Connect with us

Published

on

Sky News analysis has found that two Surrey councils spend more on interest and paying back loans than they do on services, like transport and social care.

Neighbouring borough councils Spelthorne and Runnymede have said they have had to make investments in response to government cuts.

Both councils’ investment has mainly been in commercial property, which they rent out for a profit.

In 2021/22, Spelthorne spent £36 million on financing debt, almost 60% more than the £22.8 million they spent on services.

Runnymede also spent nearly 50% more on debt than on services, spending £17 million on debt and £11.5 million on services.

Eastleigh, Basildon and North East Derbyshire all spent more than half of the amount they spend on services on repaying debt and interest.

Use our tool to see what your council spends on debt compared to what it spends on services, and how that’s changed in recent years.

Both Spelthorne and Runnymede suggest that there is no issue with their investments, however, as they’re making big returns.

A Spelthorne Borough Council spokesperson said: “The income that the portfolio generates each year far outweighs the debt and therefore the financing is not a burden, and in fact without this income, crucial service provision that support residents would be directly and adversely affected.

“[…] We acquired these investment assets acquisitions in 2016- 2018 as part of a Capital Strategy to generate sufficient long-term income to offset the impact of the disappearance of government grants.”

A Runnymede Borough Council spokesman said: “The Council made a strategic decision several years ago to borrow money from HM Treasury to invest in commercial property which we rent out.

“This was done to replace cuts in government funding which all local authorities suffered. We’ve used this income to pay for substantial regeneration in our towns, bringing fantastic facilities to the Borough, generating footfall for local businesses, creating new jobs, and revitalising town centres.

“The debts we hold are well managed and do not affect the way core Council services are provided.”

The cuts in government funding mentioned by both have affected other councils across England.

This includes the Revenue Support Grant, a central government grant given to local authorities which can be used to finance revenue expenditure on any service.

Needs-based central government grants like this used to be the largest source of revenue for councils.

But after more than a decade of austerity and changes in government funding, they rely far more on council tax and retained business rates levied on residential and commercial properties in their area.

Across England, the amount of Revenue Support Grant given to councils overall has decreased by 90% between 2013/14 to 2021/2022.

Previous Sky News analysis has shown deprived areas experienced the biggest reductions in spending power.

Big investment can go wrong for councils

Other councils have made big investments like Spelthorne and Runnymede in response to government cuts, but with less success.

Iain Murray, Director of Public Financial Management at the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) says councils need to consider the risks associated with big investments.

“They need to make decisions based on not just the here and now but model scenarios. A lot of these decisions were made in an environment where inflation was low and fairly static and stable,” he told Sky News.

“Since the last 12 months, we’re now in a completely different economic situation.”

In situations where things may have gone wrong, “it may be that there’s just not been enough forethought about some of the potential what ifs”.

Another Surrey council, Woking Borough Council, is one of several in England dealing with big debt problems.

The council said it was in the territory of issuing a Section 114 notice – which means the government has to intervene to ensure local services are sustainable.

Other councils face similar problems. Slough, Croydon and Thurrock – which has a £500m deficit caused by a series of disastrous investments in risky commercial projects – all issued Section 114 notices last year.

Woking had debts amounting to around £2bn.

Like other councils in England, Woking’s funding structure has changed significantly in the past decade.

Woking shared their sources of revenue with us for the 2011/12 and 2023/24 year.

The amount the council will receive in government funding for 2023/24 is 10% lower than it was in 2011/12, from £5.2 million to £4.7 million.

The amount of Revenue Support Grant it receives has decreased by 92% over the same period, while council tax receipts have risen by nearly 40%, from £8.3 million to £11.4 million.

Councils are running down their unallocated reserves

The reduction in government funding also means that some councils are running down their unallocated reserves.

Unallocated reserves are held so councils can continue to deliver local services when unexpected situations arise.

North Tyneside’s unallocated reserves have decreased by 90% from 2016/17 to 2021/22. They’re left with £690,000, equivalent to less than £3.50 per resident.

