Connect with us

Published

on

Britain’s second-biggest steel producer has been drawing up secret plans to axe hundreds of jobs even as it continues talks with ministers about £300m of taxpayer funding that would partly depend on decade-long employment guarantees.

Sky News has learnt that British Steel has been discussing launching a consultation on around 800 redundancies, principally focused on the Scunthorpe plant in north Lincolnshire where the company is based.

One industry insider said there was a possibility that trade union officials could be briefed on the proposals as early as Wednesday, although there remained a possibility that their disclosure could be delayed pending the outcome of negotiations with the government.

The planned cuts would arise from the closure of coke ovens, although Scunthorpe’s two blast furnaces and other mills within the Chinese-owned group would continue to operate, the insider said.

Any redundancy proposals would be certain to draw a sharp response from the government given that its offer of £300m of state support is partly predicated upon providing jobs guarantees lasting for a decade.

A source suggested job cuts would “complicate” the talks between the two sides.

Last week, Sky News revealed that British Steel and larger rival Tata Steel would be required to guarantee thousands of jobs until 2033 in return for £600m of government support to help decarbonise the industry.

More from Business

Grant Shapps, the business secretary, has told the companies that the proportion of their workforces that would need to be secured would be determined after further discussions.

A six-month moratorium on redundancies is another one of the conditions of the government offer.

The taxpayer funding is to be linked to the replacement of blast furnaces at the company’s sites with greener electric arc furnaces.

Jingye Group, British Steel’s owner, would be obliged to invest at least £1bn in the business by 2030, with Tata Steel expected to be asked for a similar commitment.

The decision to grant the state aid is not without controversy, given British Steel’s Chinese ownership and doubts about its adherence to financial commitments made when it bought the business out of insolvency proceedings in 2020.

In a letter to Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, in December, Mr Shapps and Michael Gove, the levelling-up secretary, warned that British Steel’s demise could cost the government up to £1bn in decommissioning and other liabilities.

They cautioned Mr Hunt that British Steel “does not have a viable business without government support”.

“Closing one blast furnace would be a stepping-stone to closure of the second blast furnace, resulting in a highly unstable business model dependent on Chinese steel imports,” Mr Shapps and Mr Gove wrote.

“Given the magnitude of the liabilities due to fall on HMG in the event of blast furnace closure, and following the PM’s steer, we would like officials to test whether net Government support in the region of £300m for British Steel could prevent closure, protect jobs and create a cleaner viable long-term future for steel production in the United Kingdom.”

They also argued that retaining sovereignty over steel production was critical to the UK economy.

“Every other G20 nation has maintained domestic steel production and, while we do not think that this should come at any cost, we do believe it is in HMG’s interest to offer well-designed and targeted funding which unlocks private investment, achieves a good outcome for taxpayers, and enables transformed , decarbonised and viable domestic steel production to continue in the UK in the long-term,” Mr Shapps and Mr Gove wrote.

“We do not want to become reliant on steel sources elsewhere in the same way that energy security has become self-evidently important.

The fate of British Steel, which was bought by Jingye out of an insolvency process just under three years ago, has become increasingly unclear in recent months as the current owners have indicated that they would not maintain its operations without taxpayer funding.

British Steel employs about 4,000 people, with thousands more jobs in its supply chain dependent upon the company.

Tata Steel employs substantially more people in the UK, including more than 4,000 at its Port Talbot steelworks in Wales.

According to last month’s letter, British Steel had already informed the government that it could close one of the Scunthorpe blast furnaces as soon as next month, with the loss of 1,700 jobs.

This would be “followed by the second blast furnace closing later in 2023, creating cumulative direct job losses of around 3,000”, Mr Shapps and Mr Gove wrote.

In May 2019, the Official Receiver was appointed to take control of the company after negotiations over an emergency £30m government loan fell apart.

British Steel had been formed in 2016 when India’s Tata Steel sold the business for £1 to Greybull Capital, an investment firm.

As part of the deal that secured ownership of British Steel for Jingye, the Chinese group said it would invest £1.2bn in modernising the business during the following decade.

Jingye’s purchase of the company, which completed in the spring of 2020, was hailed by Boris Johnson, the then prime minister, as assuring the future of steel production in Britain’s industrial heartlands.

British Steel and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy have been contacted for comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta results overshadowed by growing fears of AI bubble

Published

on

By

Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta results overshadowed by growing fears of AI bubble

Some of the world’s biggest tech giants reported quarterly earnings on Wednesday – with a mixed bag of results as fears grow that a bubble is forming in artificial intelligence.

Microsoft revealed that its spending on AI infrastructure hit almost $35bn (£26.5bn) in the three months to the end of September, a sharp rise compared with the year before.

Despite revenue jumping 18% and net income rising 12%, shares plunged by close to 4% in after-hours trading, with investors concerned about the mounting costs of sustaining the boom.

Microsoft is now a $4trn company thanks to its stake in ChatGPT maker OpenAI. AP file pic
Image:
Microsoft is now a $4trn company thanks to its stake in ChatGPT maker OpenAI. AP file pic

Microsoft’s vice president of investor relations Jonathan Neilson said: “We continue to see demand which exceeds the capacity we have available.

“Our capital expenditure strategy remains unchanged in that we build against the demand signal we’re seeing.”

Big Tech is facing increasing pressure to show returns on the massive AI investments they’re making, against a backdrop of soaring valuations and limited evidence of productivity gains.

Microsoft became the world’s second most valuable company this week thanks to its 27% stake in OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT.

Its market capitalisation surged beyond $4trn (£3trn) at one point, but that psychologically significant threshold is now in doubt because of recent selloffs.

iStock file pic
Image:
iStock file pic

Alphabet makes history

Last night’s results weren’t all doom and gloom – with shares in Google’s parent company surging by 6% in after-hours trading.

Alphabet has also set out aggressive spending ambitions, but placated investors thanks to an impressive set of results that surpassed analysts’ expectations.

Total revenue for the quarter stood at a staggering $102.35bn (£77bn), with the search giant’s advertising unit remaining robust despite growing competition.

But concerns linger that Alphabet’s dominance in search could be undermined by AI startups, with OpenAI recently unveiling a browser designed to rival Google Chrome.

Hargreaves Lansdown’s senior equity analyst Matt Britzman shrugged off this threat – and believes the company is “gearing up for long-term AI leadership”.

He said: “Alphabet just delivered its first-ever $100bn quarter, silencing the doubters with standout performances in both Search and Cloud.

“AI Overviews and AI Mode are clearly resonating with users, helping to ease fears that Google’s core search business is under threat from generative AI.

“With ChatGPT’s recent browser demo falling short of a game-changer, Google looks well-placed to put up a strong defence as gatekeeper to the internet.”

Read more from Sky News:
Federal Reserve cuts interest rates
Microsoft Azure outage hits thousands

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Browser could ‘change the way we use the internet’

Meta faces a mauling

Meta – the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp – saw its shares tumble by as much as 10% in after-hours trading.

Mark Zuckerberg’s tech empire anticipates “notably larger” capital expenses next year as it ramps up investments in AI and goes on a hiring spree for top talent.

Net income in the third quarter stood at $2.7bn (£2bn) and suffered an eye-watering $16bn (£12bn) hit because of Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill”.

Meta was late to the party on AI but has now doubled down on this still-nascent technology – setting an ambition to achieve superintelligence, a milestone where machines could theoretically outthink humans.

The social networking giant continues to benefit from its massive user base, and expects fourth-quarter revenues of up to $59bn (£44bn).

Continue Reading

Business

Victims of Post Office Capture scandal say they are being treated as ‘second-class’ citizens

Published

on

By

Victims of Post Office Capture scandal say they are being treated as 'second-class' citizens

Victims of the Post Office Capture scandal say they are being treated as second-class citizens – accusing the government of running a “two-tier” compensation system.

It comes as the Department for Business and Trade announced the launch of the first-ever redress scheme for those wronged after faulty software created false accounting shortfalls in the 1990s.

Capture was used between 1992 and 1999 in up to 2,500 Post Office branches, with many sub postmasters making up cash losses themselves.

A government-commissioned report last year found it was likely the software caused accounting errors.

The Capture Redress Scheme will provide payments of up to £300,000, and more in “exceptional” cases, to former postmasters who suffered financial losses.

Steve Marston, who was convicted in 1998 of stealing from his branch and is not yet eligible to apply to the scheme, said other victims were feeling “frustrated” with it.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Unbearable’ wait to clear names for Post Office victims

“I want to know, what do they consider exceptional circumstances?” he said, “because I want it to see it in black and white what they consider as exceptional circumstances rather than just a vague statement.”

He said that victims felt like “second-class” citizens, describing the Horizon schemes and the new Capture scheme as “two-tier” systems.

“[It’s] one law for the Horizon victims, and a totally different law for us Capture victims and that’s not really fair.

“One of the main bones of contention is the fact that with Horizon there’s a right of appeal against decisions, and you’ve got multiple rights to appeal.

“Whereas with the Capture appeal process, there’s only a one-shot chance, so basically, it’s a second-class system.”

The scheme will be tested for the first 150 claimants before a full roll-out.

Chris Roberts, whose mother Liz was jailed in 1999 for theft, is one of them and said victims were concerned about the “glacial pace” of government.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

November 2024: More post office convictions investigated

He is able to apply to the redress scheme on behalf of his father, who was a postmaster alongside his mother, who oversaw accounts.

Both Liz and Bill Roberts have passed away.

“I’d hate us to get to the point where, you know, this scheme’s come out and we go through these 150 cases and then it’s further developed … and half the people it would apply to are gone,” Chris said.

“We will lose people before they can see justice, and I think that’s a terrible tragedy.”

Under the Capture scheme, eligible claimants will receive an immediate interim payment of £10,000.

An independent panel will then assess final awards through a banding model ranging from £10,000 to £300,000, with higher payments in exceptional circumstances.

The Post Office Minister Blair McDougall, speaking exclusively to Sky News, said he understood why victims have “low levels of trust in the state”.

He said: “They’ve been treated appallingly by the state, but what we’ve done with this scheme is to try to learn some of those lessons from previous compensation schemes for postmasters that didn’t work.

“So we’re collecting more evidence from the beginning to try to speed things up.

“We’re trying to give sub postmasters the benefit of the doubt throughout this. And I hope we will see that this scheme treats them with a bit more dignity and a bit more urgency.”

He also said that funds overall for the Capture scandal were “uncapped”, with “no ceiling” on compensation.

Mr McDougall also said that the government was working “as fast as we possibly can, and that’s because people have waited so long”.

Read more:
At least eight Capture convictions investigated

Major milestone in Post Office scandal

When asked if he would personally guarantee speedy redress, he replied: “Absolutely – that’s what we are doing today, to make sure that we have a scheme that gets people’s redress as quickly as possible.

“But it’s challenging, because we’re dealing with cases where there’s not a lot of evidence. So much time has passed.

“So we tried to design a scheme to get postmasters the benefit of the doubt and to try to be as fair as possible.”

He said within the scheme there was the “opportunity” for victims to make a “wider case of the impact on their lives – and if the independent panel feels that there is a compelling case, they can go beyond that £300,000”.

Continue Reading

Business

Santander warns car finance redress scheme a threat to UK jobs, growth and economy

Published

on

By

Santander warns car finance redress scheme a threat to UK jobs, growth and economy

High street bank Santander has launched a scathing criticism of the car finance compensation scheme and delayed the release of its financial results “in light of uncertainties” it has caused.

The Spanish-owned lender called for government intervention – warning it sees the scheme as posing a wider threat to the economy, jobs and consumers.

Money blog: Tesco increases price of carrier bag

The scheme was set up by financial regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), to compensate people mis-sold car loans.

Under FCA proposals, up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700, as lenders broke the law by failing to disclose they paid commission to brokers. It meant customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.

The proposal differs, Santander said, “in important respects” from the Supreme Court ruling that paved the way for the redress plan.

Mr Regnier said: “We believe that the level of concern in the industry and market is such that material changes to the proposed FCA redress scheme should be an active consideration for the UK government.

“Without such change, the unintended consequences for the car finance market, the supply of credit and the resulting negative impact on the automotive industry and its supply chain could significantly impact jobs, growth and the broader UK economy.

“This could also cause significant detriment to the consumer.

“What is at stake is the supply of credit that customers need and that supports a very important sector for the economy.”

Deferred results

Santander was due to publish its latest financial figures on Wednesday morning, but has held back until it says it gets “greater clarity” on the scheme and its impact on the bank and the wider market.

No new date to report results was given. Release of the same third-quarter results last year was also deferred due to uncertainty over the impact of car loan mis-selling.

The hit to Santander, however, is not expected to impact its operations or financial position, even in a worst-case scenario for the bank where it has to allocate more funds for compensation, it said.

It had already set aside £295m to deal with the mis-selling.

The FCA said, “We believe a compensation scheme is the best way to settle, for both lenders and consumers, liabilities that exist no matter what.

“Alternatives would cost more and take longer. It’s vital we draw a line under the issue so a trusted motor finance market can continue to serve millions of families every year.”

Read more from Sky News:
Compensation scheme launched for postmasters affected by Capture scandal
‘Close eye’ will be kept on OpenAI’s for-profit conversion

Santander said it was committed to “ensuring fair outcomes” for its customers and will continue engaging constructively with the FCA, HM Treasury and other stakeholders.

Santander UK shares were up 0.5% following the news.

Continue Reading

Trending