Connect with us

Published

on

The chairman of the Conservative Party, Nadhim Zahawi, is currently under investigation over his multimillion-pound tax dispute.

On Monday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak asked new ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus to assess whether the cabinet minister breached the ministerial code with the HMRC settlement he made while he was chancellor.

“Clearly in this case there are questions that need answering,” he told reporters.

Mr Zahawi has said he is “clearly being smeared” over questions about his tax affairs – and that he did not “benefit” from an “offshore trust”.

Mr Sunak is under increasing pressure to remove Mr Zahawi from his senior cabinet post.

But what do we know about the matter so far?

Who is Nadhim Zahawi?

Mr Zahawi, the chairman of the Conservative Party, was previously an aide to Conservative peer Lord Archer and – with another aide Stephan Shakespeare – founded polling company YouGov at the turn of the millennium.

In 2010, setting his sights firmly back on politics, he became MP for Stratford-upon-Avon.

He secured his first junior minister post – education minister – in 2018, but became a household name after COVID broke out in the UK and he was appointed by former PM Boris Johnson as vaccine minister.

‘Game over’ for Zahawi – politics latest

The performance propelled him to cabinet and in September 2021, he took his first secretary of state post, back in the Department for Education.

He was propelled further to chancellor in the dying days of Mr Johnson’s premiership after the resignation of Rishi Sunak.

Mr Zahawi made an unsuccessful bid to become PM following Mr Johnson’s removal – losing out to Liz Truss – but was appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.

He became chairman of the Tory Party just weeks later when Ms Truss’s premiership came crashing down and Mr Sunak gained the keys to Number 10.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is going on with Zahawi’s taxes?

What is the controversy about?

In January 2023, The Sun On Sunday published a report claiming Mr Zahawi had paid a seven-figure sum to settle a dispute with HMRC over the sales of his YouGov shares.

The shares, worth an estimated £27m, were held by Balshore Investments, a company registered offshore in Gibraltar linked to Mr Zahawi’s family.

Sky News understands that, as part of a settlement with HMRC, Mr Zahawi paid a penalty to the tax collector.

The exact size of the settlement has not been disclosed, but it is reported to be an estimated £4.8m, including a 30% penalty.

By Monday, Mr Sunak had ordered a potentially far-reaching investigation into Mr Zahawi to be conducted by the PM’s new ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus.

Sir Laurie is expected to focus on whether the cabinet minister breached the ministerial code with the estimated £4.8m HMRC settlement he made while he was chancellor, but it could extend to his prior tax arrangement and whether he lied to the media.

It is unclear what the prime minister knew about Mr Zahawi’s dealings with the tax office when he appointed him to his cabinet in October.

Sources close to Mr Zahawi have said he is “absolutely not standing down”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nadhim Zahawi asked if he will resign

What has Zahawi said?

Last July, it was reported that HMRC was investigating Mr Zahawi’s tax affairs – but a spokesperson for him at the time said he was “not aware of any formal investigation by HMRC” and insisted “his taxes are fully paid and up to date”.

The next day, allegations arose that concerns had been raised by officials over Mr Zahawi’s tax affairs before his appointment as a minister in Mr Johnson’s cabinet.

When the issue of his tax affairs came up in an interview with Sky News as Mr Zahawi prepared to launch his leadership bid, Mr Zahawi said: “I was clearly being smeared.

“I was being told that the Serious Fraud Office, that the National Crime Agency, that HMRC are looking into me. I’m not aware of this.”

It is unclear when Mr Zahawi first knew about the probe by HMRC, but his allies have said he told the Cabinet Office’s propriety and ethics team about the matter before his appointment.

Over the weekend, Mr Zahawi said HMRC concluded there had been a “careless and not deliberate” error in the way the founders’ shares, which he had allocated to his father, had been treated.

