Connect with us

Published

on

Matt Hancock’s handling of the COVID pandemic has come under fresh scrutiny following a leaked trove of more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages.

An investigation by the Daily Telegraph alleges the former health secretary rejected testing advice on care homes and expressed concern this could get in the way of meeting his targets.

The MP strongly denied the “distorted account” with a spokesman alleging the conversations leaked by journalist Isabel Oakeshott after she worked on his Pandemic Diaries memoir have been “spun to fit an anti-lockdown agenda”.

Former chancellor George Osborne and Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg are also the subject of some of the messages.

Politics live: Rishi Sunak faces PMQs at midday amid claims Matt Hancock rejected COVID advice

Here, Sky News looks at the key exchanges that reportedly took place:

Hancock says care home testing ‘muddies’ waters

The Telegraph’s investigation claims chief medical officer Professor Sir Chris Whitty told the then health secretary in April 2020 there should be testing for “all going into care homes”.

Mr Hancock described it as “obviously a good positive step”.

But the messages suggest he ultimately rejected the guidance, telling an aide the move just “muddies the waters”.

According to the investigation, he said: “Tell me if I’m wrong but I would rather leave it out and just commit to test and isolate ALL going into care from hospital.

“I do not think the community commitment adds anything and it muddies the waters.”

Hancock texts
Hancock chat

However, a source close to Mr Hancock said The Telegraph “intentionally excluded reference to a meeting with the testing team from the WhatsApp”.

“This is critical,” the source added, “because Matt was supportive of Chris Whitty’s advice, held a meeting on its deliverability, told it wasn’t deliverable, and insisted on testing all those who came from hospitals.

“The Telegraph have been informed that their headline is wrong, and Matt is considering all options available to him.”

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Mr Hancock said: “It is outrageous that this distorted account of the pandemic is being pushed with partial leaks, spun to fit an anti-lockdown agenda, which would have cost hundreds of thousands of lives if followed. What the messages do show is a lot of people working hard to save lives.”

Care home testing could “get in the way” of the 100,000 daily test target

Mr Hancock also expressed concerns that expanding care home testing could “get in the way” of the 100,000 daily test target he wanted to hit, the investigation said.

On 2 April, the then cabinet minister put his reputation on the line with a pledge to significantly increase testing by the end of the month as the UK lagged behind Europe in capacity.

File photo dated 03/01/22 of people arriving at a Covid 19 testing centre in Leytonstone, east London, as "woefully inadequate" record-keeping by the Government makes it "impossible" to have confidence that all its Covid-19 testing contracts with Randox were awarded properly, MPs have said.

Those eligible for the tests initially included the general public and NHS staff, and when advised to widen access to include people in COVID-hit care homes later that month, Mr Hancock said this would be “OK” so long as it did not “get in the way of actually fulfilling the capacity in testing”.

According to the leaked messages, a civil servant told Mr Hancock on 24 April: “Asymptomatic testing sub is reading. Top recommendation is that you agree to: Prioritise testing of asymptomatic staff and residents in care homes where an outbreak has been recorded within the past 14 days. We estimate this will result in 60,000 tests being carried out across 2,000 care homes in the next 10 days”.

Mr Hancock replied: “This is ok so long as it does not get in the way of actually fulfilling the capacity in testing.”

He did not say why this would get in the way of his target but at the time, the government had acknowledged challenges getting tests to care homes.

Mr Hancock later approved the extra testing in care homes which was announced on 28 April.

Hancock texts George Osborne for help

As he struggled to meet his target, leaked messages show Mr Hancock texted former Tory chancellor George Osborne to ask for help.

George Osborne
Image:
George Osborne

He said the thousands of spare testing slots were “obvs good news about spread of virus” but “hard for my target”.

Mr Osborne, editor of the Evening Standard until July 2020, had reportedly responded: “Yes – of course – all you need to do tomorrow is give some exclusive words to the Standard and I’ll tell the team to splash it.”

Mr Hancock had later added: “I WANT TO HIT MY TARGET!”

