Connect with us

Published

on

Israel is in the “heart of a crisis”, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has admitted, as he delays a controversial overhaul of the judiciary.

Addressing the nation following widespread protests involving hundreds of thousands of people, Mr Netanyahu said he would “turn over every stone” to find a solution.

“From a will to prevent the rift in the nation, I have decided to delay the second and third reading (of the bill) in order to reach a broad consensus,” he said.

He also warned, however, that Israel is “at a dangerous crossroads”.

Israel’s main labour union called off a national stoppage shortly after his address. “The strike that I announced this morning will end,” said Arnon Bar-David, chairman of the Histadrut labour federation.

He also offered his help in seeking a compromise.

Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, said that stopping the legislation was the right thing to do and the broadest possible agreement was required.

Former deputy prime minister Benny Gantz said he would approach dialogue with an “open heart”.

UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly welcomed the decision to pause the legislation and said it was “vital that the shared democratic values that underpin that (UK-Israel) relationship are upheld”.

People attend a demonstration after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed the defense minister as his nationalist coalition government presses on with its judicial overhaul, in Jerusalem, March 27, 2023. REUTERS/Ammar Awad
Image:
People attending a demonstration in Jerusalem

Earlier, Mr Netanyahu’s coalition partners revealed a delay had been agreed.

The potential overhaul, which has sparked widespread protests and international condemnation, will not now be discussed in parliament until next month, said coalition member party Jewish Power.

The idea is to “pass the reform through dialogue”, the party said in a statement.

Its leader, security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, said he had agreed to delay the government’s plans in exchange for a promise that they would be brought back after the forthcoming parliamentary recess.

“I agreed to remove the veto to reject the legislation in exchange for a commitment by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the legislation would be submitted to the Knesset for approval in the next session,” Mr Ben-Gvir said.

Benjamin Netanyahu (right) attends a meeting at the Knesset on Monday
Image:
Benjamin Netanyahu (right) attends a meeting at the Knesset on Monday

Under the proposals, ministers would have more control over the appointments of judges, including to the Supreme Court, while diminishing that body’s ability to veto legislation or rule against the government.

But Mr Netanyahu’s sacking of his defence minister, Yoav Gallant, for objecting to the reforms sparked huge demonstrations in major towns.

It prompted Mr Herzog – a head of state who is supposed to remain above politics – to call on Mr Netanyahu to stop the legislative process, saying: “Come to your senses!”

Mr Herzog said the “eyes of the whole world are on you” following the PM’s dismissal of Mr Gallant on Sunday.

All flights were grounded at Ben Gurion Airport, the country’s main international hub, after the head of the Israel Airports Authority workers’ committee announced a strike.

Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, the Israeli army’s chief of staff, said this period of time is “different to any that we have known before”.

He added: “We have not known such days of external threats coalescing, while a storm is brewing at home.”

A pause – not a halt

After hours hidden out of sight and in emergency negotiations with his coalition partners, Benjamin Netanyahu eventually bowed to the inevitable.

As the sun was going down on an extraordinary day in Israel, news emerged that a deal had been struck.

The party of Itamar Ben-Gvir said he would agree to a pause in legislation.

A pause. Not a halt.

Essentially, this is intended to take the steam out of the protests as the country approaches the Passover holiday and the 75th anniversary celebrations next month.

But I don’t think the demonstrators will see it like that.

They will read it as: “We won’t pass the legislation this week, we’ll let things cool down and do it in a few weeks’ time.”

They won’t like that, and they won’t accept it.

The pause does open up a window for dialogue and possible compromise, though. Throughout the growing protests, the opposition has remained united and insisted that the legislation must be halted before they start negotiations.

That opportunity is now.

In return for his support, Mr Netanyahu has reportedly allowed Mr Ben-Gvir, the far-right security minister, to set up a National Guard.

This is interesting for a number of reasons: it again shows us just how beholden Mr Netanyahu is to the far-right in his coalition.

It is also an example of Mr Ben-Gvir’s frustrations that the national police don’t do what he tries to order them to do.

Plus: Who will serve in the National Guard?

This is a victory, of sorts, for the protestors. For 13 weeks, as they’ve taken to the streets in growing numbers, Mr Netanyahu and his allies haven’t budged an inch.

Today, with the walls closing in on them, they were left with no options.

But the fight for Israel’s future is far from over.

Continue Reading

World

Ten explosions near international airport in India-administered part of Kashmir, officials say

Published

on

By

Ten explosions near international airport in India-administered part of Kashmir, officials say

Ten explosions have been heard near Srinagar International Airport in India-administered parts of Kashmir, officials have told Reuters news agency.

The blasts followed blackouts caused by multiple projectiles, which were seen in the sky above the city of Jammu earlier on Friday.

Explosions were also heard in the Sikh holy city of Amritsar, in the neighbouring Punjab state, according to Reuters.

An Indian military official told the agency that “drones have been sighted” and “they are being engaged”.

It comes as tensions between India and Pakistan across the line of control around the region of Kashmir have boiled over this week, leading to fears of a wider conflict.

Map of where explosions were reported in Kashmir and from where

On Wednesday morning, India carried out missile strikes in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered parts of the disputed region.

The retaliation came weeks after 26 people, mainly Indian tourists, were shot dead by gunmen in an India-administered part of Kashmir last month.

The government in India said it hit nine “terrorist infrastructure” sites, while Pakistan said it was not involved in the April attack and the sites were not militant bases.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explained: India-Pakistan conflict

Around 48 people have been killed since Wednesday, according to casualty estimates on both sides – which have not been independently verified.

India also suspended its top cricket tournament, the Indian Premier League, as a result of rising tensions, while the Pakistan Super League moved the remainder of its season to the United Arab Emirates.

Meanwhile, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a conference on Friday that the US is in constant contact with both India and Pakistan.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

World

Pope Leo: How voting for new pontiff unfolded behind closed doors of the conclave

Published

on

By

Pope Leo: How voting for new pontiff unfolded behind closed doors of the conclave

Conclaves are famously unpredictable affairs – and once again the election of Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost as the new pope caught many by surprise.

The newly elected Pope Leo XIV won the consensus of the 133 cardinal electors after only four ballots – a fast process for a diverse college of cardinals.

Though his name had circulated among some Vatican watchers, other cardinals had emerged as clear front-runners, including Pietro Parolin – the Vatican’s number two who would have been the first Italian in almost 50 years to become pontiff – or Luis Tagle, a Filipino cardinal looking to become the first Asian pope.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What are the conclave’s secrecy measures?

Instead, it was the first North American to win the highly secretive process.

So, what went on behind the closed doors of the Sistine Chapel?

Until Thursday lunchtime, Cardinal Parolin was ahead, gathering between 45 and 55 votes, sources say.

A substantial number, but well short of the 89 votes he needed for a two-thirds majority.

At this point, Cardinal Prevost had between 34 and 44 votes.

But as the Italian struggled to grow his support during the first three rounds of voting, he stepped down from the race, endorsing Prevost instead, Sky News understands.

Read more:
Who is Pope Leo XIV?
List of demands in new pope’s in-tray
How does new pope compare to his predecessors?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who is Pope Leo?

An internal battle between Luis Tagle and Pablo Virgilio David – both cardinals hailing from Asia – cancelled out both of their chances.

And a contender from Africa – the most conservative sector of the church – was never likely for a conclave where the overwhelming majority of cardinals had been appointed by Francis, a progressive pontiff, sources say.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Moment new pope emerges on balcony

An American pope has long been seen as highly improbable, given the geopolitical power of the US.

But Cardinal Prevost was able to draw from across the groups making up the electors: moderate US cardinals, South American cardinals and many European cardinals all coalesced around him.

Italian newspaper La Repubblica said Prevost “certainly attracted cross-party preferences, both ideologically and geographically”.

“In the conclave he was the least American of Americans: Born in Chicago, he lived 20 years in Peru,” the newspaper said.

It added: “As a man used to teamwork, Prevost appeared to many as the right man to make the papacy evolve into a more collegial form.”

Continue Reading

World

Russia’s Victory Day parade felt more like a celebration of war than peace

Published

on

By

Russia's Victory Day parade felt more like a celebration of war than peace

Standing on Red Square, this was an intimidating sight, which felt much more like a celebration of war rather than peace.

I could feel the ground shake as the tanks rolled past, their caterpillar tracks on the ancient cobbles providing a deafening clatter.

The hairs on the back of my neck stood up in fear as the phalanxes of troops roared “Hurrah” in response to their commander in chief.

And the sight of combat drones being paraded on their launchers was actually quite sickening. Weapons that have been at the forefront of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine were paraded in a show of pomp and patriotism.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping
Image:
Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin watch the procession. Pic: Reuters

Ukraine war latest: Putin welcomes Xi at Victory Day parade

For the rest of Europe, the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War has been a celebration of peace, but this felt much more like a celebration of war.

And it wasn’t just military hardware on display here, but the very identity of modern Russia.

A general view shows Red Square during a military parade on Victory Day, marking the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two, in central Moscow, Russia, May 9, 2025. Vladimir Astapkovich/Host agency RIA Novosti/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY.
Image:
Pic: Reuters

For this is a country that is now defined by its military and its memory. The glory and sacrifice of 1945 have been weaponised to give credence to Russia’s current course and to make people believe that victory is their right.

For Russians, it served as a rallying cry and there was applause when the troops who have fought against Ukraine marched past.

But for those watching in Kyiv and other European capitals, it was an overt warning that Moscow has no intention of backing down.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin hails sacrifice of Russian troops

The parade was considerably larger in scale than in recent years, when units and hardware have been needed on the battlefield. I think it was a deliberate attempt to project an image of confidence, and so was Vladimir Putin‘s positioning of his guests.

China’s Xi Jinping was given a prime position on the Kremlin leader’s right-hand side. It was no surprise given the economic lifeline Beijing has provided, but it felt like a particularly pointed gesture to the West – that they were looking at a new world order.

Despite that appearance of confidence, there were signs of Moscow’s unease that the parade could be disrupted.

There were snipers on every rooftop. Security was extremely tight. And the mobile internet signal across the city centre was completely shut down for fear of Ukrainian drone attacks, meaning none of the international media that had gathered could broadcast any live transmissions.

After the parade finished, Putin saluted the crowds as they spontaneously erupted into rhythmic shouts of “Rus-si-ya” at the sight of him.

Another PR coup complete without interruption, he will have departed as a very happy man.

Continue Reading

Trending