Connect with us

Published

on

US intelligence suggests a pro-Ukraine group was responsible for the damage caused to Nord Stream gas pipelines, according to reports.

There is no evidence Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy or other Ukrainian government officials were behind the attacks which caused natural gas to spew into the Baltic Sea, the New York Times has said citing US officials.

There have been no firm conclusions by the US officials who reviewed the intelligence, the paper adds.

The material reportedly suggests those who carried out the attacks oppose Russian President Vladimir Putin “but does not specify the members of the group, or who directed or paid for the operation”.

“Officials who have reviewed the intelligence said they believed the saboteurs were most likely Ukrainian or Russian nationals, or some combination of the two. US officials said no American or British nationals were involved,” according to the New York Times.

There have been months of speculation about who was responsible for the explosions affecting the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, which carry Russian gas to Germany via the Baltic Sea.

The leaks occurred in international waters but within the exclusive economic zone of Denmark and Sweden.

The damaged Nord Stream pipelines, which were built by Russia’s state-controlled energy company Gazprom, discharged huge amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, into the air for several days.

The United States and NATO called the pipeline attacks “an act of sabotage” while Moscow has blamed the West.

Denmark, Germany and Sweden said last month that their investigations into the attacks have not yet concluded.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From November 2022: Traces of explosives found on pipeline

The Kremlin has said in response to the New York Times reports that it is confused as to how US officials can assume anything about the attacks without investigation. Moscow has previously blamed the West for the explosions and said the US had questions to answer over its role in what may have happened.

“Obviously, the authors of the attack want to divert attention. Obviously, this is a coordinated stuffing in the media,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russia’s state-owned RIA news agency on Tuesday.

“How can American officials assume anything without an investigation?”

Mr Peskov also said that Nord Stream shareholder countries should insist on an urgent, transparent investigation.

“We are still not allowed in the investigation. Only a few days ago we received notes about this from the Danes and Swedes,” Mr Peskov said.

“This is not just strange. It smells like a monstrous crime.”

Meanwhile, Russia’s embassy to the United States has said the reports are an attempt to confuse those who are “sincerely” trying to get to the bottom of the case.

“We simply do not and cannot believe in any notion of the ‘impartiality’ of the conclusions of the US intelligence services.

“We regard the anonymous ‘leaks’ to be no more than an attempt to confuse anyone who sincerely wishes to seek out the truth in this flagrant crime,” the embassy said on the Telegram messaging platform.

“It is simply a means of shifting suspicion from those in official government positions who ordered and coordinated the
attacks in the Baltic Sea on to abstract individuals of some sort.”

Read more:
Ukraine war – latest: Russian planners face ‘dilemma’
How the Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been controversial from the start
Pipeline connecting Russia with Germany is symbol of how political decisions can become toxic

Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said the media reports on Tuesday underscored the need for Moscow’s questions about what happened to be answered.

Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior aide to the Ukrainian president, said Kyiv was “absolutely not involved” in the blasts and has no information about what happened.

Germany’s ARD broadcaster and Zeit newspaper reported on Tuesday – without citing sources – that German authorities were able to identify the boat used for the sabotage operation.

A group of five men and one woman, using forged passports, rented a yacht from a Poland-based company owned by Ukrainian citizens, the German media outlets reported. The nationality of the perpetrators is unclear, they reported.

Investigators found traces of explosives on the yacht, which the group took from Rostock, Germany on 6 September, according to ARD and Zeit.

They also reported that intelligence indicated a pro-Ukrainian group could be behind the attack, but German authorities have not yet found any evidence.

Continue Reading

US

Dismissal of criminal charges against opponents derails Trump’s revenge tour

Published

on

By

Dismissal of criminal charges against opponents derails Trump's revenge tour

The revenge tour has come off the rails.

Donald Trump had long promised retribution against his political enemies, but – to coin a phrase used around the White House – he’s f****ed around and found out that it doesn’t fly so easily through the courts.

His mistake was in choosing a pilot unable to fly the plane.

Lindsey Halligan is the lawyer who took the job of Trump-enforcer when others, better qualified, turned it down.

The prosecution of Trump’s adversaries would have been the job of Erik Siebert, US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, but he gave it a body swerve.

He had declined to prosecute the case against Letitia James, the New York attorney-general who successfully prosecuted the Trump organisation for business fraud.

Siebert concluded there were not sufficient grounds to prosecute, which didn’t please the president, and Seibert quit before he was pushed.

