Connect with us

Published

on

Boris Johnson has said Rishi Sunak’s attempts to renegotiate Brexit arrangements in Northern Ireland may create additional problems rather than solve them.

Speaking exclusively to Sky’s Mark Austin on the eve of the first anniversary of the invasion of Ukraine, the former prime minister refused to say he would back any deal negotiated by his successor – and questioned Mr Sunak’s entire approach to the issue.

Mr Johnson insisted that the “best way forward” is to continue to pass the legislation he introduced to parliament as PM to allow the UK to unilaterally tear up parts of the Brexit deal rather than negotiating with Brussels.

Boris Johnson was interviewed by Sky's Mark Austin

Mr Sunak had been expected to junk this Johnson-era law, known as the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill, if he secured agreement on a new deal.

It is currently in the House of Lords, where it faces significant opposition from peers, who have put down 90 amendments.

Asked if he would support the deal Mr Sunak is hoping to bring back from Brussels on Northern Ireland, Mr Johnson said: “I think that it’s important that we wait to see what there may be.

“But I think the best way forward is, as I said when I was running the government, is the Northern Ireland bill, which, you know, cleared the Commons very comfortably, I think unamended, when I was in office only a few months ago. So I think that’s the best way forwards.”

More on Boris Johnson

Read more:
Analysis: Sunak has kept his Brexit talks trump card under wraps – but will he ever get to play it?
Cabinet minister refuses to confirm if MPs will get a vote on NI Protocol deal
What is the Northern Ireland Protocol and why does it matter?

This comes at a delicate moment for Mr Sunak, as he must decide whether to press ahead with the deal he has negotiated with Brussels in the face of opposition from the unionist DUP and Tory Brexiteers, junk it or renegotiate the terms further.

All Tory MPs are required to be in the Commons on Monday next week, prompting speculation that the deal could be announced then.

Mr Johnson used his Sky News interview to suggest that his bill would fix key issues that Mr Sunak is trying to deal with by negotiating with Brussels, including returning control of VAT in Northern Ireland from Brussels to Westminster.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer presses Sunak over NI Protocol

He said: “It’s a very good bill. It fixes all the problems. It solves the problems that we have in the Irish Sea, solves the problems of paperwork, VAT and so on.

“It’s an excellent bill and doesn’t set up any other problems in the economy of the whole island of Ireland. So I’d go with that one.”

Mark Austin also asked Mr Johnson about Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s suggestion that he “loathed” him.

He replied: “I think that it’s very important that politicians get on with each other as far as they possibly can.

“I had a public good relationship with him. And I think that, you know, it’s important to be as civil and friendly as he possibly can.”

Continue Reading

World

President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with ‘hostile attitudes’ to the US

Published

on

By

President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US

President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US.

He said Sunday’s attack in Colorado had shown “the extreme dangers” of “foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas”.

“We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,” the president said.

The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

The White House said some had a “significant terrorist presence” and accused others of poor screening for dangerous individuals, as well as not accepting deported citizens.

People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will face partial restrictions.

Mr Trump’s proclamation said America must ensure people entering don’t have “hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles” – and don’t support terror groups.

More on Donald Trump

Travel ban protesters at Washington Dulles airport in 2017
Image:
Protests took place when Mr Trump announced his first travel ban in 2017. Pic: Reuters

The move echoes a controversial and chaotic order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries.

The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

President Trump said on Thursday that policy was a “key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil”.

His new list notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country’s leader recently on a trip to the Middle East.

Athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics will also be exempt, as will others such as permanent US residents and Afghans with special immigrant visas.

Trump cites ‘what happened in Europe’ to justify new ban

President Trump hailed travel restrictions imposed during his first term as “one of our most successful policies”.

It was also one of the most controversial, with what became known as “the Muslim ban” sparking widespread protest. Thousands gathered at US airports to oppose the detainment of travellers arriving from affected countries.

The then German chancellor, Angela Merkel, said the fight against terrorism didn’t justify suspicion of people based on their faith. Her French counterpart at the time, President Hollande, warned against the dangers of isolationism.

Still smarting perhaps from that criticism, Trump announced his new ban with a commitment to “not let what happened in Europe happen to America”.

In addition to restrictions on 12 countries and partial restrictions on another seven, he warned others could be added as “threats emerge around the world”.

In a second proclamation, the US president escalated his war with Harvard University, suspending international visas for new students and authorising the secretary of state to consider revoking existing ones.

Having blamed Joe Biden for “millions and millions” of “illegals” in America, he issued a third proclamation ordering an investigation into the use of autopen during Biden’s presidency.

In a memorandum, President Trump claimed his predecessor’s aides used autopen to sign bills in a bid to cover up his cognitive decline.

If we didn’t know what the Trump administration meant when they talked about “flooding the zone”, we know now.

The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat.

The ban takes effect from 9 June – but countries could be removed or added.

The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be “continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented”.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

President Trump’s first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a “Muslim ban”.

It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes – or held at US airports when they landed.

Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign.

It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version in June 2018, calling it “squarely within the scope of presidential authority”.

Continue Reading

World

Hundreds of thousands in Gaza ‘catastrophically food insecure’, says aid chief

Published

on

By

Hundreds of thousands in Gaza 'catastrophically food insecure', says aid chief

Humanitarian aid must be allowed into Gaza “at scale” by Israel to avoid a “generation of children that won’t have a chance in life,” the director of the UN’s World Food Programme has told Sky News.

In early March – before Israel resumed its military operations in the Gaza Strip – all aid was blocked from entering the region.

Despite limited aid now being distributed to Gaza through a US and Israeli-backed organisation, the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry said Palestinians were killed by Israeli gunfire near one of the sites.

Cindy McCain, executive director of the World Food Programme (WFP), has urged Israel to allow international aid to “get in and get in at scale”.

“We can’t wait for this,” she told The World with Yalda Hakim. “We need safe, unfettered, clear access all the way in and we’re not getting that right now.”

Ms McCain said people in Gaza were “starving, they’re hungry, they’re doing what they can do to feed their families”.

She added: “It’s very, very important that people realise that the only way to stave off malnutrition, catastrophic food insecurity and, of course, famine would be by complete and total access for organisations like mine.”

Ms McCain said the WFP team was “talking every day” to the Israeli government to try to resume aid deliveries.

Palestinians struggle to get donated food at a community kitchen in Khan Younis on Monday. Pic: AP
Image:
Palestinians struggle to get donated food at a community kitchen in Khan Younis on Monday. Pic: AP

“We’re not going to give up, we do believe that it’s not only necessary but it’s urgent that we get in and get in at scale,” she said.

“We’re looking at a generation of children that won’t have a chance in life because they haven’t had the proper nutrients.

“Right now, we’re looking at over 500,000 people within Gaza that are catastrophically food insecure.”

Ms McCain added: “I try and put myself in their situation: I’m a mother and grandmother, and I cannot imagine having my children ask me for food and me not being able to give it them.

“I don’t know what that does to a human spirit but I don’t want to see any more of that as a humanitarian aid worker.”

Ms McCain, the widow of the late US presidential candidate John McCain, said she believes in “principled, humanitarian distribution” of aid.

Asked if she thought Hamas was taking aid, she replied: “I have not seen anything like that. I have no way of knowing because I’ve not been there in person.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How Israel’s aid plan unravelled

Aid distribution centres in Gaza were closed on Wednesday after Palestinians were reportedly killed by Israeli gunfire near one of its sites.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – which is endorsed by Israel – said the centres would be shut “for renovations, organisation, and efficiency improvements”. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) warned nearby roads would be considered “combat zones”.

It came after 27 Palestinians were killed while waiting for aid to be distributed in the Rafah area of southern Gaza on Tuesday, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.

The IDF said it fired “near a few individual suspects” who left the designated route, approached its forces and ignored warning shots, about half a kilometre from the aid distribution site of the GHF. It denied shooting at civilians at the aid centre.

Read more:
How Gaza’s aid rollout system collapsed into chaos
Israel ‘without doubt’ committed Gaza war crimes, says ex-Biden official

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

That incident came two days after reports that 31 people were killed as they walked to a distribution centre run by the GHF in the Rafah area.

However the IDF said its forces “did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the humanitarian aid distribution site and that reports to this effect are false”.

Continue Reading

World

Why Putin is in ‘victim mode’ over Ukraine’s airbase drone attack

Published

on

By

Why Putin is in 'victim mode' over Ukraine's airbase drone attack

It’s only been ten days since Donald Trump called Vladimir Putin crazy following a series of Russian attacks on Ukraine.

But now the attacks have been flowing in the opposite direction, it feels like the Russian president has seen an opportunity to win back Washington’s affections.

It involves playing the victim.

Ukraine war latest: Putin wants revenge for airbase attacks, says Trump

The Kremlin, for example, said the leaders’ call was focussed on Ukrainian attacks “on Russian civilians”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ukraine drone attack: new video analysed

 Vladimir Putin makes a video address dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the Baikonur Cosmodrome, in Moscow, Russia June 2, 2025. Sputnik/
Image:
Putin accused Ukraine of relying on ‘terror’. Pic: Reuters

And before it, Putin accused Ukraine’s leadership of being a “terrorist organisation”, in his first comments since the spate of assaults began.

He was referring to Saturday’s bombing of a highway bridge in the Bryansk region, which left seven dead and dozens injured after part of a passenger train was crushed.

More on Donald Trump

No one has claimed responsibility but Russia blames Ukraine.

“The current Kyiv regime does not need peace at all,” said President Putin.

“What is there to talk about? How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?”

It’s exactly what Ukraine has been saying about Russia for the last three years, but there was no mention of that. The Kremlin is in full-on victim mode.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will Putin go nuclear?

The aim, I think, is to turn the tables on Ukraine, cast itself as the injured party and make Donald Trump believe that Russia has a right to respond to the drone attack on its long-range bombers.

The tactic may well have worked.

“President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,” Trump wrote on social media after the call.

Did he try to talk Putin out of responding? We don’t know, but it doesn’t sound like it. If anything, Trump actually announced Russia’s retaliation himself.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Read more:
Underwater explosives strike bridge linking Russia to Crimea

Russia mercenary group ordered London attack, court hears

And even though Putin discussed the drone attack with Trump, he still hasn’t commented on it in public – four days on.

Russia wants to be seen as the victim, but it doesn’t want to look weak, so an embarrassing episode like that is kept out of the headlines.

Continue Reading

Trending