's failures in investigating the death of Harry Dunn

The report continued: “The duty (police sergeant) made the decision not to arrest.

“The rationale was largely based on a belief that the necessity test was not met, and information received that Anne Sacoolas was in shock.

“Whilst the welfare of any person is a concern for officers, this should not have prevented the arrest of Anne Sacoolas.”

Ms Charles, who was recently honoured with an MBE after her campaigning efforts led to road safety improvements near US airbases, said: “I don’t think you’re ever done grieving. There’s never any closure to losing a child. You live with it, it’s so profound.

“So the only thing I would ever say to anybody else who feels that they’ve got a fight ahead of them, dig deep, do your best, because you just never know the resilience that you’ve got until you absolutely have to find it.”

Continue Reading

UK

Battle to convince MPs to back benefit cuts to more than three million households

Published

on

By

Battle to convince MPs to back benefit cuts to more than three million households

Plans for cuts to benefits which will impact more than three million households will be published today – as the government faces a battle to convince dozens of Labour MPs to back them.

Liz Kendall, the welfare secretary, has set out proposals to cut £5bn from the welfare budget – which she has said is “unsustainable” and “trapping people in welfare dependency”.

Disabled people claiming PIP, the personal independence payment which helps people – some of them working – with the increased costs of daily living, face having their awards reviewed from the end of next year.

An estimated 800,000 current and future PIP recipients will lose an average of £4,500 a year, according to a government assessment.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Government’s battle over welfare reforms

The government also intends to freeze the health element of Universal Credit, claimed by more than two million people, at £97 a week during this parliament, and cut the rate to £50 for new claimants.

Under pressure from Labour MPs concerned particularly that changes to PIP will drive families into poverty, Ms Kendall will announce new protections in the bill today.

Sky News understands they include a 13-week transition period for those losing PIP; a higher rate of Universal Credit for people with the most serious conditions; and a commitment that disabled people who take a job will not immediately lose their benefits.

More on Benefits

Some 40 Labour MPs have signed a letter refusing to support the cuts; and dozens of others have concerns, including ministers.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Benefits cuts explained

Ms Kendall is determined to press ahead, and has said the number of new PIP claimants has doubled since 2019 – at 34,000, up from 15,000.

Ministers say 90% of current claimants will not lose their benefits; and that many people will be better off – with the total welfare bill set to continue to rise over this parliament.

To keep the benefit, claimants must score a minimum of four points out of eight on one of the daily living criteria.

Ministers say claimants with the most serious conditions, who cannot work, will not face constant reassessments.

A £1bn programme is proposed, intended to give disabled people who can work tailored support to find jobs.

Some Labour MPs have angrily opposed the reforms – which will be voted on later this month.

Last night in a parliamentary debate, Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan-Jordan disputed the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures.

Read More:
Minister tells MPs controversial disability benefit reforms will go ahead
Big benefits cuts are imminent – here’s what to expect

He said: “We already know that PIP is an underclaimed benefit. The increase in claims is a symptom of declining public health and increased financial hardship disabled people are facing.

“We have the same proportion of people on working-age benefits as in 2015. This is not an economic necessity, it’s a political choice.”

Liz Kendall
Image:
Liz Kendall

Rachael Maskell, Labour MP for York, called the proposals “devastating “. She said: “We must change direction and not proceed with these cuts.”

Disability groups say they fear an increase in suicides and mental health conditions.

The government’s own assessment forecast an extra 250,000 people could be pushed into poverty – including 50,000 children. It did not include the impact of people moving into work.

Ms Kendall was urged by MPs on the Commons Work and Pensions committee to delay the reforms, to carry out an impact assessment, but wrote back to the committee saying the reforms were too urgent to delay – and that MPs would be able to amend the legislation.

Continue Reading

UK

Missing teen Cole Cooper: Grieving mum alleges ‘third party’ involved in death

Published

on

By

Missing teen Cole Cooper: Grieving mum alleges 'third party' involved in death

The grieving mother of a Scottish teen who vanished for a month has told Sky News she believes a “third party” was involved in her son’s death.

Cole Cooper, 19, was discovered dead in woods near Falkirk earlier this month following a missing persons inquiry his relatives don’t believe was taken seriously enough by police.

He was last seen on CCTV in May after leaving a house party, but police later revealed a former school friend had spoken to Cole a few days later nearby.

Speaking exclusively to Sky News, his mum Wendy Stewart, 42, has revealed her son had “various arguments” in the days and hours before he disappeared.

Wendy&Aimee
Image:
Cole’s mum Wendy (L) and his aunt Aimee

In an emotional interview, she said: “He was only 19, he should never have been taken. I am never going to see him again. I never got a chance to give him a last cuddle and hold his hand.

“Someone has taken that away from me far too soon. Whether it be intentionally or unintentionally, I do believe there has been some involvement by a third party and the result is the death of Cole.”

The family, who organised a local vigil in Cole’s memory last weekend, have vowed to get “justice”.

More on Scotland

Asked what that means, Ms Stewart told Sky News: “Finding the culprit and getting justice that way. Finding the person that is responsible for the death of my child.”

Police previously said 400 residents were spoken to during door-to-door enquires and more than 2,000 hours of CCTV footage was collected.

The 19-year-old’s death is being treated as “unexplained”.

Read more from Sky News:
Council apologises amid school Union Flag row
Winter fuel payment in Scotland ‘will not be less than UK benefit’

Cole Cooper's mother Wendy Stewart, comforts her son Coby, 10 and daughter Casia, 11, during a vigil at the Glenskirlie Hotel in Banknock, f
Image:
Cole Cooper’s mother Wendy at a vigil in Banknock. Pic: PA

Cole’s aunt Aimee Tennie, 32, revealed the family’s anger over the police handling of the case as they attempt to find out what happened.

She said: “We are aware of small details surrounding the weekend leading up to it with arguments. He had a few arguments over that weekend. We want the details re-examined thoroughly.”

Sky News put all of the family’s concerns and allegations to Police Scotland.

The force swerved our questions and responded saying: “Enquiries remain ongoing.”

Wendy Stewart claimed the probe has been handled “shockingly” with a failure to take her son’s disappearance seriously.

The 42-year-old said: “I have had to scream and shout from rooftops to be heard by the police. I don’t think they have handled it well.

“The police really need to take accountability and listen to families, they are reporting a missing child and understand the family knows their child best.”

Cole Cooper’s loved ones still have not been told when his body will be released to allow them to lay him to rest.

Continue Reading

Trending