Connect with us

Published

on

A new plan to ban refugees arriving in the UK by small boats from today from claiming asylum will push the boundaries of international law but will not break it, a senior Tory has said.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman is set to publish long-promised legislation on Channel crossings on Tuesday that she has admitted “pushes the boundaries of international law”.

This will include preventing people who come to the UK illegally from claiming asylum or using human rights law to stop their removal.

Ms Braverman will ask for this to apply from the moment she unveils the proposals in the Commons to avoid people smugglers “seizing on the opportunity to rush migrants across the Channel”, a government source told Sky News.

She is expected to say that under the new illegal migration bill, asylum claims from those who travel to the UK in small boats will be inadmissible.

Arrivals will be removed to a third country and banned from ever returning or claiming citizenship.

Former justice secretary Sir Robert Buckland said while Ms Braverman has said the legislation will push the boundaries of international law, it will not go as far as breaking it.

He told Sky News’ Kay Burley at Breakfast: “I’ve had assurances that the government isn’t seeking to break international law – that’s its obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, the Refugee Convention.”

Sir Robert said without that it would be “a bit of a free for all for everybody to try and do their own thing” as he acknowledged other countries in Europe and around the world are also struggling with illegal immigration.

He added that he will be looking at the new legislation for exceptions to allow, for example, women from Iran who refuse to wear the hijab or a refugee coming from a war-torn part of the world “who clearly is coming for the right reasons to be able to seek asylum here in the UK”.

Sir Robert admitted there has been “a lot of over-promising and under-delivering” on small boat crossings but thinks Rishi Sunak has the right approach in going “one step at a time” and not just relying on UK legislation but taking action internationally “to avert the problem from reaching the Channel in the first place” such as talks with the French.

Read more:
How small boats trade really works

25/10/2022. London, United Kingdom. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak meets Secretary of State for the Home Department Suella Braverman.
Pic:UK Government
Image:
Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman will unveil the plan in full on Tuesday. Pic:UK Government

Refugee charities have already described the plans as “costly and unworkable” and said they “promise nothing but more demonisation and punishment” of asylum seekers.

Writing in The Sun, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the UK has a “proud history of welcoming those most in need”.

But he claimed that those arriving in small boats were doing so via “safe, European countries”, and were not “directly fleeing a war-torn country” or “facing an imminent threat to life”.

Former Labour home secretary Jack Straw told Sky News the government keeps coming up with “desperate measures” and said the latest plan is trying to “override all the international obligations and turn ourselves into a kind of pariah amongst western European states is not going to work anyway”.

He added: “I promise you we will in a year, 18 months time, when there’s a general election, Mr Sunak will be very, very embarrassed about the fact that the numbers might come down a bit but have not stopped.”

Government ‘pushing boundaries of international law’

Critics say the UK has “comprehensively shut down” legal routes for refugees to come to the UK.

While there are schemes to help people fleeing specific countries like Hong Kong and Ukraine, the government has failed to explain the safe and legal routes for asylum seekers escaping war from other parts of the world.

Mr Sunak has made stopping Channel migrant crossings one of his five priorities in office and said while previous bills have made a start on gripping this, “what we are announcing today takes that work forward”.

“It will mean that those who come here on small boats can’t claim asylum here,” he added.

Despite plans such as forcibly removing asylum seekers to Rwanda being mired in legal challenges, ministers were expected to approach the limits of the European Convention on Human Rights with the new legislation.

Writing in the Daily Express, Ms Braverman admitted the plan “pushed the boundaries of international law”.

Read more:
Sunak will hope trying to stop Channel crossings appeals to voters

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘People smuggling is just another job’

Government still committed to Rwanda deportations

Under the new legislation, a duty will be placed on the home secretary to remove “as soon as reasonably practicable” anyone who arrives on a small boat, either to Rwanda or a “safe third country”.

According to The Times, this will take precedence over human rights and modern slavery claims, and there will be new powers to mass detain arrivals.

Mr Sunak spoke to Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame before unveiling his plans, and pledged to continue working with him to ensure their stalled project works.

The government has paid more than £140m to the east African nation for deportations, but no flights forcibly carrying migrants to the capital of Kigali have taken off because of legal challenges.

The PM will also meet France’s President Emmanuel Macron on Friday to discuss further cooperation that will be required to reduce boat crossings.

Read more:
People smugglers ‘settling in Britain’

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Decmeber: Braverman defends Rwanda policy

‘Unworkable and costly’

Several Tory MPs welcomed the news that a new bill was imminent, but Labour raised doubts about the legality and feasibility of the bill and the Liberal Democrats said ministers had drawn up “another half-baked plan”.

The Immigration Services Union representing border staff also said the plans are “quite confusing” and do not seem “possible” without the Rwanda policy functioning.

Almost 3,000 migrants have made unauthorised crossings of the English Channel already this year.

