As retail traders continue to exert their influence on the markets, the brokerage landscape is turning ever more competitive. In some ways, what were seeing is an accessibility arms race, where the offering of exchange-traded securities and derivatives is increasingly being tailored to beginners and smaller investors.
The idea is to make access to these products cheaper, easier, and thus to allow investors from all walks of life to gain exposure to these markets. Zero commissions were previously one of the frontiers of the battle between retail trading venues, however, today fractional and notional trading is very much the front line.Obstacles to Small Investors
The indivisibility of shares has always been a stubborn barrier to entry for retail traders, and its becoming more so as the stock prices of mega-companies that are most popular among them continue to rise.
Currently, a share of Tesla stock is trading for just under $197, while Meta shares are going for $174, and Apple for $151. Without the ability to allocate fractional amounts, the above prices represent the minimum investment amount of 1 share for someone seeking exposure to any of these names.
This is problematic as it places diversification out of the reach of smaller investors who cant afford to purchase a selection of different names outright. This is exacerbated by the fact that these securities become even more inaccessible during bull markets, precisely when interest in share-buying tends to peak. Tesla stock reached a high of over $400 in November of 2021, Meta over $380, and Apple over $180.
The ability to invest fractional amounts in an affordable manner solves the above issue. It levels the playing field by allowing a far wider base of investors to gain a share in the wealth created by these and other iconic companies. For example, a broker offering shares in 0.1 increments can allow someone to purchase a tenth of a share in each of the above companies for just over $50 ($19.70 + $17.40 + $15.10 = $52.20).
This enables an investor to allocate a small amount to each company every month, or in the case of notional trading, they can dollar-cost average into their chosen names on a monthly basis by just splitting that $50 equally between each stock. This is why fractional shares are such a big deal. Theyre the single most important thing brokers can do to catalyze the growing interest in investing among the general public, as well as encouraging new demographics to start participating in these markets.Fractional Order Routing
As with all things, the devil in the details. The way in which fractional shares offerings are implemented by brokers directly translates to how competitive they can be, as well as to what degree they can appeal to investor preferences.
A common approach to supporting fractional trading is known as route as received. In this model, when a broker receives a fractional order, they simply route it directly to the counterparty and everything is handled on their end. This is the simplest approach as it means that the brokerage doesnt have to concern itself with any of the technological and risk management logistics involved in holding and managing fractional inventories.
On the other hand, it means that the brokerage can only implement fractional trades on the assets offered by its executing venue, which can be limited. Theres also the issue of fees to consider, which can make the trading of fractional shares less favorable when the end client is investing small amounts. Both of the above mean that brokers offering fractional trades on a wider selection of names, and at more affordable prices, will enjoy a competitive advantage in an already highly competitive segment.Internal Fractional Inventory
The other approach is for the broker to manage their own fractional inventory internally. In this model, the broker keeps a small inventory of shares on its books for the purposes of netting-off incoming fractional orders.
A fractional rounding algorithm is employed to perform this function, so that when a new order comes in that requires fractions of shares, these can be allocated directly from internal inventory. In the case of the inventory being depleted, an order thats been rounded-up to the nearest whole number is forwarded to the brokers counterparty. When this order is filled, the client order quantity is distributed to the customer, while the remaining fractional quantity is placed in the brokers inventory.
In this way, the broker only has to keep a relatively small amount of shares on its books, and with automated position closure protocols in place, it can ensure that its exposure to any given stock will never exceed a predefined amount before those excess shares are automatically liquidated.
Pre-allocated block orders can also be used to place large group orders for a brokerages customers that can include whole shares, fractions, and notional amounts, with an order management system in place to allocate the correct qualities to relevant customers. The approach may seem a great deal more complex on the surface, but modern brokerage platforms are more than up to the task, allowing brokers to take control of their offerings, appeal to a wider client base, increase volumes, and generate revenues from commissions or fees depending on the business model.Introducing DXtrade XT
DXtrade XT is Devexperts flagship multi-asset trading platform for brokers offering exchange-traded securities and derivatives. It includes a web-based trading portal and native iOS and Android mobile applications. The platform features a fractional order management system with support for both fractional quantities and notional amounts, and comes packaged with a suite of broker administration tools.
Fully branded with company logos and colors, DXtrade XT is easy to integrate with any existing brokerage architecture and comes out-of-the-box with market data and news provision integrations. Maintained and supported by Devexperts around the clock, it has everything a broker requires to start their own in-house fractional shares offering and management thereof.
It looks pretty sweet, too. Get in touchto start the conversation about what it can do for your business. Or get onto your broker and request that they integrate it!
Featured image sourced from Shutterstock
This post was authored by an external contributor and does not represent Benzinga's opinions and has not been edited for content.
Zohran Mamdani calls himself “Donald Trump’s worst nightmare”. They are the words of a man living the dream.
It’s because the 34-year-old is the headline act in Tuesday’s referendum on Trump 2.0. A statement night in US politics, as Americans – some, at least – deliver a verdict on what they’ve seen so far.
Of four electoral contests across the US – including in California, New Jersey and Virginia – the race to be New York mayor is the most compulsive and consequential.
The polls have Mamdani, the Democratic nominee, as the frontrunner. If he wins, it would signify big change in the Big Apple.
Born in Uganda to Indian parents (he moved to the US aged seven), Mamdani would become New York’s first Muslim mayor.
He is a democratic socialist whose supporters will see victory as laying down a template for taking on Trump, even if the party’s old guard is sceptical.
An effective campaign has focused on the costs and quality of life in New York, promising universal childcare, a rent freeze, free bus travel and grocery shops run by the city.
Image: Progressives Bernie Sanders and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez have endorsed Mamdani. Pic: Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx/AP
So why is he controversial?
The message has resonated with New Yorkers squeezed on affordability, but his payment plan is open to question.
Mamdani plans to raise $9bn by raising taxes on the wealthy and on corporations, but he would face a struggle to gain the necessary consent of the New York State legislature and governor.
Mamdani’s politics are pegged to the “progressive” left wing of his party, and his campaign success plays into the Democrats’ quandary around a longer-term comeback strategy.
The politics that succeed in New York don’t necessarily resonate nationwide, and a party establishment has been reluctant to embrace Mamdani.
Democrat Chuck Schumer, Senate minority leader, has declined to endorse him at all.
Party management aside, he won’t have been impressed when Mamdani was arrested outside Schumer’s Brooklyn home as part of a 2023 protest calling for a ceasefire following Hamas’ October 7th attack on Israel.
Mamdani has been a staunch critic of Israel and, in the past, has advocated defunding the police, decriminalising prostitution and closing New York City jails.
Image: Mamdani was at the White House to announce a hunger strike demanding a permanent ceasefire between Israel and Gaza in November 2023. Pic: AP
His background and Islamic faith are threaded through opposition attacks. He has been criticised for refusing to denounce the phrase “globalise the intifada”, used by pro-Palestinian activists.
Subsequently, he said he would “discourage” the term and would combat antisemitism through actions as well as words.
It hasn’t stopped his Republican rival, Curtis Sliwa, claiming Mamdani supported “global jihad”.
Andrew Cuomo, running as an independent after losing the Democratic primary to Mamdani, has labelled him “the most divisive candidate I have ever experienced in New York”.
The president, who falsely labels Mamdani a communist, said on Truth Social on the eve of the election: “Whether you personally like Andrew Cuomo or not, you really have no choice.
“You must vote for him, and hope he does a fantastic job. He is capable of it, Mamdani is not!”
At a rally the same night, Mamdani fired back to say: “The MAGA movement’s embrace of Andrew Cuomo is reflective of Donald Trump’s understanding that this would be the best mayor for him.
“Not the best mayor for New York City, not the best mayor for New Yorkers, but the best mayor for Donald Trump and his administration.”
Follow the World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
The Republican spin on the prospect of a Mamdani victory is that it would reflect a move towards radical extremism by the Democratic Party.
Trump has even suggested he may withhold federal funds from New York if Mamdani wins.
In time, Democrats would need to interpret and apply the lessons of a Mamdani victory. But more than anything else, they need a win to feel a pulse in a party undergoing an identity crisis.
Image: During the primaries, Mamdani held a news conference outside Cuomo’s apartment in March. Pic: zz/Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx
One battle after another
The same applies to Tuesday contests for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, fascinating in terms of the vote winners and vote breakdown.
What will be the verdict, nine months in, of people who turned to Trump at the last election? Will he hold onto the Latino vote, given his immigration policy, ICE raids, and other orders?
In California, Tuesday sees a redistricting vote to counter Republican gerrymandering elsewhere. If backed by the public, the plan will increase the number of winnable Democratic seats in the House of Representatives.
Donald Trump sits down for an interview with CBS’ 60 Minutes – the programme he sued successfully for $16m just four months ago.
All the while, his poll numbers are at an all-time low due to the government shutdown, as hundreds of thousands of federal workers remain unpaid and food benefits for millions of people run out.
And is this the week the real Democrats stand up? Their favourability numbers are also dire, but will the emergence of a firebrand left-wing mayor in New York City, in the shape of Zohran Mamdani, and a handful of positive off-year election results on Tuesday be the spark they desperately need to counter Trump’s MAGA agenda?
HONG KONG, CHINA – 2025/03/01: In this photo illustration, Artificial intelligence (AI) apps of perplexity, DeepSeek and ChatGPT are seen on a smartphone screen.
Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images
As companies pour billions into artificial intelligence, HSBC CEO Georges Elhedery on Tuesday warned of a mismatch between investments and revenues.
Speaking at the Global Financial Leaders’ Investment Summit in Hong Kong, Elhedery said the scale of investment poses a conundrum for companies: while the computing power for AI is essential, current revenue profiles may not justify such massive spending.
Morgan Stanley in July estimated that over the next five years, global data center capacity would grow six times, with data centers and their hardware alone costing $3 trillion by the end of 2028.
McKinsey said in a report in April that by 2030, data centers equipped to handle AI processing loads would require $5.2 trillion in capital expenditure to keep up with compute demand, while the capex for those powering traditional IT applications is forecast at $1.5 trillion.
Elhedery said that consumers were not ready to pay for it, and businesses will be cautious as productivity benefits will not materialize in a year or two.
“These are like five year trends, and therefore the ramp up means that we will start seeing real revenue benefits and real readiness to pay for it, probably later than than the expectations of investors,” he said.
William Ford, chairman and CEO of General Atlantic, speaking at the same panel, agreed: “In the long term, you’re going to create a whole new set of industries and applications, and there will be a productivity payoff, but that’s a 10-, 20-year play.”
OpenAI, which set off the AI frenzy with the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, has announced roughly $1 trillion worth of infrastructure deals with partners including Nvidia, Oracle and Broadcom.
Ford said that the huge expenditure that is going into the sector shows that people recognize the long-term impact of AI. This sector, however, will be capital-intensive initially, he said adding that “you need to, sort of, pay up front for the opportunity that’s going to come down the road.”
Ford warned there could be “misallocation of capital, destruction, overvaluation… [and] irrational exuberance” in the initial stages, and also added that it can be difficult to pick winners and losers at the moment.
“You’re really betting on this being a broad based technology, more like railroads or electricity, that had profound impacts over over time, and reshaped the economy, but were very hard to predict exactly how in the first few years.”