ChartHop CEO Ian White breathed a major sigh of relief in late January after his cloud software startup raised a $20 million funding round. He’d started the process six months earlier during a brutal period for tech stocks and a plunge in venture funding.
For ChartHop’s prior round in 2021, it took White less than a month to raise $35 million. The market turned against him in a hurry.
“There was just a complete reversal of the speed at which investors were willing to move,” said White, whose company sells cloud technology used by human resources departments.
Whatever comfort White was feeling in January quickly evaporated last week. On March 9 — a Thursday — ChartHop held its annual revenue kickoff at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel in Tempe, Arizona. As White was speaking in front of more than 80 employees, his phone was blowing up with messages.
White stepped off stage to find hundreds of panicked messages from other founders about Silicon Valley Bank, whose stock was down more than 60% after the firm said it was trying to raise billions of dollars in cash to make up for deteriorating deposits and ill-timed investments in mortgage-backed securities.
Startup executives were scrambling to figure out what to do with their money, which was locked up at the 40-year-old firm long known as a linchpin of the tech industry.
“My first thought, I was like, ‘this is not like FTX or something,'” White said of the cryptocurrency exchange that imploded late last year. “SVB is a very well-managed bank.”
But a bank run was on, and by Friday SVB had been seized by regulators in the second-biggest bank failure in U.S. history. ChartHop banks with JPMorgan Chase, so the company didn’t have direct exposure to the collapse. But White said many of his startup’s customers held their deposits at SVB and were now uncertain if they’d be able to pay their bills.
While the deposits were ultimately backstopped last weekend and SVB’s government-appointed CEO tried to reassure clients that the bank was open for business, the future of Silicon Valley Bank is very much uncertain, further hampering an already troubled startup funding environment.
SVB was the leader in so-called venture debt, providing loans to risky early-stage companies in software, drug development and other areas like robotics and climate-tech. Now it’s widely expected that such capital will be less available and more expensive.
White said SVB has shaken the confidence of an industry already grappling with rising interest rates and stubbornly high inflation.
Exit activity for venture-backed startups in the fourth quarter plunged more than 90% from a year earlier to $5.2 billion, the lowest quarterly total in more than a decade, according to data from the PitchBook-NVCA Venture Monitor. The number of deals declined for a fourth consecutive quarter.
In February, funding was down 63% from $48.8 billion a year earlier, according to a Crunchbase funding report. Late-stage funding fell by 73% year-over-year, and early-stage funding was down 52% over that stretch.
‘World was falling apart’
CNBC spoke with more than a dozen founders and venture capitalists, before and after the SVB meltdown, about how they’re navigating the precarious environment.
David Friend, a tech industry veteran and CEO of cloud data storage startup Wasabi Technologies, hit the fundraising market last spring in an attempt to find fresh cash as public market multiples for cloud software were plummeting.
Wasabi had raised its prior round a year earlier, when the market was humming, IPOs and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) were booming and investors were drunk on low interest rates, economic stimulus and rocketing revenue growth.
By last May, Friend said, several of his investors had backed out, forcing him to restart the process. Raising money was “very distracting” and took up more than two-thirds of his time over nearly seven months and 100 investor presentations.
“The world was falling apart as we were putting the deal together,” said Friend, who co-founded the Boston-based startup in 2015 and previously started numerous other ventures including data backup vendor Carbonite. “Everybody was scared at the time. Investors were just pulling in their horns, the SPAC market had fallen apart, valuations for tech companies were collapsing.”
Friend said the market always bounces back, but he thinks a lot of startups don’t have the experience or the capital to weather the current storm.
“If I didn’t have a good management team in place to run the company day to day, things would have fallen apart,” Friend said, in an interview before SVB’s collapse. “I think we squeaked through, but if I had to go back to the market right now and raise more money, I think it’d be extremely difficult.”
In January, Tom Loverro, an investor with Institutional Venture Partners, shared a thread on Twitter predicting a “mass extinction event” for early and mid-stage companies. He said it will make the 2008 financial crisis “look quaint.”
Loverro was hearkening back to the period when the market turned, starting in late 2021. The Nasdaq hit its all-time high in November of that year. As inflation started to jump and the Federal Reserve signaled interest rate hikes were on the way, many VCs told their portfolio companies to raise as much cash as they’d need to last 18 to 24 months, because a massive pullback was coming.
In a tweet that was widely shared across the tech world, Loverro wrote that a “flood” of startups will try to raise capital in 2023 and 2024, but that some will not get funded.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell arrives for testimony before the Senate Banking Committee March 7, 2023 in Washington, DC.
Win Mcnamee | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Next month will mark 18 months since the Nasdaq peak, and there are few signs that investors are ready to hop back into risk. There hasn’t been a notable venture-backed tech IPO since late 2021, and none appear to be on the horizon. Meanwhile, late-stage venture-backed companies like Stripe, Klarna and Instacart have been dramatically reducing their valuations.
In the absence of venture funding, money-losing startups have had to cut their burn rates in order to extend their cash runway. Since the beginning of 2022, roughly 1,500 tech companies have laid off a total of close to 300,000 people, according to the website Layoffs.fyi.
Kruze Consulting provides accounting and other back-end services to hundreds of tech startups. According to the firm’s consolidated client data, which it shared with CNBC, the average startup had 28 months of runway in January 2022. That fell to 23 months in January of this year, which is still historically high. At the beginning of 2019, it sat at under 20 months.
Madison Hawkinson, an investor at Costanoa Ventures, said more companies than normal will go under this year.
“It’s definitely going to be a very heavy, very variable year in terms of just viability of some early-stage startups,” she told CNBC.
Hawkinson specializes in data science and machine learning. It’s one of the few hot spots in startup land, due largely to the hype around OpenAI’s chatbot called ChatGPT, which went viral late last year. Still, being in the right place at the right time is no longer enough for an aspiring entrepreneur.
Founders should anticipate “significant and heavy diligence” from venture capitalists this year instead of “quick decisions and fast movement,” Hawkinson said.
The enthusiasm and hard work remains, she said. Hawkinson hosted a demo event with 40 founders for artificial intelligence companies in New York earlier this month. She said she was “shocked” by their polished presentations and positive energy amid the industrywide darkness.
“The majority of them ended up staying till 11 p.m.,” she said. “The event was supposed to end at 8.”
Founders ‘can’t fall asleep at night’
But in many areas of the startup economy, company leaders are feeling the pressure.
Matt Blumberg, CEO of Bolster, said founders are optimistic by nature. He created Bolster at the height of the pandemic in 2020 to help startups hire executives, board members and advisers, and now works with thousands of companies while also doing venture investing.
Even before the SVB failure, he’d seen how difficult the market had become for startups after consecutive record-shattering years for financing and an extended stretch of VC-subsidized growth.
“I coach and mentor a lot of founders, and that’s the group that’s like, they can’t fall asleep at night,” Blumberg said in an interview. “They’re putting weight on, they’re not going to the gym because they’re stressed out or working all the time.”
VCs are telling their portfolio companies to get used to it.
“In this environment, my advice is pretty simple, which is — that thing we lived through the last three or four years, that was fantasy,” Gurley said. “Assume this is normal.”
Laurel Taylor recently got a crash course in the new normal. Her startup, Candidly, announced a $20.5 million financing round earlier this month, just days before SVB became front-page news. Candidly’s technology helps consumers deal with education-related expenses like student debt.
Taylor said the fundraising process took her around six months and included many conversations with investors about unit economics, business fundamentals, discipline and a path to profitability.
As a female founder, Taylor said she’s always had to deal with more scrutiny than her male counterparts, who for years got to enjoy the growth-at-all-costs mantra of Silicon Valley. More people in her network are now seeing what she’s experienced in the six years since she started Candidly.
“A friend of mine, who is male, by the way, laughed and said, ‘Oh, no, everybody’s getting treated like a female founder,'” she said.
CORRECTION: This article has been updated to show that ChartHop held its annual revenue kickoff at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel in Tempe, Arizona, on Thursday, March 9.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk attends the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 13, 2025.
Hamad I Mohammed | Reuters
What started off as a particularly rough year for Tesla investors is turning into quite the celebration.
Following a 36% plunge in the first quarter, the stock’s worst period since 2022, Tesla shares have rallied all the way back, reaching an all-time high of $489.48. That tops its prior intraday record of $488.54 reached almost exactly a year ago.
The stock got a spark this week after CEO Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, said Tesla has been testing driverless vehicles in Austin, Texas with no occupants on board, almost six months after launching a pilot program with safety drivers.
With the rally, Tesla’s market cap climbed to $1.63 trillion, making it the seventh-most valuable publicly traded company, behind Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta, and slightly ahead of Broadcom. Musk’s net worth now sits at close to $683 billion, according to Forbes, more than $400 billion ahead of Google co-founder Larry Page, who is second on the list.
Bullish investors view the news as a sign that the company will finally make good on its longtime promise to turn its existing electric vehicles into robotaxis with a software update.
Tesla’s automated driving systems being tested in Austin are not yet widely available, and a myriad of safety related questions remain.
It’s been a rollercoaster year for Tesla, which entered the year in a seemingly favorable position due to Musk’s role in President Donald Trump’s White House, running the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, an effort to dramatically downsize the federal government and slash federal regulations.
However, Musk’s work with Trump, endorsements of far-right political figures around the world, and incendiary political rhetoric sparked a consumer backlash that continues to weigh on Tesla’s brand reputation and sales.
For the first quarter, Tesla reported a 13% decrease in deliveries and a 20% plunge in automotive revenue. In the second quarter, the stock rallied but the sales decline continued, with auto revenue dropping 16%.
The second half of the year has been much stronger. In October, Tesla reported a 12% increase in third-quarter revenue as buyers in the U.S. rushed to snap up EVs and take advantage of a federal tax credit that expired at the end of September. The stock jumped 40% in the period.
Business challenges remain due to the loss of the tax credit, the ongoing backlash against Musk, and strong competition from lower-cost or more appealing EVs made by companies including BYD and Xiaomi in China and Volkswagen in Europe.
While Tesla released more affordable variants of its popular Model Y SUV and Model 3 sedans in October, those haven’t helped its U.S. or European sales so far. In the U.S., the new stripped-down options appear to be cannibalizing sales of Tesla’s higher-priced models. According to Cox Automotive, Tesla’s U.S. sales dropped in November to a four-year low.
Despite a difficult environment for EV makers in the U.S., Mizuho raised its price target on Tesla this week to $530 from $475 and kept its buy recommendation on the stock. Analysts at the firm wrote that reported improvements in Tesla’s FSD, or Full Self-Driving (Supervised) technology, “could support an accelerated expansion” of its “robotaxi fleet in Austin, San Francisco, and potentially earlier elimination of the chaperone.”
Tesla operates a Robotaxi-branded ridehailing service in Texas and California but the vehicles include drivers or human safety supervisors on board for now.
The Baker Library of the Harvard Business School on the Harvard University campus in Boston, Massachusetts, US, on Tuesday, May 27, 2025. Recent research conducted by the Digital Data Design Institute at Harvard Business School is investigating where AI is most effective in increasing productivity and performance — and where humans still have the upper hand.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Workplace AI adoption is at an all-time high, according to Anthropic data, but just because organizations use AI doesn’t mean it’s effective.
“Nobody knows those answers, even though a lot of people are saying they do,” said Jen Stave, chief operator at the Digital Data Design Institute (D^3) at Harvard Business School. While much of the business world tries to figure out where AI can be best deployed, the team at D^3 is researching where the technology is most effective in increasing productivity and performance — and where humans still have the upper hand.
Workplace collaboration is a long-held standard for innovation and productivity, but AI is changing what that looks like. AI-equipped individuals perform at comparable levels to teams without access to AI, D^3’s recent research in partnership with Procter & Gamble finds. “AI is capable of reproducing certain benefits typically gained through human collaboration, potentially revolutionizing how organizations structure their teams and allocate resources,” according to the research.
Think AI-enabled teams, not just AI-equipped individuals.
While AI-equipped individuals show significant improvement in factors like speed and performance, strategically curated teams with AI have their own advantages. When factoring in the quality of outcomes, the best, most innovative solutions come from AI-enabled teams. This research relies on AI tools not optimized for collaboration, but AI systems purpose-built for collaboration could further enhance these benefits. In other words, simply replacing humans with AI may not be the fix businesses hope for.
“Companies that are actually thinking through the changes in roles and where we need to not just lean into it but protect human jobs and maybe even add some in that space if that’s our competitive advantage, that, to me, is a signal of a super mature mindset around AI,” Stave said.
The D^3 experiment at P&G also shows that AI integration significantly reduces gaps that exist between an organization’s pockets of domain expertise. For example, having a knowledge base at hand could make any one team’s outputs more universally beneficial beyond sole teams like human resources, engineering and research and development.
Lower-level workers benefit more, but it is a double-edged sword.
Another experiment D^3 conducted with Boston Consulting Group showed AI leads to more homogenized results. “Humans have more diverse ideas, and people who use AI tend to produce more similar ideas,” Stave said, recognizing that companies with goals of standing out in the market should lean into human-led creativity.
Performers on the lower half of the skill spectrum exhibit the biggest performance gains (43%) when equipped with AI compared to performers on the top half of the skill spectrum (who get a 17% performance surge). While both outcomes are substantial, it’s the entry-level workers who get the biggest perks.
But for the less-skilled workers, it’s a double-edged sword. For instance, if AI can do junior work better, the senior-level workplace might stop delegating work to their junior counterparts, creating training deficits that negatively impact future performance. Bearing a company’s future in mind, businesses will want to carefully consider what they do and don’t delegate.
Human managers are not prepared to oversee AI agents. They need to learn
While Stave says humans serving as managers to a suite of AI agents is “absolutely going to happen,” the scaffolding to do so both effectively and with minimal adverse harm is simply not there. Stave herself has had this experience, and it contrasted with all her managerial and leadership education. “You learn how to manage according to empathy and understanding, how to make the most of human potential,” she said. “I had all these AI agents that I was personally trying to build and manage. It was a fundamentally different experience.”
Moreover, while Grammarly CEO Shishir Mehrotra said entry-level workers could be the new managers (with AI agents — not people — in their charge), the junior workforce has not actually proven to be enterprise AI-native or managerially equipped. “We want to see AI giving humans more opportunity to flourish. The challenge I have is with assuming that the junior employees are going to step in and know how to do that right away,” Stave said.
She added that the companies truly getting value from their AI deployments are the ones undertaking process redesign. Instead of relying on AI notetaking to save time, lean into where AI helps and where humans are the winners. “It’s very easy to buy a tool and implement it,” she said. “It’s really hard to actually do org redesign, because that’s when you get into all these internal empires and power struggles.”
Jim Cramer says investors better act fast while Amazon stock is still on the sale rack. BMO Capital Markets’ decision to raise its estimates on Amazon’s cloud unit is a “clarion call to buy” the stalled stock, Jim Cramer said during Tuesday’s Morning Meeting for Club members. Amazon has been the worst-performing “Magnificent Seven” stock this year due to Amazon Web Services (AWS) growth concerns, despite a step in the right direction in the third quarter. In fact, AWS reacceleration is one of the central reasons why the Investing Club sees Amazon as one of five stocks set to bounce in 2026. Analysts at BMO are now forecasting Amazon Web Services’ fiscal 2026 first-quarter revenue growth of 24%, up from their previous estimate of 23%. Following discussions with former AWS employees, BMO sees upside to Amazon’s high-margin cloud business, citing “meaningful acceleration in customer cloud commitments” in the months ahead. According to FactSet, AWS is expected to grow 22.4% in fiscal Q1 following an estimated 21% increase in Q4. Cloud computing revenue increased 20.2% year-over year in Q3 — growing at levels not since 2022 — and beating estimates at the time for an 18.1% advance. The stock surged nearly 14% in the two sessions following its late Oct. 30 earnings print and closed at a record high of $254 on Nov. 3. Shares have since dropped back down to pre-earnings release levels around $222. Jim has not been deterred. “If you could get 30 times earnings next year’s earnings with some certainty about AWS growing, then [Amazon CEO Andy Jassy] is going to get his way out of this thing. It’s going to be terrific,” he said on ” Squawk on the Street ” on Tuesday. Amazon is trading around 28 times fiscal 2026 earnings per share estimates, according to FactSet. AMZN YTD mountain AMZN stock performance year-to-date. Another factor BMO called out as a supporter of AWS growth is the availability of Anthropic’s artificial intelligence Claude model — preferred among developers. Claude is a large language model (LLM) that’s available on AWS. The analysts said that Amazon’s $8 billion investment in Anthropic positions AWS to stay on top in the cloud. In addition to raising estimates, BMO increased its Amazon price target by $3 per share to $303 and reiterated its outperform buy rating. The Club has a $275 price target on Amazon and our buy-equivalent 1 rating . (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.