Connect with us

Published

on

When Adele was named the winner of the Brits’ inaugural artist of the year award last year, she addressed the changes that had been made to create the gender-neutral prize.

“I understand why the name of this award has changed but I really love being a woman and being a female artist,” she told the audience at the O2 Arena. “I’m really proud of us.”

The first recipient of the Brit Awards‘ artist of the year prize – a merging of the best male and best female prizes to make space for non-binary acts, after questioning from Sam Smith and others – happened to be female, but also happened to be Adele, one of the world’s biggest music stars, riding high following the release of a much-anticipated comeback album after several years out of the spotlight.

Adele receives the award for Song of the Year at the Brit Awards at the O2 Arena in London, Britain, February 8, 2022 REUTERS/Peter Cziborra

She was pretty much a dead cert. With the future Mercury Prize winner Little Simz nominated alongside her, the line-up was a mix of male and female stars, and it seemed to be a step forward for progress.

Fast-forward 12 months and the landscape is different. When this year’s best artist shortlist was revealed to be an all-male line-upHarry Styles, Stormzy, George Ezra, Fred Again and Central Cee – the criticism came instantly; Brits organisers were quick to respond and point out it is an industry problem.

“While it’s disappointing there are no nominations in the artist of the year category, we also have to recognise that 2022 saw fewer high-profile women artists in cycle with major releases as was the case in 2021,” a spokesperson said. “These trends based around the release schedule are a feature of the music industry, but if, over time, a pattern emerges, then this puts the onus on the industry to deal with this important issue.”

From Florence & The Machine to Charli XCX – who was eligible?

10 June 2022, Berlin: Singer Florence Leontine Mary Welch of the English band "Florence + the Machine" performs on stage at the Tempelhof Sounds Festival on the grounds of the former Berlin Tempelhof Airport. Photo by: Britta Pedersen/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images

To be eligible for this year’s best artist award, an act must have achieved at least one top 40 album or two top 20 singles, released between 10 December 2021 and 9 December 2022.

Florence & The Machine, Charli XCX, Rina Sawayama, Mabel, Ella Henderson, Becky Hill, Beth Orton, Emeli Sande, KT Tunstall, Beabadoobee, Nina Nesbitt and Shygirl were all eligible; Kae Tempest, who is non-binary, was also eligible.

However, female artists make up just 12 of the 71 eligible acts, or just under 17% – indicating, as Brits organisers have pointed out, that the problem is bigger than their ceremony alone. The treatment of female artists in the industry is an issue that has been put under the spotlight most recently by Raye, who has finally released her debut album after years of being held back.

But as microcosms of the wider industries they represent, awards ceremonies do tend to lay these problems bare. Take Little Mix’s win for best group in 2021, for example, when they became the first female band to win the award – ever – more than 40 years since the Brits began.

Read more:
The full list of Brits 2023 nominees
Everything you need to know about the Brits this year
‘It’s been a real wild journey’: Raye on the fight for her debut album

Sky News contacted representatives for the female and non-binary acts eligible for best artist this year, but none of the stars were available for comment.

You can’t really argue with the now Grammy best album winner and Mercury-nominated Styles, nor chart-topper and Glastonbury headliner Stormzy. And of course, it’s subjective, but there has been plenty of debate surrounding the other slots.

Overall, female artists – or groups featuring women – make up 42% of the nominations. And of course, they could well dominate the winners’ list on the night – last year, female artists picked up 10 of the 15 (66.67%) of the prizes available; Adele winning three of these.

‘They’re trying to even the playing field’

The Nova Twins: Amy Love (left) and Georgia South. Pic: Federica Burelli
Image:
The Nova Twins: Amy Love (left) and Georgia South. Pic: Federica Burelli

This year’s Brits ceremony takes place on Saturday, held on a weekend for the first time.

Alt-rock duo Nova Twins, who are nominated for two awards – best group and best rock/alternative act – say that as two young black women, they have had to overcome being pigeonholed as hip-hop or RnB musicians to make the music they really want to make, and that there is “100%” misogyny in the industry.

Speaking to Sky News about the gender-neutral award, guitarist and singer Amy Love praised Brits organisers for trying to “even the playing field” – but said: “At the same time, if you’re going to do that, then make sure you’re including everyone… otherwise it becomes just a male category again.”

She continued: “There’s been improvements [but] the conversation still needs to be had and we just hope that people can reflect, so then the following year it won’t happen again.

“And that’s all it is, it’s just a conversation. I think people get so used to jumping down each other’s throats and then nothing gets done because it turns into anger. But if you just talk, analyse, you know, recognise what’s going on, hopefully the following year it could be fixed.”

“You acknowledge the good done in other areas,” said South, highlighting their own nominations and those of fellow female duo Wet Leg – who tie with Styles for most nods this year.

More women being recognised for “heavy” music is “a win”, she added. “But then we can also keep pushing.”

There’s always controversy around an awards show…

Mo Gilligan is hosting the Brits for the second time this year. Pic: John Marshall/ JM Enternational
Image:
Mo Gilligan is hosting the Brits for the second time this year. Pic: John Marshall/ JM Enternational

Comedian Mo Gilligan, who is hosting the ceremony for the second time this year, tells Sky News there is “always some kind of controversy” surrounding an awards show; he points to the Oscars, where black actresses have yet again missed out on the best actress shortlist. “They are holding the mantle for controversy.

However, he says it is important not to let any controversy overshadow things for the artists caught up in it through no fault of their own.

“But for me, it’s letting the powers that be that are upstairs in a boardroom to be the ones who can really sort out this kind of stuff, whereas for me, it’s just [about] making sure I give people their moment, really. And I never want to feel like I’m throwing my opinion on someone’s biggest moment in their career.”

However, he says the conversations “should be” happening. “I think that’s what music’s all about.”

What have others said?

All Saints perform at the Brit Awards 1998. (L-R) Nicole Appleton, Melanie Blatt, Shaznay Lewis and Natalie Appleton.
Image:
All Saints won two gongs at the Brit Awards in 1998. (L-R) Nicole Appleton, Melanie Blatt, Shaznay Lewis and Natalie Appleton

All Saints star Shaznay Lewis, who won two Brit Awards for the band’s hit song Never Ever in 1998 – best single and best video – wrote about the issue for the Radio Times; in her article, she welcomed the category change as a “welcome and wonderful step” for recognising talent regardless of gender, but said that “progressive ideas should benefit everyone”.

She continued: “How can that be the case if we do not acknowledge female artists, who are symbols of empowerment to millions of young aspiring women?”

Next year, three-time Brit winner Smith will be eligible for a nomination for the first time since the changes in the category, following the release of their album Gloria.

Speaking about the lack of female nominees in an interview with The Sunday Times, the star said it was a “shame”, and continued: “Things are moving forward, but it’s obvious it’s not there yet. From seeing that [best artist] list, there is still a long way to go.”

They continued: “It’s incredibly frustrating… It feels like it should be easy to do. [The Brits] just have to celebrate everyone because this is not just about artists getting awards. Awards are for kids watching on TV, thinking, ‘I can make music like this’. When I was young, if I’d seen more queer people at these awards it would have lit my heart. Awards are there to inspire.”

What about the other categories?

Lizzo poses for photographers upon arrival at Brit Awards 2020 in London, Tuesday, Feb. 18, 2020.(Photo by Vianney Le Caer/Invision/AP)
Image:
Lizzo pictured at the Brits in 2020 – she is due to perform this year. Pic: Vianney Le Caer/Invision/AP

Across the other major categories – song of the year, best new artist, best group, international group, international artist, international song, and best album – there is more of a mix.

Internationally, with Taylor Swift, Beyonce and Lizzo in the mix, women outnumber the men – Kendrick Lamar and Burna Boy – as they do in the best new British artist category, 60% to 40%.

The British song of the year category is male-dominated – with two thirds (66.67%) of the artists featured being male, a quarter female (25%), and one non-binary (8.33%). And with The 1975, Wet Leg, Styles, Stormzy and Fred Again up for best album, the split in this category is 80% male, 20% female.

For international song, the nominees are 50% male, 50% female.

Girl band FLO have already been announced as this year’s rising star recipients – the award is always announced ahead of the ceremony – and the other two acts shortlisted, Cat Burns and Nia Archives, are also female; a sign perhaps that more female stars could be up for the big awards in future years.

In the genre categories, there is more gender balance, but these have received criticism of their own. While the new best pop and RnB category is more inclusive in terms of gender, it isn’t in terms of genre; with Cat Burns, Charli XCX, Dua Lipa, Harry Styles and Sam Smith in the running, there is a distinct lack of RnB.

Brits voting explained

Rhian Teasdale, left, and Hester Chambers of Wet Leg pose in the press room with the awards for best alternative music performance for "Chaise Lounge" and best alternative music album for "Wet Leg" at the 65th annual Grammy Awards on Sunday, Feb. 5, 2023, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
Image:
Wet Leg, who won two Grammys earlier in February, are up for four awards at the Brits

YolanDa Brown, chair of the BPI, which runs the awards, and Damian Christian, chair of the 2023 Brits committee, released a lengthy statement about this year’s awards and the voting process behind them.

The awards are reviewed annually, they said, and the decision to bring in the artist of the year award was made “following extensive industry consultation, and informed by the belief that it was time to progress to judging artists solely on the quality and popularity of their work, rather than on who they are, or how they choose to identify”.

Read more:
Barack Obama is a Wet Leg fan
Little Simz wins Mercury Prize

The Brits Voting Academy is made up of around 1,200 music industry experts. This year, some 52% of those who voted identified as women, while 31% were “members who are black, Asian or minority ethnic”, Brown and Christian said.

Sectors represented included artists, producers, record labels, publishers, managers, retailers, live promoters, and journalists and media workers.

Is any of this likely to come up on the night?

With artists such as Charli XCX, Sawayama and Hill, who missed out on the best artist shortlist, up for other awards, they may well have something to say should they win in their categories.

And whichever man wins best artist could also take a stand, too. In fact in 2020, when he won the award for best male artist, before the changes, Stormzy paid tribute to the women in his team – after only four nominations out of a possible 25 in mixed categories went to women that year.

“To be the best male, I have got the most incredible females in my team,” he said. “You lot are the greatest, the best male is nothing without the best females. I love you guys.”

So keep an eye on those speeches.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Ariana Grande rushed by red carpet intruder at premiere of Wicked: For Good

Published

on

By

Ariana Grande rushed by red carpet intruder at premiere of Wicked: For Good

Video footage has shown the moment singer and actress Ariana Grande was accosted by a fan at a film premiere.

Ms Grande was in Singapore for the debut of Wicked: For Good when the incident unfolded on Thursday.

The video captured the moment the fan scaled the barricade and pushed past photographers towards Ms Grande.

Pic: tacotrvck_vb/X/via REUTERS
Image:
Pic: tacotrvck_vb/X/via REUTERS

He then threw his arms around her, before co-star Cynthia Erivo intervened and security swoops in to stop him.

The man, now identified as Johnson Wen, 26, is reportedly a notorious red carpet crasher.

Wen, who has since been charged with being a public nuisance, goes by the nickname Pyjama Man, and gloated as he shared footage of the intrusion online.

“Dear Ariana Grande, Thank You for letting me Jump on the Yellow Carpet with You,” he wrote on Instagram.

More on Ariana Grande

Pic: tacotrvck_vb/X/via REUTERS
Image:
Pic: tacotrvck_vb/X/via REUTERS

In video stories posted to the site beforehand, he was seen at the Universal Studios venue, revealing his intentions.

In one, he said: “I feel like I’m in a dream, that’s my best friend, Ariana Grande, and I’m gonna meet her. I’ve been dreaming about that.”

Read more:
When you should actually arrive at cinema to avoid ads
TV and film’s obsession with upper-class actors

The Australian has ambushed several performers on stage, according to reports, including Katy Perry and The Chainsmokers at concerts in Sydney, and The Weeknd in Melbourne.

It has been reported that Wen intends to plead guilty and that he could face a fine of more than £1,000.

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo at the London premiere for Wicked: For Good
Image:
Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo at the London premiere for Wicked: For Good

Ms Grande took a moment to gather herself in the aftermath of the intrusion, visibly shocked by the incident.

She didn’t address the incident on her own Instagram, but shared some photos with the caption “thank you, Singapore”, adding “we love you”.

The singer battled post-traumatic stress disorder after her 2017 concert in Manchester was bombed, leaving 22 people dead.

She told Vogue in 2018: “It’s hard to talk about because so many people have suffered such severe, tremendous loss. But, yeah, it’s a real thing.

“I know those families and my fans, and everyone there experienced a tremendous amount of it as well. Time is the biggest thing.

“I feel like I shouldn’t even be talking about my own experience – like I shouldn’t even say anything. I don’t think I’ll ever know how to talk about it and not cry.”

In the same interview she also addressed her own anxiety, saying she has “always” had it.

Ms Grande plays Galinda Upland in Wicked: For Good, the character who becomes Glinda the Good Witch. Ms Erivo plays Elphaba, the character who becomes the Wicked Witch of the West.

The film is released in UK cinemas on 21 November.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

A third of daily music uploads are AI-generated and 97% of people can’t tell the difference, says report

Published

on

By

A third of daily music uploads are AI-generated and 97% of people can't tell the difference, says report

Do you care if the music you’re listening to is artificially generated?

That question – once the realm of science fiction – is becoming increasingly urgent.

An AI-generated country track, Walk My Walk, is currently sitting at number one on the US Billboard chart of digital sales and a new report by streaming platform Deezer has revealed the sheer scale of AI production in the music industry.

Deezer’s AI-detection system found that around 50,000 fully AI-generated tracks are now uploaded every day, accounting for 34% of all daily uploads.

File pic: iStock
Image:
File pic: iStock

The true number is most likely higher, as Deezer’s AI-detection system does not catch every AI-generated track. Nor does this figure include partially AI-generated tracks.

In January 2025, Deezer’s system identified 10% of uploaded tracks as fully AI-generated.

Since then, the proportion of AI tracks – made using written prompts such as “country, 1990s style, male singer” – has more than tripled, leading the platform’s chief executive, Alexis Lanternier, to say that AI music is “flooding music streaming”.

More on Artificial Intelligence

‘Siphoning money from royalty pool’

What’s more, when Deezer surveyed 9,000 people in eight countries – the US, Canada, Brazil, UK, France, Netherlands, Germany and Japan – and asked them to detect whether three tracks were real or AI, 97% could not tell the difference.

That’s despite the fact that the motivation behind the surge of AI music is not in the least bit creative, according to Deezer. The company says that roughly 70% of fully AI-generated tracks are what it calls “fraudulent” – that is, designed purely to make money.

“The common denominator is the ambition to boost streams on specific tracks in order to siphon money from the royalty pool,” a Deezer spokesperson told Sky News.

“With AI-generated content, you can easily create massive amounts of tracks that can be used for this purpose.”

File pic: Reuters
Image:
File pic: Reuters


The tracks themselves are not actually fraudulent, Deezer says, but the behaviour around them is. Someone will upload an AI track then use an automated system – a bot – to listen to a song over and over again to make royalties from it.

Even though the total number of streams for each individual track is very low – Deezer estimates that together they account for 0.5% of all streams – the work needed to make an AI track is so tiny that the rewards justify the effort.

Are fully-AI tracks being removed?

Deezer is investing in AI-detection software and has filed two patents for systems that spot AI music. But it is not taking down the tracks it marks as fully-AI.

Instead it removes them from algorithmic recommendations and editorial playlists, a measure designed to stop the tracks getting streams and therefore generating royalties, and marks the tracks as “AI-generated content”.

“If people want to listen to an AI-generated track however, they can and we are not stopping them from doing so – we just want to make sure they are making a conscious decision,” the Deezer spokesperson says.

Read more from Sky News:
How Elon Musk is boosting the British right
The extraordinary impact of a crime on UK growth

Concerns about artists’ livelihoods

Deezer’s survey found that more than half (52%) of respondents felt uncomfortable with not being able to tell the difference between AI and human-made music.

“The survey results clearly show that people care about music and want to know if they’re listening to AI or human-made tracks or not,” said the company’s boss Alexis Lanternier.

“There’s also no doubt that there are concerns about how AI-generated music will affect the livelihood of artists.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Musicians protests AI copyright plans

Earlier this year, more than 1,000 musicians – including Annie Lennox, Damon Albarn and Kate Bush – released a silent album to protest plans by the UK government to let artificial intelligence companies use copyright-protected work without permission.

A recent study commissioned by the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers suggested that generative AI music could be worth £146bn a year in 2028 and account for around 60% of music libraries’ revenues.

By this metric, the authors concluded, 25% of creators’ revenues are at risk by 2028, a sum of £3.5bn.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

BBC apologises to Donald Trump over editing of Panorama but says there isn’t ‘basis for defamation claim’

Published

on

By

BBC apologises to Donald Trump over editing of Panorama but says there isn't 'basis for defamation claim'

The BBC has apologised to Donald Trump over the editing of a speech in a Panorama programme in 2024.

The corporation said it was an “error of judgement” and the programme will “not be broadcast again in this form on any BBC platforms”.

But it added that it “strongly” disagrees that there is “a basis for a defamation claim”.

It emerged earlier, Donald Trump’s legal team said the US president had not yet filed a lawsuit against the BBC over the
broadcaster’s editing of a speech he made in 2021 on the day his supporters overran the Capitol building.

The legal team sent a letter over the weekend threatening to sue the media giant for $1bn and issuing three demands:

• Issue a “full and fair retraction” of the Panorama programme
• Apologise immediately
• “Appropriately compensate” the US president

On Sunday evening, two of the BBC’s top figures, including the director-general, resigned amid the edit and concerns about impartiality.

More from Ents & Arts

In a statement, the corporation said: “Lawyers for the BBC have written to President Trump’s legal team in response to a letter received on Sunday.

“BBC Chair Samir Shah has separately sent a personal letter to the White House making clear to President Trump that he and the Corporation are sorry for the edit of the President’s speech on 6 January 2021, which featured in the programme.

“The BBC has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary ‘Trump: A Second Chance?’ on any BBC platforms.

“While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim.”

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the latest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news

Continue Reading

Trending