In a statement on Monday, following the PM’s announcement of an investigation into the matter, he added: “I am confident I acted properly throughout and look forward to answering any and all specific questions in a formal setting to Sir Laurie.”

Mr Zahawi has not confirmed how much his penalty amounted to or the value of the overall settlement with HMRC.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Questions need answering’ in Zahawi case, says PM

What has the prime minister said?

The prime minister has ordered his ethics adviser to investigate whether Mr Zahawi broke ministerial rules over the estimated £4.8m bill.

A week ago, Mr Sunak told MPs that Mr Zahawi had “already addressed the matter in full” – but Downing Street subsequently revealed the PM had not been aware that the Conservative Party chairman had paid a penalty to HMRC as part of the settlement.

Mr Sunak admitted there are “questions that need answering” as the inquiry was launched, and it is unclear what he knew when appointing Mr Zahawi to the cabinet-attending role.

Read More:
What do we know about Conservative Party chairman Nadhim Zahawi’s tax affairs?
Investigation into appointment of BBC chairman after Boris Johnson loan claim

Downing Street subsequently suggested Mr Sunak did not know last week that Mr Zahawi had paid a reported 30% penalty to HMRC.

Probed on the matter by Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs on Wednesday, the PM said: “The issues in question occurred before I was prime minister.

“With regard to the appointment of the minister without portfolio, the usual appointments process was followed, no issues were raised with me when he was appointed to his current role, and since I commented on this matter last week, more information has come forward.

“That is why I have asked the independent adviser to look into the matter.

“I obviously can’t prejudge the outcome of that but it is right that we fully investigate this matter and establish all the facts.”

Mr Sunak has so far resisted growing calls to remove Mr Zahawi from his current post.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Zahawi should stand aside’, says Tory peer Lord Hayward

Who has called for him to go?

Former minister Caroline Nokes said there were “too many unanswered questions” over the tax row as she called for Mr Zahawi to “stand aside and let the investigation run its course”.

Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, Lord Hayward agreed that the Tory Party chairman should think about “standing aside” while parliament’s ethics watchdog investigates his tax affairs.

“We don’t know what the timescales are for the inquiry, and I think that’s key,” he said.

“I think he should be considering whether he stands aside for the period of the inquiry.”

But Home Office minister Chris Philp said on Monday that Mr Zahawi should be treated as “innocent until proven guilty” and it is “reasonable” for him to continue as party chairman.

“The investigation has been launched by the prime minister; that is the right thing to do. It will get to the bottom of this and then the prime minister will make his decision,” he said.

“But I don’t think it is fair to jump to any conclusions before the investigation has concluded.”

Labour said Mr Zahawi’s admitted carelessness should see him removed from government.

Shadow foreign secretary David Lammy told Sky News: “When you’ve been chancellor of the exchequer and you said you’ve been careless despite the fact that offshore trusts have been set up in Gibraltar, I’m sorry, you really ought to resign or be sacked.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I regret not wearing a seatbelt’

What does this mean for the PM?

The Zahawi tax affairs saga formed one of two controversies Mr Sunak has been forced to confront this week, with questions also being raised over the decision to appoint Richard Sharp as BBC chairman while he reportedly helped former Number 10 incumbent Mr Johnson secure a loan of up to £800,000.

The PM has also distanced himself from this allegation, saying the chairman’s appointment was made by “one of my predecessors”.

But these two incidents add to what has been a turbulent first few months in Number 10 for Mr Sunak.

On his first day as PM in October, Mr Sunak vowed to restore “integrity and accountability” to government – a promise which has now been called into question by a series of events.

A few days after entering Number 10, the PM was forced to defend re-appointing Suella Braverman as home secretary days after she quit over data breaches.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer accused the new PM of doing a “grubby deal” with Ms Braverman to secure her support in the Tory leadership contest.

An independent probe was also launched into the conduct of another cabinet member – Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab – after he was subject to multiple complaints of bullying.

