Pac-12 spring preview: Star power at QB defines league in transition
-
Kyle Bonagura
Close
Kyle Bonagura
ESPN Staff Writer
- Covers the Pac-12.
- Joined ESPN in 2014.
- Attended Washington State University.
-
Paolo Uggetti
While the conference deals with its impending search for a new media deal and potential expansion in the wake of USC’s and UCLA’s 2024 departure to the Big Ten, this spring will be the first time we get to see glimpses of some of the Pac-12’s new additions as well as returning stars as it solidifies itself as the conference of quarterbacks.
USC’s Caleb Williams leads the charge after winning the Heisman last season as a sophomore while Oregon’s Bo Nix, Utah’s Cam Rising and Washington’s Michael Penix Jr. all opted to return to school for one more year. All four of those teams should enter and emerge from spring ball as the favorites.
But don’t overlook teams like Oregon State and Washington State. The former added Clemson quarterback D.J. Uiagalelei in the transfer portal while the latter has Cameron Ward coming back for another season. Rounding out the lineup is Kent State transfer Collin Schlee at UCLA (who will have to keep an eye on freshman Dante Moore), Notre Dame transfer Drew Pyne (who landed at Arizona State under new coach Kenny Dillingham) as well as returning starters Jayden de Laura (Arizona) and of course, Deion Sanders’ son Shedeur Sanders, who will be kickstarting a new era of Colorado football.
In what is already a transition year for the Pac-12, it may be staring at its best chance to get a team back into the College Football Playoff since Washington’s lone appearance in 2016.
Top storyline: Can Arizona’s defense improve? It’s hard to overstate how bad the Wildcats’ defense was last season. They were one of the worst 25 teams in the nation in both passing defense and rushing defense while having one of the 20 best offenses in the country. The disparity between the two units is stark, but it also means there’s plenty of room for improvement. Defense will certainly be the talk of spring camp, especially after the unit lost players like defensive lineman Kyon Barrs and corner Christian Roland-Wallace to USC in the transfer portal.
Newcomer to watch: Defensive lineman Bill Norton and linebacker Daniel Heimuli are two transfer additions that could help the lackluster unit head in the right direction while incoming four-star freshman linebacker Leviticus Su’a from California proves that head coach Jedd Fisch can recruit potentially elite defensive players, not just those on offense, too. All three will be players to watch in spring as Arizona continues to pry itself away from the bottom of the conference. — Uggetti
Top storyline: The hire of Kenny Dillingham to lead the Sun Devils could not have been more opposite than that of his predecessor, Herm Edwards. By all accounts, Dillingham appears to be the right man for the job given his allegiance to the school, his offensive acumen and recruiting prowess. Spring will be the first time we’ll get a look at how Dillingham fares as a head coach of a team that badly needs leadership and a brand new start. And as Dillingham surely saw at Oregon while he was an offensive coordinator there last year in Dan Lanning’s first year, that job isn’t easy.
Newcomer to watch: Drew Pyne. The effect of Dillingham’s hire has been felt immediately in not just the recruitment of five-star quarterback Jaden Rashada (who has now flipped to the Sun Devils), but the addition of Notre Dame‘s Pyne by way of the portal. Pyne threw for over 2,000 yards with 22 touchdowns and only six interceptions last year in South Bend and provides a more than reliable option for ASU at a position that has seen better days in Tempe. Pyne will provide a perfect option to bridge the gap between last season and Rashada’s eventual expected rise to starter. — Uggetti
Top storyline: The Justin Wilcox era has officially entered win-or-else territory. After five full seasons — plus the limited 2020 season — the Bears have yet to register a winning record in conference play under Wilcox and, even more troubling, have regressed each year since going 8-5 in 2019. That’s enough time to understand what to expect with Wilcox in Berkeley and if there isn’t significant improvement this season, it’s fair to expect a change. The timing is interesting here because had the plug been pulled last season (as the Bears went 4-8, 2-7), the logical replacement would have been former Cal quarterback Troy Taylor, who instead took the job at Stanford after David Shaw stepped down.
Newcomer to watch: Jake Spavital is back in Berkeley as the offensive coordinator after serving the past four seasons as head coach at Texas State. His return to Cal, where he served as the offensive coordinator for Sonny Dykes in 2016 — and, briefly, as the offseason interim head coach — represents a blow-it-up-and-start-over approach to the offense, which has been a glaring weakness during Wilcox’s tenure. — Bonagura
1:54
Deion Sanders not surprised by success of 1st recruiting class
Colorado coach Deion Sanders weighs in on his first recruiting class with the program.
Top storyline: Unlike in previous seasons, there are plenty of storylines and questions in and around the program at Boulder heading into this spring, but all of those more or less come back to the same overarching storyline: How will Deion Sanders begin to reshape a Division I program that needs not just help but a complete overhaul? That overhaul has already begun in myriad ways, but spring camp should be the first look at what Sanders (as well as the seven Jackson State players who followed him to Colorado) will bring to the table.
Newcomer to watch: Travis Hunter. After shocking the sport by getting Hunter (the No. 1 overall recruit last season) to pick Jackson State over Florida State, Sanders’ move west meant the Buffs were getting Hunter as well. Colorado isn’t in a place where one elite player could completely elevate their defense, but Hunter’s talent will inevitably raise their floor. — Uggetti
Top storyline: It’s Dan Lanning’s team now. What does that mean? Even in this era of college football, where turning over a roster is easier through the evolution of transfer rules, it’s hard for first-year coaches to play exactly how they want. Style of play is still dictated, to a degree, by the roster makeup. So, while Lanning turned in an impressive debut season in Eugene — 10-3, 7-2 in the conference — it was always part of a larger process. This isn’t unique, of course, but that dynamic is what makes this spring so interesting for the Ducks. There are still inherited players on the roster, but this is now, more or less, a team built in Lanning’s vision. It will be particularly interesting to see how that manifests on the defensive side, given Lanning’s history on that side of the ball.
Newcomer to watch: Offensive lineman Ajani Cornelius is one of the more interesting offseason transfers. An unheralded recruit coming out of high school in New York, he blossomed into one of the most sought-after players in the portal over the last two seasons at FCS Rhode Island. — Bonagura
Top storyline: Defining success in Corvallis this year will be difficult. Continued improvement? Maintain the level the Beavers showed in 2022? Only slight regression (considering the losses on defense)? It’s a matter of framing. Since Jonathan Smith took over prior to the 2018 season, the Beavers have made incremental progress each year to reach last year’s 10-3 season, capped by a win in the Las Vegas Bowl. It was just the third time in school history the Beavers won at least 10 games, so it should be remembered as an all-time great season. Except, at the same time, the Beavs only finished in fifth place and, despite the historical context, that’s hardly a satisfying spot in the standings.
Newcomer to watch: QB DJ Uiagalelei‘s arrival is among the most high-profile transfers in college football. He went from the next big thing to out of a job at Clemson due to inconsistent play. Either way, he represents a significant upgrade at the position for Oregon State, which has been held back by QB play in recent years. — Bonagura
Top storyline: New era, new vision. After overseeing the most successful period in school history, things just didn’t work for David Shaw at the end. A fresh set of ideas was needed and that’s what new coach Troy Taylor should provide. At Sacramento State, he took over a team that went 2-8 overall and 0-7 in the Big Sky Conference in 2018 and proceeded to lose just one conference game over the next three seasons (they did not play in 2020). Replicating that type of immediate turnaround will be significantly more difficult in this situation, but it does provide some optimism that Stanford can be competitive again.
