Connect with us

Published

on

Texas leads the US in renewable electricity production, but Republican lawmakers want to curb that and boost fossil fuels instead.

Texas is a leader in renewables… and fossil fuels

Texas generated 136,118 gigawatt-hours from wind and utility-scale solar in 2022, according to the EIA. (Compare that to No. 2 California, with 52,927 gigawatt-hours.) Texas’ predominant renewable source was wind, and in fact, Texas produced about 26% of all US wind-powered electricity generation in 2021.

But Texas also leads the US in fossil-fuel production. Wind and solar were just 34.3% of the total from all sources. In 2021, Texas accounted for 43% of the nation’s crude oil production and 25% of its marketed natural gas production. Texas has the most crude oil refineries and the most refining capacity of any state.

Yesterday, Republican state senators Charles Schwertner and Phil King filed bills designed to restrict renewable energy in Texas and boost fossil-fuel power plant development. Specifically, they want more natural gas power plants in the state, and they have the backing of Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

There are nine bills, and the Dallas Morning News reports that details remain scant, including costs to taxpayers. Bills of note include [via the News]:

  • Senate Bill 6 would create a 10,000-megawatt reserve of gas-fueled power plants for times of high demand as well as a low-interest loan program for the construction of new gas plants.
  • SB 7 would put in place a market construct that would steer electricity sources toward natural gas power plants and would force wind and solar power sources to either have dispatchable power on site or buy electricity to place in the market when they are not producing.
  • SB 2014 would eliminate any remaining state incentives for building renewable energy.
  • SB 2015 would prevent the development of renewable energy in Texas from outpacing natural gas by placing a cap on the amount of new renewable megawatts based on the amount of natural gas generation in the pipeline.

Electrek’s Take

They’re citing the Big Freeze in 2021 as a reason for boosting natural gas in these bills, claiming that renewables were the biggest reason for grid failure, and that’s false. Governor Greg Abbott released a statement during the extreme weather incident in 2021:

Due to the severe weather and freezing temperatures across our state, many power companies have been unable to generate power, whether it’s from coal, natural gas, or wind power.

The source of energy that was the biggest failure during the Texas Big Freeze was actually natural gas. Natural gas production, transportation, and supply were significantly impacted due to the freezing temperatures and high heating demand. As a result, some gas-fired power plants failed or were forced to shut down, leading to a shortage of electricity supply.

Wind and solar also experienced reduced output, but they didn’t fail to the extent that natural gas did. Coal-fired power plants also experienced issues, but they weren’t as significant as those experienced by natural gas.

Patrick also cited “fairness and equity” as reasons for the new bills. Fossil fuels make up the majority of Texas power sources. That purely political argument is pretty stupid, since they’re effectively potentially kneecapping a booming and necessary new industry.

The Dallas Morning News rightly warns that if the bills pass, “They would unleash market forces that have the potential to disrupt billions of dollars in upcoming renewable energy investment in Texas while placing a thumb on the scale on the side of fossil fuel.”

Texas has been successful with wind and solar due to a previously friendly regulatory system. While the Inflation Reduction Act and the momentum of renewables in the commercial sector will help, I’m not optimistic that Texas lawmakers will do the smart thing and throw out these bills. And it won’t just be Texas that suffers for it.

Read more: Here’s how rooftop solar could have prevented 2021’s Texas big freeze power outage

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

How the explosives shortage could make everyday items even more expensive

Published

on

By

How the explosives shortage could make everyday items even more expensive

The United States is facing a shortage of TNT, a high explosive that is essential to the manufacturing of commercial explosives products, like cast boosters, which are commonly used in the mining and construction industries, according to the Institute of Makers of Explosives, or IME.

“Everything from your cellphone to your laptop to the roads you drive on to work, the homes you live in, just about everything you use on a daily basis started from commercial explosives,” said IME President Clark Mica.

The United States has depended on foreign suppliers of TNT since the mid-1980s, when the last domestic TNT facility shut down largely due to increasingly stringent environmental regulations. TNT production creates hazardous waste that poses risks to human health, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

However, the war in Ukraine is putting strain on the global defense supply chain.

“It was indeed actually China and Russia who up until just a few years ago were selling TNT directly to the USA. Then the U.S. had to rely a lot on Poland,” said GlobalData senior aerospace, defense and security analyst James Marques. “Now the reality is that Polish company Nitro-Chem is absolutely flooded with orders at the moment, and most of their produce has been going across the border the other way into Ukraine instead.”

TNT, which industry insiders say cost 50 cents per pound in the early 2000s, now can cost upward of $20 per pound. President Donald Trump‘s 10% baseline tariffs are also making it more expensive to import TNT, which the U.S. now sources from Turkey, Vietnam, Australia, India and more.

“That means more expensive construction projects, more expensive infrastructure projects, more expensive energy production, all of these things that our economy relies on to continue to grow,” said Mica.

In response to the TNT shortage, Congress awarded defense manufacturer Repkon USA a $435 million contract to design, build and commission an Army-run TNT plant in Graham, Kentucky.

“Today marks the beginning of the return of TNT production to American soil. This history making initiative underscores our commitment to strengthening our national security and reducing reliance on foreign sources for critical materials,” Maj. Gen. John T. Reim said at a news conference last November.

Yet the plant is not estimated to be operational until 2028.

“In the short term, we’re going to have to find supplies to meet the demand,” Mica said.

Other high explosives that might normally serve as viable alternatives to TNT, like RDX, are also in short supply.

“Without these materials, you are unable to mine the critical minerals that are used to make cellphones. You’re unable to mine the aggregates that go into road-based materials. On the energy side, we use commercial explosives in energy production,” said Mica.

Watch the video above to learn more about the global TNT shortage and what’s at stake for consumers.

Continue Reading

Environment

Used EVs are suddenly hot sellers, with prices in the $20,000 to $30,000 sweet spot

Published

on

By

Used EVs are suddenly hot sellers, with prices in the ,000 to ,000 sweet spot

Used vehicles are not exactly flying off the lot right now, but EVs are bucking the trend with prices hitting the sweet spot of around $20,000 to $30,000.

Used EVs offer more at lower prices

Higher prices led to slower used car sales in the third quarter. According to a new analysis by Edmunds’ director of insights, Ivan Drury, the average transaction price for a 3-year-old vehicle rose to $31,067, up 5% from Q3 2024.

Used vehicle prices topped $30,000 in Q3 for the first time since 2022, when limited new-car availability led buyers to look for used options.

With prices nearly the same as buying new, shoppers are apparently waiting for the market to cool. The average number of days vehicles sat on the lot rose to 41 days in the third quarter, up from 37 in Q3 2024, and its slowest pace since 2017.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

However, not all vehicles are sitting on the lot. Used electric vehicles were a bright spot, selling in an average of 34 days, a week less than other powertrain options.

Used-EVs-prices
(Source: Edmunds)

Despite limited options in 2022, eight of the top 20 fastest-selling 3-year-old vehicles were EVs, “underscoring their growing appeal among shoppers seeking value and lower operating costs,” the Edmunds report highlighted.

EVs sold for an average of $29,922, or about $1,100 less than gas-powered vehicles, and they had significantly fewer miles. Electric models averaged 35,661 miles compared to 39,525 miles for gas vehicles.

Used-EVs-prices
(Source: Edmunds)

Nearly two-thirds (63.1%) of the electric vehicles sold fell in the $20,000 to $30,000 price range, compared with just 42.5% of other vehicles.

Used-EVs-prices
(Source: Edmunds)

The Tesla Model S was the fastest-selling used car in Q3, averaging 21.5 days to turn, followed by the Model 3 and Model Y at 24 and 26.3 days, respectively.

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 ranked 11th at 29.7, while the Volkswagen ID.4 (30.9), Audi e-tron (31.7), Kia EV6 (32), and Ford Mustang Mach-E (32.4) rounded out the top 20.

Used Cars Are Lingering on Lots as Prices Climb, But EVs Are Moving Fast

Used EVs “deliver one of the strongest value propositions in the market, Edmunds noted, adding that the lower prices offer shoppers access to new tech and performance for significantly less than paying for it new. “In many ways, used EV buyers are embracing technology that’s just one generation old, while new EV buyers still face the risk of paying premium prices for models that evolve rapidly year over year.”

The expiration of the $7,500 federal tax credit for new EVs could push even more buyers to look toward the used market.

Looking to test one out for yourself? We can help you get started. You can use our links below to see available EVs in your area.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Nuclear startup that’s suing NRC raises $130 million with backing from Anduril’s Palmer Luckey and senior Palantir executive

Published

on

By

Nuclear startup that's suing NRC raises 0 million with backing from Anduril's Palmer Luckey and senior Palantir executive

Isaiah Taylor, CEO, Valar Atomics speaks onstage during the Reindustrialize Conference 2025 on July 16, 2025 in Detroit, Michigan.

Tasos Katopodis | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Advanced nuclear reactor developer Valar Atomics raised $130 million in its latest funding round with backing from Anduril Industries founder Palmer Luckey and Palantir Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar, the startup said Monday.

The fundraising was led by venture capital firms Snowpoint Ventures, Day One Ventures and Dream Ventures. Lockheed Martin board member and former AT&T executive John Donovan also participated. Valar’s total fundraising now totals more than $150 million, according to the company.

Doug Philippone, co-founder of Snowpoint and former head of global defense at Palantir, will also join Valar’s board of directors.

Valar is one of several nuclear startups that hopes to benefit from President Trump’s push to deploy new reactor technology in the U.S. by cutting regulations and accelerating approvals.

Based outside Los Angeles, Valar is one of several reactor developers and states that are suing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over its licensing process for small reactor designs. The parties to the suit are seeking a resolution with the NRC in the wake of Trump’s executive order that would overhaul the regulator. The case has been temporarily paused due to the government shutdown.

Pilot program

The Department of Energy in August selected Valar and other developers to participate in a pilot program that aims to deploy at least three advanced test reactors by July 2026.

Valar is developing reactor technology that would use helium as a coolant and operate at much higher temperatures than traditional plants, according to the company. Its business plan calls for the deployment of hundreds of small reactors at a single site.

Valar broke ground on a site for a test reactor in September at the Utah San Rafael Energy Lab, a unit of the Utah Office of Energy Development.

Continue Reading

Trending