Connect with us

Published

on

The government is cutting benefit payments to some of Britain’s poorest families or threatening them with debt collectors in a raid that is “plunging people into poverty”. 

More than a million people have had their universal credit payments cut over the past year because they were overpaid tax credits in the past by HMRC.

Some of these debts are decades-old and in many cases the claimant was not at fault for the overpayment or aware that the debt existed.

Campaigners and MPs called on the government to immediately pause the deductions, an approach that they warned was causing widespread destitution at a time when people are already struggling with the cost-of-living crisis.

Millions docked because of historical overpayments

Official figures obtained by Sky News show that last year 1.3 million universal credit claimants had payments docked because of historical tax credit overpayments.

It’s a figure that’s been on the rise.

More on Benefits

In total, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) deducted £372.576m from claimants on HMRC’s behalf.

Tax credits were introduced in 1999 by the then Labour government to encourage people into work by offering support payments to parents and those on low incomes.

The system is being phased out and people on tax credits will all have moved to Universal Credit by the end of next year.

In 2014 the Treasury agreed with the DWP that, as previous tax credit claimants moved onto Universal Credit, their old tax credit debts would be transferred and collected under the new system.

Blaming claimants for HMRC errors

While HMRC maintains that many of these erroneous payments are down to fraud or errors made by the claimant, a significant number are attributable to errors made by officials.

Charities warned that in some cases HMRC was blaming claimants for errors of its own making.

Michelle Welch from Bromley, south London, is one such case. She was facing deductions of £20 a month to recover an eight-year-old debt of £2,379.26.

Image:
Michelle Welch

The mother of three, who now works part-time at a British Heart Foundation charity shop, was hospitalised in October 2015 after suffering a mental health crisis.

Although a support officer telephoned HMRC to explain that she was no longer caring for her three children, HMRC did not stop the payments and the money continued being paid into a bank account that her partner was accessing to support her children.

After multiple attempts to notify the agency, the payments eventually stopped on 28 January 2016.

Years later, in August 2021, HMRC wrote to Ms Welch demanding that she repay the money the agency overpaid in the interim. They claimed she failed to notify them of her change in circumstances in time and her universal credit was docked as a result.

Ms Welch’s multiple appeals were rejected.

“I’m just living day by day. I can’t save. I can’t go out… I could put that extra money on gas and electric,” she said.

“I just feel like I’m not getting anywhere. I’m not getting anywhere fast.”

After Sky News intervened, HMRC agreed that Ms Welch was not at fault and has now cancelled the debt.

“We apologise to Ms Welch for the inconvenience and upset caused by our mistake,” HMRC said. “We’ve acted to correct her payments and a redress payment will be made.”

Ms Welch said her dealings with HMRC and DWP had left her feeling dejected, ignored and stuck in what was a difficult time in her life.

“It’s hard for a mother to give up one child let alone three because they’re mentally unwell. It wasn’t an easy thing to do. [It takes me back to] a place I would never want to be in again. It makes me feel ashamed and terrible.

“I busy myself so that I don’t have to think back to what I went through and what my children went through. It’s something I should talk to a psychiatrist about, not people I don’t know [at HMRC and DWP].”

Not an isolated case

Sky News spoke to dozens of claimants who said they were paying back debts they do not believe, or did not realise, they owed.

Many struggled to get a clear breakdown or explanation from HMRC when they challenged the demands for payment.

Image:
Vicky Timlin

Vicky Timlin, from Cheltenham, ended a tax credit claim in September 2021 after moving in with a partner.

She was then told to repay back £909.29 that had been overpaid to her. When she sought an explanation, an HMRC representative told her that the overpayment could only be explained by a “computer glitch” but she would have to repay it regardless.

Ms Timlin is not claiming Universal Credit so her payments have not been docked.

However, HMRC has warned her that the debt will be recouped through any future universal credit claim. Her debt has now been passed onto a private debt collection agency and she is on a payment plan for the next seven years.

Sky News understands that 29,000 cases are now being handled by private debt collection agencies.

“I felt completely helpless. I got off the phone and I was in absolute floods of tears because I just felt like this is so unfair.

“Why have I got to pay this money because of a computer glitch and there was literally nothing that I can do about it and they didn’t seem to care at all,” she said.

“They shouldn’t be doing it to people. They need to be able to explain to people properly why they owe this money and not give them different excuses every time.”

HMRC accepted that Vicky did nothing wrong and apologised for its failure to clearly explain the debt to Ms Timlin.

It maintained that she had been overpaid because previous re-calculations of her entitlement had triggered the system to generate duplicate payments.

It said this was a feature of the system and that these overpayments would have balanced out across the remainder of the financial year had she continued with the claim.

“To ensure customers receive regular payments of a similar amount, tax credits awards are calculated across the 12-month financial year,” HMRC said.

“Customers are required to tell us of any change in circumstances and when they do, awards are recalculated and balanced across the remainder of the period. This means when a claim ceases during the financial year, in some instances an overpayment may be due.”

Official errors disguised

Official reports published by HMRC suggest that errors on the part of officials make up a very small proportion of overpayments, compared to fraud and errors on the part of claimants.

However, charities pointed out that in many cases officials were contributing to errors by providing poor advice on the phone. In the case of Ms Welch, official error was disguised as a claimant error.

Campaigners say the system is causing widespread distress at a time when the cost-of-living crisis is already driving families into poverty.

Food bank visitors in debt to the government

The Trussell Trust, which oversees a network of more than 1,300 food banks across the UK, has said the vast majority of its visitors were in debt to the government.

MPs from across the political spectrum have urged the government to pause collections while the cost-of-living crisis is still raging.

Stephen Timms, MP for East Ham
Image:
Stephen Timms, MP for East Ham

Stephen Timms, MP for East Ham and chair of the work and pensions select committee, said: “People are completely unaware of these debts when suddenly money starts getting taken out of their Universal Credit monthly payments and, in a cost-of-living crisis with inflation running at current levels, that’s causing real hardship for people.

“So my select a committee, which is an all-party committee with a Conservative majority, recommended that the government should pause these deductions while inflation is running at its current level.

“Unfortunately, the government rejected that recommendation, but I think that would be very helpful just to support people through this really, really difficult time.”

Continue Reading

UK

Prince Harry denies having ‘physical fight’ with Prince Andrew

Published

on

By

Prince Harry denies having 'physical fight' with Prince Andrew

Prince Harry has denied having a fight with Prince Andrew after it was claimed “punches were thrown” between the pair in 2013.

The allegations appeared in excerpts from a new book on the Duke of York being serialised in the Daily Mail.

It claims a row started after Prince Andrew said something behind Harry’s back, with Andrew “left with a bloody nose” and the pair needing to be broken up.

It also claimed the Duke of York once warned his nephew about marrying Meghan and suggested it wouldn’t last long.

However, a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex strongly denied the claims.

“I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry,” a statement said.

They said a legal letter had been sent to the Daily Mail due to “gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks” in its reporting.

The book – Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York – is billed as the first joint biography of Prince Andrew and ex-wife Sarah Ferguson.

It’s said to be based on interviews with “over a hundred people who have never spoken before”.

Prince Harry – in his own 2023 book Spare – made his own claims of an altercation with Prince William.

He said his brother once knocked him to the floor amid a confrontation over Meghan’s “rude” and “abrasive” behaviour.

“It all happened so fast. So very fast,” Harry wrote in the book.

“He grabbed me by the collar, ripping my necklace, and he knocked me to the floor. I landed on the dog’s bowl, which cracked under my back, the pieces cutting into me.”

“I lay there for a moment, dazed, then got to my feet and told him to get out,” the prince added.

Harry claimed his brother wanted him to hit him back “but I chose not to”, and that William later returned and apologised.

Read more from Sky News:
Search for British woman missing in Greece
Two-year-old girl found alive in suitcase

The Duke Of Sussex has described his relationship with his family as extremely strained after he quit as a working royal and took legal action against the media, and over the removal of his UK police protection.

He claimed earlier this year the King wouldn’t speak to him and there had “been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family”.

Continue Reading

UK

Search for British woman who disappeared from Greek beach

Published

on

By

Search for British woman who disappeared from Greek beach

A search is under way for a British woman who went missing from a beach in Kavala, northern Greece.

The Hellenic Coastguard said the port authority received reports that Michele Ann Joy Bourda, 59, was missing on the evening of 1 August.

The woman went missing from the Ofrynio beach area.

The coastguard is investigating reports that her belongings were left on the beach.

On Sunday, three recreational craft, five fishing boats and two patrol boats were involved in the search.

According to local media, she lived with her husband, who is reportedly of Greek origin, in the Macedonian city of Serres.

She had gone to the beach with him and reportedly vanished while he was sleeping on a sunbed.

More on Greece

The charity LifeLine Hellas, which put out an appeal to try and find Ms Bourda, said she went missing at noon on 1 August.

She has been described as having straight blonde hair up to her shoulders and being 1.73m tall.

Continue Reading

UK

Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation – and how much they’ll get

Published

on

By

Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation - and how much they'll get

Martin Lewis says motorists who were mis-sold car finance are likely to receive “hundreds, not thousands of pounds” – with regulators launching a consultation on a new compensation scheme.

The founder of MoneySavingExpert.com believes it is “very likely” that about 40% of Britons who entered personal contact purchase or hire purchase agreements between 2007 and 2021 will be eligible for payouts.

“Discretionary commission arrangements” saw brokers and dealers charge higher levels of interest so they could receive more commission, without telling consumers.

Pics: PA
Image:
Pics: PA

Speaking to Sky News Radio’s Faye Rowlands, Lewis said: “Very rarely will it be thousands of pounds unless you have more than one car finance deal.

“So up to about a maximum of £950 per car finance deal where you are due compensation.”

Lewis explained that consumers who believe they may have been affected should check whether they had a discretionary commission arrangement by writing to their car finance company.

However, the personal finance guru warned against using a claims firm.

More on Money

“They’re hardly going to do anything for you and you might get the money paid to you automatically anyway, in which case you’re giving them 30% for nothing,” he added.

Read more: How to tell if you’ve been mis-sold car finance

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who’s eligible for payout after car finance scandal?

Yesterday, the Financial Conduct Authority said its review of the past use of motor finance “has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers”.

The FCA’s statement added that those affected “should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way”.

Lewis told Sky News that the consultation will launch in October – and will take six weeks.

“We expect payouts to come in 2026, assuming this will happen and it’s very likely to happen,” he said.

“As for exactly how will work, it hasn’t decided yet. Firms will have to contact people, although there is an issue about them having destroyed some of the data for older claims.”

He believes claims will either be paid automatically – or affected consumers will need to opt in and apply to get compensation back.

Read more from Sky News:
Hamas ‘ready’ to deliver aid to hostages
Oasis ‘saddened’ after man dies at concert

What motorists should do next

The FCA says you may be affected if you bought a car under a finance scheme, including hire purchase agreements, before 28 January 2021.

Anyone who has already complained does not need to do anything.

The authority added: “Consumers concerned that they were not told about commission, and who think they may have paid too much for the finance, should complain now”.

Its website advises drivers to complain to their finance provider first.

If you’re unhappy with the response, you can then contact the Financial Ombudsman.

Any compensation scheme will be easy to participate in, without drivers needing to use a claims management company or law firm.

The FCA has warned motorists that doing so could end up costing you 30% of any compensation in fees.

The FCA estimates the cost of any scheme – including compensation and administrative costs – to be no lower than £9bn.

But in a video on X, Lewis said that millions of people are likely to be due a share of up to £18bn.

The regulator’s announcement comes after the Supreme Court ruled on a separate, but similar, case on Friday.

Continue Reading

Trending