Boris Johnson has sworn “hand on heart” he did not lie to MPs about partygate events in Downing Street – and said a gathering where he was pictured holding a glass in the air was “absolutely essential for work purposes”.
The former prime minister also said the size of Number 10 made it difficult to social distance inside with staff following the guidance “to the best of our ability”.
Mr Johnson faced about three hours of questioning by the cross-party Privileges Committee as they determine whether he misled parliament by denying events in Number 10 during the pandemic broke COVID regulations. He could be suspended from the Commons and face a by-election if they find he purposefully misled the House.
In his opening remarks, Mr Johnson swore “hand on heart, I did not lie to the House” after taking an oath on the King James Bible to tell the truth during the session.
“When this inquiry was set up I was completely confident that you would find nothing to show that I knew or believed anything else, as indeed you have not,” he said.
“I was confident, not because there has been some kind of cover-up. I was confident because I knew that was what I believed and that is why I said it.”
More on Boris Johnson
Related Topics:
He added that there is no evidence of officials raising issues about breaking rules “because that never happened” as he accused the committee of not giving people at the events the chance to explain themselves.
But he claimed it had been a mistake to say guidance had been “followed completely at No 10”.
Advertisement
“I was misremembering the line that had already been put out to the media about this even, which was ‘COVID rules were followed at all times’,” he said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:33
Boris Johnson swears oath on Bible
Mr Johnson, as he did in his written evidence published on Tuesday, said it was difficult to social distance in No 10 as it is a “cramped, narrow 18th Century town house” and they had no choice but to meet “day in, day out, seven days a week in an unrelenting battle against COVID”.
“I will believe till the day I die that it was my job to thank staff for what they had done, especially during a crisis like COVID, which kept coming back, which seemed to have no end,” he said.
He said the most important point was that the police, in their inquiry, agreed his attendance at the events was not against the rules.
And he mentioned his former chief adviser Dominic Cummings, who he said has no evidence to show he raised concerns and has “every motive to lie” after the pair fell out.
‘Essential for work purposes’
When questioned about a photo of one of the events in November 2020, which shows the former PM appearing to toast staff with a drink at a leaving do for departing communications chief Lee Cain, he said: “I believe it was absolutely essential for work purposes.”
He said the meeting, which happened while social distancing was in place, was “necessary” because two senior members of staff were about to leave “in potentially acrimonious circumstances”.
“I accept that perfect social distancing is not being observed but that does not mean that what we were doing is incompatible with the guidance,” he added.
Image: 13 November 2020 gathering
The former PM insisted time and time again during the grilling that his officials assured him no rules were being broken and nobody raised any problems with him.
At one point he got frustrated at being continually asked if anybody had assured him guidance was being followed, and said: “It’s clear from what I’ve said that I was assured repeatedly by different people and on different occasions that the rules have been followed.”
But chair and veteran Labour MP Harriet Harman called his reassurances flimsy.
“Do you actually think we would be entitled to be a bit dismayed about the flimsy nature of this assurance?” she asked.
Ms Harman said it appeared his assurances “did not amount to much at all”.
Mr Johnson acknowledged he could have given a fuller explanation to MPs about his view on following COVID guidance in No 10.
“Perhaps if I had elucidated more clearly what I meant and what I felt and believed about following the guidance, that would have helped,” he said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:34
Social distancing ‘imperfectly observed’
Sue Gray crops up several times
Mr Johnson took several aims at former top civil servant Sue Gray, who carried out a partygate inquiry that criticised the leadership in No 10 at the time of the events. She has recently resigned from the civil service to become Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s chief of staff.
Committee chair Harriet Harman said in her opening remarks they are not relying on any material from Ms Gray’s report “and nor will we”, adding she is not a witness in their inquiry.
The former PM mentioned her several times in his opening remarks and answers to MPs, saying Ms Gray told him “on a couple of occasions at least” she “did not think the threshold of criminality had been reached”. He also mentioned the Sue Gray report a handful of times.
At times the interactions between committee members and Mr Johnson were terse, with the former PM at one point saying a gathering in the garden of Number 10: “I really must insist this point, people who say that we were partying in lockdown simply do not know what they are talking about.
“People who say that that event was a purely social gathering are quite wrong.”
When asked if Mr Johnson believed exceptions to the workplace rules and social distancing guidelines applied to No 10 but not to hospitals and care homes, he said: “Of course not.”
Image: 19 June 2020 event
The committee has been looking into denials made by Mr Johnson in 2021 and 2022 after a deluge of stories in 2021 claimed illegal gatherings were held in No 10 while the public was being told to stay at home.
Mr Johnson was asked about the events time and time again in the Commons, and he repeatedly denied any COVID rules were broken.
But after further articles, police and Cabinet Office investigations, and more than 100 fines, it became clear that was not the case.
MPs from all sides of the Commons questioned whether Mr Johnson had misled the Commons over what he knew – a serious breach of parliamentary rules – and they voted in favour of the privileges committee carrying out an inquiry.
An initial report from the cross-party group of MPs said it would have been “obvious” to the prime minister at the time that rules were being breached, and the Commons may have been misled multiple times.
“We’ve got two,” explains Emer Szczygiel, emergency department head of nursing at King George Hospital, as she walks inside a pastel coloured room.
“If I had my time back again, we would probably have four, five, or six because these have helped us so much in the department with the really difficult patients.”
On one wall, there’s floral wallpaper. It is scored through with a graffiti scrawl. The words must have been scratched out with fingernails.
There are no other implements in here.
Patients being held in this secure room would have been searched to make sure they are not carrying anything they can use to harm themselves – or others.
Image: Emer Szczygiel wishes the hospital had more of the ‘ligature light’ mental health rooms
There is a plastic bed secured to the wall. No bedding though, as this room is “ligature light”, meaning nothing in here could be used for self harm.
On the ceiling, there is CCTV that feeds into a control room on another part of the Ilford hospital’s sprawling grounds.
“So this is one of two rooms that when we were undergoing our works, we recognised, about three years ago, mental health was causing us more of an issue, so we’ve had two rooms purpose built,” Emer says.
“They’re as compliant as we can get them with a mental health room – they’re ligature light, as opposed to ligature free. They’re under 24-hour CCTV surveillance.”
Image: The rooms have a CCTV camera in the ceiling that feeds through to the main control room
There are two doors, both heavily reinforced. One can be used by staff to make an emergency escape if they are under any threat.
What is unusual about these rooms is that they are built right inside a busy accident and emergency department.
The doors are just feet away from a nurse’s station, where medical staff are trying to deal with acute ED (emergency department) attendances.
The number of mental health patients in a crisis attending A&E has reached crisis levels.
Some will be experiencing psychotic episodes and are potentially violent, presenting a threat to themselves, other patients, clinical staff and security teams deployed to de-escalate the situation.
Image: The team were already dealing with five mental health cases when Sky News visited
Like physically-ill patients, they require the most urgent care but are now facing some of the longest waits on record.
On a fairly quiet Wednesday morning, the ED team is already managing five mental health patients.
One, a diminutive South Asian woman, is screaming hysterically.
She is clearly very agitated and becoming more distressed by the minute. Despite her size, she is surrounded by at least five security guards.
She has been here for 12 hours and wants to leave, but can’t as she’s being held under the Mental Capacity Act.
Her frustration boils over as she pushes against the chests of the security guards who encircle her.
“We see about 150 to 200 patients a day through this emergency department, but we’re getting on average about 15 to 20 mental health presentations to the department,” Emer explains.
“Some of these patients can be really difficult to manage and really complex.”
Image: Emer Szczygiel says the department gets about 15 to 20 mental health presentations a day
“If a patient’s in crisis and wants to harm themselves, there’s lots of things in this area that you can harm yourself with,” the nurse adds.
“It’s trying to balance that risk and make sure every emergency department in the country is deemed a place of safety. But there is a lot of risk that comes with emergency departments, because they’re not purposeful for mental health patients.”
In a small side room, Ajay Kumar and his wife are waiting patiently by their son’s bedside.
He’s experienced psychotic episodes since starting university in 2018 and his father says he can become unpredictable and violent.
Image: Ajay and his wife were watching over their son, who’s been having psychotic episodes
Ajay says his son “is under a section three order – that means six months in hospital”.
“They sectioned him,” he tells us.
“He should be secure now, he shouldn’t go out in public. Last night he ran away [from hospital] and walked all the way home. It took him four and a half hours to come home.
“I mean, he got three and a half hours away. Even though he’s totally mental, he still finds his way home and he was so tired and the police were looking for him.”
Image: Mr Kumar said his son ran away from hospital and walked for hours to get home
Now they are all back in hospital and could be waiting “for days”, Ajay says.
“I don’t know how many. They’re not telling us anything.”
Matthew Trainer, chief executive of Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, is at pains to stress nobody is blaming the patients.
“We’ve seen, particularly over the last few years, a real increase in the number of people in mental health crisis coming into A&E for support,” he says.
“And I don’t know if this is because of the pandemic or wider economic pressures, but what we’re seeing every day is more and more people coming here as their first port of call.”
Image: ‘More and more’ people in mental health crisis are showing up at A&E, says Mr Trainer
The hospital boss adds: “If you get someone who’s really distressed, someone who is perhaps experiencing psychosis etc, I’m seeing increasing numbers of complaints from other patients and their families about the environment they’ve had to wait in.
“And they’re not blaming the mental health patients for being here.
“But what they’re saying is being in a really busy accident & emergency with ambulances, with somebody highly distressed, and you’re sat there with an elderly relative or a sick child or whatever – it’s hard for everyone.
“There’s no blame in this. It’s something we’ve got to work together to try to fix.”
New Freedom of Information data gathered by the Royal College of Nursing shows that over the last five years, more than 1.3 million people in a mental health crisis presented to A&E departments.
That’s expected to be a significant underestimate however, as only around a quarter of English trusts handed over data.
For these patients, waits of 12 hours or more for a mental health bed have increased by more than 380%.
Over the last decade, the number of overnight beds in mental health units declined by almost 3,700. That’s around 17%.
The Department for Health and Social Care told Sky News: “We know people with mental health issues are not always getting the support or care they deserve and incidents like this are unacceptable.
“We are transforming mental health services – including investing £26m to support people in mental health crisis, hiring more staff, delivering more talking therapies, and getting waiting lists down through our Plan for Change.”
Claire Murdoch, NHS England’s national mental health director, also told Sky News: “While we know there is much more to do to deal with record demand including on waits, if a patient is deemed to need support in A&E, almost all emergency departments now have a psychiatric liaison team available 24/7 so people can get specialist mental health support alongside physical treatment.
“The NHS is working with local authorities to ensure that mental health patients are given support to leave hospital as soon as they are ready, so that space can be freed up across hospitals including A&Es.”
Patients in a mental health crisis and attending hospital are stuck between two failing systems.
A shortage of specialist beds means they are left untreated in a hospital not designed to help them.
And they are failed by a social care network overwhelmed by demand and unable to provide the early intervention care needed.
Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK.
A body has been found in the search for a missing Scottish man who disappeared while on a stag do in Portugal.
Greg Monks, 38, was last seen in Albufeira during the early hours of Wednesday, 28 May, while enjoying the first night of a five-day stay.
A major search was launched for the Cambuslang man, with his parents and girlfriend flying out to Portugal to also provide assistance.
Image: Mr Monks and his partner. Pic: Family handout
His sisters, Jillian and Carlyn, previously spoke to Sky News about the family’s devastation at his disappearance.
Speaking to The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee before the police’s announcement, they described their brother as a “big part of our family”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
9:36
Mr Monks’ sisters spoke to The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee
Local police confirmed on Wednesday that a body had been found in the Cerro de Aguia area, where Mr Monks was believed to have been last seen.
A statement by Portuguese police said the body was located on a vacant and uneven lot.
The force added: “After the competent judicial inspection has been carried out, the body will be removed to the area’s legal medicine office for an autopsy to be performed.”
A truck driver found guilty of murdering his wife, whose remains were found under the stairs at their home in Ireland, has been sentenced to life in prison.
Richard Satchwell, originally from Leicester, had denied the murder of Tina Satchwell on a date between 19 March and 20 March 2017.
Her skeletal remains were discovered at the Co Cork property in October 2023, six years after her husband reported her missing.
During his five-week trial, jurors heard from more than 50 witnesses, including police officers involved in the investigation.
Police had discovered Mrs Satchwell’s remains buried under the stairs in the living room of their home. Her badly decomposed body was wrapped in a soiled sheet and covered with black plastic.
She was wearing pyjamas and a dressing gown, with the belt of the gown wrapped around her.
A state pathologist said she could not establish the exact cause of death because of how decomposed the body was.
More from UK
During police interviews, Satchwell, 58, said that on the morning of 20 March 2017 he found his wife standing at the bottom of the stairs with a chisel in her hand, scraping off the plasterboard, and claimed she came at him with the object and he fell back on to the floor.
He said Mrs Satchwell tried to stab him multiple times with the chisel and he grabbed her clothing and restrained her by putting the belt of the dressing gown against her neck.
Satchwell said that in a very short period of time she went limp and fell into his arms.
He said he put her body on the sofa in the living room, before moving her to the chest freezer and then burying her under the stairs.
Relatives of Mrs Satchwell wept as the guilty verdict was returned on Friday 30 May.
Satchwell did not react as the unanimous verdict was read to the Central Criminal Court in Dublin.
Following the sentencing, the family of Mrs Satchwell described her as a kind and gentle woman who loved animals.
Tina’s cousin, Sarah Howard, said that Mrs Satchwell was murdered “by someone who claimed to love her”.
“The emotional toll of her loss is something I will carry with me always,” she said.
Image: Tina Satchwell. Pic: Family Handout/PA
Her half-sister Lorraine Howard said the way Mrs Satchwell was buried in plastic in her own home “sends shivers down my spine every time I think about it”.
“I will never be able to forgive Richard Satchwell for what he has done.”
Satchwell’s barrister Brendan Grehan SC told the court that Satchwell intends to appeal, and that he “never intended to kill Tina”.
Mr Grehan also said that Satchwell said “despite anything he said in the trial, Tina was a lovely person”.
The court was told the couple married in the UK on Tina’s 20th birthday, and later settled in Co Cork, first in Fermoy before moving to Youghal in 2016.
The trial heard that on 24 March 2017, Satchwell went to Irish police and claimed his wife had left their Youghal home four days ago because their relationship had deteriorated.
Satchwell had also claimed Mrs Satchwell had taken €26,000 euros in cash from savings they kept in the attic, which the court later heard they did not have the capacity to save.
He formally reported his wife missing in May 2017 and claimed to investigators that his wife was sometimes violent towards him.
In the following years, he made over a dozen media appearances in which he spoke extensively about the morning he claimed Mrs Satchwell left the house and never returned.