On Monday, Prince Harry will go to court, accusing the publisher of The Daily Mail newspaper of phone-tapping and other breaches of privacy.
The 38-year-old royal is bringing the action along with others including actresses Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost, Elton John’s husband and filmmaker David Furnish, and Baroness Doreen Lawrence of Clarendon OBE.
It’s the latest of several cases brought against the tabloid press by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex over the last few years, and this is just one of several cases Prince Harry is currently involved in.
Here’s everything you need to know about the case.
Image: Liz Hurley is also included in the group of claimants
Image: Sir Elton John and his husband are claimants in the case
Who’s involved?
The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd will take place at the High Court in London and is set to last four days.
While Prince Harry is one of the key players, as a group litigation he is not the only claimant.
Others involved include Doreen Lawrence, the mother of black teenager Stephen Lawrence who was murdered in a racist attack in 1993, Sir Elton John and his husband, filmmaker David Furnish, and actresses Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost.
Legal firm Hamlins is representing Prince Harry and Sadie Frost, while law firm Gunnercooke is representing Elizabeth Hurley, Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish.
Advertisement
Lawyer David Sherborne – who previously represented phone hacking victims at the Leveson Inquiry – is representing all the claimants.
Image: Associated Newspapers in west London
Who are Associated Newspapers?
One of Britain’s biggest media publishers, Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) is the publisher of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and MailOnline.
The publisher has applied to the court to block public access to the case, limiting the details of content set to be publicly revealed.
Image: Harry and Meghan stepped away from royal duties in 2020. Pic: Netflix
What’s alleged?
Lawyers for the claimants have said they had become aware of “highly distressing” evidence revealing they had been victims of “abhorrent criminal activity” and “gross breaches of privacy” by Associated Newspapers.
Accusations include:
• The hiring of private investigators to secretly place listening devices inside people’s cars and homes
• The commissioning of individuals to surreptitiously listen into and record people’s live, private telephone calls while they were taking place
• The payment of police officials, with corrupt links to private investigators, for inside, sensitive information
• The impersonation of individuals to obtain medical information from private hospitals, clinics, and treatment centres by deception
• The accessing of bank accounts, credit histories and financial transactions through illicit means and manipulation
Associated Newspapers have strongly denied the allegations, describing them as “preposterous smears”, and claiming the legal action taken is “a fishing expedition by [the] claimants and their lawyers”.
Image: Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson
What was the Leveson Inquiry and why is it relevant?
In 2011, judge Sir Brian Leveson led a public inquiry after it was revealed News Of The World journalists had hacked the phone of murdered school girl Milly Dowler.
Initially intended to be carried out in two sections, the first part of the Leveson Inquiry looked at the culture, practices and ethics of the press. It involved celebrities including Hugh Grant, Sienna Miller, Steve Coogan and Charlotte Church.
During the inquiry, Paul Dacre, who was editor of the Daily Mail between 1992 and 2018, and is now Associated Newspapers’ editor-in-chief, “unequivocally” condemned “phone hacking and payments to the police”, saying “such practices are a disgrace and have shocked and shamed us all.”
He said: “They need to be purged from journalism and reforms instigated to prevent such criminal activities ever happening again.”
The counsel for Associated Newspapers at the time, Jonathan Caplan, told the inquiry that “so far as [Associated] is aware no journalist at Associated Newspapers has engaged in phone-hacking.
“It does not bribe police officers and, in particular, it condemns the shameful practice of hacking the mobile phones of the victims of crime, or of their families.”
Part two of the Leveson Inquiry was meant to investigate the relationship between journalists and the police, but never took place. There have since been calls to re-open the uncompleted inquiry, with activists including those from the Hacked Off campaign saying such cases as this show wrongdoing within some newspapers is still taking place.
Who else is Prince Harry taking to court?
This is not the only legal battle Prince Harry is fighting.
The royal has an ongoing libel case against Associated Newspapers over an article about his security arrangements in the Mail on Sunday. The paper says the article was based on “honest opinion”. He has a separate legal fight against the Home Office over the same protection issues.
Other celebrities involved in the case include former Girls Aloud bandmate Cheryl, actor Ricky Tomlinson, ex-footballer and TV presenter Ian Wright and the estate of the late singer George Michael. MGN has contested the claims and argues that some have been brought too late.
