Shamima Begum – who left home in east London at the age of 15 to join Islamic State in Syria – will find out today if she is allowed back to the UK.
Back in 2015, Begum was pictured leaving Bethnal Green with two other girls to make the journey to Turkey and then onto Syria, where she joined the caliphate.
Sir James Eadie KC told the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC): “You can be trafficked in the most ghastly, unacceptable way, exposed in the most unacceptable way, desensitised in the most unacceptable way and yet, unfortunately … still be a security threat.
The SIAC will hand down its written judgment over whether she should win back her British citizenship and return to the UK after a lengthy period gathering evidence and testimony from the government and Begum’s family.
But how did Shamima Begum get to this point, and why is her potential return to the UK proving so controversial?
Image: A photo of Begum from before she ran to join IS
2015
Begum dropped out of school at the Bethnal Green Academy with friends Amira Abase and Kadiza Sultana, and on 17 February, travelled from Gatwick Airport to Istanbul in Turkey.
It is thought they were radicalised by someone called Aqsa Mahmood, reported to be the first woman to flee the UK to join Islamic State in Syria two years earlier.
Advertisement
It is said the girls stole family jewellery to pay for their flights.
Once in Syria, Begum married a Dutch fighter for Islamic State, Yago Riedijk, and had three children with him – all of whom later died.
Begum was said to be an “enforcer” who recruited other women to the caliphate.
Image: The Bethnal Green Trio: Kadiza Sultana, Shamima Begum, and Amira Abase going through security at Gatwick airport
Sultana had married an IS fighter with Somalian heritage and was said to have been killed in a Russian attack. Her family told ITV at the time they believed she’d been planning an escape.
Abase was married to an Australian IS fighter and was reportedly killed in coalition strikes – but this has never been confirmed.
2019
The whereabouts or actions of Begum fall quiet between 2016 and 2019, and it was not until a journalist from The Times finds her at a displacement camp that she is seen or heard from.
Begum had fled the village of Baghuz, where there was fierce fighting taking place in a last stand for Islamic State.
When Sky News interviewed her, she had just given birth, and was said to be “unrepentant” about joining IS, but did want to return to the UK.
In February, Sajid Javid, who was the then home secretary, stripped Begum of her British citizenship – though this decision was controversial, as it meant it could have potentially left her stateless, which is in contravention to the United Nations.
It is understood that she also holds Bangladeshi citizenship through her father, but the country made it clear if she went there, she would face the death penalty.
By April, Begum was granted legal aid by the Ministry of Justice to appeal the decision.
Image: Shamima Begum being interviewed by Sky News in 2019
2020
Begum is given permission by the Court of Appeal to return to the UK and contest the government’s decision to rescind her British citizenship – but it was not clear at the time how she would do this.
2021
In November, Sky News met with Begum again, where she said she did not hate the UK when she left, only her own life, and reaffirmed her keenness to come back to the UK. She also described living under IS rule as “hell, hell on Earth”, and that she had no part in any of the atrocities carried out by the terrorist group.
Days later, the Supreme Court blocked Begum’s appeal to return home after the government argued that she “would create significant national security risks” and expose the public to “an increased risk of terrorism”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:44
November 2021: ‘I didn’t hate Britain, I hated my life’ – Begum
The Home Office, once again, stood by its decision to bar her from entering the UK, while her parents argued that stopping her from coming home contravenes their right to a family life.
We’re estimated to consume 8.2kg each every year, a good chunk of it at Christmas, but the cost of that everyday luxury habit has been rising fast.
Whitakers have been making chocolate in Skipton in North Yorkshire for 135 years, but they have never experienced price pressures as extreme as those in the last five.
“We buy liquid chocolate and since 2023, the price of our chocolate has doubled,” explains William Whitaker, the real-life Willy Wonka and the fourth generation of the family to run the business.
Image: William Whitaker, managing director of the company
“It could have been worse. If we hadn’t been contracted [with a supplier], it would have trebled.
“That represents a £5,000 per-tonne increase, and we use a thousand tonnes a year. And we only sell £12-£13m of product, so it’s a massive effect.”
Whitakers makes 10 million pieces of chocolate a week in a factory on the much-expanded site of the original bakery where the business began.
Automated production lines snake through the site moulding, cutting, cooling, coating and wrapping a relentless procession of fondants, cremes, crisps and pure chocolate products for customers, including own-brand retail, supermarkets, and the catering trade.
Steepest inflation in the business
All of them have faced price increases as Whitakers has grappled with some of the steepest inflation in the food business.
Cocoa prices have soared in the last two years, largely because of a succession of poor cocoa harvests in West Africa, where Ghana and the Ivory Coast produce around two-thirds of global supply.
A combination of drought and crop disease cut global output by around 14% last year, pushing consumer prices in the other direction, with chocolate inflation passing 17% in the UK in October.
Skimpflation and shrinkflation
Some major brands have responded by cutting the chocolate content of products – “skimpflation” – or charging more for less – “shrinkflation”.
Household-name brands including Penguin and Club have cut the cocoa and milk solid content so far they can no longer be classified as chocolate, and are marketed instead as “chocolate-flavour”.
Whitakers have stuck to their recipes and product sizes, choosing to pass price increases on to customers while adapting products to the new market conditions.
“Not only are major brands putting up prices over 20%, sometimes 40%, they’ve also reduced the size of their pieces and sometimes the ingredients,” says William Whitaker.
“We haven’t done any of that. We knew that long-term, the market will fall again, and that happier days will return.
“We’ve introduced new products where we’ve used chocolate as a coating rather than a solid chocolate because the centre, which is sugar-based, is cheaper than the chocolate.
“We’ve got a big product range of fondant creams, and others like gingers and Brazil nuts, where we’re using that chocolate as a coating.”
Image: The costs are adding up
A deluge of price rises
Brazil nuts have enjoyed their own spike in price, more than doubling to £15,000 a tonne at one stage.
On top of commodity prices determined by markets beyond their control, Whitakers face the same inflationary pressures as other UK businesses.
“We’ve had the minimum wage increasing every year, we had the national insurance rise last year, and sort of hidden a little bit in this budget is a business rate increase.
“This is a small business, we turn over £12m, but our rates will go up nearly £100,000 next year before any other costs.
“If you add up all the cocoa and all the other cost increases in 2024 and 2025, it’s nearly £3m of cost increases we’ve had to bear. Some of that is returning to a little normality. It does test the relevance of what you do.”
The UK is to rejoin the European Union’s Erasmus student exchange scheme, according to reports.
The popular programme allowed Britons to spend a year studying at European universities as part of their degree, without paying extra fees, and vice versa for their European counterparts.
Negotiations have included work on “mutually agreed financial terms” for the UK and the EU.
The UK had pushed for a discount on membership fees, which are calculated on the basis of a country’s gross domestic product (GDP), The Times reported.
It said the EU is understood to have offered the government a 30% reduction of fees in the first year of membership.
Labour MP Darren Frith told Sky News’ Politics Hub he would “welcome” such a move.
The Guardian reported that, as well as university-based study exchanges, British students will be able to participate in vocational training placements under the scheme.
Minister on Brexit ‘self-harm’
Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds held talks with Maros Sefcovic, the European Commission’s trade lead, in Brussels last week.
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: “We are not commenting on ongoing talks.”
‘Fantastic opportunities for students’
But the UK’s universities welcomed the apparent breakthrough.
Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group of leading universities, said: “We’re delighted at the UK’s association to Erasmus+.
“With an even greater scope than previous programmes, Erasmus+ opens up fantastic opportunities for students, adult learners and young people to all benefit from new experiences and learning.
“It will also renew the huge contributions that EU students and staff make to life on our university campuses.”
The Lib Dems, who have been campaigning to rejoin Erasmus, welcomed the news.
Leader Sir Ed Davey said: “This is a moment of real opportunity and a clear step towards repairing the disastrous Conservative Brexit deal.”
Resident doctors across England begin a five-day strike this morning over pay and jobs, marking the 14th walkout by them since March 2023.
It coincides with the record number of flu cases in England and NHS leaders warning of a “huge strain on hospitals” and strikes causing “further disruption and delays”.
Resident doctors are striking in England from 7am today until 7am on Monday 22 December.
Sir Keir Starmer called the action “irresponsible” while Health Secretary Wes Streeting has rejected the British Medical Association’s (BMA) pay demands, accusing the union of a “shocking disregard for patient safety”.
But the BMA insists its strike is “entirely avoidable” and has demanded a “credible offer” to avert “real-terms pay cuts”.
Streeting: Government has gone ‘as far as we can’ with BMA negotiations
Why are resident doctors on strike?
The government says resident doctors have already received an average pay rise of 28.9% over the past three years (2023-24 to 2025-6).
But the BMA has been demanding an additional 26% pay uplift to restore what they say amounts to erosion in their earnings, once inflation is taken into account. Although there is some dispute about the extent of the real terms fall, because of the BMA’s use of the Retail Price Index (RPI) in its calculation.
While it did not include any extra pay, the offer included the fast expansion of specialist training posts; covering out-of-pocket expenses such as exam fees; and offering to extend the union’s strike mandate to enable any walkout to be rescheduled to January.
BMA boss on decision to go ahead with doctors’ strike
What if I need urgent medical care?
The Department of Health and Social Care says it is important people do not avoid seeking urgent care, and should use 999 if it is a serious or life-threatening emergency. For everything else, there is NHS 111 or the NHS App.
It adds that patients should turn up for planned appointments unless they have been told otherwise. Any appointments that need to be rescheduled will be given priority.
During strikes, there are exemptions or special arrangements, called derogations, which allow certain essential services to continue operating. It means critical services will be maintained to ensure patient safety and prevent serious harm.
How much do resident doctors earn?
There are many different types of resident doctor in England with different levels of pay. Full Fact, which has crunched the numbers, said they currently earn between £38,831 and £73,992 a year, but that does not take into account extra pay for unsociable hours.
Full Fact states that resident doctors typically get between a quarter and a third more than their basic salary from other sources.
This takes estimated average earnings (in the year ending August 2025) to between £45,846 and £81,061 (although the government claims the figures are more like £49,000 to £97,000).
Comparisons with other countries are difficult because of how doctors are categorised. Broadly, resident doctors in England earn about the same as those in Ireland and anything between 1% less and 26% more than in New Zealand.
But doctors in Australia earn somewhere between 23% and 48% more than their counterparts in England.
BMA rejects offer despite Streeting’s attack
Wes Streeting took a risky line of attack. He put an offer of more jobs to the BMA.
And while that offer was being considered he went on the offensive.
He warned the NHS would collapse if the resident doctors carried on with their strikes during a record flu season.
He repeated that line throughout last weekend when doctors were voting on whether to call off the strikes.
The BMA responded by accusing Streeting of “scaremongering”. In the end, 83.2% of those who took part in the poll rejected the government’s offer.
Senior NHS consultants gave interviews saying flu season was bad, but to be expected, and with the same contingency planning that happens every summer (off flu season) the NHS would cope.
The BMA will argue that Streeting can make the resident doctors his scapegoat for an NHS that will struggle again this winter.
They rejected that idea completely. And now they have rejected his offer.
What has the reaction been?
The prime minister has said the strike comes “on the back of a very substantial pay increase in the last year or so”.
“I think it’s irresponsible action by the BMA,” he told MPs.
BMA actions ‘irresponsible’, says Starmer
The health secretary called for doctors to ignore the strike and criticised what he called the “fantasy demand for another 26% pay rise,” adding that “it reveals the BMA’s shocking disregard for patient safety”.
Dr Jack Fletcher, chairman of the BMA’s resident doctors’ committee, said the strikes were “entirely avoidable”. He added that “we should start negotiating, and the government should stop game-playing”.
But organisations representing NHS trusts have been scathing about the walkouts. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said: “Trust leaders and staff will be working now to minimise the impact of the strike, but sadly it will mean further disruption and delays.”
Meanwhile, Rory Deighton, acute and community care director at the NHS Confederation, said: “These strikes come at the worst possible time, with rapidly rising flu levels putting huge strain on hospitals.”
What about public support for strikes?
Public support for the strikes is low, according to a YouGov poll released last week.
The results showed 58% of those asked either somewhat or strongly opposed the industrial action, while 33% somewhat or strongly supported it.