Boris Johnson has said he accepts he misled parliament over partygate but insists his statements were “in good faith”.
In his evidence to the privileges committee, published on Tuesday, the former prime minister accused it of having gone “significantly beyond its terms of reference”.
He added that it was “unprecedented and absurd” to claim that relying on assurances from “trusted advisers” was “in some way reckless”.
The committee launched its probe in the wake of Sue Gray’s partygate report, which blamed a “failure of leadership and judgement” for the lockdown-busting parties that took place in No 10 during the COVID pandemic.
It offered a damning indictment of the culture that existed at the heart of government at a time when the rest of the country was ordered to follow strict social distancing guidelines.
Mr Johnson said he accepts the House of Commons “was misled by my statements that the rules and guidance had been followed completely at No. 10.
“But when the statements were made, they were made in good faith and on the basis of what I honestly knew and believed at the time,” he added.
More on Boris Johnson
Related Topics:
For many MPs, the picture painted by Ms Gray’s report came in stark contrast to the previous assurances Mr Johnson had given about there being no rule-breaking in Downing Street.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer subsequently tabled a motion in the House of Commons calling for an investigation into whether the-then prime minister had misled parliament, which MPs voted in favour of.
Advertisement
Mr Johnson conceded in his evidence that his statements to parliament “did not turn out to be correct”, but insisted he corrected the record at “the earliest opportunity”.
‘No evidence I intentionally misled the House’
He added: “There is no evidence at all that supports an allegation that I intentionally or recklessly misled the House.
“There is not a single document that indicates that I received any warning or advice that any event broke or may have broken the Rules or Guidance.”
It said it had identified at least four occasions where Mr Johnson may have misled MPs, which will form the backbone of its investigation.
The first instance was when Mr Johnson told MPs in December 2021 that no rules or guidance had been broken – when subsequent investigations by Ms Gray and the Met Police found otherwise.
The second occasion came when the former prime minister failed to tell the Commons about his own knowledge of gatherings where the rules or guidance had been broken, when evidence showed he had been present at some of them.
Thirdly, the committee said MPs may have been misled when Mr Johnson claimed on 8 December 2021 he had been given “repeated assurances” that rules were not broken.
However, these assurances only applied to one event on 18 December 2020 and not to compliance with the rules and guidance more generally.
Finally, the committee said Mr Johnson gave the impression that he could only answer MPs’ questions once the investigation by Ms Gray had determined whether rules or guidance had actually been broken.
“While repeatedly making that statement to the House he appears to have had personal knowledge he did not reveal,” the committee said.
As well as being required to be truthful to parliament at all times, MPs are also encouraged to correct the record at the earliest opportunity if they have inadvertently said something wrong.
The committee said in its interim findings that Mr Johnson “did not use the well-established procedures of the House” to correct the record, as is convention.
Russia is trying to “bully, fearmonger and manipulate” the UK and its allies with attacks under the threshold of all-out war, the new head of MI6 has said.
Blaise Metreweli, the first female chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), said Britain was “operating in a space between peace and war” and that everyone has a responsibility to understand the dangers because “the frontline is everywhere”.
In her first big speech on Monday, she also focused on Vladimir Putin’s devastating war in Ukraine, accusing him of “dragging out negotiations” on a peace deal and warning that Kyiv’s fate is “fundamental not just to European sovereignty and security but to global security”.
Offering her view on the evolution of global security threats, Ms Metreweli underlined the transformative role of technology, from artificial intelligence to quantum computing.
She said control over such advanced technologies is shifting from states to corporations and even individuals, making the balance of global power more “diffuse, more unpredictable”.
The spymaster did not name anyone.
Image: Blaise Metreweli. Pic: PA
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:12
Is time running out for peace plan?
However, innovators such as Elon Musk are becoming increasingly influential, with their technologies such as his Starlink satellites and his social media site X.
The boss of MI6 was speaking at her agency’s headquarters in London, though she said that the main work of her spies was carried “many miles away from this place – out of sight, hidden from the world, undercover, recruiting and running agents who choose to place their trust in us, sharing secrets to make the UK and the world safer”.
She warned the world was “more dangerous and contested now than it has been for decades”.
The spy chief said: “Conflict is evolving and trust eroding, just as new technologies spur both competition and dependence.
“We are being contested from sea to space – from the battlefield to the boardroom. And even our brains as disinformation manipulates our understanding of each other and ourselves… We are now operating in a space between peace and war.
“This is not a temporary state or a gradual evolution. Our world is being actively remade with profound implications for national and international security.”
Breaking with a tradition by previous chiefs of offering a view on a range of threats when speaking publicly, Ms Metreweli said she was choosing to focus on Russia.
“We all continue to face the menace of an aggressive, expansionist and revisionist Russia, seeking to subjugate Ukraine and harass NATO,” she said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:57
Ukrainian MP: Who will stop Putin?
On the conflict, she said Putin was “dragging out negotiations and shifting the cost of war on to his own population”.
Her comments come as Donald Trump is attempting to broker a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv.
General Oleksandr Syrskyi, the head of Ukraine’s armed forces, told Sky News in an interview earlier this month that he believed Putin was using the US push for negotiations as “cover” while Russian troops attempted to seize more land by force.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:35
The Wargame returns with new episodes
The MI6 boss said the UK’s support for Ukraine would endure regardless of Moscow’s stalling actions.
She also flagged a growing wave of “grey zone” hostilities – deliberately carried out under the threshold of conventional armed conflict – that she attributed to Moscow.
“It’s important to understand their [Russia’s] attempts to bully, fearmonger and manipulate because it affects us all,” she said.
“I am talking about cyber attacks on critical infrastructure. Drones buzzing airports and bases. Aggressive activity in our seas, above and below the waves. State-sponsored arson and sabotage. Propaganda and influence operations that crack open and exploit fractures within societies.”
Image: Germany’s President Steinmeier with President Zelenskyy in Berlin on Monday. Pic: Reuters
While she did not specify any particular incidents, there have been a spate of mysterious drone sightings in Denmark, Germany and Sweden; while a Russian spy ship was spotted off the coast of Scotland and acts of arson and sabotage have been carried out in the UK, such as a blaze at a warehouse in east London that was providing aid to Ukraine.
Drawing attention to another method to attack a country and its people, Ms Metreweli underlined how information is being weaponised, with falsehoods spread online that are designed to erode trust in a society and amplify divisions.
“The export of chaos is a feature not a bug in this Russian approach to international engagement and we should be ready for this to continue until Putin is forced to change his calculus,” she said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:38
NATO boss: ‘Conflict is at our door’
MI6, she said, is adapting to respond to the evolving threats.
But unusually Ms Metroweli also said the wider British public had a role to play, such as with schools helping to educate children to spot disinformation on social media and to check sources of news “and be alive to those algorithms that trigger intense reactions like fear”.
She added: “It also means everyone in society really understanding the world we are in – a world where… the frontline is everywhere. Online, on our streets, in our supply chains, in the minds and on the screens of our citizens.”
Building on the success of the highly acclaimed podcast The Wargame, Sky News presents The Wargame: Decoded – a one-off live event that takes you deep inside the minds of the wargame’s participants. Discover how they tackled the toughest challenges, the decisions they made under intense pressure, and even experience key moments of the game for yourself.
Sky News’ Deborah Haynes will guide the conversation with Sir Ben Wallace, Robert Johnson, Jack Straw, Amber Rudd, Keir Giles and General Sir Richard Barrons – real-life military chiefs, former government officials and leading experts. Together, they will unpack their experiences inside The Wargame, revealing the uncertainty, moral dilemmas and real-world pressures faced by those who must make decisions when the nation is under threat.
Join us for this unique event exploring how the UK might respond in a moment of national crisis and get a rare, unfiltered glimpse into how prepared the country truly is for war.
A “hero” pedestrian climbed into the car of Liverpool parade attacker Paul Doyle and stopped him, a court has heard.
Doyle, who used a car as a “weapon” to plough through more than 100 people celebrating Liverpool’s Premier League title win, told officers “I’ve just ruined my family’s life”, the court heard.
The sentencing hearing was told the 54-year-old was “in a rage” and his “anger had completely taken hold of him”.
Doyle is due to be sentenced on Tuesday after pleading guilty to 31 offences relating to seriously injuring people during the victory parade on 26 May.
Doyle, described as a “family man” by prosecutors, wept as footage of the horrific rampage was shown to the city’s crown court several times on Monday.
Paul Greaney KC, prosecuting, described the actions of Daniel Barr, who he called the “hero” of the day.
Image: Emergency services at the scene. Pic: AP
Mr Barr, an ex-soldier, had “bravely” jumped into the back of Doyle’s Ford Galaxy and placed the vehicle into park.
He was walking up Water Street when he noted the defendant’s Ford Galaxy in the distance, said Mr Greaney, noting the crowd’s attitude changed from “joyous to desperate”.
Doyle’s vehicle then stopped next to Mr Barr “all of a sudden”.
“Daniel Barr instinctively pulled open the rear passenger-side door and climbed in. He did so with the intention of stopping the driver,” the prosecutor said.
Mr Barr leaned forward and moved the gear into “park” and “held it as hard as he could”.
Mr Greaney added: “The Galaxy did not stop immediately, but in the end it did.”
The prosecutor said police officers forced Doyle into a police van after the attack.
This, he said, was done “in the midst of a hostile crowd”, adding that officers’ behaviour was both “brave and effective”.
When Doyle was securely in the van, Mr Greaney said police body-worn camera footage picked up him saying: “I’ve just ruined my family’s life.”
Doyle admitted dangerous driving, affray, 17 charges of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent, nine counts of causing GBH with intent, and three counts of wounding with intent last month.
He had previously denied the offences, which relate to 29 victims aged between six months old and 77 years old.
Image: Forensic officers at the scene in Water Street.
Pic: PA
The court was shown dashcam footage taken from the defendant’s car showing the attack.
Mr Greaney warned the court: “What we are about to display on the screens is truly shocking.”
There were audible gasps in the courtroom as the footage played.
Doyle could be heard repeatedly shouting at pedestrians to “move out the f****** way” as he drove through crowds.
Consistently using his vehicle’s horn, people could be seen trying to jump out of the way, with some forced on to the bonnet of the car.
“F****** pr****,” Doyle shouts as the footage continues.
By the end of the footage, people begin to attempt to run up to the vehicle.
When the car stops, one man shouts, “get the f*** out of the car”.
Image: Pic: Reuters
Mr Greaney also detailed some of the injuries sustained by victims on the day of the attack.
One woman, aged 66, spent four nights in hospital after breaking six ribs and suffering fractures to her fingers on her left hand and her left wrist.
Another woman, aged 77 at the time, spent 27 days in hospital.
The prosecutor said she suffered a fractured left forearm, fractured left collar bone, three fractured ribs, a fractured pelvis, a broken nose, as well as multiple abrasions and bruising to her head, knees and back.
Another victim, who was 17, suffered bruising to their legs, shoulder and had a small fracture to their tibia.
After suffering wound infections, it took two months before the victim regained mobility, the prosecutor added.
Victims of parade attack speak of ‘psychological injury’ and ‘flashbacks’
The victims of Paul Doyle’s attack during Liverpool’s Premier League victory parade have spoken of how they have suffered from “emotional and psychological injury” as well as “frequent flashbacks”.
A total of 78 people submitted victim statements to the court, in which they described how the “best day ever” soon became the worst.
Doyle sobbed as the words of one victim, a 12-year-old boy, were read out by prosecutor Philip Astbury at Liverpool Crown Court.
The child, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said: “I found myself on the floor having been hit by a car I did not see coming, I have never felt so scared before in my life.”
The boy’s mother said in her statement her heart sank when she saw her child inert on the floor.
She said the incident “caused me much anxiety having to watch my son deal with the pain, the frustration, him feeling down and isolated from his friends in school, the nightmares and the after-effects on him”.
The boy’s mother added: “The sight of my son lying motionless on the road, not moving for those few seconds, and the sound of the car hitting people will live with me forever.”
Another mother said she thought her baby son had died after his pram was catapulted into the air after being struck by Doyle’s vehicle, adding that she thought she would “be next”.
Sheree Aldridge, 37, said her partner Dan Eveson had proudly dressed their six-month-old son Teddy Eveson in his Liverpool FC shirt that day and “was excited to share this moment” with him.
She said in the statement: “In that moment I thought I was going to die. I didn’t know where Dan and Teddy was.
“I felt an overwhelming pain in my leg and looked up to see Teddy’s pushchair on its side further up the road. I thought my Teddy was dead.
“I thought I was next. I thought my children would grow up without a mother.”
The court also heard how a third mother, whose 13-year-old son was injured, said she has trouble sleeping due to flashbacks and has visions of her son’s “terrified face”.
Mr Greaney said some people at the scene on 26 May “thought that what was taking place was a terrorist attack”.
However, the prosecution ruled out that the defendant’s actions were “driven by ideology”.
Police investigations showed there was no problem with the vehicle, and Doyle was completely sober and “free of all drugs”, Mr Greaney said.
“The truth is a simple one – Paul Doyle just lost his temper in his desire to get to where he wanted to get to.
“In a rage, he drove into the crowd,” he added.
Doyle was arrested at the scene in Water Street just after 6pm and charged later that week.
The youngest victim was six-month-old Teddy Eveson, whose parents later told media he was thrown about 15ft down the road in his pram when the crash happened.
Doyle, of Croxteth, Liverpool, admitted attempting to cause grievous bodily harm to the baby.
Five other children, whom Doyle either injured or attempted to injure, cannot be named for legal reasons.
A five-day strike involving tens of thousands of doctors in England will go ahead as planned, the British Medical Association (BMA) has said.
The union said its resident doctor members had rejected the government’s offer to call off the strikes, and will stop work between 17 and 22 December.
Announcing the move, the BMA said 83.2% of those who took part in a poll rejected the offer, with a turnout of 65.34%.
The news comes after NHS England said it was facing the “worst case scenario” following a rise in flu cases of more than 55% in a week. Hospitals in England are said to be facing record levels of the disease for the time of year.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:54
Streeting: ‘BMA made totally unrealistic demand’
Health Secretary Wes Streeting accused the union of “shocking disregard for patient safety” for choosing to stage a walkout “to inflict damage on the NHS at the moment of maximum danger”.
He said the strikes were “self-indulgent, irresponsible and dangerous” – and said doctors would be “abandoning” patients.
Mr Streeting said the BMA had refused to postpone strikes to January and “help patients and other NHS staff cope over Christmas”. “There is no need for these strikes to go ahead this week, and it reveals the BMA’s shocking disregard for patient safety,” he added.
But the BMA said the strike was “still entirely avoidable” and that it was “willing to work to find a solution”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:45
BMA: ‘Strikes are still avoidable’
BMA resident doctors committee chair Dr Jack Fletcher said: “The health secretary should now work with us in the short time we have left to come up with a credible offer to end this jobs crisis and avert the real terms pay cuts he is pushing in 2026.”
The union said it remained “committed to ensuring patient safety” and it would be in “close contact” with NHS England during the strike action to “address safety concerns if they arise”.
The government’s offer had included a fast expansion of specialist training posts as well as covering out-of-pocket expenses such as exam fees.
It did not include extra pay, but had offered to extend the union’s strike mandate to enable any walkout to be rescheduled to January.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
Mutated virus is behind flu surge
‘Abandoning patients in hour of greatest need’
Mr Streeting said the strike “goes against everything” a medical career is about.
He said: “The government’s offer would have halved competition for jobs and put more money in resident doctors’ pockets, but the BMA has again rejected it because it doesn’t meet their ask of a further 26% pay rise.
“Resident doctors have already had a 28.9% pay rise – there is no justification for striking just because this fantasy demand has not been met.
“I am appealing to ordinary resident doctors to go to work this week. There is a different magnitude of risk in striking at this moment.
“Abandoning your patients in their hour of greatest need goes against everything a career in medicine is meant to be about.”
BMA rejects offer despite Streeting’s attack
Wes Streeting took a risky line of attack. He put an offer of more jobs to the BMA.
And while that offer was being considered he went on the offensive.
He warned the NHS would collapse if the resident doctors carried on with their strikes during a record flu season.
He repeated that line throughout the weekend when the pools were open and voting had begun.
The BMA responded by accusing Wes Streeting of “scaremongering”.
Senior NHS consultants gave interviews saying flu season was bad, but to be expected, and with the same contingency planning that happens every summer (off flu season) the NHS would cope.
The BMA will argue that Mr Streeting can make the resident doctors his scapegoat for an NHS that will struggle again this winter.
They reject that idea completely. And now they have rejected his offer.
Hospital leaders said the strike would come as the NHS “needs all hands on deck” – and called the action “bitterly disappointing”.
Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said: “This vote is a bitter pill which will inevitably result in harm to patients and damage to the NHS.
“We had hoped that the government’s recent updated offer would be enough to head off another walkout at a time when so many people are suffering with flu, and the NHS needs all hands on deck.”
Rory Deighton, acute and community care director at the NHS Confederation, said: “It is bitterly disappointing that the BMA has rejected this offer and chosen to continue with hugely disruptive strikes.”
Public support for the strikes is low, according to a YouGov poll released last week.
The results showed 58% of those asked either somewhat or strongly opposed the industrial action, while 33% somewhat or strongly supported it.