Silicon Valley Bank UK trouble won’t affect other British banks, according to finance ministry
The collapse of the UK branch of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is being mitigated by the Treasury and Bank of England, according to the Treasury.
US regulators shut down the country’s 16th largest bank, in the biggest collapse of a financial institution since the 2008 financial crisis.
SVB had failed after depositors – mostly technology workers and venture capital-backed companies – began withdrawing their money, creating a run on the bank.
Despite this failure, the finance ministry said Britain’s banking system remained strong and resilient, adding that the issues affecting SVB were specific to it and did not have implications for other banks operating in the UK.
Read more:
NatWest chief gets huge bonus as bank reveals profits surged
Grant Thornton UK partners to vote on Indian investment
In a bid for government intervention, more than 250 tech company chief executives signed a letter addressed to Chancellor Jeremy Hunt.
It said that SVB’s insolvency represented “an existential threat to the UK tech sector” and the tech founders themselves would be “running numbers to see if they were potentially technically insolvent”.
The letter continued: “Most businesses are operating on very fine margins in the current economy and the contagion from the initial insolvencies will be vast and impact the economy far beyond the tech sector.”
The finance ministry said in a statement: “The government recognises that tech sector companies are often not cashflow-positive as they grow and that they rely on cash on deposits to cover their day-to-day costs.”
The Bank of England on Friday said it was seeking a court order to place SVB UK into an insolvency procedure after US regulators took over its parent company SVB Financial Group.
Under insolvency proceedings for British banks, some depositors are eligible for up to £85,000 ($102,000) of
compensation for cash held at lenders, or £170,000 ($204,000) for joint accounts.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Bank of London may bid for SVB
The Bank of London was considering salvaging the UK arm of SVB but given the clearing bank was only established two years ago, the credibility of an offer is unclear.
Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at the investment firm Hargreaves Lansdown, said in an email that there would be aftershocks in the tech sector next week.
Ms Streeter said: “Urgent talks regarding potential takeovers will be ongoing, with regulators under pressure to negotiate bailouts to avoid further damaging fallout.”
The co-founders of the Ben & Jerry’s ice cream brand are demanding the brand be given its independence back amid a long-running row with its current UK owner.
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield have written an open letter demanding that it be “released” from its parent firm.
Mr Cohen told Sky News he would give back the money he received in the sale of the business to Unilever in 2000 if it meant the brand could be independent.
Ben & Jerry’s is set to spin off all its ice cream brands under The Magnum Ice Cream Company (TMICC) name in a deal set to be fully completed before the end of the year.
“You’re saying, would I give it back? Absolutely. If we could still have Ben and Jerry’s independent, any day”, he said.
“It seems like the board of Magnum has been Trumpified”, Mr Cohen told Sky News as he protested the “silencing” of Ben & Jerry’s social mission.
Money latest: My parents’ row with P&O Cruises was resolved by audio recording
The consumer goods firm Unilever has never enjoyed an easy relationship with Ben & Jerry’s – a brand known for its activism on many political and social issues.
As part of the original merger deal, an independent board was set up to protect the ice cream brand’s mission.
But a series of disputes have followed.
The most high-profile spat came in 2021 when the US brand took the decision not to sell ice cream in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories on the grounds that sales would be “inconsistent” with its values.
Ben Cohen in London
Unilever responded by selling the business to its licensee in Israel.
The independent board is currently locked in a legal dispute with Unilever, claiming in March that its then-chief executive David Stever was improperly sacked.
Ben Cohen. File pic: AP
For its part, Unilever has always argued that it “reserved primary responsibility for financial and operational decisions” as owners of Ben & Jerry’s.
In another example of the frostiness between them, an ice cream flavour launched in support of Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris went down badly in London.
Ben & Jerry’s claimed Unilever had demanded it stop public criticism of Donald Trump.
Mr Cohen was one of seven people arrested during the Senate protest in May
Ben Cohen himself was arrested earlier this year over a protest in support of Gaza during a US Senate hearing.
He and Mr Greenfield intervened in the ownership row as TMICC briefed investors on their plans at a so-called capital markets day. They say the independent board and many consumers and employees “no longer support the trajectory on which it is set”.
Mr Cohen, who is attending the event to protest, said: “Ben & Jerry’s was founded on a simple but radical premise: that our business could thrive and make outstanding products whilst standing up for progressive values.
“We fought to ensure our social justice mission was protected by Unilever when the company was acquired, but over the past several years, this has been eroded, and the company’s voice has been muted.
“We won’t be silent anymore. Authenticity has always been at the very heart of what we do, and stripping this away risks destroying the very value of Ben & Jerry’s. We urge the board and potential investors to rethink the inclusion of Ben & Jerry’s in Magnum’s future makeup and establish a Free Ben & Jerry’s.”
The new ice cream division, which will also comprise other brands such as Wall’s, is based in the Netherlands and will have a primary stock market listing in Amsterdam.
A spokesperson for The Magnum Ice Cream Company told Sky News: “Ben & Jerry’s is a proud part of The Magnum Ice Cream Company and is not for sale.
“We remain committed to Ben & Jerry’s unique three-part mission – product, economic and social – and look forward to building on its success as an iconic, much-loved business.”
Unilever has also been contacted for comment.
The co-founders of the Ben & Jerry’s ice cream brand are demanding the brand is given its independence back amid a long-running row with its current UK owner.
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield have written an open letter demanding that it be “released” from its parent firm.
Unilever bought Ben & Jerry’s in 2000 but is set to spin off all its ice cream brands under The Magnum Ice Cream Company (TMICC) name in a deal set to be fully completed before the end of the year.
The consumer goods firm has never enjoyed an easy relationship with Ben & Jerry’s – a brand known for its activism on many political and social issues.
Money latest: My parents’ row with P&O Cruises was resolved by audio recording
As part of the original merger deal, an independent board was set up to protect the ice cream brand’s mission.
But a series of disputes have followed.
The most high-profile spat came in 2021 when the US brand took the decision not to sell ice cream in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories on the grounds that sales would be “inconsistent” with its values.
Unilever responded by selling the business to its licensee in Israel.
Ben Cohen. File pic: AP
The independent board is currently locked in a legal dispute with Unilever, claiming in March that its then-chief executive David Stever was improperly sacked.
For its part, Unilever has always argued that it “reserved primary responsibility for financial and operational decisions” as owners of Ben & Jerry’s.
In another example of the frostiness between them, an ice cream flavour launched in support of Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris went down badly in London.
Ben & Jerry’s claimed Unilever had demanded it stop public criticism of Donald Trump.
Ben Cohen himself was arrested earlier this year over a protest in support of Gaza during a US Senate hearing.
Mr Cohen was one of seven people arrested during the Senate protest in May
He and Mr Greenfield intervened in the ownership row as TMICC briefed investors on their plans at a so-called capital markets day. They say the independent board and many consumers and employees “no longer support the trajectory on which it is set”.
Mr Cohen, who is attending the event to protest, said: “Ben & Jerry’s was founded on a simple but radical premise: that our business could thrive and make outstanding products whilst standing up for progressive values.
“We fought to ensure our social justice mission was protected by Unilever when the company was acquired, but over the past several years, this has been eroded, and the company’s voice has been muted.
“We won’t be silent anymore. Authenticity has always been at the very heart of what we do, and stripping this away risks destroying the very value of Ben & Jerry’s. We urge the board and potential investors to rethink the inclusion of Ben & Jerry’s in Magnum’s future make-up and establish a Free Ben & Jerry’s.”
The new ice cream division, which will also comprise other brands such as Wall’s, is based in the Netherlands and will have a primary stock market listing in Amsterdam.
Unilever and TMICC have been contacted for comment.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment11 months agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024