Connect with us

Published

on

A man in Tehran holds a local newspaper reporting on its front page the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Atta Kenare | Afp | Getty Images

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — When arch-rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran announced they were restoring diplomatic relations, much of the world was stunned — not only because of the breakthrough after years of mutual animosity, suspected attacks and espionage between the two countries, but because of who brokered the deal: China.

Taking up a specific role that the U.S. could not have fulfilled, this was Beijing’s first foray into Middle East mediation, an area that for the past few decades was largely occupied by Washington.

As tensions simmer between the world’s two largest economies and U.S. policymakers sound the alarm over competition and security concerns with China, what does Beijing’s ascendance in the region mean for the Middle East — and for U.S. interests?

“Many are breathing a sigh of relief [with] today’s official Iran-Saudi agreement,” Bader al-Saif, an assistant professor of history at Khalifa University in Abu Dhabi, wrote on Twitter after the news was announced. “All 3 parties to the deal can claim victory, but Saudis are arguably the biggest winner,” he contended.

From the Saudi perspective, normalization with Iran — a country that’s long been seen by the Saudi monarchy as one of its greatest security threats — removes obstacles in its reform and economic transformation journey, according to Joseph Westphal, a former U.S. ambassador to the kingdom.

“I think the leadership there believes that this is a very important moment for Saudi Arabia as it emerges … as a real leader in the world on many issues,” Westphal told CNBC’s Dan Murphy on Tuesday. “A constant struggle with Iran delays that and impedes the progress that they made.”

“Obviously, the United States could not have made this agreement possible because we don’t have a relationship with Iran,” the ambassador added. “I think China was a good partner to do this. I think they’re the right people,” he said, noting that China invests heavily in Saudi Arabia and is its top trading partner.

“So I think this is a very good thing all the way around.” 

China was a good partner to do this, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia says

Hopes for de-escalation in areas like Yemen, where Saudi Arabia has carried out a brutal war against Iran-backed Houthi rebels since 2015, are now more realistic than before, analysts say. Risks to shipping and oil supplies in the region may be reduced, and trade and investment between the countries could add to growth.

Reduced risk of direct military confrontation

At the very least, improved communication will reduce risks of confrontation, said Torbjorn Soltvedt, principal Middle East and North Africa analyst at Verisk Maplecroft, who called the deal “a much needed pressure valve amid heightened regional tensions.”

Still, it’s a mistake to assume that everything is solved.

“Due to the ongoing shadow war between Iran and Israel – and sporadic Iran-backed attacks against shipping and energy infrastructure throughout the region – the risk of escalation due to miscalculation is still uncomfortably high,” he said.

In the past few years, the region has seen numerous attacks, particularly on Saudi and Emirati ships and energy infrastructure, which Riyadh and Washington blamed on Iran. Tehran rejects the accusations.

Saudi-Iranian deal: Saudis demonstrating they're 'in control of their own destiny,' think tank says

“Riyadh and Tehran will remain adversaries with competing visions for the region,” Soltvedt stressed. “But improved channels for communication have the potential to reduce the risk of a direct military confrontation between the two states.”

Iran is also now enriching uranium at its highest level ever, and is believed to be just months away from nuclear bomb-making capability. Rapprochement between Riyadh and Tehran may mean little if the latter’s nuclear program isn’t addressed.

Has Washington been snubbed?

The White House’s seeming reluctance to praise China was hard not to notice.

“We support any effort to de-escalate tensions in the region. We think it’s in our interests,” National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said of the news on Friday, adding that the Biden administration had made similar efforts in that direction.

But when asked about Beijing’s role, Kirby replied: “This is not about China and I’m not going to characterize here whatever China’s role is.”

Chinese President, Xi Jinping (L) is welcomed by Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud (R) at the Palace of Yamamah in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on December 8, 2022.

Anadolu Agency | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

US Marine Corps General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. (C, behind), commander of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) and Lieutenant General Fahd bin Turki bin Abdulaziz al-Saud (front), commander of the Saudi-led coalition forces in Yemen, are shown reportedly Iranian weapons seized by Saudi forces from Yemen’s Huthi rebels, during his visit to a military base in al-Kharj in central Saudi Arabia on July 18, 2019.

Fayez Nureldine | AFP | Getty Images

Still, there seems to be a consensus that in terms of military power and security alliances in the region, U.S. influence is in no danger.

“No Chinese mediation — or any diplomatic involvement — will threaten US primacy in the region. All states, Iran included, know that,” Khalifa University’s Al-Saif said. The U.S.-Saudi Arabia security partnership spans nearly three-quarters of a century, and Saudi Arabia’s military arsenal is overwhelmingly supplied and maintained by the U.S. and American military personnel.

Neither KSA nor Iran will change overnight.

Bader Al-Saif

Assistant professor of history, Khalifa University

In any case, China’s gain doesn’t have to mean a loss for the U.S., many believe.

“This shouldn’t be a zero sum game for the US. It can serve US interests: Iran nuclear deal, Yemen, Lebanon for starters can benefit from the agreement,” Al-Saif said.

“A quick move should follow on these files [because] the agreement may not last long,” he added. “Might as well reap benefits while it lasts.”

Will the deal hold?

It’s yet to be seen whether the agreement between the two Middle Eastern powers – and the mutual goodwill expressed in its wake – will last.

Many regional watchers are skeptical.

“Iran’s opting for engagement here should not be misinterpreted as a de-escalation,” Behnam ben Taleblu, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told CNBC. “Tehran is capitalizing on deeper Chinese enmeshment in Persian Gulf trade as well as increased Saudi hedging of the pro-American order in the region.”

This year 'the real outlier is Iran' in the region, Atlantic Council CEO Fred Kempe says

“There was zero political cost to the Islamic Republic to this agreement, whereas the mere optics and politics of it, let alone the substance, are in Iran’s favor,” he said, stressing his doubt that Iran will stop meddling in regional conflicts and other countries via proxies and militant activity.

Ben Taleblu also argued that Iran’s enmity with Israel played a role in its calculations as “Tehran is trying to show that it beat Jerusalem to Riyadh, and is trying to push back and break out of the diplomatic isolation it felt due to the Abraham Accords” when the UAE and Bahrain normalized relations with Israel.

For al-Saif, there is “certainly hope for the agreement to live on” and lead to the prosperity that people of both countries deserve. “But,” he said, “neither KSA nor Iran will change overnight.”

Continue Reading

Environment

China’s mineral dominance gives Western magnet makers a moment in the sun

Published

on

By

China’s mineral dominance gives Western magnet makers a moment in the sun

Annealed neodymium iron boron magnets sit in a barrel at a Neo Material Technologies Inc. factory in Tianjin, China on June 11, 2010.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Rare earth magnet makers are having a moment as Western nations scramble to build domestic “mine-to-magnet” supply chains and reduce their dependence on China.

A turbulent year of supply restrictions and tariff threats has thrust the strategic importance of magnet manufacturers firmly into the spotlight, with rare earths surging toward the top of the agenda amid the U.S. and China’s ongoing geopolitical rivalry.

Magnets made from rare earths are vital components for everything from electric vehicles, wind turbines, and smartphones to medical equipment, artificial intelligence applications, and precision weaponry.

It’s in this context that the U.S., European Union and Australia, among others, have sought to break China’s mineral dominance by taking a series of strategic measures to support magnet makers, including heavily investing in factories, supporting the buildout of new plants, and boosting processing capacity.

The U.S. and Europe, in particular, are expected to emerge as key growth markets for rare earth magnet production over the next decade. Analysts, however, remain skeptical that Western nations will be able to escape China’s mineral orbit anytime soon.

“Frankly, we were the solution to the problem that the world didn’t know it had,” Rahim Suleman, CEO of Canadian group Neo Performance Materials, told CNBC by video call.