Boris Johnson ‘going crackers’ over testing

Building a centralised test and trace system was one of the biggest challenges for the government during the pandemic.

The £37bn service is widely seen as having failed in its main objective to reduce the spread of the virus and prevent further lockdowns after its launch on May 28 2020.

The “lockdown files” suggest then prime minister Boris Johnson was frustrated over its capacity after it got up and running.

On 4 June he text Mr Hancock saying: “It’s all about testing. That’s our Achilles heel. We can’t deliver a sensible border policy or adequate track and trace because we can’t test enough. Did we go to the Germans for those kits that Angela Merkel was offering ? What is wrong with us as a country that we can’t fix this?”

Former prime minister Boris Johnson attending an ecumenical prayer service at the Ukrainian Catholic Cathedral in London, to mark the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Picture date: Friday February 24, 2023.
Image:
Former prime minister Boris Johnson

In another message Mr Johnson adds: “We have had months and months.

“I am going quietly crackers about this.”

Mr Hancock replied: “Don’t go crackers. We have test capacity enough to do this. We now have the biggest testing capacity in Europe. The problem is the false negatives – so the medics are against releasing from self isolation (whether for quarantine or T&T) with a negative test.”

Test couriered to Jacob Rees-Mogg for one of his children

The “lockdown files” investigation also claims that officials couriered Jacob Rees-Mogg a COVID test for one of his children while there was a shortage.

The aide messaged Mr Hancock to say the lab had “lost” the original test for one of the then Commons leader’s children, “so we’ve got a courier going to their family home tonight”.

He added: “Jacob’s spad (special adviser) is aware and has helped line it all up, but you might want to text Jacob.”

Jacob Rees-Mogg seen in Downing Street. Pic: PA
Image:
Jacob Rees-Mogg seen in Downing Street. Pic: PA

It is not clear if Mr Hancock sent a text flagging up the intervention or if the test was delivered.

Commenting on the claim, Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “This is yet more evidence that it’s one rule for Conservative ministers and another for everyone else.

“The COVID inquiry must look into reports Conservative ministers were able to get priority access to tests at a time of national shortage.”

Hancock warned restrictions on care home visits ‘inhumane’

The Telegraph’s investigation also claims social care minister Helen Whately advised the health secretary not to stop “husbands seeing wives” in October 2020.

HELEN WHATELY
Image:
Social care minister Helen Whately

This was in relation to care home visits, which were to be restricted as the UK went into a tiered lockdown system, with tighter rules in areas with higher COVID rates.

Ms Whately said: “I’m hearing there’s pressure to ban care home visiting in tier 2 as well as tier 3. Can you help? I really oppose that. Where care homes have COVID-secure visiting we should be allowing it. To prevent husbands seeing wives because they happen to live in care homes for months and months is inhumane.”

Mr Hancock replied: “Hearing from whom? Tier 2 was agreed yesterday as far as I’m concerned.”

The rules that came into place that month allowed some visits for those in tier one, but banned them unless under “exceptional circumstances” in other tiers.

In January 2021, when some restrictions still remained on care home visits despite the vaccine rollout, Ms Whately also reportedly said: “I am getting v positive updates from David P on care home vaccinations, with just a handful left to do. As I think I’ve flagged, we do need to be ready with policy on visiting, given risks of lives lost through old people just giving up as well as COVID… and expectation that vaccine = safe to visit.”

Hancock replied: “Yes on visiting but only after a few weeks. Meanwhile we need to hit the end-of-month target!”

Sky News has contacted Ms Whately for comment.

Continue Reading

UK

Emergency bill to protect British Steel becomes law

Published

on

By

Emergency bill to protect British Steel becomes law

An emergency bill to save British Steel’s Scunthorpe blast furnaces has become law.

The urgent legislation gives ministers the power to instruct British Steel to keep the plant open.

The bill was rushed through the House of Commons and House of Lords in one day, with MPs and peers being recalled from recess to take part in a Saturday sitting for the first time in over 40 years.

Emergency bill becomes law – follow the latest reaction here

British Steel's Scunthorpe plant
Image:
An emergency bill to save British Steel’s Scunthorpe blast furnaces has passed. Pic: Reuters

After passing through both houses of parliament, the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill was granted royal assent by the King.

The bill gives the government the power to take control of British Steel – or any other steel asset – “using force if necessary”, order materials for steelmaking and instruct that workers be paid. It also authorises a jail sentence of up to two years for anyone breaching this law.

Sir Keir Starmer hailed the legislation for “turning the page on a decade of decline”, adding “all options are on the table to secure the future of the industry”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is the future of British Steel?

It will mean the steel plant in Scunthorpe will continue to operate as the government decides on a long-term strategy, and steelmaking in the UK more broadly.

Officials from the Department for Business and Trade arrived at the site before the bill had even passed, Sky News understands.

Earlier, staff from the plant’s ousted Chinese owners Jingye were denied access, with police called over a “suspected breach of peace” – though officers found “no concerns”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The role of steel in the UK economy

Ministers took the unusual step of recalling parliament from its recess to sit on Saturday after negotiations with Jingye appeared to break down.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the measures within the bill were “proportionate and necessary” to keep the Scunthorpe blast furnaces open and protect both the UK’s primary steelmaking capacity and the 3,500 jobs involved.

The emergency legislation stops short of full nationalisation of British Steel, but Mr Reynolds told MPs that public ownership remained the “likely option” for the future.

Read more:
British Steel employees express fears over plant’s future
Why the hot spring weather is sliding away

During the debate, several Conservative MPs, Reform UK’s deputy leader Richard Tice and the Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader Daisy Cooper all spoke in favour of nationalisation.

MPs had broken up for the Easter holidays on Tuesday and had not been due to return until Tuesday 22 April.

The business secretary accused Jingye of failing to negotiate “in good faith” after it decided to stop buying enough raw materials to keep the blast furnaces at Scunthorpe going.

But the Conservatives said the government should have acted sooner, with shadow leader of the house Alex Burghart accusing ministers of making “a total pig’s breakfast” of the situation regarding British Steel.

The government was also criticised for acting to save the Scunthorpe plant but not taking the same action when the Tata Steel works in Port Talbot were threatened with closure.

Continue Reading

UK

Major incident declared after gas explosion causes house collapse in Nottinghamshire

Published

on

By

Major incident declared after gas explosion causes house collapse in Nottinghamshire

A major incident has been declared in Nottinghamshire after a gas explosion caused a house to collapse.

There is still a “substantial emergency service presence” in place after the explosion in John Street, Worksop just after 7.30pm on Saturday.

Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service (NFRS) declared it a “major incident” and said “multiple houses in and around John Street have been evacuated”. Nearby Crown Place Community Centre has been opened as a “place of safety”, the service said. Around 20 people have sought refuge there, Sky News camera operator James Evans-Jones said from the scene.

Videos posted on social media showed the front of a terraced house blown out with the roof collapsed, while neighbouring houses had their windows damaged.

NFRS said in a statement late on Saturday: “This has now been declared a major incident, and we are likely to be on scene throughout the night and even into Sunday morning.”

The fire service said it was called to the scene at 7.39pm.

The back of the property where the explosion happened in Worksop. Pic: YappApp
Image:
The back of the property where the explosion happened in Worksop. Pic: YappApp

Pic: YappApp
Image:
Pic: YappApp

“This is a gas explosion involving a house that has been significantly damaged,” the service said in a previous statement.

More on Nottinghamshire

One person posted on Facebook that they heard “a terrific bang, like a very loud firework” as they turned into Gladstone Street from Gateford Road.

“I thought the back end had blown off my car,” they said. “A house in John Street has had, presumably, a gas explosion!”

Emergency services at the scene on Saturday. Pic: YappApp
Image:
Emergency services at the scene on Saturday. Pic: YappApp

NFRS said it was also called to a separate incident shortly afterwards but does not believe the two are connected.

Ten fire engines were sent to the scene of the industrial fire in nearby Holgate Road in The Meadows, Nottingham.

“The building has been severely damaged but there are no reports of any injuries,” NFRS said.

Having been called to the incident at 8.11pm, NFRS said at around 10.30pm that it was scaling its response down with the flames “now under control”.

NFRS’s group manager Leigh Holmes said from the scene just after 11pm: “We will begin to relax the cordon in the next hour as we continue to scale down this incident.”

A damaged building at The Meadows in Nottingham. Pic: NFRS
Image:
A damaged building at The Meadows in Nottingham. Pic: NFRS

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

A sticking plaster, not a solution: What next for British Steel?

Published

on

By

A sticking plaster, not a solution: What next for British Steel?

Sir Keir Starmer was flying the flag for domestic steel production on Saturday as his government passed emergency legislation to give itself extraordinary powers to intervene in the running of the steel works in Scunthorpe and elsewhere.

He wants voters to notice that his intervention-friendly government has stepped in to save virgin steel production which was days away from dying out for good because of what ministers call the bad faith behaviour of Chinese owners.

The politics and optics of Saturday’s intervention seem relatively simple. What happens next, however, is not.

Follow live updates: Emergency law to keep British steel plant open

Even before the emergency bill had made its way through parliament, officials had turned up at British Steel in Scunthorpe.

There’s a nervousness about what happens next. As one person close to the talks told me, keeping the blast furnaces alive is far from a foregone conclusion and there are difficult times to come.

More on Sir Keir Starmer

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Emergency steel bill receives King’s approval

“We’re in for a very hard few days and week while government and UK management secure and ensure the vital loads of raw materials needed,” said a source.

“You can’t just do next day delivery on Amazon. Until this is in the blast furnaces keeping them going this won’t be a job done.”

It stands to reason the government will pull out all the stops and the furnace for now will be kept alive, whatever the cost, because the political cost of failure at this point is too high.

Future not secure

But the medium term prospects for virgin British steel are far from secure.

The blast furnaces being saved only have a few years life at best – but it remains unclear who will fund a transition to the new-style electric blast furnaces.

Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, said: “The action I seek to take today is not a magic wand or a panacea.

“The state cannot fund the long term transformation of British Steel itself, nor would it want to do so.”

Nor would he say that steel production is an overriding national security issue, effectively guaranteeing future production. The wiggle room will be noted in Scunthorpe and beyond.

The government has provided a sticking plaster not a solution.

But this is about so much more than what’s going on in Lincolnshire, this is about Britain’s place in the world – and its resilience.

SIR KEIR STARMER SCINTSHORPE

Is dependence on China inevitable?

Can our domestic steel industry survive if Trump continues to impose 25% tariffs on steel going from the UK to the US?

Can we make our own weapons for years to come – as part of Mr Starmer‘s newfound commitment to spend 3% of GDP on defence – without British steel?

Is the eventual dependence on Chinese steel an inevitability?

Yet one of the fascinating features of Saturday’s debate was the most strident attack on a Chinese entity by a minister – the toughest assault since Mr Starmer’s government entered office.

Mr Reynolds said: “Over the last few days, it became clear that the intention of Jingye was to refuse to purchase sufficient raw materials to keep the blast furnaces running.

“In fact, their intention was to cancel and refuse to pay for existing orders. The company would therefore have irrevocably and unilaterally closed down primary steelmaking at British Steel.

“Their intention has been to keep the downstream mills, which colleagues will know are fundamental to our construction steel industry, and supply them from China rather than from Scunthorpe.”

This attack – at a time when ministers (most recently Ed Miliband) have been heading to Beijing to repair relations.

However, the accusation that a Chinese entity has been acting in bad faith in order to effectively scupper domestic steel production is a serious charge.

It also comes before we find out whether Donald Trump is going to make it harder for allies to trade with China.

The government has succeeded in protecting the domestic manufacturer of virgin steel for the short term.

But what happens in the long term, and where we might get it from, remains as murky today as it did before.

Continue Reading

Trending