When Adele was named the winner of the Brits’ inaugural artist of the year award last year, she addressed the changes that had been made to create the gender-neutral prize.
“I understand why the name of this award has changed but I really love being a woman and being a female artist,” she told the audience at the O2 Arena. “I’m really proud of us.”
The first recipient of the Brit Awards‘ artist of the year prize – a merging of the best male and best female prizes to make space for non-binary acts, after questioning from Sam Smith and others – happened to be female, but also happened to be Adele, one of the world’s biggest music stars, riding high following the release of a much-anticipated comeback album after several years out of the spotlight.
She was pretty much a dead cert. With the future Mercury Prize winner Little Simz nominated alongside her, the line-up was a mix of male and female stars, and it seemed to be a step forward for progress.
“While it’s disappointing there are no nominations in the artist of the year category, we also have to recognise that 2022 saw fewer high-profile women artists in cycle with major releases as was the case in 2021,” a spokesperson said. “These trends based around the release schedule are a feature of the music industry, but if, over time, a pattern emerges, then this puts the onus on the industry to deal with this important issue.”
From Florence & The Machine to Charli XCX – who was eligible?
To be eligible for this year’s best artist award, an act must have achieved at least one top 40 album or two top 20 singles, released between 10 December 2021 and 9 December 2022.
Florence & The Machine, Charli XCX, Rina Sawayama, Mabel, Ella Henderson, Becky Hill, Beth Orton, Emeli Sande, KT Tunstall, Beabadoobee, Nina Nesbitt and Shygirl were all eligible; Kae Tempest, who is non-binary, was also eligible.
Advertisement
However, female artists make up just 12 of the 71 eligible acts, or just under 17% – indicating, as Brits organisers have pointed out, that the problem is bigger than their ceremony alone. The treatment of female artists in the industry is an issue that has been put under the spotlight most recently by Raye, who has finally released her debut album after years of being held back.
But as microcosms of the wider industries they represent, awards ceremonies do tend to lay these problems bare. Take Little Mix’s win for best group in 2021, for example, when they became the first female band to win the award – ever – more than 40 years since the Brits began.
Sky News contacted representatives for the female and non-binary acts eligible for best artist this year, but none of the stars were available for comment.
You can’t really argue with the now Grammy best album winner and Mercury-nominated Styles, nor chart-topper and Glastonbury headliner Stormzy. And of course, it’s subjective, but there has been plenty of debate surrounding the other slots.
Overall, female artists – or groups featuring women – make up 42% of the nominations. And of course, they could well dominate the winners’ list on the night – last year, female artists picked up 10 of the 15 (66.67%) of the prizes available; Adele winning three of these.
‘They’re trying to even the playing field’
Image: The Nova Twins: Amy Love (left) and Georgia South. Pic: Federica Burelli
This year’s Brits ceremony takes place on Saturday, held on a weekend for the first time.
Alt-rock duo Nova Twins, who are nominated for two awards – best group and best rock/alternative act – say that as two young black women, they have had to overcome being pigeonholed as hip-hop or RnB musicians to make the music they really want to make, and that there is “100%” misogyny in the industry.
Speaking to Sky News about the gender-neutral award, guitarist and singer Amy Love praised Brits organisers for trying to “even the playing field” – but said: “At the same time, if you’re going to do that, then make sure you’re including everyone… otherwise it becomes just a male category again.”
She continued: “There’s been improvements [but] the conversation still needs to be had and we just hope that people can reflect, so then the following year it won’t happen again.
“And that’s all it is, it’s just a conversation. I think people get so used to jumping down each other’s throats and then nothing gets done because it turns into anger. But if you just talk, analyse, you know, recognise what’s going on, hopefully the following year it could be fixed.”
“You acknowledge the good done in other areas,” said South, highlighting their own nominations and those of fellow female duo Wet Leg – who tie with Styles for most nods this year.
More women being recognised for “heavy” music is “a win”, she added. “But then we can also keep pushing.”
There’s always controversy around an awards show…
Image: Mo Gilligan is hosting the Brits for the second time this year. Pic: John Marshall/ JM Enternational
Comedian Mo Gilligan, who is hosting the ceremony for the second time this year, tells Sky News there is “always some kind of controversy” surrounding an awards show; he points to the Oscars, where black actresses have yet again missed out on the best actress shortlist. “They are holding the mantle for controversy.
However, he says it is important not to let any controversy overshadow things for the artists caught up in it through no fault of their own.
“But for me, it’s letting the powers that be that are upstairs in a boardroom to be the ones who can really sort out this kind of stuff, whereas for me, it’s just [about] making sure I give people their moment, really. And I never want to feel like I’m throwing my opinion on someone’s biggest moment in their career.”
However, he says the conversations “should be” happening. “I think that’s what music’s all about.”
What have others said?
Image: All Saints won two gongs at the Brit Awards in 1998. (L-R) Nicole Appleton, Melanie Blatt, Shaznay Lewis and Natalie Appleton
All Saints star Shaznay Lewis, who won two Brit Awards for the band’s hit song Never Ever in 1998 – best single and best video – wrote about the issue for the Radio Times; in her article, she welcomed the category change as a “welcome and wonderful step” for recognising talent regardless of gender, but said that “progressive ideas should benefit everyone”.
She continued: “How can that be the case if we do not acknowledge female artists, who are symbols of empowerment to millions of young aspiring women?”
Next year, three-time Brit winner Smith will be eligible for a nomination for the first time since the changes in the category, following the release of their album Gloria.
Speaking about the lack of female nominees in an interview with The Sunday Times, the star said it was a “shame”, and continued: “Things are moving forward, but it’s obvious it’s not there yet. From seeing that [best artist] list, there is still a long way to go.”
They continued: “It’s incredibly frustrating… It feels like it should be easy to do. [The Brits] just have to celebrate everyone because this is not just about artists getting awards. Awards are for kids watching on TV, thinking, ‘I can make music like this’. When I was young, if I’d seen more queer people at these awards it would have lit my heart. Awards are there to inspire.”
What about the other categories?
Image: Lizzo pictured at the Brits in 2020 – she is due to perform this year. Pic: Vianney Le Caer/Invision/AP
Across the other major categories – song of the year, best new artist, best group, international group, international artist, international song, and best album – there is more of a mix.
Internationally, with Taylor Swift, Beyonce and Lizzo in the mix, women outnumber the men – Kendrick Lamar and Burna Boy – as they do in the best new British artist category, 60% to 40%.
The British song of the year category is male-dominated – with two thirds (66.67%) of the artists featured being male, a quarter female (25%), and one non-binary (8.33%). And with The 1975, Wet Leg, Styles, Stormzy and Fred Again up for best album, the split in this category is 80% male, 20% female.
For international song, the nominees are 50% male, 50% female.
Girl band FLO have already been announced as this year’s rising star recipients – the award is always announced ahead of the ceremony – and the other two acts shortlisted, Cat Burns and Nia Archives, are also female; a sign perhaps that more female stars could be up for the big awards in future years.
In the genre categories, there is more gender balance, but these have received criticism of their own. While the new best pop and RnB category is more inclusive in terms of gender, it isn’t in terms of genre; with Cat Burns, Charli XCX, Dua Lipa, Harry Styles and Sam Smith in the running, there is a distinct lack of RnB.
Brits voting explained
Image: Wet Leg, who won two Grammys earlier in February, are up for four awards at the Brits
YolanDa Brown, chair of the BPI, which runs the awards, and Damian Christian, chair of the 2023 Brits committee, released a lengthy statement about this year’s awards and the voting process behind them.
The awards are reviewed annually, they said, and the decision to bring in the artist of the year award was made “following extensive industry consultation, and informed by the belief that it was time to progress to judging artists solely on the quality and popularity of their work, rather than on who they are, or how they choose to identify”.
The Brits Voting Academy is made up of around 1,200 music industry experts. This year, some 52% of those who voted identified as women, while 31% were “members who are black, Asian or minority ethnic”, Brown and Christian said.
Sectors represented included artists, producers, record labels, publishers, managers, retailers, live promoters, and journalists and media workers.
Is any of this likely to come up on the night?
With artists such as Charli XCX, Sawayama and Hill, who missed out on the best artist shortlist, up for other awards, they may well have something to say should they win in their categories.
And whichever man wins best artist could also take a stand, too. In fact in 2020, when he won the award for best male artist, before the changes, Stormzy paid tribute to the women in his team – after only four nominations out of a possible 25 in mixed categories went to women that year.
“To be the best male, I have got the most incredible females in my team,” he said. “You lot are the greatest, the best male is nothing without the best females. I love you guys.”
Owen Cooper, the star of TV drama Adolescence, has made history becoming the youngest to win an outstanding supporting actor Emmy.
Cooper, who is 15, played Jamie Miller in the highly-acclaimed Netflix series set in Liverpool.
Adolescence, which dominated Netflix’s most-watched list earlier this year, centres on the story of a 13-year-old boy arrested for the murder of a classmate.
It won a total of four Emmys.
Cooper was just 14 at the time of filming Adolescence and had never acted before.
Image: Pic: Netflix
In his acceptance speech he said he was “nothing three years ago.”
“It’s just so surreal. Honestly, when I started these drama classes a couple years back, I didn’t expect to be even in the United States, never mind here.
“So I think tonight proves that if you listen and you focus and you step out your comfort zone, you can achieve anything in life.”
More from Ents & Arts
The four-part mini-series provoked a strong response from viewers and prompted a conversation in the UK – and worldwide – around misogyny and online safety, with co-creator Jack Thorne joining Prime Minister Keir Starmer for a discussion on the matter at the end of March.
It was also widely praised for its filming techniques, with each episode captured in one continuous take.
Gyllenhaal’s gift
Cooper’s co-star Erin Doherty (who played Jamie’s therapist) won best supporting actress in a limited series, director Philip Barantini took home the Emmy for outstanding directing for a limited or anthology series or movie, while writers Jack Thorne and Stephen Graham won for outstanding writing in the same category.
Before the awards ceremony, Cooper, from Warrington, had been surprised by his acting hero Jake Gyllenhaal, who walked in unannounced during an interview he was giving to press.
The pair hugged, and Gyllenhaal gave Cooper a small gift – a “lucky duck”.
“I made this movie [Brokeback Mountain], and I got nominated for an Academy Award, and a friend of mine sent me this before. Something just like this,” he said.
“It’s just a ‘Lucky Duck’ to keep in your pocket. To give you a little bit of luck.”
Putting it kindly, sports stars aren’t always known for their sparkling personalities.
It was Ricky’s lack of interest in the trappings of fame which accompanied his epic run of victories that made him all the more cool.
More from UK
He was the working-class hero who seemed unstoppable. It was a story that everyone wanted to follow.
Image: Ricky Hatton smiles during a news conference in 2006. Pic: Reuters
Celebrities wanted to be seen alongside him. Piggy-backing off his popularity the likes of Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Denzel Washington and David Beckham were all pictured ringside at one time or another, drawn to his fan-friendly style and impressive winning streak.
At the same time as the Gallagher brothers were flying the flag for music from Manchester, Hatton was doing the same for boxing.
During his 2008 fight against Paulie Malignaggi, he had Liam and Noel escort him to the ring.
In an interview he said he thought all three of them might be killed when Liam held up Hatton’s IBO belt inches from Malignaggi’s face and with a swagger said ‘what do you think about that you d*** head?’.
Stories like that are why his appeal extended beyond sport. He was an ordinary bloke who’d done extraordinary things. He never lost sight of who he was and fans loved him for it.
Image: Ricky Hatton is joined by Liam and Noel Gallagher after his 2008 fight against Paulie Malignaggi. Pic: Reuters
Ever found yourself religiously following the lives of people you’ve never met on social media?
Be it your favourite artist, influencer – or someone you met once at a party – those of us “chronically online” are likely familiar with that strange phenomenon of feeling like you know someone – without actually knowing them at all.
That funny feeling is what psychologists call a parasocial relationship: a one-sided attachment or bond with someone despite a lack of reciprocity.
The term was first used by academics in 1956 with the advent of television, which facilitated the “illusion of face-to-face relationships” with “performers” on our screens.
Today, it’s increasingly associated with influencers and podcasters, given the amount – and often intimate nature – of what they put online.
“Unrequited relationships are nothing new,” Dr Veronica Lamarche, a social personality psychologist at the University of Essex, says. “Throughout history there are lots of examples of people forming one-sided connections.
“It’s a case of all your connection with that person coming solely through what you’re presented with through those channels – be it your favourite TV show or a social media profile.”
A 2024 study co-authored by Dr Lamarche revealed that while people found their emotional needs were still best met by friends and family, parasocial relationships with YouTubers were valued more than relationships with “real” acquaintances or colleagues.
“Parasocial relationships are available whenever we need them,” Dr Lamarche adds.
“In the middle of the night, if you’re feeling a bit sad, you can turn to your favourite content creator and get that feeling of solace – whereas it might be inappropriate to wake up your best friend to call them for a chat. There aren’t those same boundaries.”
Four influencers share their experiences of parasocial relationships
One follower ‘turned up at my house’
Charlie Pauly, 34, is a travel blogger and content creator who knows those blurred boundaries all too well.
He and his then partner started documenting their round-the-world trip in 2017 and unwittingly became “the UK’s biggest Instagram travel couple”.
But when the couple separated in 2022, not only did he have to navigate a break-up but his followers’ reactions – and many had been invested in their “couple goals” persona for years.
Image: Travel blogger Charlie Pauly in New York. Pic: Charlie Pauly/Instagram
“The thing with social media is people love depth. They really want to get to know you – and people really believe that they know you,” he tells Sky News.
“I got lots of lovely messages of support, but it went crazy at first. I got [messages saying]: ‘I always knew she was gay’ and ‘he was definitely cheating on her’ – none of which was true.
“Even just recently a guy came up to me and kept saying ‘you were such a good couple’.
“I suppose that’s the perfect example of a parasocial relationship. I don’t know this person and yet he came and said all of this to my face. It’s just weird.”
Image: Charlie travelling with his ex-partner. Pic: Charlie Pauly
When Charlie was living on a narrowboat near his hometown of Peterborough, a follower sent a picture of himself standing beside it.
“He just turned up at the boat when we weren’t there – I had no idea,” he recalls. “He took a selfie and sent it to me on Instagram.”
Instagram
This content is provided by Instagram, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Instagram cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Instagram cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Instagram cookies for this session only.
Charlie, who has now rebranded as a solo traveller, still isn’t sure whether it was meant maliciously or not, but he felt it crossed privacy and safety boundaries.
“He said he ‘just wanted to say hi’, but I got quite defensive about it. I told him: ‘I don’t know where your head’s at, but that’s not cool. Don’t ever turn up at my house again’.”
‘I hadn’t realised my follower had died’
Lifestyle content creator Kristabel Plummer says she has felt the effects of the parasocial relationship in reverse – when she found out one of her most loyal followers had died.
The 37-year-old from London has been making a living from her social media channels for the past 12 years, with around 80,000 followers on Instagram and “lives” on TikTok roughly three times a week.
Image: Lifestyle influencer Kristabel Plummer, from London. Pic: Kristabel Plummer/Instagram
Earlier this year, she realised she hadn’t heard from a follower she’d had on-off conversations with for years.
The follower, an aspiring influencer herself, would diligently follow tips and hacks Kristabel posted, and Kristabel had followed her back roughly two years ago.
“She was in South Africa and I’m not sure what the influencer scene is like there, but she wasn’t able to do it as a job – like me. So she would always remember very specific things I’d written and put them into practice,” she says.
She recalls: “She crossed my mind one day, so I checked her profile – only to find someone had posted about her passing away.”
Although she didn’t find out until eight months later, and she still doesn’t know how she died, Kristabel was brought to tears.
TikTok
This content is provided by TikTok, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable TikTok cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to TikTok cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow TikTok cookies for this session only.
“It’s such a strange sort of relationship. If someone stops messaging you, you have no way of knowing what’s happened to them – so it was very upsetting to find out that way,” she adds.
Her experience is in line with academic research, which has shown people can still experience grief-like symptoms even if they have never met the person who has died, or if they’re not real.
Parasocial relationships ‘part of our psychological toolkit’
But there are plenty of positives to parasocial relationships. Dr Lamarche describes them as “part of our psychological toolkit for connection” when used in the right way.
Research has shown they can reduce social isolation, build confidence, and enhance our sense of identity.
Josh Fletcher, or ‘Anxiety Josh’, is a psychotherapist, author, and podcaster with around 240,000 Instagram followers and nearly two million podcast downloads.
Image: ‘Anxiety Josh’ from Manchester. Pic: Jon Shard Photography
After a breakdown in his early 20s, he was diagnosed with anxiety and OCD, and suffered from panic attacks and intrusive thoughts.
Having found the resources he’d been given of little use, he decided to create a platform to help others like him. His posts aim to show what various conditions and their symptoms look like in reality – and how people can separate themselves from how they feel in that moment.
“When you’re anxious you feel alone, you feel isolated – sometimes you don’t even have the words to describe how you’re feeling,” the 35-year-old from Manchester tells Sky News.
“I live a happy life now, but by me saying ‘I’ve been there’ gives people hope.”
Instagram
This content is provided by Instagram, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Instagram cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Instagram cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Instagram cookies for this session only.
Researchers who specialise in parasocial relationships have consistently found that minority groups, particularly the LGBTQ+ community, often get the most benefits from them – especially if they lack those peers in their social circles.
“Being able to see yourself mirrored back to you is a great antidote to that loneliness and hopelessness that comes with a lot of mental health conditions,” Josh says.
He sees the benefits of his followers’ parasocial relationships with him in the messages he gets, he adds.
On his podcast Disordered, his listeners share things they’ve achieved with the help of his online community, despite their mental health challenges.
And in response to his latest book, And How Does That Make You Feel: Everything You Never Wanted To Know About Therapy, he’s had “hundreds” of messages from people inspired to follow in his footsteps because he has “taught them it’s okay be a therapist – and still not have your all s*** sorted”.
Risk of social withdrawal
While parasocial connections have proven benefits, they’re not without their risks.
Following someone else’s experiences day in, day out, inevitably leads to social comparison – and can risk people developing unhealthy ideals or expectations.
And for those with low self-esteem or attachment issues, there is a risk of withdrawing from in-person relationships in favour of parasocial ones.
“The reason they can be so harmful is that one-sidedness,” Dr Lamarche says.
“While they’re useful, they can’t ever fully satiate our needs, so when things get really challenging, these people can’t tailor their behaviours to us – because they don’t know who we are.
“So if someone with low self-esteem starts putting all their eggs in their parasocial basket, that withdrawal can make them more vulnerable and actually lower their wellbeing long-term.”
So how do you strike the right balance?
Both Charlie and Kristabel admit they are “still figuring out their boundaries” when it comes to these kinds of parasocial relationships.
But as a psychotherapist, Josh says he has always been mindful that they can form and feels a responsibility to navigate them carefully.
“That over-familiarity can lead to disappointment,” he says.
“I come across as this caring, considerate person on social media, but if people reach out to me and I don’t respond, that can be perceived as a rejection.
“I have to put ‘no DM advice’ on my profile because I can’t provide individual advice – it’s unethical.”
So how do you strike the right balance – particularly when you make a living from sharing your life online?
Michelle Elman is a life coach, author, content creator, and self-styled “queen of boundaries”.
Image: Life coach Michelle Elman, from London. Pic: Michelle Elman
Just over a year ago, having kept her relationship relatively private, she revealed that she had got engaged and discovered her fiance had been cheating on her with one of her followers – all on the same day.
Now, she has returned to posting about dating, friendships, and body positivity – having initially found internet fame for sharing pictures of her surgery scars.
“I think with my style of content there’s a perception that I share everything about my life – when I actually really don’t,” she tells Sky News.
Whenever she has felt the need to demonstrate this to her followers, she asks them how many siblings she has – so they realise they don’t know the answer.
“I’m very private about the people in my life – my family, friends, the people I’m dating,” she explains.
While she may share screenshots of WhatsApp messages or conversations on dating apps, she doesn’t reveal names or anything beyond the early stages of a relationship.
Instagram
This content is provided by Instagram, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Instagram cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Instagram cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Instagram cookies for this session only.
“Every so often, I might get a message asking ‘What happened to this guy?’, but I won’t answer, because the moment you start, it’s never going to be enough to meet people’s expectations.”
Asked how influencers can avoid the pitfalls of parasocial relationships, she advises them not to let followers dictate what they do and don’t talk about – and to be aware “oversharing” won’t increase their numbers.
“People can think that relatability thing, if you overshare, you’ll get a bigger following – but you have to ask yourself if that’s why you want people to follow you.
“If you look at my Instagram as a whole – it does sum up my life – but that doesn’t mean I’ve shared every thought I’ve ever had.”