Prince Harry is also suing News Group Newspapers (NGN), the publisher of The Times, The Sunday Times and The Sun newspapers (as well as the now-defunct News of the World) for alleged phone hacking. The Sun has always denied phone hacking took place at the paper, and the publisher has not admitted any unlawful conduct at the title.
Image: The Princess of Wales holds an infant Prince Harry in 1987
Why is Prince Harry doing this?
Prince Harry’s hatred of the British tabloid press is well-documented – he has written about it at length in his memoir Spare and spoken about it in numerous resulting TV interviews.
He has said he blames the paparazzi for the part they played in his mother’s death and vented his frustration at the “injustice” of no one being sent to jail following the inquest into the car crash that killed her.
He has also said that media intrusion was part of the reason he and Meghan stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and moved to America.
Just this year Prince Harry accused members of his family of getting into bed with the devil – the tabloid press – to sully him and his wife Meghan to improve their own reputations.
He has called it his “life’s work” to change the British “media landscape,” making it more accountable for its actions. With a high profile and deep pockets, it’s a mission he’s started in earnest.
It remains to be seen whether the tell-all interviews, a revealing memoir and now numerous court cases assist Prince Harry in his crusade against the media, or simply fuel the fire he says he is so keen to put out.
Police have been called to the Palace of Westminster after a man was seen climbing up the tower which houses Big Ben.
Video on social media shows a barefoot man stood on a ledge several metres up the Elizabeth Tower holding a Palestinian flag.
Police said they were called to the scene at 7:24am this morning.
A fire engine has now raised a cherry picker to the same height as the man’s position on the tower.
Three people standing on the crane are engaging with the man who is several feet away.
The protester has been sharing videos on Instagram from his viewpoint on the tower as a woman in plain clothes speaks to him from the cherry picker.
The woman says: “At some point you have to come down, how long do you think you are going to be there, how long do you think you are able to be there?”
Her voice is then barely audible as she appears to say “your message was to say ‘Free Palestine'” before she encourages to him come down.
A large red stain which appears to be blood can be seen on the side of the tower around the protester’s feet.
Instagram
This content is provided by Instagram, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Instagram cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Instagram cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Instagram cookies for this session only.
Image: The bare-footed protester is holding a Palestinian flag. Pic: PA
A Met Police spokesperson said: “At 7.24am on Saturday March 8 officers were alerted to a man climbing up the Elizabeth Tower at the Houses of Parliament.
“Officers are at the scene working to bring the incident to a safe conclusion. They are being assisted by the London Fire Brigade and the London Ambulance Service.”
Bridge Street, which is at the north end of Westminster Bridge, has been closed to allow the emergency services to deal with the incident, police confirmed.
Image: Pic: AP
Image: The man before the cherry picker was raised
A spokesman for London Fire Brigade (LFB) said crews from Lambeth, Chelsea, Soho and Islington fire stations have been deployed.
At least nine emergency service vehicles have lined the street in central London as crowds look on from beyond a police cordon.
Image: Pic: PA
The protest in Westminster comes as the Palestine Action group said it had sprayed “Gaza is not for sale” on Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf course in Scotland.
Sharing an image of the vandalism on Saturday morning, the group wrote on X: “Whilst Trump attempts to treat Gaza as his own property, he should know his own property is within reach.”
The Turnberry protest comes after the American president claimed the US will “take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too”.
Mark Hammersley is a survivor. Standing in the Welsh sun, smiling broadly with an outreaching hand to welcome me, he looks the picture of good health.
There is no sign of the trauma. Or the desperate battle for life he fought and won.
Image: Mark Hammersley, who was treated for COVID in an intensive care unit in October 2020
I first met Mark as he gasped for air in Warrington Hospital’s intensive care unit. It was October 2020 and the country was in the grip of the second wave of the COVID pandemic.
“The first 24 hours was critical. I was unconscious really in many ways,” Mark reminds me.
He doesn’t need to. The image of Mark wearing a breathing mask attached by a tube to a CPAP machine will stay with me for a very long time.
He had been admitted after becoming poorly while moving house. Mark was 57 then and his underlying health conditions put him at serious risk.
His raspy voice was barely audible over the constant bleeping of the ICU’s life-saving diagnostic machines.
More on Covid
Related Topics:
“I’ve got diabetes and I’m overweight so they’re my risk factors. So to be honest for me it’s still early days,” he told me at the time. His underlying health issues meant Mark had to shield for most of the year. And until then it had worked.
Standing next to his bed I asked Mark if he was concerned about his health, about the possible outcome.
“I’m worried yes,” he replied. “But I’m feeling safe if that makes sense.”
Mark tells me now that the doctors treating him were not sure he would make it through the night. They had warned his wife that he was not likely to survive. But instead of inducing Mark into a coma and putting him on life support using a ventilator, the doctors gambled by using a CPAP machine.
Image: Doctors caring for COVID patients in 2020. Pic: PA
The Continuous Positive Airway Pressure unit crucially keeps airways from narrowing or collapsing.
And that decision, Mark is convinced, ultimately saved his life. He is aware that the outcomes for COVID patients put on ventilators were not good.
Five years on and Mark is still feeling the impact of that devastating infection. But he is a relieved man.
“I have been told that I have scarring on my lungs but it’s not affecting their functionality, whether it will later on in life I don’t know,” he says.
“So at the moment it’s still a process but I’m a lot better than I was certainly five years ago and it affects you in different ways. When I was in hospital and afterwards I had a lot of muscular pain so for about 18 months I probably couldn’t even put a shirt on properly.”
Image: Paramedics and staff at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital in April 2020. Pic: PA
In the ICU bed next to Mark’s I also interviewed a young grandmother. She was sat upright and also breathing with the help of a CPAP machine. But she was much more talkative and alert compared to Mark. She was confident her treatment was going well.
But when I returned to the hospital a few weeks later to follow up with both patients I was told she had died shortly after filming.
Mark was aware. He knows that he will live with the long-term health complications from COVID for the rest of his life. But he’s still thankful, every single day for that opportunity.
Image: Chris Whitty, Boris Johnson and Patrick Vallance during a COVID news conference on 9 March, 2020. Pic: Reuters
Image: The National COVID Memorial Wall in London. File pic: PA
The UK will mark the five-year anniversary of the start of the COVID pandemic on Sunday.
The deadly virus shut down the world after it spread from Wuhan in China at the start of 2020.
Between March of that year and July 2022, an estimated 180,000 people died after contracting COVID in England and Wales, according to figures published by The King’s Fund thinktank.
The UK government said Sunday’s day of reflection will be an opportunity for the public to remember those who lost their lives, as well as reflect on the impact the virus had on everyday life and pay tribute the frontline workers.
Reform UK has suspended MP Rupert Lowe and reported him to the police over alleged threats of physical violence towards the party’s chairman.
A statement from chair Zia Yusuf and chief whip Lee Anderson MP also said the party has received complaints from two female employees about alleged serious bullying in Mr Lowe’s offices.
Mr Yusuf and Mr Anderson said “we understand complaints have been made to parliamentary authorities”.
Mr Lowe, 67, has released a statement saying the allegations were “untrue and false”, the accusations of physical threats were “outrageous and entirely untrue”, and he referenced a “vexatious complaint” made by another staff member.
Image: Rupert Lowe. File pic: PA
Mr Lowe, the MP for Great Yarmouth, has had the whip suspended, meaning he will sit as an independent MP in the House of Commons.
Mr Yusuf and Mr Anderson said in their statement that Mr Lowe had “on at least two occasions made threats of physical violence against” Mr Yusuf.
The statement said: “It is with regret that we feel obligated to disclose that the party received complaints from two female employees about serious bullying in the offices of the member of parliament for Great Yarmouth, Rupert Lowe.”
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
Claims of ‘disturbing pattern of behaviour’
It added: “Evidence was provided to us of workplace bullying, the targeting of female staff who raised concerns, and evidence of derogatory and discriminatory remarks made about women, including reference to a perceived disability.
“We feel we have a duty of care to all our staff, whether employed directly or indirectly. Accordingly, we appointed an independent King’s Counsel to conduct an investigation into the veracity of these complaints. To date, Mr Lowe has yet to cooperate with this investigation.
“In addition to these allegations of a disturbing pattern of behaviour, Mr Lowe has on at least two occasions made threats of physical violence against our party chairman. Accordingly, this matter is with the police.
“Reform stands for the highest standards of conduct in public life, and we will apply these standards without fear nor favour, including within our own party.”
Image: (L-R) Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and party chairman Zia Yusuf. Pic: PA
Rumblings of leadership challenge
Earlier this week, Mr Lowe appeared to question Nigel Farage’s leadership of Reform UK.
In an interview with the Daily Mail, Mr Lowe said: “Nigel is a fiercely independent individual and is extremely good at what we have done so far. He has got messianic qualities.
“Will those messianic qualities distil into sage leadership?
“I don’t know.”
He added: “I’m not going to be by Nigel’s side at the next election unless we have a proper plan to change the way we govern from top to bottom.”
During Mr Farage’s online falling out with Elon Musk, in which the Tesla businessman said Reform needed a new leader, Mr Lowe drew praise from Mr Musk.
And in the interview with the Daily Mail, Mr Lowe noted that he was “barely six months into being an MP” and “in the betting to be the next prime minister.”
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
In his response to the allegations, Mr Lowe said on Friday the party leadership had a “complete inability to accept even the most mild constructive criticism without such a malicious reaction”.
He said in a statement posted on X: “I am disappointed, but not surprised, to read Reform’s untrue and false allegations. Let me be abundantly clear – this investigation is based on zero credible evidence against me, as has been repeatedly stated by the neutral investigator. None has been provided.
“I have cooperated and spoken at length with the KC they instructed, at great cost to the party, to investigate a minor staff matter.”
He claimed the lawyer was “dismayed” the statement from Reform UK had been published – and that the investigation had not even started.
Mr Lowe claimed the lawyer told him that “no credible evidence has been given”.
The MP added that he was sent an initial letter of complaint last Friday from the party with “no evidence provided”.
“I have never made any derogatory comments about women, or those with disabilities. This is a lie. These allegations are not even referring to me. I will be seeking legal advice immediately,” he added.
Analysis: Could Musk have triggered mess within Reform?
It sounds too weird to be true, but Elon Musk may very well be the reason that Reform UK is embroiled in a messy public battle with one of its five MPs.
Detailed and damning statements released on Friday look to be the culmination of months of growing division between Nigel Farage and Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe.
The allegations against him are serious, numerous and have triggered three possible investigations – from the party, the parliamentary authorities and the police.
His rebuttal is equally robust, indicating he will fight hard to clear his name.
But is this battle just about his behaviour? Or is it because of his leadership ambitions? And were they ignited after a bizarre intervention from across the pond?
In January, Musk posted on X, calling for Farage to step down, saying he wasn’t up to the job, and later suggested Lowe could step up as he ‘makes a lot of sense’.
Two months later and relations had broken down beyond repair, with a war of words erupting this week in the papers, in which Lowe called Farage messianic and he responded saying the MP probably wanted to be prime minister.
There is no doubt that an endorsement from the world’s richest man would flatter the ego of any aspiring politician.
But given Friday’s revelations, it seems that instead of kick-starting his rise to the top of Reform, Musk’s meddling has instead severed his ties with the party for good.
When it comes to his parliamentary career, salvaging his reputation could also prove difficult as other critical accounts of his character emerge.
Sky News has heard from Labour MP Mike Kane about an incident which took place in the Commons last December, during which he says he was “manhandled” by the then Reform MP.
The Transport minister described an angry scene in which Lowe had to be restrained by Reform’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, and eventually broken up by the Sergeant at Arms.
Mr Lowe did not wish to comment on the claim, but it adds yet another obstacle in the fight for his political future.
‘Vexatious’ complaint
Mr Lowe continued: “It is no surprise that this vexatious statement has been issued the day after my reasonable and constructive questions of Nigel and the Reform structure. It was issued on X late on a Friday afternoon, with no prior warning.
“All I stated was that communication needs to improve, delegation needs to improve, structure needs to improve – these are all reasonable requests of a party looking to form the next government. I stand by everything I said.”
His response added: “I do not believe that Reform members will be pleased to know that their membership fees are being spent on instructing expensive lawyers to investigate their own MPs, over matters that are entirely baseless and have been dealt with in the correct Parliamentary procedure, with HR’s full involvement and support.
“The staff member in question only raised a vexatious complaint once disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against them for serious wrongdoing. The other individual mentioned, dropped her appeal.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Mr Lowe said he had been trying to change the way Reform is run “behind the scenes” for many months, and urged his supporters to “stay with the party”.
He said: “This is our party as much as it is Nigel’s.”
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: “On Thursday, 6 March we received an allegation of verbal threats made by a 67-year-old man on Friday, 13 December.
“Officers are carrying out an assessment of the allegations to determine what further action may be required.”