Connect with us

Published

on

To retain journalistic credibility, getting a story right is more important than pursuing a crusade.

That’s a fair takeaway from a report published this week by the Columbia Journalism Review dissecting the so-called Russiagate saga, during which former President Donald Trump was accused of colluding with Russian officials to win the 2016 election. While pursuing the story, many journalists went well beyond their traditional role of scrutinizing powerful officials and not only openly picked a side in America’s escalating political warfare but committed to proving a literal conspiracy theory true, no matter the evidence. It didn’t go well.

“The end of the long inquiry into whether Donald Trump was colluding with Russia came in July 2019, when Robert Mueller III, the special counsel, took seven, sometimes painful, hours to essentially say no,” former New York Times reporter Jeff Gerth writes at the beginning of his detailed analysis. His old employer was at the center of the frenzy and its editors still defend their efforts, he adds. “But outside of the Times’ own bubble, the damage to the credibility of the Times and its peers persists, three years on, and is likely to take on new energy as the nation faces yet another election season animated by antagonism toward the press. At its root was an undeclared war between an entrenched media, and a new kind of disruptive presidency, with its own hyperbolic version of the truth.”

The whole piece is worth reading, but make yourself a pot of coffee or crack open a bottle of wineit’s long. Nobody comes off looking especially good. That’s true of the former president, though the flaws it reveals in Trump are nothing new to anybody who has watched him and his ego on the national stage. It’s true of the FBI agents who joined with too many journalists to fan each other into a hopeful frenzy over the Steele dossier and its assertions that Trump was Putin’s puppet. And it’s especially true of those members of the press who shed credibility by committing to a narrative that didn’t pan out.

“Before the 2016 election, most Americans trusted the traditional media and the trend was positive, according to the Edelman Trust Barometer,” Gerth notes. “Today, the U.S. media has the lowest credibility26 percentamong forty-six nations, according to a 2022 study by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.”

That Reuters study is echoed by other studies finding minimal trust in the media. But distrust is unevenly spread.

“Americans’ trust in the media remains sharply polarized along partisan lines, with 70 percent of Democrats, 14 percent of Republicans and 27 percent of independents saying they have a great deal or fair amount of confidence,” according to Gallup polling in October 2022.

That divide is explained by the public perception that the media is not only biased, but out to push an agenda without regard for honesty. Americans “suspect that inaccuracies in reporting are purposeful, with 52 percent believing that reporters misrepresent the facts, and 28 percent believing reporters make them up entirely,” a Gallup/Knight poll found in 2020.

Journalistic shenanigans like the Russiagate debacle can only feed such concerns.

Strictly speaking, there’s nothing wrong with journalists having a point of view, so long as they’re open about it and emphasize getting the story right. You’re reading a libertarian publication right now; we do our best to confine our beliefs to interpreting facts that exist independent of our preferences. A partisan press is well-rooted in American history, from the newspapers that gleefully tormented the early presidents to the Republican and Socialist newspapers over which my grandparents screamed at each other. Efforts at “objectivity” in news coveragehowever successfuldidn’t really become the norm until after World War II. And it’s likely a passing norm as journalists re-embrace partisanship and find (or don’t) supportive audiences.

“A little more than half of the journalists surveyed (55 percent) say that every side does not always deserve equal coverage in the news,” Pew Research reported last summer. “By contrast, 22 percent of Americans overall say the same, whereas about three-quarters (76 percent) say journalists should always strive to give all sides equal coverage.”

“Beyond Objectivity: Producing Trustworthy News in Today’s Newsrooms,” published last week by the Knight-Cronkite News Lab, found that “a growing number of journalists of color and younger white reporters, including LGBTQ+ people, believe that objectivity has become an increasingly outdated and divisive concept that prevents truly accurate reporting informed by their own backgrounds, experiences and points of view.” Authors Leonard Downie Jr., formerly of the Washington Post, and Arizona State University journalism professor Andrew Heyward wisely recommend that post-objectivity newsrooms should be open with their staff and the public about their core beliefs. But, troublingly, they also suggest that newsroom leaders should “move beyond accuracy to truth.”

It’s really hard to get to any sort of truth if you bypass accuracy.

“My main conclusion is that journalism’s primary missions, informing the public and holding powerful interests accountable, have been undermined by the erosion of journalistic norms and the media’s own lack of transparency about its work,” Gerth writes in the afterword to his Russiagate post mortem. “One traditional journalistic standard that wasn’t always followed in the Trump-Russia coverage is the need to report facts that run counter to the prevailing narrative.”

If more of the journalists pursuing the Russiagate story had been scrupulous about getting the facts right, they might have noticed that a story that many wanted to be true was remarkably thin and, ultimately, inaccurate. Failing to perform due diligence did the media no favors when the facts finally emerged and further eroded public trust.

Gerth calls for his colleagues to recommit themselves to “a transparent, unbiased, and accountable media” in order to win back trust and audiences that are increasingly siloed along partisan lines. “Unbiased” is probably a big ask given the inclinations of journalists themselves. It’s not even obvious that it ever existed; the media giants that dominated for a few decades were likely more monolithic in their newsroom ideologies than they were truly neutral. But transparency and accountability should be expected of journalists who should be open about their methods and pursue stories, not results.

In the end, no matter what ideologies or causes motivate journalists, nobody will put faith in us if we fail to get the story right.

Continue Reading

World

Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy pushes for Gaza ceasefire deal ahead of US inauguration

Published

on

By

Donald Trump's Middle East envoy pushes for Gaza ceasefire deal ahead of US inauguration

Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy has met Israel’s prime minister in an effort to secure a ceasefire deal in Gaza before the president-elect takes office on 20 January.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s office confirmed details of the meeting with Steve Witkoff on Saturday, adding that the head of the Israeli Mossad intelligence agency has been deployed to Qatar in order to “advance” talks.

It was not immediately clear when David Barnea would travel to Doha for the latest round of indirect discussions between Israel and Hamas.

Earlier on Saturday, an Israeli official said some progress had been made, mediated by Egypt, Qatar and the United States, to reach a deal in Gaza.

Israel's Chief of the Mossad David Barnea and Security Agency director Ronen Bar attend a memorial ceremony of the Hamas attack on October 7 last year that sparked the ongoing war in Gaza, at the Mount Herzl military cemetery in Jerusalem on October 27, 2024. GIL COHEN-MAGEN/Pool via REUTERS
Image:
Ronen Bar (left), director of Israel’s security agency, and David Barnea (right), head of Mossad, at a ceremony marking the 7 October Hamas attack. File pic: Reuters

The mediators are making renewed efforts to halt fighting in Gaza and free the remaining Israeli hostages held there before Mr Trump takes office.

A deal would also involve the release of some Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails.

Families of Israeli hostages welcomed Mr Netanyahu’s decision to dispatch the officials, with the Hostages and Missing Families Forum Headquarters describing it as a “historic opportunity”.

Mr Witkoff arrived in Doha on Friday and met the Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Qatar’s foreign ministry said.

Egyptian and Qatari mediators received reassurances from Mr Witkoff that the US would continue to work towards a fair deal to end the war soon, Egyptian security sources said, though no further details were released.

Read more from Sky News:
Why does Donald Trump want Greenland?
Trump says Vladimir Putin wants to meet
A guide to Donald Trump’s inauguration

Israel launched its assault on Gaza after Hamas fighters stormed across its borders in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages, according to Israeli figures.

Families of the roughly 100 hostages still held in Gaza are pressing Mr Netanyahu to reach a deal to bring their loved ones home.

Since then, more than 46,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to Palestinian health officials, with much of the area destroyed and gripped by a humanitarian crisis, with most of its population displaced.

Continue Reading

World

Pope Francis honoured by Joe Biden with Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction

Published

on

By

Pope Francis honoured by Joe Biden with Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction

Pope Francis has been honoured with America’s highest civilian award by President Joe Biden, who has described the pontiff as “a light of faith, hope, and love that shines brightly across the world”.

It is the first time Mr Biden, 82, has given the Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction during his four years in office.

In a statement, the White House said the award is “presented to individuals who have made exemplary contributions to the prosperity, values, or security of the United States, world peace, or other significant societal, public or private endeavours”.

Mr Biden had been scheduled to present the medal to Pope Francis, 88, in person on Saturday in Rome on what was to be the final overseas trip of his presidency. But the president cancelled his visit to monitor the California wildfires.

The White House said Mr Biden bestowed the award during a phone call in which they also discussed efforts to promote peace and alleviate suffering around the world.

President Joe Biden presents Bono with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Pic: AP
Image:
President Joe Biden presented Bono with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Pic: AP

President Joe Biden presents the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Denzel Washington. Pic: AP
Image:
Denzel Washington was also recognised. Pic: AP

President Joe Biden presents the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Michael J Fox. Pic: AP
Image:
Michael J Fox was bestowed with the honour. Pic: AP

The award can be presented with or without distinction.

Mr Biden presented the medal of freedom – without distinction – on 5 January to several people including fellow Democrat Hillary Clinton, humanitarian and U2 singer Bono, fashion designer Ralph Lauren and actors Michael J Fox and Denzel Washington.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I could have beaten Trump’

Read more from Sky News:
Gay men can become priests
Search widened for missing sisters
Carrie Johnson left ‘struggling to breathe’

Mr Biden himself is a recipient of the award with distinction, recognised when he was vice president by then president Barack Obama in a surprise ceremony eight years ago.

President Barack Obama presents Vice President Joe Biden with the Presidential Medal of Freedom during a ceremony in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Jan. 12, 2017. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Image:
Barack Obama presented Joe Biden with the Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction in 2017. File pic: AP

The citation for the pope’s honour said his “mission of serving the poor has never ceased”.

“A loving pastor, he joyfully answers children’s questions about God. A challenging teacher, he commands us to fight for peace and protect the planet. A welcoming leader, he reaches out to different faiths,” it added.

Continue Reading

World

As the AfD elects its chancellor candidate, the far-right party looms large over German politics

Published

on

By

As the AfD elects its chancellor candidate, the far-right party looms large over German politics

And so now it is certain. Alice Weidel will lead her far-right party into Germany’s general election next month.

She was overwhelmingly backed at the Alternative for Germany (AfD) conference and was greeted with a standing ovation.

Weidel will fight the election with a manifesto that follows a familiar pattern from other successful populist campaigns in Europe and beyond – contempt for mainstream politicians, anger over levels of irregular immigration, a desire to rein in the power of the European Union and dismay over the spread of so-called woke values.

Alice Weidel looks on after she was elected as top candidate for chancellor of the AfD.
Pic: Reuters/Matthias Rietschel
Image:
Alice Weidel looks on after she was elected as top candidate for chancellor of the AfD.
Pic: Reuters/Matthias Rietschel

A participant at the AfD national party conference.
Pic: AP/Sebastian Kahnert/picture-alliance/dpa
Image:
A participant at the AfD national party conference.
Pic: AP/Sebastian Kahnert/picture-alliance/dpa

“Thank you for your trust,” she told the audience.

“I am excited to lead our campaign. For our people, for our future.”

Who is Weidel?

Weidel is an unusual figure to lead a German hard right-wing party – a gay woman with a PhD in economics, a Sri Lankan partner, two children and a home in another country – she commutes from Switzerland.

More on Far-right

Admittedly there is an awkward history – her grandfather was a Nazi judge appointed to the job personally by Adolf Hitler, but she has maintained that she did not know that fact growing up and has angrily distanced herself from accusations of racism.

Indeed, Ms Weidel maintains that her party is not on the far right, but is simply conservative.

Pic: AP/Sebastian Kahnert/picture-alliance/dpa/
Image:
Pic: AP/Sebastian Kahnert/picture-alliance/dpa/

And that is part of her attraction – she is perceived as uncompromising on the things that the AfD’s supporters hold dear – migration, Euroscepticism, the greatness of German culture – but she’s also perceived as more palatable to the wider public.

Or, at least, that’s the idea.

Thousands of protesters

Outside the sports centre, where the AfD’s convention was being held, thousands of protesters gathered to raise their fears that the country was going back to the politics of the past.

“They are fascists,” said a man called Gabriel, who was helping to blockade the road that ran past the venue.

“I don’t know if we have learnt anything in the past hundred years but now we do have to stand against fascism.”

Protestors against the AfD during their national conference.
Pic: AP/Jan Woitas/picture-alliance/dpa/
Image:
Protesters against the AfD during their national conference.
Pic: AP/Jan Woitas/picture-alliance/dpa/

Many of the delegates would angrily decry that label.

However, there was a rousing reception for Bjorn Hocke, a long-standing AfD politician who is from the right wing of this right-wing party.

His grouping, Der Flugel, was declared a suspected extremist organisation but he remained the party’s leader in Thuringia.

In 2019, a court ruled that it was not libellous to refer to Hocke as a fascist.

He has twice been found guilty of using Nazi slogans but last year, under his leadership, the AfD won the state election.

Emotions often run high when the AfD is involved. The protests here were, at times, heated.

Police officers during the protest that blocked a road near the venue for the AfD party congress.
Pic: Reuters/Thilo Schmuelgen
Image:
Police officers during the protest that blocked a road near the venue for the AfD party congress.
Pic: Reuters/Thilo Schmuelgen

Police had to clear the road in front of Ms Weidel’s car as some protesters sat down and others began to surround it.

Later, the party’s MPs were called to gather together for a sudden security briefing.

The sports centre where this meeting was held once hosted the World Sumo Wrestling Championship.

Here, the heavyweights were political, and the prize at stake was far more consequential.

Barring a quite astonishing movement in the polls, the AfD is unlikely to win the election next month, but the party may well come second with more than 20% of the vote.

Read more from Sky News:
Harry and Meghan visit LA fires evacuees
Ukraine says it captured North Korean soldiers
Sudanese army retakes city from rebels

That probably won’t equate to power – Germany’s major parties have all said they won’t go into coalition with the AfD – but it will mean momentum.

It will mean a loud voice in the Bundestag, the German federal parliament, and the ability to pressure the next chancellor into reflecting the opinions of the millions who vote for Ms Weidel’s vision.

Long term, if Ms Weidel can prove that her party is palatable, as well as popular, then she knows the political dam will one day break.

If enough people back the AfD, it will eventually become impossible to shun the party forever.

Continue Reading

Trending