The Nashville Predators disagreed that a “weird” Minnesota Wild overtime goal scored with the net displaced Tuesday night should have counted.

Wild forward Kirill Kaprizov sent a pass across the crease to teammate Marcus Johansson just as Predators goalie Justus Annunen pushed the net off its moorings. Johansson’s shot hit the side of the net as the cage continued to slide out of place. He collected the puck and then backhanded it over the goal line and off the end boards with the net dislodged.

The referee signaled a goal at 3:38 of overtime, and it was upheld after an NHL video review. Minnesota won, 3-2, overcoming an emotional letdown when Nashville’s Steven Stamkos tied the score with just 0.3 seconds left in regulation.

“The explanation was that, in [the referee’s] opinion, it was a goal. I disagree with his opinion, but that’s the way it is,” Nashville coach Andrew Brunette said.

Stamkos wasn’t pleased with the goal call after the game.

“Obviously, a weird play. I can see the confusion, but the confusing part for us was why it was so emphatically called [a goal]. I get it. Listen, the net came off. If the puck goes in right away, no problem if the net is off. But he missed the net, and the puck actually bounced back to him because the net was sideways,” he said.

The NHL’s Situation Room upheld the goal because it felt Annunen caused the net to be displaced prior to an “imminent scoring opportunity” by Johansson and cited Rule 63.7 as justification. The rule reads:

“In the event that the goal post is displaced, either deliberately or accidentally, by a defending player, prior to the puck crossing the goal line between the normal position of the goalposts, the Referee may award a goal. In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have been displaced by the actions of a defending player, the attacking player must have an imminent scoring opportunity prior to the goal post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.”

Stamkos didn’t believe that Johansson’s goal-scoring shot was only made possible by the net having come off its moorings.

“I understand the net came off. I don’t think there was any intent from our goaltender to knock it off — it came off twice today. From our vantage point, we thought the puck came back to him on the second attempt because the net was off. If not, the puck goes behind the net, and we live to fight another day. So, that’s where we didn’t agree with the call,” he said.

Brunette doesn’t believe his goalie intentionally pushed the net off its moorings.

“I don’t think just by the physics of pushing that’s what he was trying to do. I thought they missed the net. If the net didn’t dislodge, you would have ended up hitting the net,” he said.

“Unfortunately, they didn’t see it the same way. And you move on.”

This was the second win in a row for the Wild, moving them to 5-6-3 on the season. Nashville dropped to 5-6-4, losing its second straight overtime game.

“We deserved a lot better, for sure. One of our best games of the season, for sure,” Stamkos said.

Cadillac wants to live up to its “standard of the world” tag line so bad they can taste is – but adding $60K to the CELESTIQ’s MSRP might not be the flex the marketing team might think. To teach them a lesson, we’re going to ignore the CELESTIQ and list every new EV you can buy for less than that $60K price hike, instead. Enjoy!

Cadillac is on the verge of an electric renaissance, with nearly 40% of all new Caddies sold last quarter being electric and historic votes of confidence coming from the international motoring press. That said, a $60,000 price hike on the company’s hand built, ultra-luxury flagship CELESTIQ sedan feels especially like a cynical cash grab in today’s economy.

So, instead of talking about the now $60,000 pricier Cadillac CELESTIQ, I’ve decided to give you a list of all the new EVs you can buy (in the US, at least) for less than that $60K. Take a look at the list, below, then let me know if I missed any in the comments.

• Audi Q4 e-tron — $50,600
• Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback — $59,000
• BMW i4 — $57,900
• Cadillac LYRIQ — $59,200
• Cadillac OPTIQ — $50,900
• Chevy Brightdrop — $46,425
• Chevy Blazer EV — $44,600
• Chevy Equinox EV — $33,600
• Chevy Silverado EV — $55,895
• Dodge Charger Daytona — $59,595
• Fiat 500e — $30,500
• Ford E-Transit — $45,700
• Ford F-150 Lightning — $54,780
• Ford Mustang Mach-E — $37,995
• Genesis GV60 — $52,525
• Honda Prologue — $47,400
• Hyundai IONIQ 5 — $42,600
• Hyundai IONIQ 6 — $37,850
• Hyundai IONIQ 9 — $58,955
• Hyundai Kona EV — $32,975
• Kia EV6 — $42,900
• Kia EV9 — $54,900
• Kia Niro EV — $39,600
• Lexus RZ — $44,095
• Mercedes EQB — $53,050
• Nissan Ariya — $39,770
• Nissan LEAF — $29,990
• Subaru Solterra — $38,495
• Tesla Model Y — $39,990
• Tesla Model 3 — $36,990
• Toyota bZ/bZ4X — $34,900
• Vinfast VF8 — $41,100
• Volkswagen ID.4 — $45,095

If you’re curious about what those vehicles are actually selling for, what rebates and special rates are out there, or even just want to take one for a test drive, click on one of the links and you’ll be directed to a local dealer who can walk you through it all (trusted affiliate link).

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Original content from Electrek.

If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.