BBC chairman Richard Sharp made “significant errors of judgement” by facilitating an £800,000 loan guarantee for Boris Johnson, a cross-party committee of MPs has found.
The committee said Mr Sharp should “consider the impact his omissions will have” on public trust in the broadcaster after he failed to declare his role as a go-between for the former prime minister when applying for the chairman’s job.
The MPs also said his actions “constitute a breach of the standards expected of individuals” applying for prominent public appointments.
Mr Sharp said he did not arrange the loan but admitted introducing his friend Sam Blyth, a cousin of Mr Johnson who wanted to help the then-prime minister, to the Cabinet Office.
Image: Richard Sharp appearing before the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee
A spokesperson for Mr Sharp said he “regrets” not telling MPs about his association with Mr Blyth “and apologises”.
Chairman of the BBC – What is the role?
The Chairman of the BBC is the head of the BBC board – on a salary of £160,000.
They are responsible for maintaining the independence of the BBC while overseeing the functioning of the corporation to fulfill its mission.
The chairman is also in charge of the process for appointing the director-general and can dismiss the person in this role. They also act as the corporation’s most senior representative to Parliament and the government, including the devolved administrations.
Roger Mosey, a former head of TV news at the BBC, told Sky News it was a job with “two directions”.
He said while it is “the most important role for the accountability of the BBC to the public”, it is not one which is involved in the BBC’s journalism.
But Mr Mosey pointed out that it is not uncommon for the chair to be a political appointment and that this is “nothing new”.
“It was in seeking at the time to ensure that the rules were followed, and in the belief that this had been achieved, that Mr Sharp acted in good faith in the way he did,” the spokesperson said.
The strongly-worded report from the cross-party MPs on the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee suggests Mr Sharp’s actions could damage the BBC.
More on Bbc
Related Topics:
The same committee backed Mr Sharp’s appointment to the chairman’s job in January 2021 but was not aware of his role in facilitating the loan.
“Richard Sharp’s decisions, firstly to become involved in the facilitation of a loan to the then-prime minister while at the same time applying for a job that was in that same person’s gift, and then to fail to disclose this material relationship, were significant errors of judgement, which undermine confidence in the public appointments process and could deter qualified individuals from applying for such posts,” the committee said.
Timeline
November 2020: According to the Sunday Times the loan guarantee was first suggested by Canadian millionaire Sam Blyth during a dinner with Richard Sharp.
Early December 2020: In early December, Richard Sharp put Sam Blyth in contact with the Cabinet Secretary, Simon Case.
Late 2020: Before the end of the year, Richard Sharp and Sam Blyth met with Boris Johnson for dinner at his country residence, Chequers. They insist the prime minister’s finances were not discussed.
January 2021: At the start of January, the government announced Richard Sharp as the preferred candidate to be BBC chairman.
The MPs continued: “Mr Sharp should consider the impact his omissions will have on trust in him, the BBC and the public appointments process.”
A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “The Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments is reviewing the competition to ensure the process was run in compliance with the rules and we will await the outcome.”
“I’d say the last two years people are just – they just don’t care anymore, they are using knives and doing all sorts.”
PC Maguire, 28, speaks with the authority of experience: experience that comes from working in Greater Manchester’s most high-crime areas.
“I remember when I was a teenager,” she says, “you’d never really hear of people carrying a knife or anything. But now it’s the normal thing to do.”
“It’s mad,” she adds.
Image: PC Maguire on patrol – her face is blurred because she also does undercover work for the unit
PC Maguire is part of Operation Venture, an elite policing unit within Greater Manchester Police set up to tackle serious violence and knife crime.
Over the past two months, we’ve been given exclusive access to watch them work.
Moped chase
We’re on a Friday afternoon vehicle patrol in south Manchester with another member of the Venture team, Sgt Mohammed Waqas, when his radio, and that of fellow officer PC Hodge, who’s driving, starts pinging.
Their plain clothes team has spotted two youths in balaclavas, on a moped, weaving in and out of traffic.
“We suspect they are involved in some sort of knife-point robberies,” Sgt Waqas says.
The moped has also had its registration plates pulled off – officers suspect it’s been stolen.
The team starts searching the streets and is flagged down by a passing driver who says he’s just had to swerve to avoid hitting a moped.
Image: One of the GMP officers during the hunt for the moped which was suspected to have been stolen
“They’re little idiots, up there!” the driver says, visibly angry. “There are kids around.
“I swear to god I felt like f*****g chasing them down, and kicking them up the arse.”
Meanwhile, the unit’s covert officers are waiting where the moped has been previously spotted.
When it returns, a short while later, there are three youths onboard.
The team detain one, a 16-year-old who is known to them, but the two other youths get away.
Image: The youths on the moped filming themselves escaping from police – suspects filming escapes and incidents and then posting it online has grown increasingly common
Sgt Waqas and PC Hodge take up the chase, following the moped at speed as it runs red lights.
Incredibly, we see one of the moped riders filming it all on their mobile phone.
Later, the officers tell us: “They’ll probably post it online.”
But right now, they are focused on trying to catch them, which, in rush hour traffic, proves impossible.
They lose them – “yeah, total loss”, Sgt Waqas reports via his radio to the comms operator.
“Just to log as well,” he adds, “two males, white males, both got balaclavas on.”
“One of them has possibly got something in his jacket. Can’t tell what it is, just the way that he was holding himself.”
It’s extremely frustrating for the team.
Image: The elite unit has taken 250 knives off of Manchester’s streets – an officer holds one of the knives recovered that he describes as a ‘rambo’ blade
A baby buggy, a knife and £50,000 cash
A few hours later, during a patrol in Salford, we see the sorts of weapons they are up against.
We’re with PC Maguire again, on vehicle patrol, when a police camera flags a car with links to suspected drug supply.
Along with another of the unit’s patrol cars, PC Maguire works to get into a formation to box in the suspect’s vehicle.
“XR2, show me as Car two,” PC Maguire tells a radio operator, having quickly made ground to get the vehicle in her sights.
“You want to get a stop on, before they have an opportunity to get away,” she explains.
But, after a brief pursuit through the dark streets, the car they are following pulls over of its own accord.
The driver, who’s in his 20s, is searched – as is his vehicle.
Inside, along with baby buggies and car seats, officers find a knife in the glovebox and a shoebox full of cash.
Image: One of the knives officers recovered during the elite unit’s work
Image: The car pulled over by the officers was full of baby equipment, as well as a knife and cash
Image: The cash recovered by officers from car – thought to be around £50,000
After brief questioning on site, the man tells officers that he’s been staying at a house nearby and admits there’s another weapon in there.
A few minutes later, PC Ben Cartledge – another Operation Venture officer – comes out holding what looks like a huge knife.
“It’s a machete,” he says, “it was in the bedroom.”
It’s extremely heavy and looks terrifying.
Image: The machete recovered by officers in Greater Manchester Police’s Operation Venture unit from the bedroom of a suspect they pulled over
Image: One of Operation Venture’s officers minutes before they pull over a car with £50,000 cash and a knife
“I’m not going to lie to you, mate, it’s for protection only,” the arrested man says, when PC Cartledge arrests him on a further offence of having an offensive weapon in a private place.
It’s a line officers have heard before.
“There’s that social media side of it,” a senior officers says.
“Sometimes they’ll film themselves doing the robbery and sharing it around, and that becomes the normality.
“So then people will sometimes carry weapons to protect themselves.”
The unit uses a combination of proactive stop and search, intelligence-led policing and undercover tactics.
It’s why we can name officers but sometimes not show faces.
It was a welcome party of sorts, and it was assembled near arrivals at Heathrow’s Terminal 5.
A few people clutched flowers, others brought presents, while everyone carried a sense of relief.
Two children from Gaza had been given permission to enter Britain for specialist medical care and the pair would arrive on the evening flight from Cairo.
It was a significant moment – the first time UK visas had been granted to children from this war-ravaged enclave – and the product of months of struggle by a small group of British volunteers.
Image: Ghena Abed, five, needs urgent treatment to save the vision in her left eye
As those in attendance offered up a cheer, a five-year-old called Ghena Abed emerged shyly from behind the security gates. With fluid pressing on her optic nerve, she needs urgent treatment to save the vision in her left eye.
Also in this party was a 12-year-old girl called Rama Qudiah. She is weak and malnourished and suffers from incontinence. Medics think she requires an operation on her bowel.
Image: Medics think Rama Qudiah, 12, needs a bowel operation
Her mother, Rana, told us their arrival in Britian “is just a like a dream”.