Newcomer to watch: Taylor. Some more facts about Taylor at Sac State: The Hornets ranked No. 3 in total offense (499.8 yards per game) using a two-quarterback system in which QB Asher O’Hara was second on the team in passing yards (883) and rushing yards (938). — Bonagura
Top storyline: Who will replace Dorian Thompson-Robinson under center? After waving goodbye to his longtime, NFL-bound quarterback, Chip Kelly may have a good old fashioned quarterback battle on his hands. The Bruins plucked Kent State‘s Collin Schlee from the transfer portal and Schlee is set up well to take over the quarterback gig for the Bruins. Last season. Schlee threw for over 2,000 yards and 13 touchdowns (and ran for nearly 500 yards and four touchdowns) and has the potential to further excel in an offense like Kelly’s. Yet incoming recruit Dante Moore gives UCLA a five-star wunderkind who looks the part and could give Schlee a run at the position. Speaking of…
Newcomer to watch: The 17-year-old quarterback out of Michigan shocked the college football world last year when he flipped from Oregon to UCLA. Then, at the 2023 All-American bowl this year, Moore proceeded to show just how good he already is. In limited snaps at the bowl, Moore threw for four touchdowns and won the game’s MVP award. — Uggetti
Top storyline: It will be difficult for USC to convince the college football world it has done enough to improve its defense until the fall when games begin. Yet after leaving last season on a sour note following a bowl game loss to Tulane, defensive coordinator Alex Grinch’s unit will be the focus of spring camp. Lincoln Riley retained Grinch and reinforced his trust in him after an-up-down season that was buoyed by a historic turnover rate. But much will have to improve for the defense to achieve a level of play that will be enough to avoid getting in the way of what could once again be one of the best offenses in college football. The additions of players like defensive linemen Anthony Lucas and Kyon Barrs via the transfer portal should help.
Newcomer to watch: Dorian Singer. In the wake of Jordan Addison’s departure to the NFL, Heisman winner Caleb Williams will need a new No. 1 target. Spring could be the time when Singer — who transferred from Arizona after a 1,105-yard, six-touchdown season — may develop a crucial chemistry with Williams to ensure their partnership will be as productive. USC’s wide receiver room is full of talented players, but Singer has all the makings to emerge as its best. — Uggetti
Top storyline: What can Utah do to become a playoff contender? For a team that has now won the conference two seasons in a row, the only ceiling left to break through is the College Football Playoff. Last year, the Utes were a couple of close losses away from being in the field and though there’s little doubt Kyle Whittingham’s team will have another strong season across all position groups, it’s been evident that they’re still a cut below the nation’s elite teams. Rising’s return for another reason gives the Utes every opportunity to get to that level, but replacing players like tight end Dalton Kincaid and cornerback Clark Phillips III will be a challenge.
Newcomer to watch: Emery Simmons. The four-star wide receiver from Indiana hasn’t had a particularly stellar career so far, but his move to Salt Lake City could give the Utes a much-needed option on offense. Last year, Utah’s leading receiver was tight end Dalton Kincaid, who is now NFL-bound. Both returning receivers Devaughn Vele and Money Parks should play substantial roles in ensuring Rising has plenty of options next season. Spring could be a time for Simmons to get in the mix as well. — Uggetti
Top storyline: Is Washington a national title contender? It might seem ridiculous to ask that of a Pac-12 team given the conference’s history in the playoff era, but that’s what springtime is for. This is a team that returns most of its key offensive pieces — including Heisman candidate Michael Penix Jr. — from a team that ranked No. 7 in the country in scoring. And it did so in coach Kalen DeBoer’s first season. There are some questions to answer in the rushing game with starting RB Wayne Taulapapa gone, but there is every reason to believe this offense will be even better in 2023.
Newcomer to watch: Dillon Johnson is probably the player with the chance to make the biggest impact right away. The Mississippi State transfer arrives with over 1,000 career rushing yards and will compete for the starting running back job. — Bonagura
Top storyline: How much does the lack of continuity on the coaching staff matter? Appointing Jake Dickert as head coach was supposed to provide some stability for the Cougars after Nick Rolovich’s awkward departure. Instead, the Cougs are working with their third set of coordinators on both sides of the ball in three years. Common sense says that’s not ideal, but this group of players has been remarkably resilient through constant change. The Cougars have reached a bowl game in each of the last seven (full) seasons, which is a massive accomplishment considering the previous program record was three (2001 to 2003).
Newcomer to watch: Offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle. At Western Kentucky, Arbuckle coordinated the No. 7 offense in college football (497.2 yards per game) and best among the Group of 5. — Bonagura
The opening weekend of the 2025 MLB season was taken over by a surprise star — torpedo bats.
The bowling pin-shaped bats became the talk of the sport after the Yankees’ home run onslaught on the first Saturday of the season put it in the spotlight and the buzz hasn’t slowed since.
What exactly is a torpedo bat? How does it help hitters? And how is it legal? Let’s dig in.
Read: An MIT-educated professor, the Yankees and the bat that could be changing baseball
What is a torpedo bat and why is it different from a traditional MLB bat?
The idea of the torpedo bat is to take a size format — say, 34 inches and 32 ounces — and distribute the wood in a different geometric shape than the traditional form to ensure the fattest part of the bat is located where the player makes the most contact. Standard bats taper toward an end cap that is as thick diametrically as the sweet spot of the barrel. The torpedo bat moves some of the mass on the end of the bat about 6 to 7 inches lower, giving it a bowling-pin shape, with a much thinner end.
How does it help hitters?
The benefits for those who like swinging with it — and not everyone who has swung it likes it — are two-fold. Both are rooted in logic and physics. The first is that distributing more mass to the area of most frequent contact aligns with players’ swing patterns and provides greater impact when bat strikes ball. Players are perpetually seeking ways to barrel more balls, and while swings that connect on the end of the bat and toward the handle probably will have worse performance than with a traditional bat, that’s a tradeoff they’re willing to make for the additional slug. And as hitters know, slug is what pays.
The second benefit, in theory, is increased bat speed. Imagine a sledgehammer and a broomstick that both weigh 32 ounces. The sledgehammer’s weight is almost all at the end, whereas the broomstick’s is distributed evenly. Which is easier to swing fast? The broomstick, of course, because shape of the sledgehammer takes more strength and effort to move. By shedding some of the weight off the end of the torpedo bat and moving it toward the middle, hitters have found it swings very similarly to a traditional model but with slightly faster bat velocity.
Why did it become such a big story so early in the 2025 MLB season?
Because the New York Yankees hit nine home runs in a game Saturday and Michael Kay, their play-by-play announcer, pointed out that some of them came from hitters using a new bat shape. The fascination was immediate. While baseball, as an industry, has implemented forward-thinking rules in recent seasons, the modification to something so fundamental and known as the shape of a bat registered as bizarre. The initial response from many who saw it: How is this legal?
OK. How is this legal?
Major League Baseball’s bat regulations are relatively permissive. Currently, the rules allow for a maximum barrel diameter of 2.61 inches, a maximum length of 42 inches and a smooth and round shape. The lack of restrictions allows MLB’s authorized bat manufacturers to toy with bat geometry and for the results to still fall within the regulations.
Who came up with the idea of using them?
The notion of a bowling-pin-style bat has kicked around baseball for years. Some bat manufacturers made smaller versions as training tools. But the version that’s now infiltrating baseball goes back two years when a then-Yankees coach named Aaron Leanhardt started asking hitters how they should counteract the giant leaps in recent years made by pitchers.
When Yankees players responded that bigger barrels would help, Leanhardt — an MIT-educated former Michigan physics professor who left academia to work in the sports industry — recognized that as long as bats stayed within MLB parameters, he could change their geometry to make them a reality. Leanhardt, who left the Yankees to serve as major league field coordinator for the Miami Marlins over the winter, worked with bat manufacturers throughout the 2023 and 2024 seasons to make that a reality.
When did it first appear in MLB games?
It’s unclear specifically when. But Yankees slugger Giancarlo Stanton used a torpedo bat last year and went on a home run-hitting rampage in October that helped send the Yankees to the World Series. New York Mets star Francisco Lindor also used a torpedo-style bat last year and went on to finish second in National League MVP voting.
Who are some of the other notable early users of torpedo bats?
In addition to Stanton and Lindor, Yankees hitters Anthony Volpe, Austin Wells, Jazz Chisholm Jr., Cody Bellinger and Paul Goldschmidt have used torpedoes to great success. Others who have used them in games include Tampa Bay’s Junior Caminero, Minnesota’s Ryan Jeffers and Toronto’s Davis Schneider. And that’s just the beginning. Hundreds more players are expected to test out torpedoes — and perhaps use them in games — in the coming weeks.
How is this different from a corked bat?
Corking bats involves drilling a hole at the end of the bat, filling it in and capping it. The use of altered bats allows players to swing faster because the material with which they replace the wood — whether it’s cork, superballs or another material — is lighter. Any sort of bat adulteration is illegal and, if found, results in suspension.
Could a rule be changed to ban them?
Could it happen? Sure. Leagues and governing bodies have put restrictions on equipment they believe fundamentally altered fairness. Stick curvature is limited in hockey. Full-body swimsuits made of polyurethane and neoprene are banned by World Aquatics. But officials at MLB have acknowledged that the game’s pendulum has swung significantly toward pitching in recent years, and if an offensive revolution comes about because of torpedo bats — and that is far from a guarantee — it could bring about more balance to the game. If that pendulum swings too far, MLB could alter its bat regulations, something it has done multiple times already this century.
So the torpedo bat is here to stay?
Absolutely. Bat manufacturers are cranking them out and shipping them to interested players with great urgency. Just how widely the torpedo bat is adopted is the question that will play out over the rest of the season. But it has piqued the curiosity of nearly every hitter in the big leagues, and just as pitchers toy with new pitches to see if they can marginally improve themselves, hitters will do the same with bats.
Comfort is paramount with a bat, so hitters will test them during batting practice and in cage sessions before unleashing them during the game. As time goes on, players will find specific shapes that are most comfortable to them and best suit their swing during bat-fitting sessions — similar to how golfers seek custom clubs. But make no mistake: This is an almost-overnight alteration of the game, and “traditional or torpedo” is a question every big leaguer going forward will ask himself.
Sports
‘It’s taken on a life of its own’: Inside the 48 hours torpedo bats launched into baseball lore
At 1:54 ET on Saturday afternoon, New York Yankees play-by-play man Michael Kay lit the fuse on what will be remembered as either one of the most metamorphic conversations in baseball history or one of its strangest.
During spring training, someone in the organization had mentioned to Kay that the team’s analytics department had counseled players on where pitches tended to strike their bats, and with subsequent buy-in from some of the players, bats had been designed around that information. In the hours before the Yankees’ home game against the Brewers that day, Kay told the YES Network production staff about this, alerting them so they could look for an opportunity to highlight the equipment.
After the Yankees clubbed four homers in the first inning, a camera zoomed in on Jazz Chisholm Jr.‘s bat in the second inning. “You see the shape of Chisholm’s bat…” Kay said on air. “It’s got a big barrel on it,” Paul O’Neill responded, before Kay went on to describe the analysis behind the bat shaped like a torpedo.
Chisholm singled to left field, and after Anthony Volpe worked the count against former teammate Nestor Cortes to a full count, Volpe belted a home run to right field using the same kind of bat. A reporter watching the game texted Kay: Didn’t he hit the meat part of the bat you were talking about — just inside where the label normally is?
Yep, Kay responded. Within an hour of Kay’s commentary, the video of Chisholm’s bat and Kay’s exchange with O’Neill was posted on multiple platforms of social media, amplified over and over. What happened over the next 48 hours was what you get when you mix the power of social media and the desperation of a generation of beleaguered hitters. Batting averages are at a historic low, strikeout rates at a historic high, and on a sunny spring day in the Bronx, here were the Yankees blasting baseballs into the seats with what seemed to be a strangely shaped magic bat.
An oasis of offense had formed on the horizon, and hitters — from big leaguers to Little Leaguers, including at least one member of Congress — paddled toward it furiously. Acres of trees will be felled and shaped to feed the thirst for this new style of bats. Last weekend, one bat salesman asked his boss, “What the heck have we done?”
Jared Smith, CEO of bat-maker Victus, said, “I’ve been making bats for 15, 16 years. … This is the most talked-about thing in the industry since I started. And I hope we can make better-performing bats that work for players.”
According to Bobby Hillerich, the vice president of production at Hillerich & Bradsby, his company — which is based in Louisville, Kentucky, and makes Louisville Slugger bats — had produced 20 versions of the torpedo bat as of this past Saturday, and in less than a week, that number has tripled as players and teams continually call in their orders.
Even though Saturday marked its launch into the mainstream, this shape of bat has actually been around for a while. Hillerich & Bradsby had its first contact with a team about the style in 2021 and had nondisclosure agreements with four teams as the bat evolved; back then, it was referred to as the “bowling pin” bat. The Cubs’ Nico Hoerner was the first major leaguer to try it — and apparently wasn’t comfortable with it. Cody Bellinger tried it when he was with the Cubs before joining the Yankees during the offseason.
Before Atlanta took the field Sunday night, Braves catcher Drake Baldwin recalled trying one in the Arizona Fall League last year (noting that his first impression was that it “looked weird”). Mets shortstop Francisco Lindor used it in 2024, in a year in which he would finish second in the NL MVP voting; Lindor’s was a little different from Volpe’s version, with a cup hollowed out at the end of the bat. Giancarlo Stanton swung one throughout his playoff surge last fall, but no one in the media noticed, perhaps because of how the pitch-black color of Stanton’s bat camouflaged the shape.
Minnesota manager Rocco Baldelli saw one in the Twins’ dugout during spring training and picked it up, his attention drawn to the unusual shape. “What the hell is this thing?” he asked, wondering aloud whether the design was legal. When he was assured it was, he put it back down.
Baldelli’s experience reflected the way hitters have used and assessed bats since the advent of baseball: They’ll pick up bats and see how they feel, their interest fueled by the specter of success. Tony Gwynn won eight batting titles, and many teammates and opposing hitters — Barry Bonds among them — asked whether they could inspect his bats. The torpedo bat’s arrival was simply the latest version of that long-held search for the optimal tool.
On Opening Day, eight teams had some version of the torpedo bat within their stock, according to one major league source. But with video of the Yankees’ home runs being hit off unusual bats saturating social media Saturday afternoon, the phone of Kevin Uhrhan, pro bat sales rep for Louisville Slugger, blew up with requests for torpedo bats. James Rowson, the hitting coach of the Yankees, began to get text inquiries — about 100, he later estimated. Everyone wanted to know about the bat; everyone wanted to get their own.
In San Diego, Braves players asked about the bats, and by Sunday morning, equipment manager Calvin Minasian called in the team’s order. By the middle of the week, all 30 teams had asked for the bats. “Every team started trying to get orders in,” Hillerich said. “We’re trying to scramble to get wood. And then it was: How fast can we get this to retail?”
Victus produces the bats Chisholm and Volpe are using and has made them available for retail. Three senior players, all in their 70s, stopped by the Victus store to ask about the torpedoes. A member of Congress who plays baseball reached out to Louisville Slugger.
The Cincinnati Reds contacted Hillerich & Bradsby, saying, “We need you in Cincinnati on Monday ASAP,” and soon after, Uhrhan and pro bat production manager Brian Hillerich, Bobby’s brother, made the 90-minute drive from the company’s factory in Louisville with test bats.
Reds star Elly De La Cruz tried a few, decided on a favorite and used it for a career performance that night.
“You can think in New York, maybe there was wind,” Bobby Hillerich said. “Elly hits two home runs and gets seven RBIs. That just took it to a whole new level.”
A few days after the Yankees’ explosion, Aaron Leanhardt, who had led New York’s effort to customize its bats as a minor league hitting coordinator before being hired by the Marlins as their field coordinator, was in the middle of a horseshoe of reporters, explaining the background. “There are a lot more cameras here today than I’m used to,” he said, laughing.
Stanton spoke with reporters about the simple concept behind the bat: build a design for where a hitter is most likely to make contact. “You wonder why no one has thought of it before, for sure,” Stanton said. “I didn’t know if it was, like, a rule-based thing of why they were shaped like that.”
Over and over, MLB officials assured those asking: Yes, the bats are legal and meet the sport’s equipment specifications. Trevor Megill, the Brewers’ closer, complained about the bats, calling them like “something used in slow-pitch softball,” but privately, baseball officials were thrilled by the possibility of seeing offense goosed, something they had been attempting through rule change in recent years.
“It’s all the rage right now, given what transpired over the weekend,” said Jeremy Zoll, assistant general manager of the Twins. “I’m sure more and more guys are going to experiment with it as a result, just to see if it’s something they like.”
That personal preference is a factor for which some front office types believe the mass orders of the bats don’t account: The Yankees’ recommendations to each hitter were based on months of past data of how that player tended to strike the ball. This was not about a one-size-fits all bat; it was about precise bat measurements that reflected an individual player’s swing.
“I had never heard of it. I’ve used the same bat for nine years, so I think I’ll stick with that,” White Sox outfielder Andrew Benintendi said. “It’s pretty interesting. It makes sense. If it works for a guy, good for him. If it doesn’t, stick with what you got.”
As longtime player Eric Hosmer explained on the “Baseball Tonight” podcast, the process is a lot like what players can do in golf: look for clubs customized for a player’s particular swing. And, he added, hitting coaches might begin to think more about which bat might be most effective against particular pitchers. If a pitcher tends to throw inside, a torpedo bat could be more effective; if a pitcher is more effective outside, maybe a larger barrel would be more appropriate.
That’s the key, according to an agent representing a player who ordered a bat: “You need years of hitting data in the big leagues to dial it in and hopefully get a better result. He’s still tinkering with it; he may not even use it in a game. … I think of it like switching your irons in golf to blades: It will feel a little different and take some adjusting, and it may even change your swing subtly.”
Two days after the home run explosion, Boone said, “You’re just trying to just get what you can on the margins, move the needle a little bit. And that’s really all you’re going to do. I don’t think this is some revelation to where we’re going to be — it’s not related to the weekend that we had, for example. I don’t think it’s that. Maybe in some cases, for some players it may help them incrementally. That’s how I view it.”
“I’m kind of starting to smile at it a little more … a lot of things that aren’t real.”
Said the player agent: “It’s not an aluminum bat with plutonium in it like everyone is making it out to be.”
Reliever Adam Ottavino watched this all play out, with his 15 years of experience. “It’s the Yankees and they scored a million runs in the first few games, and it’s cool to hate the Yankees and it’s cool to look for the bogeyman,” Ottavino said, “and that’s what some people are going to do, and [you] can’t really stop that. But there’s also a lot of misinformation and noneducation on it too.”
Major league baseball mostly evolves at a glacial pace. For example, the sport is well into the second century of complaints about the surface of the ball and the debate over financial disparity among teams. From time to time, however, baseball has its eclipses, moments that command full attention and inspire change. On a “Sunday Night Baseball” game on May 18, 2008, an umpire’s botched home run call at Yankee Stadium compelled MLB to implement the first instant replay. Buster Posey’s ankle was shattered in a home plate collision in May 2011, imperiling the career of the young star, and new rules about that type of play were rewritten.
The torpedo bat eruption could turn out to be transformative, a time when the industry became aware how a core piece of equipment has been taken for granted and aware that bats could be more precisely designed to augment the ability of each hitter. Or this could all turn out to be a wild overreaction to an outlier day of home runs against a pitching staff having a really bad day.
On Thursday, Cortes — who had been hammered for five homers over two innings in Yankee Stadium — shut out the Reds for six innings.
In Baltimore, Bregman, who had tried the torpedo bat earlier this week, reverted to his usual stock and had three hits against the Orioles, including a home run. Afterward, Bregman said, “It’s the hitter. Not the bat.”
This story was also reported by Jeff Passan, Jorge Castillo, Jesse Rogers and Kiley McDaniel.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports12 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway