Connect with us

Published

on

BAE Systems, the UK’s biggest engineering company, has enjoyed a record year for new orders as western governments stepped up defence spending in response to Russia’s attack on Ukraine..

Britain’s premier defence contractor saw a record order intake of £37.1bn – taking its order backlog to £58.9bn.

BAE, whose current work includes building type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy, making electronic warfare systems for the F-35 jet fighter and making the Beowulf unarmoured all-terrain vehicle for the US Army, said it was expecting order growth this year to be better still.

Underlying operating profits for 2022 came in at £2.5bn – up 12.5% on 2021 – as top line sales grew by 4.4% to £23.3bn.

BAE, one of the biggest suppliers to the US Pentagon, also enjoyed a tailwind from the strength of the US dollar against the pound.

The results allowed the company to raise its dividend to shareholders for the 19th consecutive year.

But it was that big increase in the size of the order book that really caught the eye.

More on Bae Systems

The biggest portion of the new orders came in air, driven by new orders from Saudi Arabia and for MBDA, the European missiles systems business in which BAE is a partner.

The tanks will be able to automatically launch a counter-explosive at incoming anti-tank missiles. Pic: BAE Systems
Image:
Pic: BAE Systems

Maritime, driven by orders for the type 26 frigate and the UK’s dreadnought submarine programme, also contributed a big chunk of new business.

However, the other three key product and service areas – electronic systems, platforms and services and cyber and intelligence – all enjoyed growth in new orders as well.

The latter, while still the smallest part of BAE in terms of sales and profits, is among its most profitable businesses in terms of returns.

‘Tremendous potential ahead’

Charles Woodburn, the chief executive, said: “This is just the start. I still see tremendous potential ahead. We are investing in the business to support the future. We have leading technology solutions for our customers.”

He said BAE’s diverse geographic footprint, its deep customer relationships in the US, Europe and the Middle East and the multi-year nature of many contracts would create numerous opportunities in the future.

Mr Woodburn said it was not widely enough appreciated that BAE’s ability to export from the US, UK, Australia and Sweden meant it was “uniquely well equipped” to compete in multiple markets.

Re-equipping ammo stocks amid Ukraine war

He highlighted the urgent need to re-equip armed forces with ammunition – much of which has been diverted to Ukraine by its western allies – as one area where BAE’s strengths would stand it in good stead.

Read more: War in Ukraine helps boost earnings outlook at BAE Systems

BAE, which has two major Swedish subsidiaries in Hagglunds and Bofors, is also seen as a potential beneficiary if Sweden and Finland’s applications to join NATO are approved and the two countries raise defence spending accordingly.

Interestingly, while some of the sales growth is coming from BAE passing on inflation to customers, the vast majority comes from actually growing sales.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nov 2022: MD of BAE Systems’ naval ships business, speaks on Ian King Live

Only around a third of contracts are linked to the rate of inflation – a headwind that Mr Woodburn said BAE was increasingly comfortable with managing.

Cognisant of past criticisms of BAE for being too heavily dependent on Saudi defence orders, Mr Woodburn also stressed that no one programme represents more than 10% of group revenues.

UK-Australia security pact

Disappointingly, though, there was little news around the potential benefits for BAE from AUKUS, the new security pact between Australia, the UK and the US, which was announced 18 months ago.

Mr Woodburn said there was little he could say publicly but pointed to some work already being done around submarines – Australia’s decision to switch from French-made to British-made submarines created fury in Paris – cyber security and quantum computing.

The governments of the three countries are due to provide an update next month on the agreement and Mr Woodburn said he had no reason to think that would not be delivered.

There was, though, an update on the work BAE is doing as the lead contractor in the future combat air system programme, aimed at building Tempest, the sixth-generation jet fighter.

The project recently won a boost as Japan joined the Anglo-Italian programme. The company said work was progressing well and reiterated – as was announced before Christmas – that there are plans for the UK to lead the development of a new flying combat air demonstrator set to fly within the next five years.

The overall picture is one of a business that is diversified both in terms of its geographic footprint, customer base and its products and services.

Crucially, a major criticism often levelled at BAE in the past – that it fails to generate enough cash from its activities – also appears to be being addressed.

Shares of BAE, which with an increase of 48% have been the best performer in the FTSE 100 over the last 12 months, fell by just over 1% having hit an all-time high on Wednesday evening.

Rolls-Royce

Rolls-Royce takes City by surprise

Elsewhere, another of the UK’s big prestige engineering companies, Rolls-Royce, was taking the City by surprise with appreciably better results than expected.

The aircraft engine maker reported an underlying operating profit for 2022 of £652m – up 57% on 2021 – thanks to a better performance in its civil aerospace and power systems operations.

The shares were ahead by as much as 20% at one stage as investors digested not only this news but guidance that the company is expecting operating profits of £800m-£1bn for 2023.

Tufan Erginbilgic, the new chief executive, said Rolls had benefitted from a 35% increase in flying hours for its engines and highlighted new large engine orders received from Malaysia Aviation Group, Norse Atlantic Airways and Qantas.

He said Rolls was assuming large engine flying hours this year would come in at 80-90% of the 2019 level.

Underperforming for extended period

However, in his assessment or the company’s prospects, Mr Erginbilgic – a former BP executive who succeeded the long-running Warren East at the start of the year – pulled no punches.

He said Rolls had been underperforming for an extended period.

He added: “This is not just a COVID issue. Cash generation is unsatisfactory and our debt is too high.”

Mr Erginbilgic said too much of the company’s resources were simply covering its costs and interest payments and stifling its ability to invest.

He said it had a relatively high fixed cost base and lower profit margins than its rivals: “In the last five years, even excluding the COVID year of 2020, we have averaged a return on capital employed of just 3.5%.”

Arguing that Rolls had in the past lacked strategic clarity and tried to keep too many options open, he added: “I believe we have the potential to be a much higher quality and much more competitive company.

“We must only invest in new technologies where we are differentiated, where the market opportunity is sufficiently large and where there are synergies with our existing operations.”

‘Monumental uncertainties’

It will be tempting to suggest that, with massive demand still pent-up for flying, a strong 2023 for Rolls is all but guaranteed.

But Mr Erginbilgic warned there were “monumental uncertainties and challenges” in the guidance he was offering for the year, including inflation, potential supply chain disruption, interest rate rises and possible recessions around the world.

Investors also have other questions.

One is that, with civil aerospace set to continue growing in 2023, how easily they will be able to discern how well Rolls has done due to its own self-help measures – as opposed to just a general improvement in market conditions.

Looming redundancies but good potential to generate cash

Another is that with big a round of redundancies looming, Rolls may lose some people it would rather hang onto, due to the tight labour market.

Mr Erginbilgic said: “When we engage with our people, they are very excited about the future. Who doesn’t want to work for a successful company? And who wants to work for an underperforming company? Everybody has a role and we need to mobilise the whole workforce.

“Starting with clarity, why we need to change, and a very clear strategy, everybody knows their role.”

Rolls also still has net debt of £3.3bn and there is a degree of scepticism among investors that the company will be able to get that down by self-help measures and increased cash generation rather than by a sale of new shares.

This business, if it is managed the right way, has good potential to generate cash.

“We are already into our performance improvement agenda. We are looking to drive performance improvement as we speak. There is a huge sense of urgency there. Strategic clarity will follow that and then we will combine the two. Both of them will come together.”

After the near-death experience that the company went through during the pandemic, that will be music to the ears not only of investors but also the government, which is looking to Rolls to play a key role in the energy transition with the delivery of small modular nuclear reactors.

Continue Reading

Business

IMF upgrades UK economic growth forecast – but issues tariffs warning

Published

on

By

IMF upgrades UK economic growth forecast - but issues tariffs warning

The UK economy will grow more than previously thought, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which has upgraded its latest forecast.

It also said the Bank of England should “continue to ease monetary policy gradually”, indicating it expected further reductions in interest rates.

But it warned trade tensions linked to US tariff plans will reduce UK economic growth next year.

The Washington-based UN financial agency said the UK economy will expand 1.2% this year and “gain momentum next year”.