Mr Sunak initially stood by the justice secretary – who he reappointed to the role in the autumn – but eventually bowed to pressure to allow the formal probe.

On top of this, the prime minister received a second police fine last week, this time for failing to wear a seatbelt.

The first was received last year after he broke coronavirus rules during the partygate scandal.

Continue Reading

World

Four more arrests made over Louvre heist as £76m haul remains missing

Published

on

By

Four more arrests made over Louvre heist as £76m haul remains missing

Four more arrests have been made by French police investigating the Louvre museum heist.

Two men and two women from the Paris region were detained on Tuesday, prosecutor Laure Beccuau said.

Ms Beccuau’s statement did not say what role the quartet are suspected of having played in the robbery. The two men are aged 38 and 39, and the two women are aged 31 and 40.

They are being interrogated by police, who can hold them for questioning for 96 hours.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Louvre: How ‘heist of the century’ unfolded

The latest arrests come after investigating magistrates filed preliminary charges against three men and one woman who were arrested last month.

Some of the French Crown Jewels, worth an estimated £76m, were stolen in the audacious October raid.

The haul – which included a diamond and emerald necklace Napoleon gave to Empress Marie-Louise, jewels linked to 19th-century Queens Marie-Amelie and Hortense, and Empress Eugenie’s pearl and diamond tiara – has not been recovered.

The heist was pulled off in mere minutes last month – and took place while the Louvre was open to visitors, raising doubts over the credibility of the world’s most-visited museum as a guardian for its priceless works.

On Sunday 19 October, two men used a stolen furniture lift to access the second floor Galerie d’Apollon.

They then cracked open display cases with angle grinders before escaping with their loot and fleeing on the back of two scooters driven by accomplices.

Read more:
Louvre director offers to resign
Gallery closed as structure in ‘dire state’

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Moment thieves escape Louvre in jewel heist

The Paris prosecutor previously said the robbery appeared to be the work of small-time criminals rather than professional gangsters.

Speaking shortly after the heist, art detective Arthur Brand told Sky News that detectives faced a “race against time” to recover the stolen treasure.

“These crown jewels are so famous, you just cannot sell them,” Mr Brand said. “The only thing they can do is melt the silver and gold down, dismantle the diamonds, try to cut them. That’s the way they will probably disappear forever.

“They [the police] have a week. If they catch the thieves, the stuff might still be there. If it takes longer, the loot is probably gone and dismantled. It’s a race against time.”

Continue Reading

World

Zelenskyy is racing to beat Donald Trump’s peace plan deadline – but what will Russia do?

Published

on

By

Zelenskyy is racing to beat Donald Trump's peace plan deadline – but what will Russia do?

Washington woke up this morning to a flurry of developments on Ukraine.

It was the middle of the night in DC when a tweet dropped from Ukraine’s national security advisor, Rustem Umerov.

He said that the US and Ukraine had reached a “common understanding on the core terms of the agreement discussed in Geneva.”

He added that Volodymyr Zelenskyy would travel to America “at the earliest suitable date in November to complete final steps and make a deal with President Trump”.

Ukraine latest: ‘Delicate’ deal details must be sorted, White House says

By sunrise in Washington, a US official was using similar but not identical language to frame progress.

The official, speaking anonymously to US media, said that Ukraine had “agreed” to Trump’s peace proposal “with some minor details to be worked out”.

More on Donald Trump

In parallel, it’s emerged that talks have been taking place in Abu Dhabi. The Americans claim to have met both Russian and Ukrainian officials there, though the Russians have not confirmed attendance.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Peace deal ‘agreement’: What we know

“I have nothing to say. We are following the media reports,” Dmitry Peskov, Vladimir Putin’s spokesperson, told Russian state media.

Trump is due to travel to his Florida resort Mar-a-Lago tonight, where he will remain until Sunday.

He set a deadline of Thursday – Thanksgiving – for some sort of agreement on his plan.

We know the plan has been changed from its original form, but it’s clear that Zelenskyy wants to be seen to agree to something quickly – that would go down well with President Trump.

Read more:
US hails ‘tremendous progress’ on Ukraine peace plan

In full: Europe’s 28-point counter proposal

My sense is that Zelenskyy will try to get to Mar-a-Lago as soon as he can. Before Thursday would be a push but would meet Trump’s deadline.

It will then be left for the Russians to state their position on the revised document.

All indications are that they will reject it. But maybe the secret Abu Dhabi talks will yield something.

Continue Reading

World

Controversial US and Israeli-backed aid operation the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to close

Published

on

By

Controversial US and Israeli-backed aid operation the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to close

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial US and Israeli-backed aid distribution group, has said it will permanently cease operations.

Set up as an alternative to United Nations aid programmes in May, GHF’s executive director John Acree said on Monday that it “succeeded in our mission of showing there’s a better way to deliver aid to Gazans”.

The foundation had already closed down aid distribution sites after US President Donald Trump’s ceasefire plan was agreed by Hamas and Israel in October.

The GHF which began operations in Gaza after an Israeli blockade of food deliveries, lasting nearly three months, was criticised by Palestinians, aid workers and health officials who said it forced people to risk their lives to reach the sites.

File pic: Reuters
Image:
File pic: Reuters

According to witnesses and videos posted to social media, Israeli soldiers repeatedly opened fire at the sites, killing hundreds. The IDF denied this, saying it only fired warning shots as a crowd-control measure or if its troops were in danger.

In July, analysis from Sky News’ Data and Forensics team found that aid distributions by GHF were associated with a significant increase in deaths.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gaza deaths increase when aid sites open

MSF – also known as Doctors Without Borders – said in a report in August that the GHF sites “morphed into a laboratory of cruelty,” and described scenes there as “orchestrated killing”.

More on Gaza

‘We are proud,’ says GHF director

Mr Acree said in a statement through the GHF’s website that “from the outset, GHF’s goal was to meet an urgent need” and to hand over a successful aid operation to “the broader international community”.

The GHF would hand over its work to the US-led Civil-Military Coordination Center in Israel overseeing the Gaza ceasefire.

“We are winding down our operations as we have succeeded in our mission of showing there’s a better way to deliver aid to Gazans,” Mr Acree said.

File pic: Reuters
Image:
File pic: Reuters

The GHF director added: “At a critical juncture, we are proud to have been the only aid operation that reliably and safely provided free meals directly to Palestinian people in Gaza, at scale and without diversion.

“From our very first day of operations, our mission was singular: feed civilians in desperate need. We built a new model that worked, saved lives, and restored dignity to civilians in Gaza.”

According to the GHF website, the group distributed more than three million food boxes, totalling 187 million meals, and supplied 1.1 million packs of Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) for malnourished children.

Read more:
Sky’s Adam Parsons sees Gaza destruction
Israel launches strikes on Gaza
Israel strikes Beirut for first time in months

Hamas welcomes GHF closure

In a statement, Hamas welcomed the closure of GHF and accused it of being a project that “engineered starvation” in partnership with Israel.

A Hamas spokesperson said: “Since its entry into the Gaza Strip, this foundation was part of the occupation’s security system, which adopted distribution mechanisms entirely disconnected from humanitarian principles, and created dangerous and degrading conditions for the dignity of the starving Palestinian people during their attempts to obtain a piece of bread, resulting in the killing and injury of thousands, through sniper operations and deliberate killing.”

They also called on international legal bodies to hold “this foundation and its officers accountable for their crimes against our people”.

US state department deputy spokesperson Tommy Piggot also said on X that the aid group “shared valuable lessons learned with us and our partners”.

“GHF’s model, in which Hamas could no longer loot and profit from stealing aid, played a huge role in getting Hamas to the table and achieving a ceasefire,” he added.

Continue Reading

Trending