Refugee Council chief executive Enver Solomon said the plans “shatter the UK’s long-standing commitment under the UN Convention to give people a fair hearing regardless of the path they have taken to reach our shores”.

“It’s unworkable, costly and won’t stop the boats,” he added.

Continue Reading

World

Iraqi PM frustrated with West’s ‘failures’ over Gaza

Published

on

By

Iraqi PM frustrated with West's 'failures' over Gaza

As uncertainty sweeps through the Middle East, Iraq’s prime minister has been focused on development, travelling to London to negotiate a series of deals on the economy and security.

Yet it is the prospect of stability offered by a ceasefire in Gaza that represents a more valuable prize and it was on this subject that Mohammed Shia’ al Sudani seemed particularly frustrated when he met Sky News at a central London hotel.

He said: “The decision to stop the war is not just up to the Israelis, there are other factors that play a part, like the international community.

“Iraq has been seeking international partners to stop this destructive war, which [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu has been trying to lengthen for various reasons, including internal political reasons that interest him. One of which is to embroil the region in all-out war to give him more time in office.”

Iraqi PM’s patience ‘running thin’

Disagreements and misunderstandings continue to bedevil the ceasefire deal and the imprecise wording contained within the agreement suggests that a respite from fighting could be short-lived. It was clear that Mr Sudani’s patience was running thin.

He said: “It’s more than 16 months now, that’s enough, it’s time for the international community to take action. It’s failed to carry its responsibilities in regards to the grave violations of the rules of war in Gaza.

More on Gaza

“Everyone realises that this war, this genocidal war, must stop and that efforts should be made, regionally and internationally, to reconstruct Gaza.”

Sir Keir Starmer does not use words like genocide to describe Israel’s activities in Gaza – but that is a symptom of the West’s failure, said Mr Sudani, to enforce the values they claim to advance.

Frustration over West’s ‘failures’

He said: “It is not only me but everyone is frustrated with the international community, the failure to recognise the rules of war, international law, humanitarian law, principles of human rights, ideals which everybody says they are fighting for but they’re not. All of these things are thrown against the wall.”

Keir Starmer welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al Sudani at 10 Downing Street,
Pic Reuters
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer welcomed the Iraqi PM to Downing Street on Tuesday. Pic Reuters

Mr Sudani told Sky News that he shared his exasperation with Sir Keir when the two men met this week, yet it seems he has not had the opportunity to do the same with US president-elect Donald Trump.

The Iraqi PM said: “There was a phone call to congratulate him because he won the presidential election. It was a positive call, we both expressed our desire to cooperate.”

Read more from Sky News:
Gaza faces huge task of rebuilding
Families of hostages wait for news
Starmer makes surprise visit to Kyiv

Many believe Mr Trump’s re-arrival on the international scene will foster greater instability in the Middle East with his affinity for right-wing Israeli objectives. Furthermore, Mr Trump ordered the killing of key Iranian military leader, Qassem Soleimani, in the Iraqi capital Baghdad during his first term.

Careful not to judge Trump

Yet Mr Sudani was careful not to venture an opinion on Mr Trump.

“This is the choice of the American people, we have to respect their choice, our relations with the US are based on institutions, they’re governed by questions of strategy,” he said.

The Iraqi prime minister performs a political high-wire act, as he tries to maintain relations with Western leaders as well as Tehran, which provides funding and training to a number of militia groups which form part of Iraq’s security forces.

Munitions were routinely fired at Israel by some of these groups as the war in Gaza escalated.

“We’re not embarrassed in any way, we carry out our duties to enforce the law, to maintain security and stability in Iraq and reject all means of violence. We won’t allow any side to dictate the decision between peace and war,” he said.

Mr Sudani says he is in control.

“Yes, yes, certainly.”

Continue Reading

World

Russian drone shot down near presidential palace during Starmer’s Ukraine visit

Published

on

By

Russian drone shot down near presidential palace during Starmer's Ukraine visit

Sir Keir Starmer’s visit to the presidential palace in Kyiv was met with a message from Russia when a drone was blasted out of the sky above.

The prime minister was meeting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss the next steps for Ukraine, on Sir Keir’s first visit to Kyiv since his election victory last July.

The sound of anti-aircraft gunfire was audible in the palace courtyard as air sirens warned of possible drone attacks. While air sirens blaring are a daily occurrence in Ukraine, it’s rare for drones to be shot out of the sky over the presidential palace.

One drone was shot down, although eyewitnesses think there were at least two drones operating and suspect they were probably surveillance drones, as the one taken out didn’t explode on impact.

President Zelenskyy gave his Russian enemies short shrift, saying when the drone was detected: “We will say hello to them too.”

Politics latest: UK to give Ukraine new air defence system

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer and Zelenskyy lay flowers at memorial

An audacious move by Moscow, Sir Keir said the drone threat was “a reminder of what Ukraine is facing every day” and that the war was brought about by “Russian aggression”.

The PM reiterated his support for Ukraine’s eventual accession to NATO, and noted the discussion at the NATO summit in Washington last year – when its allies put Ukraine on an “irreversible path” to NATO membership.

However, President Zelenskyy, perhaps with an eye on the incoming Trump administration, was more forthright in his response to the question of Western allies supporting Ukraine’s membership. He told reporters the US, Slovakia, Germany and Hungary “cannot see us in NATO”.

President Trump has recently acknowledged Moscow’s longstanding opposition to Ukraine’s ambition to join NATO, given it would mean, as the president-elect said: “Russia has somebody right on their doorstep, and I can understand their feeling about that.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer visits burns victims

‘Nothing is off the table’

This was a news conference big on symbolism as Sir Keir vowed to stand by Ukraine for as long as it takes and put Kyiv in the strongest possible position for negotiations with Russia.

He pledged to work with Ukraine in the months ahead to ensure security guarantees for the country in any ceasefire deal, while also opening the door to possible troop deployments in training or a peacekeeping capacity, saying “nothing is off the table”.

“We must be totally clear – a just and lasting peace comes through strength,” said Sir Keir.

Keir Starmer poses for photos with staff members at a hospital in Kyiv.
Pic: PA
Image:
Keir Starmer poses for photos with staff members at a hospital in Kyiv. Pic: PA

The PM also pledged to send 1,540 artillery barrels to Ukraine as President Zelenskyy called for more weapons, blaming Russia’s advance in the eastern part of Ukraine on the slow supply of weapons.

A new mobile defence system and a ramping up in the training of troops were also promised by Sir Keir.

President Zelenskyy also acknowledged in the news conference that much is uncertain around this conflict and what security guarantees Ukraine might get from its allies ahead of conversations with Trump.

Continue Reading

World

A ceasefire between Hamas and Israel brings hope, but there’s still great uncertainty about whether deal can last

Published

on

By

A ceasefire between Hamas and Israel brings hope, but there's still great uncertainty about whether deal can last

In a region bereft of hope, the prospect of a ceasefire represents a flicker of possibility – but make no mistake, there’s still a great deal of uncertainty about the deal.

If all goes well, the violence in Gaza which has ravaged the enclave for 467 long and brutal days will halt and hopefully lead to a better future.

However, the question remains – just how likely is the ceasefire deal to succeed in the long term?

Ceasefire deal latest: Dozens reported dead in Gaza strikes

The agreement will in the short term offer at least a pause from the fighting. It’s perhaps better to look at it in that context, as a cessation of hostilities rather than an actual ceasefire.

More than 45,000 Palestinians have been killed during Israel’s military campaign, according to the Hamas-led health ministry in Gaza.

Israel launched its response after around 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage in Hamas’s attacks on 7 October 2023.

For Israel, the deal in the first phase will see the release of 33 hostages who have been held inside the strip since they were kidnapped that day.

Supporters of Israeli hostages react to news on the Gaza ceasefire negotiations  in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
The first phase of the ceasefire will see 33 Israeli hostages released. Pic: Reuters

It is not lost on anyone though how difficult it’s been – after many false starts – to get to this point.

The deal itself is deliberately ambiguous and there’s a sense that it’s been left that way to simply get it across the line and started.

Much could still go wrong and there are more questions than there are answers.

Hamas is involved in the negotiations, but Israel has made it clear that it can have no place in post-war Gaza.

However, as an entity and fighting force, it is diminished but far from defeated.

It will almost certainly not give up power easily.

Read more:
What’s in the ceasefire deal?
World will be watching – this ceasefire could yet collapse

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gazans celebrate ceasefire deal

It is this ambiguity that raises the terrifying spectre that the fighting could start up again at any point – many of the main issues remain unresolved.

For instance, we still don’t know who will run Gaza in the longer term.

The international community’s answer to that is a reformed Palestinian authority but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said in the past that that’s not acceptable to Israel – neither is any role for Hamas.

As far as mediators are concerned, it seems there’s a hope that the deal can commence and then, over the six weeks of the first phase, more negotiations can take place – and hopefully, faith on both sides can be created to bring around a permanent ceasefire.

But if all of that collapses we could see a return to the violence.

There are also domestic considerations inside Israel – the deal in some respects is all things to all men.

It means Netanyahu can present it as both temporary or permanent, depending on who he’s speaking to or trying to appease.

But on an optimistic note, it does mean that as long as the negotiations continue, there’s no fighting.

People protest a ceasefire deal in Jerusalem, 16 January 2025. Pic: Reuters
Image:
People protesting against the ceasefire deal in Jerusalem. Pic: Reuters

More broadly it’s also worth bearing in mind that over the years there have been numerous attempts at ceasefire deals – most of which have ultimately failed to bring long-lasting peace to the region.

This pattern of repeated failures raises doubts about the likelihood of success this time.

Both sides have a long history of mistrust and animosity.

Continue Reading

Trending