The upgrade in forecasts, however, is slight, up from an expected 1.1% announced in April as the world reeled from the global trade war sparked by US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

That April figure was a 0.5% downgrade from the projected 1.6% growth for 2025 the IMF foresaw in January and the 1.5% forecast issued in October.

It means the IMF expects the UK economy to grow less this year than it forecast in October and January.

Money blog: Britons face 100% property tax in Spain

Tariffs warnings

This anticipated lower growth is largely due to tariffs – taxes on goods imported to the United States – and the uncertainty caused by shifting trade policy in the US, the world’s largest economy.

While many tariffs have been paused until 8 July, it’s unclear if deals will be in place by then and if pauses may be extended.

The effect of this has been quantified as a 0.3 percentage points lower growth by 2026 in the UK, the IMF said.

The organisation held its prediction that the UK economy will grow by 1.4% in 2026.

“The forecast assumes that global trade tensions lower the level of UK GDP by 0.3% by 2026, due to persistent uncertainty, slower activity in UK trading partners, and the direct impact of remaining US tariffs on the UK,” it said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know

It comes despite the UK having agreed a deal with the Trump administration to circumvent the 25% tariffs on cars and metals.

The IMF also cautioned that “weak productivity continues to weigh on medium-term growth prospects”.

Lower productivity has been an issue since the global financial crash of 2008-2009, but has been caused by “chronic under-investment”, low private sector research and development, limited access to finance for businesses to expand, skill gaps, and a “deterioration in health outcomes”, it said.

Interest rates

Interest rates “should” continue to come down, making borrowing cheaper, though the IMF acknowledged rate-setters at the Bank of England now have a “more complex” job due to the recent rise in inflation and “fragile” growth.

The author of the report on the UK, Luc Eyraud, said the IMF expected the Bank to cut interest rates by 0.25 percentage points every three months until they reach a level of around 3%, down from the current 4.25%.

Praise was given to the UK government as the IMF said “fiscal plans strike a good balance between supporting growth and safeguarding fiscal sustainability”.

“After a slowdown in the second half of 2024, an economic recovery is under way,” the IMF said.

Global factors – “weaker export performance in the challenging global environment” – are blamed for the slowdown last year.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

The news is being taken as a win by Chancellor Rachel Reeves.

“The UK was the fastest growing economy in the G7 for the first three months of this year and today the IMF has upgraded our growth forecast,” she said.

“We’re getting results for working people through our plan for change – with three new trade deals protecting jobs, boosting investment and cutting prices, a pay rise for three million workers through the national living wage, and wages beating inflation by £1,000 over the past year.”

Continue Reading

Business

What is the two-child benefit cap and will Labour scrap it?

Published

on

By

What is the two-child benefit cap and will Labour scrap it?

The government is considering getting rid of the two-child benefit cap first brought in by the Conservatives.

The policy has caused considerable consternation within the Labour Party, with a growing number of MPs calling to scrap it and ministers so far refusing to.

Farage says he can be PM – politics latest

But now, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has given the government’s strongest hint yet it may scrap the cap after she told Sky News ministers are “considering” lifting it.

We look at what the cap is and the controversy over it.

What is the two-child benefit cap?

Since 2017, parents have only been able to claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children, if they were born after April 2017.

An exception is made for children born as a result of rape.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Child benefit reform ‘not off the table’

Who introduced it?

Then work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith first proposed the policy in 2012 under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government.

It was not until 2015 that then chancellor George Osborne announced a cap would be introduced from the 2017/2018 financial year.

The coalition said it made the system fairer for taxpayers and ensured households on benefits faced the same financial choices around having children as those not on benefits.

Read more:
Why PM’s Reform strategy may backfire
Winter fuel U-turn could have big consequences

David Cameron on the 2015 campaign trail
Image:
David Cameron’s government introduced the cap, though he was out of office by the time it came in

What is Labour’s position on the cap?

The party has long been divided over the issue, with Sir Keir Starmer ruling out scrapping the cap in 2023.

He then said Labour wanted to remove it, but only when fiscal conditions allowed.

Following Labour’s landslide victory last July, the prime minister refused to bow to pressure within his party, and suspended seven MPs for six months for voting with the SNP to scrap the cap.

Ministers have toed the party line for months, but the narrative started to shift in May, with Sir Keir reported to have asked the Treasury to see how scrapping it could be funded.

The publication of Labour’s child poverty strategy was delayed from the spring to autumn, fuelling speculation the government wants to use the next budget to scrap the cap.

Then the education secretary told Sky News on 27 May lifting the cap is “not off the table” – and “it’s certainly something that we’re considering”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did Labour delay their child poverty strategy?

How many children does the cap affect?

Government figures show one in nine children (1.6m) are impacted by the two-child limit.

In the first three months Labour were in power, 10,000 children were pulled into poverty by the cap, the Child Poverty Action Group found.

In May, it said another 109 children are pulled into poverty each day by the limit, adding to the 4.5 million already in poverty.

The Resolution Foundation said the cap would increase the number of children in poverty to 4.8 million by the next election in 2029-30.

Torsten Bell, the foundation’s former chief executive and now a Labour Treasury minister, said scrapping the cap would lift 470,000 children out of poverty.

Torsten Bell.
Pic: Dimitris Legakis/Athena Pictures/Shutterstock
Image:
Torsten Bell has warned against keeping the cap. Pic: Dimitris Legakis/Athena Pictures/Shutterstock

How much would lifting the cap cost the taxpayer?

The cap means for every subsequent child after the first two, families cannot claim benefits worth £3,455 a year, according to the Institute for Government.

It estimates removing the limit would cost the government about £3.4bn a year – equal to roughly 3% of the total working-age benefit budget.

It is also approximately the same cost as freezing fuel duties for the next parliament.

Research has found the indirect fiscal impacts of lifting the cap could be higher, as some data shows investing in young children can pay for itself by causing better outcomes for them later in life.

Continue Reading

Business

Donald Trump says he will postpone 50% tariffs on EU until July

Published

on

By

Donald Trump says he will postpone 50% tariffs on EU until July

Donald Trump says he will delay the imposition of 50% tariffs on goods entering the United States from the European Union until July, as the two sides attempt to negotiate a trade deal.

It comes after the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, said in a post on social media site X that she had spoken to Mr Trump and expressed that they needed until 9 July to “reach a good deal”.

The US president had last Friday threatened to bring in the 50% tariffs from 1 June, as European leaders said they were ready to respond with their own measures.

But Mr Trump has now said that date has been put back to 9 July to allow more time for negotiations with the 27-member bloc, with the phone call appearing to smooth over tensions for now at least.

Speaking on Sunday before boarding Air Force One for Washington DC, Mr Trump told reporters that he had spoken to Ms Von der Leyen and she “wants to get down to serious negotiations” and she vowed to “rapidly get together and see if we can work something out”.

The US president, in comments on his Truth Social platform, had reignited fears last Friday of a trade war between the two powers when he said talks were “going nowhere” and the bloc was “very difficult to deal with”.

Mr Trump told the media in Morristown, New Jersey, on Sunday that Ms Von der Leyen “just called me… and she asked for an extension in the June 1st date. And she said she wants to get down to serious negotiation”.

More on Donald Trump

“We had a very nice call and I agreed to move it. I believe July 9th would be the date. That was the date she requested. She said we will rapidly get together and see if we can work something out,” the US president added.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Shortly after, he wrote on Truth Social: “I agreed to the extension – July 9, 2025 – It was my privilege to do so.”

On his so-called “liberation day” last month, Mr Trump unleashed tariffs on many of America’s trade partners. But since then he’s backed down in a spiralling tit-for-tat tariff face-off with China, and struck a deal with the UK.

Read more from Sky News:
Gail’s backer plots rare move with bid for steak chain Flat Iron
AA owners line up banks to steer path towards £4.5bn exit

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

12 May: US and China reach agreement on tariffs

Much of his most incendiary rhetoric on trade has been directed at Brussels, though, even going as far as to claim the EU was created to rip the US off.

Responding to his 50% tariff threat, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said: “EU-US trade is unmatched and must be guided by mutual respect, not threats.

“We stand ready to defend our interests.”

Continue Reading

Trending