Silicon Valley investors and founders express shock, describe struggles to get money out of SVB
Nikolas Kokovlis | Nurphoto | Getty Images
Venture capitalists and technology executives are scrambling to make sense and account for the potential repercussions of the sudden implosion of Silicon Valley Bank on Friday.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said Friday that U.S. federal regulators shut down Silicon Valley Bank, the premiere financial institution for Silicon Valley tech startups for the past 40 years. The collapse of SVB represents the biggest banking failure since the 2008 global economic crises.
Numerous venture investors and technology executives expressed shock to CNBC, some comparing SVB’s current debacle to the Lehman Brothers, which filed for bankruptcy in 2008. Many of the investors and execs requested anonymity discussing matters that might affect their firms and employees.
General sentiment is that SVB did a poor job communicating to clients when it announced earlier this week that it would be raising $500 million from venture firm General Atlantic while also unloading holdings worth roughly $21 billion at a loss of $1.8 billion. One VC said the fact for SVB to announce that it’s raising money while at the same time essentially saying that everything is “fine,” seemed to trigger people’s memories of Lehman Brothers, who they remember acted similarly at the time.
“So unfortunately, they repeated mistakes in history and anyone who lived through that period said, ‘Hey, maybe they’re not fine; we were told that last time,'” the VC said.
SVB attempted to quell any fears that it was financially unsound as late as Thursday evening.
In one email that SVB sent to a customer, a copy of which CNBC obtained, the bank characterized the rumors about its problems as “buzz about SVB in the markets” and attempted to reassure the customer that it “launched a series of strategic actions to strengthen our financial position, enhance profitability and improve financial flexibility now and in the future.”
“It is business as usual at SVB,” the bank said in the email to startups. It added toward the end of the email, “Moreover, we have a 40 year history navigating bear and bull markets and have developed leading risk mitigation capabilities to ensure our long term financial health.”
Another venture capitalist said that a representative from Silicon Valley Bank called their firm on Thursday to assuage their fears, but that the firm’s CFO “didn’t feel that it was reassuring, to say the least.”
However, one tech CEO was sympathetic to the bank’s plight, asking, “What message would ever reassure you that your money is safe when other people are telling you that there’s a fraud happening? There’s no message because it’s not a messaging thing. It’s the prisoner’s dilemma thing is everybody at that moment now has to try and imagine what everybody else is going to do.”
When asked for comment, a representative from SVB referred CNBC back to the FDIC announcement. “The FDIC will share additional information when it is available.”
‘A Twitter-led bank run’
Several venture capitalists quickly told their portfolio companies to move money out of Silicon Valley Bank to other banks, including Merrill Lynch, First Republic, and JP Morgan, so they could pay their employees on time next week.
One AI startup executive noted that the company’s chief financial officer was quick to handle the situation, and it had enough money to pay employees on time. Still, the collapse of SVB left a poor taste in the executive’s mouth, who said that the bank’s collapse feels like “unnecessary hysteria.”
“It makes me disappointed in our ecosystem,” the startup CEO said.
Many venture capitalists echoed the startup CEO’s sentiment that the SVB collapse felt like a self-fulfilling prophecy created by unnecessary panic. Some likened it to a “Twitter-led bank run,” as the tech community took to social media to spread information, and, often, panic. One prominent technology CEO told CNBC that numerous startup founders were using Twitter and Meta’s communication service WhatsApp to send each other rapid-fire updates.
One venture capitalist said it was as if someone screamed “fire in a crowded theater where there is no fire.”
“And then when everyone rushes to the door, they knock over the oil lamp and there is a fire and it burns down the building,” the venture capitalist said. “And then that same person standing outside being like, ‘see I told you so.'”
‘Everyone is scrambling’
As the panic spread and the FDIC stepped in, companies with funds locked up were reporting problems getting cash out and making payroll.
One startup founder told CNBC that “everyone is scrambling.” He said he has talked to more than 30 other founders, and that both big and small companies are being impacted.
The founder added that a CFO from a unicorn startup has tried to move more than $45 million out of SVB to no avail. Another company with 250 employees told the founder that SVB has “all our cash.”
Another founder said her company’s payroll provider moved from SVB to another bank on Thursday, which meant payroll did not run for employees as planned Friday morning. She said she has been over-communicating with employees to alleviate their concerns as much as possible, and she is expecting payroll to hit by the end of the day Friday.
In the case that it doesn’t, the company is planning to wire employees who need immediate spot coverage the funds directly, according to an internal memo viewed by CNBC.
“A lot of people live down to the dollar in terms of budgeting, and they cannot afford 24 hour delay in their payroll,” the founder said.
Jean Yang, the founder and CEO of monitoring company Akita, attempted to perform a wire transfer to ensure she could make payroll for her seven-person team, then drove to the SVB location on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, a street populated by venture-capital offices.
There, she asked a teller for a bank transfer and was told the branch couldn’t do it. So she asked for a cashier’s check for $1 million. After 20 or 25 minutes the bank handed it over.
Others in line were taking out their entire balance. “I regret not taking out our entire balance now,” she said.
On Frida, Yang returned to the Silicon Valley Bank branch 15 minutes before it opened to remove the remaining money. A line of about 40 people had formed. Gossip spread among those waiting. One person showed a tweet on their phone suggesting that bank employees had been instructed not to come to work.
Then an employee came out of the office and offered about 15 copies of an article from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the agency’s response to the bank’s situation. The line disbanded as people realized the bank’s fate.
Later on Friday one of the startup’s investors called Yang and offered to help Akita make payroll, she said.”My hope is that the government bails out people past $250,000,” she said. “I know people with tens of millions, hundreds of millions with SVB. I think if they only get $250,000, their companies are going to be wiped out.”
“Now, everyone’s waiting to see when the Treasury will step in,” said another venture investor. “Hopefully [California Governor] Gavin Newsom is calling Biden right now and saying, ‘This is systemic in our area, but you can see the ripple effects on other banks and their equities and their bonds.’ If it’s systemic, I think the Treasury will step in like 2007 and ’08 and protect the money market accounts, plus will protect the depositor.”
This person added, “If they don’t step in, then people will presume that money’s lost. That’s going to have huge ramifications on the business environment.”
Artificial intelligence robot looking at futuristic digital data display.
Yuichiro Chino | Moment | Getty Images
Businesses are turning to artificial intelligence tools to help them navigate real-world turbulence in global trade.
Several tech firms told CNBC say they’re deploying the nascent technology to visualize businesses’ global supply chains — from the materials that are used to form products, to where those goods are being shipped from — and understand how they’re affected by U.S. President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs.
Last week, Salesforce said it had developed a new import specialist AI agent that can “instantly process changes for all 20,000 product categories in the U.S. customs system and then take action on them” as needed, to help navigate changes to tariff systems.
Engineers at the U.S. software giant used the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, a 4,400-page document of tariffs on goods imported to the U.S., to inform answers generated by the agent.
“The sheer pace and complexity of global tariff changes make it nearly impossible for most businesses to keep up manually,” Eric Loeb, executive vice president of government affairs at Salesforce, told CNBC. “In the past, companies might have relied on small teams of in-house experts to keep pace.”
Firms say that AI systems are enabling them to take decisions on adjustments to their global supply chains much faster.
Andrew Bell, chief product officer of supply chain management software firm Kinaxis, said that manufacturers and distributors looking to inform their response to tariffs are using his firm’s machine learning technology to assess their products and the materials that go into them, as well as external signals like news articles and macroeconomic data.
“With that information, we can start doing some of those simulations of, here is a particular part that is in your build material that has a significant tariff. If you switched to using this other part instead, what would the impact be overall?” Bell told CNBC.
‘AI’s moment to shine’
Trump’s tariffs list — which covers dozens of countries — has forced companies to rethink their supply chains and pricing, with the likes of Walmart and Nike already raising prices on some products. The U.S. imported about $3.3 trillion of goods in 2024, according to census data.
Uncertainty from the U.S. tariff measures “actually probably presents AI’s moment to shine,” Zack Kass, a futurist and former head of OpenAI’s go-to-market strategy, told CNBC’s Silvia Amaro at the Ambrosetti Forum in Italy last month.
“If you wonder how hard things could get without AI vis-a-vis automation, and what would happen in a world where you can’t just employ a bunch of people overnight, AI presents this alternative proposal,” he added.
Nagendra Bandaru, managing partner and global head of technology services at Indian IT giant Wipro, said clients are using the company’s agentic AI solutions “to pivot supplier strategies, adjust trade lanes, and manage duty exposure dynamically as policy landscapes evolve.”
Wipro says it uses a range of AI systems — both proprietary and supplied by third parties — from large language models to traditional machine learning and computer vision techniques to inspect physical assets in cross-border transit.
‘Not a silver bullet’
While it preferred to keep company names confidential, Wipro said that firms using its AI products to navigate Trump’s tariffs range from a Fortune 500 electronics manufacturer with factories in Asia to an automotive parts supplier exporting to Europe and North America.
“AI is a powerful enabler — but not a silver bullet,” Bandaru told CNBC. “It doesn’t replace trade policy strategy, it enhances it by transforming global trade from a reactive challenge into a proactive, data-driven advantage.”
AI was already a key investment priority for global firms prior to Trump’s sweeping tariff announcements on April. Nearly three-quarters of business leaders ranked AI and generative AI in their top three technologies for investment in 2025, according to a report by Capgemini published in January.
“There are a number of ways AI can assist companies dealing with the tariffs and resulting uncertainty. But any AI solution’s success will be predicated on the quality of the data it has access to,” Ajay Agarwal, partner at Bain Capital Ventures, told CNBC.
The venture capitalist said that one of his portfolio companies, FourKites, uses supply chain network data with AI to help firms understand the logistics impacts of adjusting suppliers due to tariffs.
“They are working with a number of Fortune 500 companies to leverage their agents for freight and ocean to provide this level of visibility and intelligence,” Agarwal said.
“Switching suppliers may reduce tariffs costs, but might increase lead times and transportation costs,” he added. “In addition, the volatility of the tariffs [has] severely impacted the rates and capacity available in both the ocean and the domestic freight networks.”
WATCH: Former OpenAI exec says tariffs ‘present AI’s moment to shine’
Technology
Amazon’s Zoox robotaxi unit issues second software recall in a month after San Francisco crash
A Zoox autonomous robotaxi in San Francisco, California, US, on Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024.
David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Amazon‘s Zoox robotaxi unit issued a voluntary recall of its software for the second time in a month following a recent crash in San Francisco.
On May 8, an unoccupied Zoox robotaxi was turning at low speed when it was struck by an electric scooter rider after braking to yield at an intersection. The person on the scooter declined medical attention after sustaining minor injuries as a result of the collision, Zoox said.
“The Zoox vehicle was stopped at the time of contact,” the company said in a blog post. “The e-scooterist fell to the ground directly next to the vehicle. The robotaxi then began to move and stopped after completing the turn, but did not make further contact with the e-scooterist.”
Zoox said it submitted a voluntary software recall report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Thursday.
A Zoox spokesperson said the notice should be published on the NHTSA website early next week. The recall affected 270 vehicles, the spokesperson said.
The NHTSA said in a statement it had received the recall notice and that the agency “advises road users to be cautious in the vicinity of vehicles because drivers may incorrectly predict the travel path of a cyclist or scooter rider or come to an unexpected stop.”
If an autonomous vehicle continues to move after contact with any nearby vulnerable road user, it risks causing harm or further harm. In the AV industry, General Motors-backed Cruise exited the robotaxi business after a collision in which one of its vehicles injured a pedestrian who had been struck by a human-driven car and was then rolled over by the Cruise AV.
Zoox’s May incident comes roughly two weeks after the company announced a separate voluntary software recall following a recent Las Vegas crash. In that incident, an unoccupied Zoox robotaxi collided with a passenger vehicle, resulting in minor damage to both vehicles.
The company issued a software recall for 270 of its robotaxis in order to address a defect with its automated driving system that could cause it to inaccurately predict the movement of another car, increasing the “risk of a crash.”
Amazon acquired Zoox in 2020 for more than $1 billion, announcing at the time that the deal would help bring the self-driving technology company’s “vision for autonomous ride-hailing to reality.”
While Zoox is in a testing and development stage with its AVs on public roads in the U.S., Alphabet’s Waymo is already operating commercial, driverless ride-hailing services in Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Austin, Texas, and is ramping up in Atlanta.
Tesla is promising it will launch its long-delayed robotaxis in Austin next month, and, if all goes well, plans to expand after that to San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Antonio, Texas.
— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway