Connect with us

Published

on

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have publicly used the titles prince and princess for their children Archie and Lilibet for the first time.

They used the title princess for their daughter, known as Lili for short, when she was christened in Los Angeles on Friday.

It was the first time Lilibet has been publicly referred to as a princess.

Why did Archie and Lilibet not previously have their royal titles?

Technically Harry and Meghan’s children became a prince and princess when the King acceded to the throne, but they have remained “master” and “miss” on the Buckingham Palace website for the last six months.

The palace has confirmed the site’s line of succession list would now be updated to reflect the change, after a spokesperson for the Sussexes publicly referred to Lilibet as a princess when announcing news of her christening.

Title rules set out by King George V in 1917 gave the children and grandchildren of a sovereign the automatic right to the HRH, prince and princess titles.

When Archie was born, he was the great-grandchild of a sovereign rather than a grandchild, so was not given the title.

However, when the Queen died and her son King Charles acceded to the throne, it meant Archie and Lilibet were entitled to be a prince and princess.

They are also entitled to use the HRH style – although Harry and Meghan retain their HRH styles, they no longer use them after leaving the working monarchy.

Read more:
Princess Lilibet Diana christened in LA

Charles ‘very emotional’ at first meeting with Lilibet

Lilibet at an 'intimate and casual backyard picnic' for her birthday. Pic: Misan Harriman
Image:
Lilibet. Pic: Misan Harriman

How will the titles be used?

It is understood the titles will be used in formal settings but not in everyday conversational use.

As such, the announcement of Lillibet’s baptism in California was the first opportunity to use her title since the death of the Queen.

Harry and Meghan are keen not to deny their children their birthright, but wish to allow them the chance to decide for themselves when they are older whether to drop or keep using the royal titles.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Meghan claimed Archie was not given title because of his race

In an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, Meghan complained that Archie was not automatically given the title of prince.

“They didn’t want him to be a prince or princess, not knowing what the gender would be, which would be different from protocol, and [said] that he wasn’t going to receive security,” Meghan said.

Asked if she was bothered her son was not going to be given the title, she said: “All the grandeur surrounding this stuff is an attachment I don’t personally have. I have been a waitress, an actress, a princess, a duchess, and I’ve always just been Meghan.

“The most important title I will ever have is Mom but the idea of our son not being safe and also the idea of the first member of colour in this family not being titled in the same way that other grandchildren would be…”

She said the convention of whether her children would be princes or princesses was changed while she was pregnant: “It’s not their right to take it away… While I was pregnant they said they want to change the convention for Archie. Well, why?”

However, when he was born seventh in line to the throne in May 2019, Archie was too far down the line of succession – though he was a great-grandchild of the monarch, he was not a first-born son of a future king, so was not automatically a prince.

Could King Charles remove Archie and Lilibet’s royal titles?

It was previously reported in 2021 that Charles intended, when he became monarch, to prevent Archie from becoming a prince in a bid to limit the number of key royals.

To do so he would have to issue a Letters Patent amending Archie’s right to be a prince and Lilibet’s right to be a princess.

It is understood the King was aware beforehand that the Sussexes intended to refer to their daughter as Princess Lili.

Continue Reading

UK

Two arrested on suspicion of murder after disappearance of woman in South Wales

Published

on

By

Two arrested on suspicion of murder after disappearance of woman in South Wales

Police investigating the disappearance of a woman in South Wales have arrested two people on suspicion of murder.

Paria Veisi, 37, was last seen around 3pm on Saturday 12 April when she left her workplace in the Canton area of Cardiff.

She was driving her car, a black Mercedes GLC 200, which was later found on Dorchester Avenue in the Penylan area on the evening of Tuesday 15 April.

South Wales Police said it was now treating her disappearance as a murder investigation.

A 41-year-old man and a 48-year-old woman, both known to Ms Veisi, have been arrested on suspicion of murder and remain in police custody.

Detective Chief Inspector Matt Powell said he currently had “no proof that Paria is alive”.

The senior investigating officer added: “[Ms Veisi’s] family and friends are extremely concerned that they have not heard from her, which is totally out of character.

“Paria’s family has been informed and we are keeping them updated.

“We have two people in custody, and at this stage we are not looking for anybody else in connection with this investigation.

“Our investigation remains focused on Paria’s movements after she left work in the Canton area on Saturday April 12.

“Extensive CCTV and house-to-house inquiries are being carried out by a team of officers and I am appealing for anybody who has information, no matter how insignificant it may seem, to make contact.”

Read more from Sky News:
Zelenskyy hits out at US envoy
Four killed in Naples cable car crash

Ms Veisi is described as having long, curly black hair.

She was last seen wearing a black zip-up gym top over a red top, black trousers and trainers, and was carrying a small handbag.

Continue Reading

UK

UB40 say striking Birmingham bin workers ‘shouldn’t give up’

Published

on

By

UB40 say striking Birmingham bin workers 'shouldn't give up'

Birmingham band UB40 say the city’s striking bin workers and their union should “keep fighting” in their dispute over pay.

It comes as the government and the council urged them to accept a “fair and reasonable offer”.

“We’re fully on their side,” drummer Jimmy Brown told Sky News. “I think they shouldn’t give up, they should still be fighting.

“Working people shouldn’t have to take a reduction in their incomes, which is what we’re talking about here.

“We’re talking about people being paid less and it seems to me with prices going up, heating, buying food, inflation and rents going up then people need a decent wage to have a half decent life… keep going boys!”

Members of Unite on the picket line in Tyseley, Birmingham, amid an ongoing refuse workers' strike in the city. Birmingham City Council says it is declaring a major incident over the impact of the ongoing bin strike, as it estimates 17,000 tonnes of waste remains uncollected around the city. Picture date: Tuesday April 1, 2025.
Image:
Members of the Unite union in Birmingham earlier this month. Pic: PA

Workers joined picket lines again on Thursday, with some fearing they could be up to £600 a month worse off if they accept the terms.

“We have total utter support for the bin men and all trade unions,” said guitarist Robin Campbell.

“The other side is always going to say they’ve made a reasonable offer – the point is they’re the ones who’ve messed up, they’re the ones who’ve gone bankrupt, they’re the ones now trying to reduce the bin men’s wages.”

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Lead singer Matt Doyle told Sky News: “It’s a shame that what we’re seeing is all the images of rats and rubbish building up, that is going to happen inevitably, but we’ve just got to keep fighting through that.”

About 22,000 tonnes of rubbish accumulated on the city’s streets after a major incident was declared last month by Birmingham City Council.

Rubbish bags in Poplar Road in Birmingham.  
Pic: PA
Image:
Rubbish has blighted the city’s streets for weeks . Pic: PA

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Bin situation ‘pains me’ – council boss

On a visit to the city, local government minister Jim McMahon said the union and local authority should continue to meet in “good faith” and the government felt there was a deal that could be “marshalled around”.

He paid tribute to the “hundreds of workers” who have worked “around the clock” to clear the rubbish.

Read more:
Bin workers urged to accept ‘fair’ offer
Military planners help with bin crisis

“As we stand here today, 85% of that accumulated waste has been cleared and the council have a plan in place now to make sure it doesn’t accumulate going forward,” said Mr McMahon.

Sky News understands talks are not set to resume until next week.

Continue Reading

UK

Trans women to be strip searched by male transport police after court ruling

Published

on

By

Trans women to be strip searched by male transport police after court ruling

Trans women in British Transport Police custody will now be strip searched by male officers – not female – following Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling.

The force said it is introducing an “interim position” while it digests the Supreme Court’s decision that the definition of a “woman” under the Equality Act 2010 refers to “a biological woman and biological sex”.

A British Transport Police (BTP) Authority spokesman told Sky News: “Under previous policy, we had advised that someone with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) may be searched in accordance with their acquired sex.

“However, as an interim position while we digest today’s judgment, we have advised our officers that any same sex searches in custody are to be undertaken in accordance with the biological birth sex of the detainee.”

Politics latest: Badenoch responds to Jenrick WhatsApp mishap

In September last year, BTP, which is responsible for policing the UK’s railways and similar transport systems, published its “position” on transgender and non-binary officers carrying out strip searches.

It said officers would “only be able to search persons of the same sex on their birth or gender recognition certificate (GRC).

Officers who identified as another gender but who did not have a GRC were not allowed to, but if a trans woman had a certificate, they could strip search a female detainee.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gender ruling – How it happened

Strip searches involve the removal of more than a jacket, outer coat, gloves, headwear and footwear.

They “expose buttocks, genitalia and (female) breasts”, the BTP guidance says.

The Sex Matters campaign applied for a judicial review of that guidance with the High Court in December.

It said the policy “puts detainees at risk of sexual harassment and sexual assault”, and said it was a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.

Sex Matters said the policy “also puts female officers in a humiliating and dangerous position, as they may be pressured to search trans-identified men”.

Read more: NHS must stop trans people being allowed on single-sex wars

Campaigners celebrate outside the Supreme Court in London after terms "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex, the Supreme Court has ruled. Picture date: Wednesday April 16, 2025.
Image:
Campaigners celebrated outside the Supreme Court after Wednesday’s ruling. Pic: PA

One of the High Court judges who made Wednesday’s decision, Lord Hodge, said the ruling should not be read as “a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another”.

Government minister Karin Smyth told Sky News public bodies have been told to look at how equality laws are implemented following the ruling.

She said: “Obviously, public bodies have been asked to look at their own guidance.

“And we will do that very, very carefully.”

But she warned against public bodies making statements “that may alarm people”, telling them to take their time to look at their guidance.

Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chair of the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), said the ruling means there is “no confusion” now.

She said the NHS will “have to change” its 2019 policy, which says transgender patients are entitled to be accommodated on single-sex wards matching how they identify.

Continue Reading

Trending