More on Donald Trump

A number of career prosecutors were similarly reluctant to take the case, leaving Trump checking availability.

That’s when he turned to Lindsey Halligan, an insurance lawyer by trade.

Her work experience didn’t necessarily suit the job brief – the prosecutor with the highest of profiles had no prosecutorial experience.

In pursuing the cases against Comey and James, she had to present evidence before a grand jury, something she hadn’t done before.

Letitia James and James Comey have had criminal charges against them dismissed. Pics: Reuters
Image:
Letitia James and James Comey have had criminal charges against them dismissed. Pics: Reuters

If that wasn’t ideal, that wasn’t all.

Something else Halligan didn’t have was the legal ability to do the job. Her appointment violated laws limiting the ability of the justice department to install top prosecutors.

It was an elementary error that didn’t pass by Judge Cameron Currie, who called it a “defective appointment”.

In setting aside the indictments against Comey and James, she wrote: “I conclude that all actions flowing from Ms Halligan’s defective appointment… constitute unlawful exercises of executive power.”

The US Department of Justice can appeal the move, so Comey and James haven’t reached road’s end.

Read more from Sky News:
US hails ‘tremendous progress’ on Ukraine peace plan
Trump changes tack on Marjorie Taylor Greene

But it’s a significant boost for both, and a significant blow for Trump.

He is the president in pursuit of sworn enemies, which his critics characterise as a weaponisation of the justice system.

Those same critics will point to the haste and impropriety on display as evidence of it, and take heart from a system offering a robust resistance.

Donald Trump appears undeterred. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said: “The facts of the indictments against Comey and James have not changed, and this will not be the final word on this matter.”

Letitia James is charged with bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. James Comey was charged with making false statements and obstructing a congressional investigation.

Trump fired Comey in 2017, while he was overseeing an investigation into alleged Russian interference in the Trump 2016 campaign.

Continue Reading

US

US hails ‘tremendous progress’ on Ukraine peace plan – but says negotiators ‘need more time’

Published

on

By

US hails 'tremendous progress' on Ukraine peace plan - but says negotiators 'need more time'

The US secretary of state has hailed a “tremendous amount of progress” on peace talks after the US and Ukraine delegations met in Geneva – but said that negotiators would “need more time”.

Marco Rubio said the meetings in Switzerland on Sunday have been “the most productive and meaningful” of the peace process so far.

He said the US was making “some changes” to the peace plan, seemingly based on Ukrainian suggestions, “in the hopes of further narrowing the differences and getting closer to something that both Ukraine and obviously the United States are very comfortable with”.

Mr Rubio struck an optimistic tone talking to the media after discussions but was light on the details, saying there was still work to be done.

US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Geneva after peace talks with Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
Image:
US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Geneva after peace talks with Ukraine. Pic: Reuters

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Analysis: Rubio strikes an optimistic tone – but is light on detail

“I don’t want to declare victory or finality here. There’s still some work to be done, but we are much further ahead today at this time than we were when we began this morning and where we were a week ago for certain,” Mr Rubio said.

He also stressed: “We just need more time than what we have today. I honestly believe we’ll get there.”

Sky News’ defence analyst Michael Clarke said on the initial US-Russian 28-point peace plan that it was Donald Trump against the world, with maybe only Moscow on his side.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is Trump’s plan a ‘capitulation document’?

Mr Rubio praised the Ukrainian attitude towards the talks and said Mr Trump was “quite pleased” after he previously said in a social media post that Ukraine’s leaders had expressed “ZERO GRATITUDE” for US efforts.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly address on Sunday that there are signs that “President Trump’s team hears us”.

In a news release on Sunday evening, the White House said the day “marked a significant step forward”.

“Ukrainian representatives stated that, based on the revisions and clarifications presented today, they believe the current draft reflects their national interests and provides credible and enforceable mechanisms to safeguard Ukraine’s security in both the near and long term,” it claimed.

Despite diplomatic progress in Geneva the finish line remains a long way off


John Sparks

John Sparks

International correspondent

@sparkomat

We’ve witnessed a day of determined and decidedly frantic diplomacy in this well-heeled city.

Camera crews were perched on street corners and long convoys of black vehicles swept down Geneva’s throughfares as the Ukrainians worked hard to keep the Americans on side.

Secretary of state Marco Rubio did not want to go into details at a press “gaggle” held at the US Mission this evening, but he seemed to think they had made more progress in the last 96 hours than the previous 10 months combined.

The Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy also seemed satisfied enough, posting on Telegram that there were “signals President Trump’s team is hearing us” after a day of “numerous meetings and negotiations”.

That said, we are a long way from the finish line here – something Rubio acknowledged when he said that any proposal agreed here would have to be handed over to the Russians.

At that point, negotiations to stop the war would surely get tougher.

President Putin has shown little or no inclination to stop the conflict thus far.

This, then, is the most important reason the Ukrainians seem determined to keep the Americans on side.

European leaders have presented a counter proposal to the widely criticised US-Russian peace plan, with suggestions including a cap on Ukraine’s peacetime army and readmitting Moscow into the G8.

This will only take place if the plan is agreed to by the US, Russia and Ukraine, and the G7 signs off on the move. Russia was expelled after annexing Crimea in 2014.

The counter proposal also includes US guarantees to Ukraine that mirror NATO’s Article 5 – the idea that “an armed attack against one NATO member shall be considered an attack against them all”.

Read more:
Who actually wrote US-Russian peace plan for Ukraine?
In full: Europe’s 28-point counter proposal to US-Russia plan

The initial peace plan was worked up by the White House and Kremlin without Ukraine’s involvement, and it acquiesces to many of Russia’s previous demands.

It covers a range of issues – from territorial concessions to reconstruction programmes, the future Ukrainian relationship with NATO and the EU, and educational reforms in both Ukraine and Russia.

US and Ukrainian officials are set to meet again today to continue work on the proposal.

It has also been reported that President Zelenskyy could travel to the US as early as this week to discuss the most sensitive aspects of the plan with President Trump.

Continue Reading

US

‘Couple of points of disagreement’ over Ukraine peace plan, says White House

Published

on

By

'Couple of points of disagreement' over Ukraine peace plan, says White House

The White House says there are still a “couple of points of disagreement” over the Ukraine peace plan.

The US and Ukraine said in a joint statement they had drafted a “refined peace framework” after discussions in Geneva on Sunday.

Europe tabled a counter-proposal to a US-Russia draft peace plan for Ukraine, both of which compromised of 28 points.

But speaking on Monday night, the Ukrainian president said: “As of now, after Geneva, there are fewer points – no longer 28 – and many of the right elements have been taken into account in this framework.

“There is still work for all of us to do together to finalise the document, and we must do everything with dignity.”

White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said there were “just a couple of points of disagreement” and the revised plan would need to be put to the Russians.

“There is a sense of urgency,” she added. “The president wants to see this deal come together, and to see this war end.”

Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House. Pic: AP
Image:
Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House. Pic: AP

Read more:
Fierce battle for key Ukrainian towns
In full: Europe’s 28-point counter proposal
Trump’s 28-point Ukraine peace plan in full

Following a US-backed 28-point plan, Ukraine’s European allies drew up a counter-proposal.

The counter-proposal would halt fighting at present front lines, leaving discussions of territory for later, and include a NATO-style US security guarantee for Ukraine.

Moscow, which described the initial reported US plan as a potential basis for an agreement, rejected the European version.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Russian drones devastate Kharkiv

Mr Trump, who had accused Ukraine of not being grateful enough for US military support while the talks were under way, on Monday suggested the process could be moving in the right direction.

He had earlier given Ukraine until Thursday to agree to the plan, but US secretary of state Marco Rubio downplayed the deadline, saying officials could keep negotiating.

Ukrainian troops fire near the frontline town of Pokrovsk. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Ukrainian troops fire near the frontline town of Pokrovsk. Pic: Reuters

In a message on his Truth Social platform, the US president said: “Is it really possible that big progress is being made in Peace Talks between Russia and Ukraine???

“Don’t believe it until you see it, but something good just may be happening.”

His latest comments come after he said Ukraine leadership had expressed “ZERO GRATITUDE” for US efforts in a longer post on Sunday.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Ukraine’s allies in the “coalition of the willing” – a broad term for about 30 countries supporting Kyiv – will hold discussions about the negotiations on Tuesday by video.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The fight for key Ukrainian towns

Mr Trump on Monday held a phone call with China’s President Xi Jinping, where they discussed bringing the Ukraine war to an end, the White House said.

Mr Xi urged “all parties” in the conflict to “reduce differences”, according to Chinese state news agency Xinhua.

He reiterated that China supported all efforts conducive to peace.

China has remained a consistent ally of Russia throughout its invasion of Ukraine, and is the top buyer of Russian oil, along with India.

Continue Reading

Trending