Her daughter has certainly been fortunate. A small number of children from Gaza have benefited from medical evacuations, with the majority receiving care in countries in the Middle East, Europe, as well as the United States.
Image: Rama’s mother, Rana
In March, the Israelis signed a deal with Jordan which could allow 2,000 children to leave the enclave for treatment of war injuries and conditions like cancer. However, just 29 were allowed to go at first instance.
The process has not been easy
Until now, not a single child from Gaza has entered the UK for medical care since the start of the current conflict, and the process has not been an easy one for the volunteers at Project Pure Hope.
They told Sky News it has taken 17 months to arrange temporary visas for Ghena and Rama.
Image: Dr Farzana Rahman from Project Pure Hope
“A lot of us are health care workers and I think it’s in our DNA that when we see people who are suffering, particularly children, we want to try and do something and that’s what motivated us,” says Dr Farzana Rahman from Project Pure Hope.
When asked why she thinks it has taken so much time to secure their visas, Dr Rahman said: “I don’t know.”
Group argues it has no time to lose to help other children
But it is clear the arrival of children from Gaza is an issue of sensitivity. The British volunteers told us on a number of occasions that all costs would be met by private sources. The children will return to Gaza when the treatment is completed.
Follow The World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
Project Pure Hope is not finished, however – group members have drawn up a list of other children they can help, and argue they have no time to lose.
“One of the hardest parts of trying to make progress in this area is that delays cost lives. A number of children have died who we haven’t been able to help and this is an urgent situation and I think for all of us that’s the hardest part,” says Dr Rahman.
The government will give ‘recognition’ payments to Post Office Capture victims before they receive full compensation.
Former sub-postmasters and their families who are entitled to redress have been told the initial amount, which is yet to be finalised, could be £10,000.
Capture was a faulty computer system used by sub postmasters in the 1990s – before the Horizon scandal.
A report last year found the software is likely to have caused errors in accounting.
A redress scheme is currently being set up for those affected and could possibly be introduced by the end of the summer.
Steve Marston, a Capture user who was convicted of stealing from his Post Office in 1996, describes “quite a lot of progress” at a government meeting but raised concerns over pace.
He told Sky News: “I’m more than happy that the compensation scheme is going to be put in place as quickly as possible.
More on Post Office Scandal
Related Topics:
“None of us are guaranteed how long we’re going to be here. We just want people to see recognition as soon as possible.”
Image: Steve Marston with his wife Jan
Ken Tooby’s late wife June was a Capture victim. Ken is seriously ill in hospital so his family has sent a plea to the government to “sort this Capture business asap”.
June Tooby represented herself in court in 2003 and challenged the Post Office over its “faulty” software system.
The evidence she compiled led to the Kroll investigation into Capture concluding there was a “reasonable likelihood” the software caused accounting errors.
Another victim, who wanted to remain anonymous, told Sky News he was “frustrated” at the slow progress of redress, describing it as “like pulling teeth”.
He also raised concerns over interim payments potentially being “too low”, claiming the government may be trying to “keep people sweet”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:19
PO miscarriages of justice cases ‘double’
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), meanwhile, is currently investigating 28 convictions and it’s hoped decisions will be made over whether to refer cases to the Court of Appeal by the end of the year.
Neil Hudgell, lawyer for Capture victims, said there was a “positive dialogue” at the latest meeting between government officials and families.
“The real frustration is the time it takes because of the processes that are involved,” he said. “I can see why it would take as long as it has.
“But [victims] just want peace and to see the end of it… There’s a real acute need to bring matters to a close.”
On timescales, he said there were “no guarantees” but a “guesstimate” was that redress will start “to flow… in the second half of the year”.
Mr Hudgell said he would be “disappointed” if conviction cases have not been progressed by the CCRC by this autumn.
“I don’t under emphasise the amount of work they’ve got – it involves multiple cases… I think they’ve got enough evidence now to start to formulate a decision,” he said.
A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: “Postmasters have already endured immeasurable suffering, and we continue to listen to those who have been sharing their stories on the Capture system.
“Ensuring postmasters are treated with dignity and respect is our absolute priority.
“Officials met with postmasters [on Wednesday] as part of our commitment to develop an effective and fair redress process for those affected by Capture.
“We will continue to update on the development of the redress mechanism as it progresses.”