Photo taken on Sept. 19, 2025 shows rare-earth magnetic bars at NEO magnetic plant in Narva, a city in northeastern Estonia.

Xinhua News Agency | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

“The end-market is growing from the point of physics, not software, so therefore it has to grow in this way,” he continued. “And it’s not dependent on any single end market, so it’s not dependent on automotive or battery electric vehicles or drones or wind farms. It’s any energy-efficient motor across the spectrum,” Suleman said, referring to the demand for magnets from fast-growing industries such as robotics.

His comments came around three months after Neo launched the grand opening of its rare earth magnet factory in Narva, Estonia.

Situated directly on Russia’s doorstep, the facility is widely expected to play an integral role in Europe’s plan to reduce its dependence on China. European Union industry chief Stéphane Séjourné, for example, lauded the plant’s strategic importance, saying at an event in early December that the project marked “a high point of Europe’s sovereignty.”

How Europe is scrambling to reduce dependence on China’s rare earths

Neo’s Suleman said the Estonian facility is on track to produce 2,000 metric tons of rare earth magnets this year, before scaling up to 5,000 tons and beyond.

“Globally, the market is 250,000 tons and going to 600,000 tons, so more than doubling in ten years,” Suleman said. “And more importantly, our concentration is 93% in a single jurisdiction, so when you put those two factors together, I think you’ll find an enormously quick growing market.”

‘Skyrocketing demand’

To be sure, the global supply of rare earths has long been dominated by Beijing. China is responsible for nearly 60% of the world’s rare earths mining and more than 90% of magnet manufacturing, according to the International Energy Agency.

A recent report from consultancy IDTechEx estimated that rare earth magnet capacity in the U.S. is on track to grow nearly six times by 2036, with the expansion driven by strategic support and funding from the Department of Defense, as well as increasing midstream activity.

Magnet production in Europe, meanwhile, was forecast to grow 3.1 times over the same time period, bolstered by the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act, which aims for domestic production to satisfy 40% of the region’s demand by 2030.

Regional composition of rare earths and permanent magnet production in 2024, according to data compiled by the International Energy Agency.

IEA

John Maslin, CEO of Vulcan Elements, a North Carolina-based rare earth magnet producer, told CNBC that the company is seeking to scale up as fast as possible “so that this fundamental supply chain doesn’t hold America back.”

Vulcan Elements is one of the companies to have received direct funding from the Trump administration. The magnet maker received a $620 million direct federal loan last month from the Department of Defense to support domestic magnet production.

“Rare earth magnets convert electricity into motion, which means that virtually all advanced machines and technologies—the innovations that shape our daily lives and keep us safe—require them in order to be operational,” Maslin told CNBC by email.

“The need for high-performance magnets is accelerating exponentially amid a surge in demand and production of advanced technologies, including hard disk drives, semiconductor fabrication equipment, hybrid/electric motors, satellites, aircraft, drones, and almost every military capability,” he added.

Separately, Wade Senti, president of Florida-based magnet maker Advanced Magnet Lab, said the only way to deliver on alternative supply chains is to be innovative.

“The demand for non-China sourced rare earth permanent magnets is skyrocketing,” Senti told CNBC by email.

“The challenge is can United States magnet producers create a fully domestic (non-China) supply chain for these magnets. This requires the magnet manufacturer to take the lead and bring the supply chain together – from mine to magnet to customers,” he added.

Continue Reading

Environment

Watch BYD’s insanely fast EV charger add nearly 250 miles range in 5 minutes [Video]

Published

on

By

Watch BYD's insanely fast EV charger add nearly 250 miles range in 5 minutes [Video]

BYD is closing the gap between gas pumps and EV chargers. A new video shows one of its EVs gaining nearly 250 miles (400 km) of range in just five minutes.

BYD’s 5-minute EV charging matches refuel speeds

“The ultimate solution is to make charging as quick as refueling a gasoline car,” BYD’s CEO, Wang Chuanfu, said after unveiling its new Super e-Platform in March.

Chuanfu was referring to the so-called “charging anxiety” that’s holding some drivers back from going electric. BYD’s Super e-Platform is the first mass-produced “full-domain 1000V high-voltage architecture” for passenger vehicles.

BYD also launched its Flash Charging Battery during the event, with charging currents of 1000A and a charging rate of 10C, both new records.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The ultra-fast charging battery can deliver 1 megawatt (1,000 kW) of charging power, which BYD claims enables EVs equipped with the setup to regain 400 km (248 miles) of CLTC driving range in just 5 minutes of charging.

BYD-EV-charger-5-minutes
BYD CEO Wang Chuanfu unveils Super e-Platform with Flash Charging Battery enabling EVs to add 400 km of range in 5 minutes (Source: BYD)

BYD launched its first vehicles based on the Super e-Platform, the Han L and Tang L, a month later, starting at just 219,800 yuan ($30,000).

With the new models rolling out across China, we are getting a look at the ultra-fast charging speeds in action. A video posted on X by user Dominic Lee shows BYD’s EV charging at up to 746 kW, with an estimated charging time to 70% of around 4 minutes and 40 seconds.

In just six minutes, BYD said the Han L, based on its Super e-Platform, can recharge from 10% to 70%, and in 20 minutes, the battery can be fully charged.

The Tang L SUV, also based on BYD’s 1000V architecture, can add 370 km (230 miles) of range in 5 minutes, while a full charge takes about 30 minutes.

BYD said its Flash Charging Battery enables EVs to gain the same range as a gas-powered vehicle would at the pump, “ultimately making the charging time as short as refueling time.”

Although 400 km (250 miles) is more than enough range for most drivers, BYD is out to make gas stations a thing of the past. And it’s not just in China, BYD plans to bring its Flash Charging system to Europe and likely other overseas markets.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla driver crashes during livestream desmonstrating ‘Full Self-Driving’ features

Published

on

By

Tesla driver crashes during livestream desmonstrating 'Full Self-Driving' features

A Tesla drove in the wrong direction, resulting in a head-on collision with another vehicle, during a livestream, demonstrating Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ features.

Earlier this year, Tesla launched its Level 2 driver-assist system, ‘Full Self-Driving’ (FSD), in China.

Like in the US, despite its name, the system requires constant driver supervision. Unlike in the US, China quickly made Tesla change the name of the system as it was judged not representative of its capabilities.

Many Tesla owners in China have been enthusiastically livestreaming their drives using FSD on platforms such as Douyin (TikTok).

Advertisement – scroll for more content

They try to demonstrate that Tesla FSD is able to operate the vehicle by itself and compare it to other similar systems from other automakers in China.

Last week, a Douyin user going by 切安好 was livestreaming a Tesla FSD drive in his Model 3 when the vehicle went into the left lane, which was for the opposing traffic, and collided head-on with another car.

The livestream itself wasn’t widely popular, but the Tesla owner posted video captures of the aftermath, which quickly went viral:

Fortunately, no one was critically hurt during the crash.

Many questioned whether FSD was active during the incident, and the driver initially didn’t release the crash footage as he claimed to be seeking direct compensation from Tesla, which isn’t likely.

The automaker always states that it is not responsible for its FSD or Autopilot systems.

The Tesla driver has now released the footage, which clearly shows that FSD was active during the crash and initiated the lane change into the wrong direction:

The crash highlights the dangers of being overconfident in Tesla’s autonomous driving features.

Electrek’s Take

Be safe out there. Some people are abusing driver assistance features and are a danger to all road users.

Tesla isn’t helping with its own marketing, encouraging abuse with claims that FSD “gives you time back” as if you don’t have to be supervising the system all the time.

Recently, Tesla even started monitoring usage of your phone less while using FSD.

Also of note, Grok, Elon Musk’s LLM, falsely claimed that this crash was “staged” and that the driver was “manual driving”:

There’s misinformation everywhere. Weird times.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending