Connect with us

Published

on

The Oscars is a ceremony designed to celebrate the year’s best films and the people who made them, but often the awards themselves get overshadowed by other events.

In recent years we’ve seen the wrong film announced as best picture, #Oscarssowhite trending on social media and of course, last year’s now infamous slap by Will Smith, who later went back on stage to accept the award for best actor.

This year the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, who are behind the ceremony, have for the first time implemented a crisis team who will be on hand should anything unexpected happen.

In preparation the team have been tasked with running practice scenarios, with the intention that they will react instantly should something controversial take place.

But it’s not something that seems to have impacted plans for the show itself.

Speaking at a press conference, the executive producer and showrunner of this year’s Oscars, Glen Weiss, says at the many events he’s worked at there have always been teams in place to deal with difficult moments, but it’s not something he’s focusing on.

“We put on the entertainment, the secret service takes on the other stuff,” he said.

Last month the Academy’s new president (she took on the role last summer) Janet Yang told attendees at the Oscars Nominees Luncheon (an annual event that takes place in the weeks before the awards for those nominated) that she thought changes were necessary following what she described as last year’s “unprecedented event”.

“What happened on stage was wholly unacceptable and the response from the organisation was inadequate,” Ms Yang said.

“We learned from this that the Academy must be fully transparent and accountable in our actions and particularly in times of crisis.”

Will Smith accepts the award for best performance by an actor in a leading role for King Richard. Pic: AP Photo/Chris Pizzello
Image:
Will Smith accepts the award for best actor after slapping Chris Rock. Pic: AP Photo/Chris Pizzello

“We must act swiftly, compassionately and decisively for ourselves and for our industry – you should and can expect no less from us going forward.”

“We are committed to maintaining the highest of standards while creating the changes we wish to see in our industry.”

So, with a crisis team now in place, what are the chances they will actually be called upon? It’s not as if anyone could have predicted the slap ahead of last year’s Oscars.

But Academy CEO Bill Kramer, who is also new, having been in the position since last July, has told Time they have already in fact been put to work after the nominations came under fire following a very short and targeted campaign for Andrea Riseborough.

It saw a week of heavy promotion on social media for the actress’s performance in To Leslie by Hollywood heavyweights including Jennifer Aniston, Ed Norton and fellow nominee Cate Blanchett.

When she was shortlisted for the lead actress award, some critics queried whether the nominations process is fit for purpose.

Mr Kramer told Time the Academy was “much more ready to handle the campaign regulations discussion” thanks to the crisis team.

“That happened on a Tuesday and, six days later, we were able to issue our formal statement from the board that really carved out a plan for us,” he said.

“So you never know exactly what’s going to happen.”

Read more:
Top Gun: Maverick – Pro-Ukraine group calls on Academy to ‘review eligibility’ of sequel for Oscars
Hollywood’s brightest stars on what it feels like to be nominated for an Oscar

Mr Kramer added: “But you have to have the teams and frameworks in place and the processes in place, to come together to figure things out quickly.”

“But also making sure that you have the right groups of members and leaders and stakeholders who can come together to have a voice in this conversation.”

The Academy has faced criticism in the past for being slow to change, but it seems perhaps lessons have now been learned, and with the Oscars still pulling in millions of viewers around the world (despite declining viewing figures) all eyes will be on the organisation – and its crisis team – should the unexpected happen.

You can watch the Academy Awards on Sunday 12 March from 11pm exclusively on Sky News and Sky Showcase.

Plus, get all the intel from our Oscars special Backstage podcast, available wherever you get your podcasts, from Monday morning.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Appeal to bring manslaughter charge against Alec Baldwin over 2021 Rust shooting dropped by prosecutor

Published

on

By

Appeal to bring manslaughter charge against Alec Baldwin over 2021 Rust shooting dropped by prosecutor

Alec Baldwin will not appear again in court for involuntary manslaughter over a fatal shooting on the set of Rust after New Mexico prosecutors dropped their appeal.

The trial against him earlier this year collapsed after just three days over testimony that prosecutors had withheld potential evidence from the defence.

Baldwin was holding a gun which went off on the set in New Mexico in 2021, killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.

The 66-year-old, an actor and co-producer on the film, denied ever pulling the trigger and said he had been directed to aim it at a camera.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From July: Baldwin case dismissed by judge

After the trial had ended, special prosecutor Kari Morrissey filed an appeal and claimed the case was “improperly dismissed” by Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer.

The state’s district attorney’s office said on Monday that while it still strongly disagreed with the judge’s decision, it “did not intend to exhaustively pursue the appeal”.

Local prosecutors added: “As a result, the State’s efforts to continue to litigate the case in a fair and comprehensive manner have been met with multiple barriers that have compromised its ability to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.”

More on Alec Baldwin

Baldwin’s lawyers Luke Nikas and Alex Spiro said the decision “is the final vindication of what Alec Baldwin and his attorneys have said from the beginning – this was an unspeakable tragedy but Alec Baldwin committed no crime”.

It means Judge Marlowe Sommer’s original ruling – that the case accusing Baldwin of involuntary manslaughter has been dismissed and cannot be filed again – stands.

Special prosecutor Kari Morrissey looks on during US actor Alec Baldwin's trial for involuntary manslaughter at Santa Fe County District Court in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on July 12, 2024. In October 2021, on the New Mexico set of the Western movie "Rust," a gun pointed by Baldwin discharged a live round, killing the film's cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding its director. RAMSAY DE GIVE/Pool via REUTERS
Image:
Kari Morrissey was told the Attorney General’s office ‘did not intend to exhaustively pursue’ the case. Pic: Ramsay de Give/Pool Photo via Reuters

The case collapsed when Baldwin’s defence team learnt the Santa Fe sheriff’s office had taken possession of live rounds as potential evidence on the same day the film’s armourer, Hannah Gutierrez, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

Investigators did not list these live rounds in the Rust file and they were not disclosed to defence lawyers, prompting a motion to dismiss the case.

After Mr Spiro claimed evidence had been concealed on day three of the trial, Ms Morrissey called herself as a witness and said the ammunition was not connected to the case.

Read more from Sky News:
Wham! make chart history with Last Christmas
Amber Heard reacts to Lively’s complaint about Baldoni

In a bizarre moment, Mr Spiro put it to Ms Morrissey during questioning that she simply did not “like Mr Baldwin very much”.

After she replied “that is absolutely untrue” and praised his acting and politics, Mr Spiro told the court that she had referred to the actor as a “c*********” and an “arrogant p****” to witnesses. She said she did not recall this.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From July: Watch extraodinary moment in Baldwin case

Dismissing the trial, Judge Marlowe Sommer found the prosecution’s conduct on the live rounds was “highly prejudicial” to Baldwin and there was “no way for the court to right this wrong”.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Crocodile from hit film Crocodile Dundee dies peacefully, zoo says

Published

on

By

Crocodile from hit film Crocodile Dundee dies peacefully, zoo says

The iconic crocodile who starred in hit film Crocodile Dundee has died, his zoo has announced.

Crocosaurus Cove, where Burt had been kept since 2008, said he passed away “peacefully” over the weekend.

He was estimated to be over 90 years old, well over the usual life expectancy.

“Burt was truly one of a kind. He wasn’t just a crocodile; he was a force of nature and a reminder of the power and majesty of these incredible creatures,” the zoo said.

“While his personality could be challenging, it was also what made him so memorable and beloved by those who worked with him and the thousands who visited him over the years.

“Visitors from around the globe marvelled at his impressive size and commanding presence, especially at feeding time.”

Burt was captured for the first time in the 1980s, the zoo said, and he appeared in Crocodile Dundee just before Christmas in 1986.

He starred alongside Paul Hogan in the film, helping to “shape Australia’s image as a land of rugged natural beauty and awe-inspiring wildlife”.

Known for his “independent nature”, the zoo said Burt was a “confirmed bachelor” with a “fiery temperament”, which earned him the respect of caretakers and visitors.

“As we mourn his loss, we are reminded of the vital role wildlife plays in our shared history and the importance of preserving it for future generations,” the zoo added.

Read more:
The notable deaths of 2024
What to know for new Lion King

The average saltwater crocodile usually lives up to 70 years.

Crocosaurs Cove said it plans to install a commemorative sign to celebrate his “extraordinary life and the stories and interactions he shared throughout his time at the park”.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

What texts and messages Blake Lively’s legal complaint against It Ends With Us co-star show

Published

on

By

What texts and messages Blake Lively's legal complaint against It Ends With Us co-star show

Documents from actress Blake Lively’s legal complaint about her It Ends With Us co-star Justin Baldoni claim to show how his PR team deliberately “planted pieces of how horrible Blake is to work with” in the press and on social media.

The legal complaint, filed to the California Civil Rights Department on Friday, contains pages of text messages allegedly sent between Baldoni and his PR team.

Lively, 37, claims that Baldoni, 40, who is also the director of the film, hired crisis PR management to engage in a “multi-tiered” plan to damage her reputation after she and her husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, complained of “repeated sexual harassment and other disturbing behaviour” on set of the movie.

Lively at the UK gala screening for the film on 8 August. Pic: AP
Image:
Lively at the UK gala screening for the film on 8 August. Pic: AP

A lawyer representing Baldoni and his production company Wayfarer Studios says the allegations are “completely false, outrage and intentionally salacious”.

He adds that the studio and its PR team “did nothing proactive nor retaliated” against Lively – and that it hired crisis PR managers “due to the multiple demands and threats made by Ms Lively during production”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Blake Lively on being an actor and producer

The text messages, which Lively says she acquired through a subpoena, involve exchanges between Jennifer Abel, of PR firm RWA Communications, Melissa Nathan, of The Agency Group PR, and Baldoni.

They include:

  • Details of two quotes of PR packages – one costing “£175k” for a “3-4 month period” including “full reddit, full social account take downs”;
  • Another PR package costing “$25k per month” for “min 3 months” that includes “creation of social fan engagement to go back and forth with any negative accounts, helping to change the narrative and stay on track”;
  • Baldoni asking Ms Abel “What is the TikTok strategy” and saying “I’d like you guys to start posting me ONLY talking about domestic violence and clips and why this movie is so important”;
  • Ms Abel telling Ms Nathan she was “having reckless thoughts of wanting to plant pieces this week of how horrible Blake is to work with”;
  • Ms Abel saying: “The narrative online is so freaking good and fans are still sticking up for Justin” and telling Ms Nathan “you did such amazing work”;
  • Ms Nathan telling Ms Abel: “The majority of socials are so pro Justin and I don’t even agree with half of them lol”;
  • Ms Nathan replying to Ms Abel: “Narrative is CRAZY good”;
  • Ms Nathan telling Ms Abel: “We can’t write it down to him… We can’t write we will destroy her”;
  • Ms Nathan adding: “you know we can bury anyone”;
  • Ms Nathan saying to Ms Abel: “Don’t worry, I didn’t kill her and send her in a box to your house”, to which Abel replies: “DAMNIT”;
  • Ms Nathan telling Ms Abel socials are “really really ramping up”, to which Ms Abel adds: “It’s actually sad because it just shows you have people really want to hate on women”.

The text messages appear to date between 15 May and 18 August this year. It Ends With Us was released on 9 August.

In one other exchange, Baldoni expresses concerns his PR team may have been deploying fake “bots” to “take her [Lively] down” on social media, to which Ms Nathan replies: “I can fully confirm we do not have bots.”

The legal documents also include the alleged list of conditions Lively submitted for her “returning to production” after she alleged sexual harassment on set.

They include “no one entering… BL’s trailer while she is in a state of undress” and “no discussions of personal experience with sex or nudity”.

Lively’s legal complaint claims Baldoni “abruptly pivoted away from” the film’s marketing plan and “used domestic violence ‘survivor content’ to protect his public image” after the sexual harassment allegations came out.

Justin Baldoni at the world premiere in New York on 6 August. Pic: AP
Image:
Baldoni at the world premiere in New York on 6 August. Pic: AP

Baldoni brands Lively’s claims ‘shameful’

Mr Freedman, representing Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios, says in his statement: “It is shameful that Ms. Lively and her representatives would make such serious and categorically false accusations against Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and its representatives, as yet another desperate attempt to ‘fix’ her negative reputation which was garnered from her own remarks and actions during the campaign for the film; interviews and press activities that were observed publicly, in real time and unedited, which allowed for the internet to generate their own views and opinions.

“These claims are completely false, outrageous and intentionally salacious with an intent to publicly hurt and rehash a narrative in the media. Wayfarer Studios made the decision to proactively hire a crisis manager prior to the marketing campaign of the film, to work alongside their own representative with Jonesworks employed by Stephanie Jones, due to the multiple demands and threats made by Ms. Lively during production which included her threatening to not showing up to set, threatening to not promote the film, ultimately leading to its demise during release, if her demands were not met.

“It was also discovered that Ms. Lively enlisted her own representative, Leslie Sloan with Vision PR, who also represents Mr. Reynolds, to plant negative and completely fabricated and false stories with media, even prior to any marketing had commenced for the film, which was another reason why Wayfarer Studios made the decision to hire a crisis professional to commence internal scenario planning in the case they needed to address.

“The representatives of Wayfarer Studios still did nothing proactive nor retaliated, and only responded to incoming media inquiries to ensure balanced and factual reporting and monitored social activity. What is pointedly missing from the cherry-picked correspondence is the evidence that there were no proactive measures taken with media or otherwise; just internal scenario planning and private correspondence to strategize which is standard operating procedure with public relations professionals.”

Lively says in a statement to the New York Times: “I hope that my legal action helps pull back the curtain on these sinister retaliatory tactics to harm people who speak up about misconduct and helps protect others who may be targeted.”

The August release of It Ends With Us, an adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling 2016 novel, was shrouded by speculation over discord between the lead pair.

Baldoni took a backseat in promoting the film while Lively took centre stage along with Reynolds, who was on the press circuit for Deadpool & Wolverine at the same time.

Sky News has contacted Jessica Abel and RWA Communications for comment.

Continue Reading

Trending