The content of a Royal Air Force order to give priority places on training courses to female and ethnic minority recruits over white men can be revealed.
The instruction, dated 3 August 2022, aimed to “sequence inflow into our service” to improve diversity, according to a copy of the email, seen by Sky News.
The revelations came as pressure mounted on Air Chief Marshal Sir Mike Wigston, the head of the RAF, over the furore – described by MPs this week as a “dark chapter” for the service.
“The leadership team ignored the concerns of the staff and the clear and unambiguous legal advice which was provided,” a source within the RAF said.
“I have never seen such dissent within the service and such contempt for a Chief of Air Staff. The lack of respect and disdain makes his position untenable. In football terms, he has ‘lost the dressing room’.”
The 3 August email was sent to Group Captain Nicholl by Air Commodore Jo Lincoln, Assistant Chief of Staff Workforce Requirements and Recruiting, “on behalf of AVM [Air Vice-Marshal Maria] Byford”, the Chief of Staff Personnel.
It said Air Vice-Marshal Byford, one of the most senior female officers in the military, would like “any remaining women and EM [ethnic minorities] in those priority professions that are ready” to be among those loaded onto courses even if they were not first in line.
Advertisement
The email concluded: “The RAF is committed to increasing diversity and hence we need to sequence inflow into our service.”
Addressing the Chief of the Air Staff about the scandal on Wednesday, Tobias Ellwood, chair of the defence select committee, called the order a “formal directive from the top”.
Image: Air Chief Marshal Mike Wigston (left) and Station Commander for RAF Coningsby Billy Cooper (right) with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (centre) at RAF Coningsby in Linconshire
He listed the chain of command, with Group Captain Nicholl receiving the instruction from Air Commodore Lincoln, who was ordered by Air Vice-Marshal Byford, “who I am guessing was ordered by her boss, the head of the air force, which I think is you”.
Air Chief Marshal Wigston avoided responding directly, saying that an inquiry into the Group Captain’s resignation was continuing and its findings had yet to be shared with him.
But he did admit that mistakes had been made when placing recruits onto initial training courses in 2021, with a “limited number” of women and ethnic minorities fast-tracked ahead of their white male counterparts.
He put the number at around 150 personnel, although denied that any illegal discrimination had taken place.
Mr Ellwood said the number was around 160.
The source within the RAF described Air Chief Marshal Wigston’s comments – repeated in a tweet on the RAF’s Twitter account – as “cringeworthy” and unconvincing.
Air Chief Marshal Wigston, in his Twitter statement posted on Thursday, said: “At no point did the RAF recruitment process select ethnic minority and female pilots over better qualified white pilots. Over 80% of our recruits during the period in question were white men.
“The error, which we have corrected and apologise for, was fast-tracking approximately 150 women and ethnic minority recruits, who had already passed all selection standards, onto earlier initial training courses.”
The error, though, only referred to the preferential treatment given to women and ethnic minorities in 2020-to-2021. It did not address the attempt at doing the same in 2022. Nor did it clarify who was ultimately responsible for the 3 August order.
A spokesperson for the RAF said it would be inappropriate to comment further while the inquiry is going on.
“It’s a big deal for this government,” says Simon Case.
“It’s the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto.
“This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: ‘This is what we’re about’.”
As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021.
On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government’s priorities for the next three years. But it’s unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it’s really about.
Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments.
Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash – setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire.
This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government’s priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called “challenge panels” of independent experts.
It’s clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS – with a boost of up to £30bn expected – and to increase defence spending.
On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding “£86bn boost” to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
14:18
What will be in spending review?
We’re told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return.
But the headline figure is misleading. It’s not £86bn in new funding. That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it’s a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated.
Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for “the most we’ve ever spent per pupil in our school system”.
I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift – but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of extending free school meals, and the promised uplift in teachers’ pay.
In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners.
We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions – but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze.
We’ve heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government’s crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils.
The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she’s sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day spending.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
But the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects.
That’s why we’ve seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she’s spending on regional transport projects.
The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we’ll hear more in the coming days.
But there’s a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out – and the promises which could slip as a result.
Water cremation and human composting could soon be offered as an alternative to traditional funerals.
A Law Commission consultation is proposing legal approval of new methods beyond burial, cremation, and the rarely used burial at sea.
The paper published earlier this week highlights two methods used in other countries – alkaline hydrolysis and human composting.
Alkaline hydrolysis – also known as water cremation or resomation – involves placing a person’s body into woollen shroud or other organic pouch, using water, alkaline chemicals, heat and pressure to break down the tissue.
Image: Bones left from water cremations can be ground to be scattered like ashes. Pic: Kindly Earth
The resulting liquid is checked and treated if necessary to enter the wastewater system, while remaining pieces of bone and teeth are dried and can be ground to a powder and scattered like ashes.
Water cremation, which mimics the process of natural decomposition when someone is buried, takes between four and 14 hours.
The method, which has been suggested as a greener alternative to traditional cremation, was used for the bodies of five dead people in 2019, as part of a study facilitated by Middlesex and Sheffield universities.
Anti-apartheid campaigner Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who died in 2021, chose resomation for his own funeral in South Africa.
Co-op Funeralcare said it hoped to offer the service in the UK in 2023 but backed out because of the current regulations.
The firm welcomed the Law Commission review, which will run until spring next year, ending in a final report and draft Bill.
New funerary methods are not currently regulated, other than by more general legislation such as environmental and planning laws.
Provisional proposals suggest a legal framework to enable new methods to be regulated in the future.
A Co-op Funeralcare spokesperson said: “At Co-op Funeralcare, we are committed to serving the needs of our member-owners and clients and offering the most sustainable and affordable services.
“In 2023, we announced our ambition to pilot resomation in the UK, and we subsequently worked closely with government to explore the regulatory requirements to introduce this service across the nation.
“However, we did not proceed with this as, at the time, we were unable to find a path through the current regulatory framework.
“We welcome the Law Commission’s review and encourage exploration into alternative methods that provide consumers with greater choice and deliver environmental benefits.”
The consultation paper also highlights human composting, where a body is placed into a sealed chamber, or vessel, with carbon-rich organic matter, such as straw and wood chips, to enable quicker decomposition.
The process takes around two to three months and resulting soil can be returned to bereaved loved ones.
Other methods involving the freezing of human remains have also been suggested, although none have them are yet viable, according to the paper.
Two men have been charged with murder after the death of a teenager in Sheffield.
Abdullah Yaser Abdullah al Yazidi, 16, died after being hit by a car.
He had only recently come to the UK from Yemen, looking “for a better future”, his loved ones previously said.
Zulkernain Ahmed, 20, and Amaan Ahmed, 26, both of Locke Drive, Sheffield, have been charged with murder and three counts of attempted murder.
They are due to appear before Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on Monday.
Image: Flowers at the scene of the crash in Darnall.
Pic: PA
‘Innocently walking down the street’
South Yorkshire Police said Abdullah was “innocently walking” down a street in the Darnall area of the city, just after 4.50pm on 4 June, when a car collided with him.
The force said they understood a grey Audi had driven towards three electric bikes, hitting one.
As the car continued following the collision with the electric bike, it then hit Abdullah, police said.
According to the force, the driver failed to stop at the scene.
Abdullah was taken to hospital where he later died.
The rider of the electric bike, 18, suffered serious but non-life-threatening injuries and remains in hospital.
Two people, a man, 46, and a woman, 45, who were previously arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender, remain on bail.
Image: Police at the scene of the collision in the Darnall area of Sheffield.
Pic: PA
A ‘kind boy’
Abdullah’s relative, Saleh Alsirkal, runs a corner shop that the teenager popped into just before he was hit by the car on Wednesday.
“His dad brought him over to change his life, to get a better future for his son, but this has happened and destroyed everything,” said Mr Alsirkal.
He said Abdullah was a “kind boy” who just wanted to look after his family, including his three sisters and was really enjoying learning English.
“Every time he had a new word to learn, he was so excited about it,” he said.
“It meant a lot to him and he learned quick. Sometimes he would stay in the shop just so he could talk to people. He tried to be friends with everyone.”
“He wanted to be the main guy for the family. He was 16 years old, but he was a clever man,” said Mr Alsirkal.