Unallocated reserves in Newark & Sherwood, in Nottinghamshire, Uttlesford, in Essex, and South Norfolk have also decreased by more than 80%.

Cllr James Jamieson, Chairman of the Local Government Association, said: “Over the past decade, councils have already done more than their fair share of the heavy lifting when it comes to putting public finances on a more sustainable footing.

“Many councils are still grappling with significant challenges when setting their budgets and trying to protect services from cutbacks due to the deep underlying and existing pressures they face.

“[…] Councils want to work with government on a long-term funding plan which ensures they have adequate resources, certainty and freedoms and can deliver local services for our communities.”

Does this mean councils will go bankrupt?

It’s not possible for a council to go bankrupt in the same way as an individual or a business, but what it can do is issue a Section 114 notice, which is effectively the same thing.

This Section 114 notice triggers a form of action which blocks any new spending and gives the council 21 days to meet and decide what to do next – typically setting a new budget reducing spending on services.

Funding for services like safeguarding vulnerable people are protected, existing financial commitments and contracts will be honoured, as well as ongoing payment of council staff.

On it’s own, councils spending large amounts on financing their debts and running down their reserves does not mean they’re at risk of issuing 114 notices, or financial disaster.

However, spending on debt and the amount reserves councils are getting through are indicators that CIPFA has identified that make councils less financially resilient.

Other identifiers of financial reliance are harder to measure.

For example, CIPFA suggests councils should have sound financial management and good governance.

Financial plans should be made in the medium term, rather than just trying to get from budget to budget in the way that struggling households might make money stretch to last from month to month.

This is harder for councils because the amount of funding they receive from central government is only set at the end of each financial year.

We noticed that several councils, like Thurrock and West Northamptonshire, weren’t able to report their accounts on time. West Northamptonshire, in particular, wasn’t able to submit some of its accounts despite receiving an extension.


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Why data journalism matters to Sky News

Continue Reading

UK

Chelsea fans condemn ‘unethical’ ticket resale site – which club chairman invests in

Published

on

By

Chelsea fans condemn 'unethical' ticket resale site - which club chairman invests in

Premier League match tickets at Chelsea have been selling for more than twice the price of a season ticket on an American exchange website with a familiar director and investor to supporters – club chairman Todd Boehly.

Amid growing fan fury, Sky News was able to access the Vivid Seats platform on different devices last week from London – and saw tickets for the visit of Liverpool on 4 May, priced by Chelsea at a maximum of £80, being sold for between £537 and £2,666.

Some tickets were listed as being sold by traders.

Todd Boehly, co-founder, chairman and CEO of Eldridge, speaks at the 2023 Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., May 3, 2023. REUTERS/Mike Blake
Image:
Chairman of Chelsea Todd Boehly. Pic: Reuters

Chelsea’s official website appeared to show no availability for this premium fixture, with the Blues battling for Champions League qualification and Liverpool potentially celebrating being crowned Premier League winners.

The most expensive Stamford Bridge season ticket for this campaign was £1,015.

Vivid is listed by the Premier League among “unauthorised ticket websites” with a message: “We would urge fans to exercise extreme caution when dealing with these websites.”

Vividseats logo
Image:
Vivid insisted it adheres to laws and regulations in Britain

The Chelsea Supporters’ Trust has written to the Premier League to ask that Vivid – given its ties with a club’s shareholder – “ceases facilitating the sale of tickets for significantly above face value”.

Mr Boehly – part of the consortium that replaced Roman Abramovich as owner in 2022 – has not addressed accusations of a “conflict of interest” or claims he is undermining efforts to combat ticket touting.

There are anti-touting warnings on signs in the streets approaching the stadium.

Chelsea football club ticket graphics
Image:
Sky News found some tickets for more than £2,000 on Vivid Seats

An official Chelsea Ticket Exchange allows season ticket holders to sell their tickets “at the pro-rata price of season tickets” to a club member “in a safe, secure environment”.

While Chelsea’s website says to only buy tickets in the UK from official sellers, it adds: “Many of the websites that advertise and sell tickets online are not within the jurisdiction of UK law.

“This means, while we report these sites when we see Chelsea tickets on them, there is little we can do to shut down the sites.”

Sign at Stamford Bridge warning against ticket touting
Image:
Sign at Stamford Bridge warning against ticket touting

On Vivid, we did see warnings telling visiting users not to buy seats in the home sections and a pop-up eventually appeared after browsing the availability, saying: “Tickets for the EPL matches are not currently available for purchase in your location.”

No attempt was made by us to buy tickets. But should we have been able to see the listings at all?

Sky News first asked for comment from Vivid last Monday and continued to see ticket listings with variable prices in pounds during the week. It took until Friday night for any form of response.

“Vivid Seats respectfully adheres to the laws that are in place in the United Kingdom and is not in violation of any regulations around EPL tickets,” the email read in part. “As such, Vivid Seats’ policy restricts the sale and marketing of EPL tickets in the United Kingdom.”

Soccer Football - Premier League - Brentford v Chelsea - GTech Community Stadium, London, Britain - April 6, 2025 Chelsea's Malo Gusto and Trevoh Chalobah Action Images via Reuters/Matthew Childs EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO USE WITH UNAUTHORIZED AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, FIXTURE LISTS, CLUB/LEAGUE LOGOS OR 'LIVE' SERVICES. ONLINE IN-MATCH USE LIMITED TO 120 IMAGES, NO VIDEO EMULATION. NO USE IN BETTING, GAMES OR SINGLE CLUB/LEAGUE/PLAYER PUBLICATIONS. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR FURTHER
Image:
Pic: Reuters

When Sky News checked the website again on Saturday the listings for Premier League matches were no longer visible as they are from outside of Britain.

Asked if they were no longer visible after our inquiries, Vivid’s official replied: “The conclusions that you are drawing are factually incorrect.

“We understand that people will try to find ways to circumvent technology and as such, we have validation protocols in place in order to restrict the sale and marketing of EPL tickets in the United Kingdom.”

Again, Vivid insisted it adheres to laws and regulations in Britain.

But the same official did not respond to an email detailing how we were able to view the tickets listings from London on separate days, without using VPN software that can make your browser seem as if it’s accessing the internet from another country.

Chelsea's Stamford Bridge stadium
Soccer Football - Premier League - Chelsea v Ipswich Town - Stamford Bridge, London, Britain - April 13, 2025 Chelsea's Jadon Sancho celebrates scoring their second goal with Chelsea's Enzo Fernandez and Chelsea's Cole Palmer REUTERS/Dylan Martinez EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO USE WITH UNAUTHORIZED AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, FIXTURE LISTS, CLUB/LEAGUE LOGOS OR 'LIVE' SERVICES. ONLINE IN-MATCH USE LIMITED TO 120 IMAGES, NO VIDEO EMULATION. NO USE IN BETTING, GAMES OR SINGLE CLUB/LEAGUE/PLAYER PUBLICATIONS. PL
Image:
Chelsea’s match against Ipswich at Stamford Bridge. Pic: Reuters

‘It’s the only way I was going to get here’

Ticket exchange websites can be the only way for some fans overseas to come to matches.

When Ipswich played at Stamford Bridge on 13 April, Baz Gillespie was able to watch after 20 years living in Cyprus by paying a vastly-inflated £300 for two tickets on a website other than Vivid.

“The only way I was going to get here was that way,” he said, remembering the days he could just queue up and pay a fiver for a ticket.

The same match was Martin van Dijk’s first-ever game at the Bridge, having come from the Netherlands after paying €150 (£128) on another exchange website after initially trying through Vivid.

“If there’s no other option, and you want to visit, it’s the only way, but I’d rather get it through like the normal way,” he said.

Chelsea fan Martin van Dijk travelled from the Netherlands
Image:
Chelsea fan Martin van Dijk paid €150 for a ticket on a resale website

‘An absolute disgrace’

It is the “normal way” that so many supporters want to protect and are aghast at Mr Boehly’s links to Vivid, predating his purchase of a stake in Chelsea.

“It’s an absolute disgrace,” supporter Ben Grey said. “He shouldn’t be involved in Chelsea and a reselling website. It’s unethical from a basic perspective.

“The club are coming out with communication saying that they’re against ticket reselling and our semi-majority shareholder [has a website] reselling tickets to our games.”

Asked what the Premier League should do, he replied: “I’m a massive Chelsea fan, I don’t want Chelsea to be hit hard by anything.

“But the fact of the matter is they need to sort that out and if they’re allowing there to be an owner of a club who’s reselling tickets, it’s a disgrace.”

Chelsea supporter Ben Grey
Image:
Fan Ben Grey said Mr Boehy shouldn’t be involved in Chelsea and a reselling website

‘Not a very good look’

Another fan, Rich Still, called it “21st century greed”.

The issue is resonating with young children.

Rhys Edwards, watching with his father, said: “It doesn’t look too good on Chelsea and their owners to be fair.

“Saying that [the website] is not authorised by the league they’re playing in isn’t a very good look.”

Officials with Chelsea, the Premier League and Mr Boehly declined to comment.

The Vivid statement to Sky News stressed: “It is important to note that Vivid Seats does not set the base price for tickets sold on its marketplace or receive any revenue from that base price; only the seller sets and receives the base ticket price.”

Labour MP for Ealing Central and Acton Rupa Huq
Image:
Labour MP Rupa Huq has proposed a law change to improve pricing transparency

‘It’s like the Wild West’

Vivid highlighted to Sky News its “long-standing partnership”, including being a backer of a 2023 summer tour of the United States.

Chelsea’s website featured a quote saying: “We are pleased to join with a company committed to becoming the ultimate partner for connecting fans to the live events, teams and artists they love.”

The government has launched a consultation to prevent people from being ripped off in Britain by the resale of tickets.

Read more:
Chelsea star’s £160,000 car seized
UK set to host 2035 Women’s World Cup

The limit could range from the cost of the original ticket to a 30% uplift to stop the public being “fleeced” by professional touts.

Labour MP for Ealing Central and Acton, Rupa Huq, has separately proposed a change to the law to improve pricing transparency on secondary ticketing sites.

“It’s an unregulated market,” she told Sky News. “It’s like the Wild West. It needs getting back into control.”

Continue Reading

UK

Woman stabbed to death in Enfield, north London

Published

on

By

Woman stabbed to death in Enfield, north London

A murder investigation is under way after a woman was stabbed to death in north London.

Police were called to an address in Ayley Croft, Enfield, around 7pm on Saturday following reports of a stabbing.

Emergency workers treated a 45-year-old woman but she died at the scene, the Metropolitan Police said.

The victim’s next of kin has been informed and is being supported by specialist officers.

GVs from SN footage on 20/04/2025 at scene of murder on 19/04/2025 of woman at Gainsborough House, Ayley Croft, Enfield in north London.
Ingest 25 NM25 SKY SAF ENFIELD MURDER GVS ENFIELD 2045
Image:
Officers at the scene in Enfield

GVs from SN footage on 20/04/2025 at scene of murder on 19/04/2025 of woman at Gainsborough House, Ayley Croft, Enfield in north London.
Ingest 25 NM25 SKY SAF ENFIELD MURDER GVS ENFIELD 2045

No one has been arrested in connection with her death.

Police have been seen focusing on Gainsborough House, a high-rise block on the estate.

An officer was spotted at the window on the fifth floor. Patrols have also been seen outside.

Police officer on 5th floor of Gainsborough House
GVs from SN footage on 20/04/2025 at scene of murder on 19/04/2025 of woman at Gainsborough House, Ayley Croft, Enfield in north London.
Ingest 25 NM25 SKY SAF ENFIELD MURDER GVS ENFIELD 2045
Image:
An officer in Gainsborough House

Detective Chief Inspector Neil John said: “Our thoughts are with the victim’s family at this difficult time.

“As our investigation continues, there will be an increased police presence in the area, and a crime scene remains in place.

“We understand this will be very distressing to the local community and anyone who has concerns can speak to local officers.”

Read more from Sky News:
Husband describes ‘horror’ as wife fatally hit by van
Prince Andrew joins King and Queen at Easter service

Police are appealing for dashcam footage from anyone who was driving through Ayley Croft between 6.30pm and 7.30pm on Saturday.

Continue Reading

UK

Ranked: Britain’s 10 worst airports for flight delays

Published

on

By

Ranked: Britain's 10 worst airports for flight delays

Gatwick is the UK’s worst airport for flight delays for the second year running, according to new data from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

After suffering from continued air traffic control (ATC) disruptions, departures from the West Sussex airport were delayed by more than 23 minutes on average in 2024.

In 2023, its flights were delayed by nearly 27 minutes – so the airport, which is the UK’s second busiest, has seen an improvement.

A spokesperson said the airport had a “robust plan” to improve things further in 2025, including a new method to separate arriving aircraft, and trialling the co-ordination of connecting jet bridges to planes remotely.

They said Gatwick remains “the world’s most efficient single-runway airport, with flights departing or arriving every 55 seconds”.

Gatwick was badly impacted by ATC staff shortages both in Europe and in its own control tower last year, which a 2024 report by the Royal Aeronautical Society suggested may be in part due to the pandemic.

It said staffing was reduced because of a downturn in traffic during lockdowns, and recruiting and training new ATC workers can take up to three years.

Julia Lo Bue-Said, chief executive of Advantage Travel Partnership, a network of independent travel agents, said passengers should expect better than “stuck in terminals” for hours “with little information or support”.

UK’s top ten worst airports for delays – ranked

10 – Cardiff Airport

Cardiff had average delays of 17 minutes and 36 seconds.

9 – Luton Airport

Luton recorded average delays of 17 minutes and 42 seconds in 2024.

That was an improvement on the year before, with the airport recording delays of nearly 23 minutes in 2023.

8 – Bournemouth Airport

Bournemouth also saw an improvement.

Despite recording average delays of 17 minutes and 48 seconds, it saw around a two-and-a-half minute improvement on the year before.

7 – Edinburgh Airport

Scotland’s busiest airport had average delays of 18 minutes and six seconds in 2024.

That was an improvement of nearly three-and-a-half minutes from the 12 months previous.

6 – Exeter Airport

Exeter, on the other hand, saw growing delays in 2024.

Last year’s data showed average delays of 15 minutes and 42 seconds at the airport.

In 2024, that figure jumped to 19 minutes.

5 – Teesside International Airport

Teesside also recorded longer delays of around two minutes on average.

In 2024, its departing flights were delayed by an average of 19 minutes and six seconds.

4 – Stansted Airport

Stansted recorded average delays of 19 minutes and 36 seconds in 2024, a 30-second increase on the previous year.

3 – Manchester Airport

The UK’s third-busiest airport came third on the list with average delays of 20 minutes last year.

In 2023, its delays were longer by nearly two minutes.

2 – Birmingham Airport

Birmingham saw delays of 21 minutes and 18 seconds.

Despite moving up the list, it improved its delay time by 12 seconds on the year before.

1 – Gatwick Airport

Gatwick Airport recorded delays of 23 minutes and 18 seconds, an improvement of over three minutes and 36 seconds.

At the other end of the table…

Belfast City airport recorded the best punctuality in the UK for the second year in a row.

Its typical delay per flight was less than 12 minutes.

The average delay for flights from major UK airports was 18 minutes and 24 seconds in 2024, down from 20 minutes and 42 seconds in 2023.

Read more from Sky News:
Husband describes ‘horror’ as wife killed on golf course
Police appeal over ‘senseless’ damage to seven statues

“Aviation continues to recover from the pandemic, and operates in an extremely busy, global environment with resilience challenges,” said a spokesperson for trade body AirportsUK.

“It is therefore positive that the data shows delays continue to come down as everyone in aviation works together to provide the best possible service to passengers.”

Continue Reading

Trending