Local Tory councils have threatened to take legal action against the government over its plans to house asylum seekers in disused military bases in their areas.
Immigration minister Robert Jenrick confirmed the scheme today, saying “thousands” would be accommodated at former RAF sites in Essex and Lincolnshire.
But Braintree District Council said it was planning to “imminently” apply for a High Court injunction to challenge the proposed use of the Wethersfield airbase amid concerns over the “isolated” location and impact on local services.
And West Lindsey District Council said it was “extremely disappointed” by the plans to use RAF Scampton and was “considering all legal options, including urgent judicial review proceedings”.
The new housing plans are aimed at reducing the £6.8m a day the government says it spends on hotel accommodation while acting as a deterrent to prevent Channel crossings.
But charities said the military accommodation won’t stop the small boats and is “grossly inadequate” for people who have fled war.
And Labour said the proposals will not reduce spending “contrary to all of the briefing in the papers”.
Making the announcement in the Commons, Mr Jenrick claimed the use of hotels to house asylum seekers has resulted in a loss of tourism and cancelled weddings, saying: “We must not elevate the wellbeing of illegal migrants above those of the British people”.
Advertisement
He said the new accommodation “should meet their essential living needs and nothing more”, adding: “We cannot risk becoming a magnet for the millions of people who are displaced and seeking better economic prospects.”
The minister said the two RAF sites will be “scaled up over the coming months” to house “several thousand asylum seekers through repurposed barrack blocks and porta cabins”.
And he said Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was “showing leadership” by “bringing forward proposals” to use barracks in Catterick Garrison in his constituency, along with a separate site on private land in Bexhill, East Sussex.
“This government remains committed to meeting our legal obligations for those who would otherwise be destitute but we are not prepared to go further,” said Mr Jenrick.
But he faced a backlash from his own benches, with former home secretary Priti Patel saying the Essex site was not suitable – pointing to another RAF base in North Yorkshire.
She said: “Can I ask why it is deemed appropriate for asylum seeker accommodation to be placed in a rural village in Essex with single men where there is no infrastructure, no amenities, but it was not appropriate for somewhere like Linton-on-Ouse?”
Concerns about the Essex site had previously been voiced by Foreign Secretary James Cleverly, the Conservative MP for the area, though earlier deputy PM Dominic Raab told Sky News his cabinet colleague now “fully supports” the policy.
He said the decision was “not based on good governance but the politics of trying to do something”.
Image: RAF Scampton is the former home of The Red Arrows
Transport minister Huw Merriman said voters in his Bexhill constituency would have “great concern” about plans to house asylum seekers in the former Northeye prison turned training centre.
The site is expected to need a considerable amount of work to make it suitable for up to the 1,200 people the Home Office intends to house there.
“I know that this decision will have an impact on local authorities and public services. It will also be of great concern to local residents,” Mr Merriman said.
Jenrick’s words on immigration send a message
As expected, Robert Jenrick today announced plans to house asylum seekers at disused RAF sites in Lincolnshire, Essex, and a former prison in East Sussex, instead of hotels.
He is addressing a subject many Conservative MPs feel very strongly about – one texts to say it is “about time” the government addresses the “hotel problem”.
It is estimated housing migrants in hotels costs the taxpayer almost £7m a day, but there are still plenty of questions about the workability of alternative accommodation.
Local councils are launching legal threats, and transport minister Huw Merriman has said he will be meeting the Home Office to “take forward local concerns”.
Immigration minister Mr Jenrick says the accommodation will “meet essential living needs, nothing more”.
The government hopes the new sites, including a former prison and military training camp, will act as a deterrent, and we understand they will be largely for new arrivals.
In the short-term at least, there is no prospect of moving the thousands of people already in hotels, but Mr Jenrick’s words today certainly send a message.
Opposition MPs also criticised the announcement, with Labour’s Yvette Cooper calling it an “admission of failure”.
“Maybe that’s why the home secretary has asked the immigration minister to make it instead,” she quipped in a dig at her government counterpart Suella Braverman.
Ms Cooper said the Conservatives promised four years ago to halve Channel crossings but “they’ve gone up 20 fold since then”, while more hotels have opened up despite repeated promises to stop their use.
“The asylum system is broken because they broke it,” she said.
“They have let criminal gangs rip along the channel. People smuggler convictions have halved in the last four years, even though more boats and more gangs have been crossing. And yet Tory MPs voted against Labour’s plan for cross-border police units to go after the gangs.”
There was also anger from charities, with Amnesty International UK describing the government’s argument that its plan will put migrants off travelling to the UK as “utter nonsense”.
Speaking to Sky News, the charity’s refugee and migrant rights programme director, Steve Valdez-Symonds, said: “People don’t get into dangerous boats or on the back of lorries and make dangerous journeys and put themselves in the hands of, quite frankly, very dangerous people on the basis of trying to get some meagre accommodation in a hotel, stuck in limbo in the UK’s asylum system.”
He added that the plan to house migrants on military bases “reflects a continuing failure by the government to simply get a grip on deciding the claims of people who arrive in this country and make asylum claims, something that it’s determined to stop doing, which is why we have this big backlog, and why it is constantly flailing around for places to accommodate people”.
The Home Office is also “continuing to explore” controversial plans to use vessels as a form of accommodation while asylum claims are being processed, Mr Jenrick said, comparing such schemes to those in Scotland and the Netherlands.
The announcement was met with cries of “it’s not the same” from Scottish MPs.
In Scotland, cruise ships have been used to house Ukrainian refugees fleeing the war.
An oil tanker seized by the US off the Venezuelan coast on Wednesday spent years trying to sail the seas unnoticed.
Changing names, switching flags, and vanishing from tracking systems.
That all came to an end this week, when American coast guard teams descending from helicopters with guns drawn stormed the ship, named Skipper.
A US official said the helicopters that took the teams to the tanker came from the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R Ford.
Image: The USS Gerald R Ford (in grey) off the US Virgin Islands on 4 December. Source: Copernicus
The sanctioned tanker
Over the past two years, Skipper has been tracked to countries under US sanctions including Iran.
TankerTrackers.com, which monitors crude oil shipments, estimates Skipper has transported nearly 13 million barrels of Iranian and Venezuelan oil since 2021.
More on Nicolas Maduro
Related Topics:
And in 2022, the US Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) placed Skipper, then known as Adisa, on its sanctions list.
But that did not stop the ship’s activities.
Image: Skipper pictured from the Venezuelan shore. Source: TankerTrackers.com
In mid-November 2025, it was pictured at the Jose Oil Export Terminal in Venezuela, where it was loaded with more than one million barrels of crude oil.
Image: Skipper (R) loads up with crude oil at the Jose Oil Export Terminal in Venezuela. Source: Planet
It left Jose Oil Export Terminal between 4 and 5 December, according to TankerTrackers.com.
And on 6 or 7 December, Skipper did a ship-to-ship transfer with another tanker in the Caribbean, the Neptune 6.
Ship-to-ship transfers allow sanctioned vessels to obscure where oil shipments have come from.
The transfer with Neptune 6 took place while Skipper’s tracking system, known as AIS, was turned off.
Image: Skipper (R) and Neptune 6 in the Caribbean Sea during an AIS gap. Source: European Union Copernicus Sentinel and Kpler
Dimitris Ampatzidis, senior risk and compliance manager at Kpler, told Sky News: “Vessels, when they are trying to hide the origin of the cargo or a port call or any operation that they are taking, they can just switch off the AIS.”
Matt Smith, head analyst US at Kpler, said they believe the ship’s destination was Cuba.
Around five days after leaving the Venezuelan port, it was seized around 70 miles off the coast.
Datawrapper
This content is provided by Datawrapper, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Datawrapper cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Datawrapper cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Datawrapper cookies for this session only.
Skipper has tried to go unnoticed by using a method called ‘spoofing’.
This is where a ship transmits a false location to hide its real movements.
“When we’re talking about spoofing, we’re talking about when the vessel manipulates the AIS data in order to present that she’s in a specific region,” Mr Ampatzidis explained.
“So you declare false AIS data and everyone else in the region, they are not aware about your real location, they are only aware of the false location that you are transmitted.”
When it was intercepted by the US, it was sharing a different location more than 400 miles away from its actual position.
Image: The distance between Skipper’s spoofed position on AIS (towards the bottom right hand corner) and its real position when seized by the US. Source: MarineTraffic
Skipper was manipulating its tracking signals to falsely place itself in Guyanese waters and fraudulently flying the flag of Guyana.
“We have really real concerns about the spoofing events,” Mr Ampatzidis told Sky News.
“It’s about the safety on the seas. As a shipping industry, we have inserted the AIS data, the AIS technology, this GPS tracking technology, more than a decade back, in order to ensure that vessels and crew on board on these vessels are safe when they’re travelling.”
Dozens of sanctioned tankers ‘operating off Venezuela’
Skipper is not the only sanctioned ship off the coast of Venezuela.
According to analysis by Windward, 30 sanctioned tankers were operating in Venezuelan ports and waters as of 11 December.
Image: About 30 sanctioned tankers are currently operating in Venezuelan waters. Source: Windward Maritime AI Platform
The tanker seizure is a highly unusual move from the US government and is part of the Trump administration’s increasing pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
In the past, Mr Ampatzidis explained, actions like sanctions have had a limited effect on illegally operating tankers.
But the seizure of Skipper will send a signal to other dark fleet ships.
“From today, they will know that if they are doing spoofing, if they are doing dark activities in closer regions of the US, they will be in the spotlight and they will be the key targets from the US Navy.”
The Data X Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy says the US has offered to create a “free economic zone” in the contested Donbas region of eastern Ukraine in a bid to push a peace deal over the line.
The Donbas – an industrial and coal-mining area primarily made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions – has become one of the key sticking points in the US-proposed peace plan.
The first draft of the plan, widely leaked last month, stipulated that Ukraine must withdraw from areas of the Donbas it currently controls, thought to be a minority portion, as a condition for peace.
Image: Donald Trump meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House in February. Pic: Reuters
Ukraine considered that point “unacceptable”, and Mr Zelenskyy has spent the last few weeks drafting a response to the plan that removed “obvious anti-Ukraine points”.
After a series of meetings with Ukraine’s European allies, including a trip to London to meet Sir Keir Starmer on Monday, Zelenskyy said on Thursday that he’d sent Washington a revised peace plan, whittled down to just 20 points.
The new US proposal envisions Ukraine withdrawing from its territory in the Donbas without the Russians advancing, creating a neutral zone.
But Zelenskyy poured cold water on the plans as he briefed journalists in Kyiv.
More from World
Image: Rescuers work after a Russian air strike in Sumy region, Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
“Who will govern this territory, which they are calling a ‘free economic zone’ or a ‘demilitarised zone’ – they don’t know,” he said.
“If one side’s troops have to retreat and the other side stays where they are, then what will hold back these other troops, the Russians? Or what will stop them disguising themselves as civilians and taking over this free economic zone? This is all very serious.
“It’s not a fact that Ukraine would agree to it, but if you are talking about a compromise then it has to be a fair compromise.”
Sky News military analyst Michael Clarke gave an ominous assessment of the proposal, saying it left “no physical solution” to resolve the problem of future attacks.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
49:17
Michael Clarke assesses the state of the war in Ukraine
He said: “If Ukraine gives up the fortress cities in the Donbas, the only security they can have is by being heavily armed and being backed by their allies in some way.”
“The only thing that would stop Russia is deterrence: the knowledge that either the European forces were sitting in Ukraine ready to fight for them, which is hard to imagine at the moment, and even harder to imagine that they are backed up by American forces.”
Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at the Royal United Service Institute, was similarly sceptical.
“The general view is that the Russians will be too tempted to… try and come back for more,” he told Sky News.
He added that “some kind of temporary ceasefire” might work, but it would require “the Europeans to demonstrate they can put their forces where their mouth is in terms of a reassurance force”.
Amid this backdrop there was a meeting today of the coalition of the willing – the 34-strong bloc of nations pledged to support Ukraine against Russian aggression, of which Britain is a part.
There was agreement to continue to fund military support, “progress on mobilising frozen Russian sovereign assets”, and an update from Zelenskyy on Russia’s continued bombardment of his country, according to Downing Street.
Afterwards, Zelenskyy said the bloc was working to ensure any peace deal contains “serious components of European deterrence”.
Image: A Ukrainian serviceman in combat practice in Kharkiv region, Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
He added: “It is important that the United States is with us and supports these efforts. No one is interested in a third Russian invasion.”
He also addressed growing pressure from the US for an election in Ukraine, saying “there must be a ceasefire” before the country can go to the polls.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Zelenskyy’s term expired last year, but wartime elections are forbidden by law in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, the tone tonight from the White House was one of impatience, with Trump’s team saying he wouldn’t attend further meetings until there’s a real chance of signing a peace deal.
“The president is extremely frustrated with both sides of this war, and he is sick of meetings just for the sake of meeting,” said White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt.
An oil tanker seized by the US off the Venezuelan coast on Wednesday spent years trying to sail the seas unnoticed.
Changing names, switching flags, and vanishing from tracking systems.
That all came to an end this week, when American coast guard teams descending from helicopters with guns drawn stormed the ship, named Skipper.
A US official said the helicopters that took the teams to the tanker came from the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R Ford.
Image: The USS Gerald R Ford (in grey) off the US Virgin Islands on 4 December. Source: Copernicus
The sanctioned tanker
Over the past two years, Skipper has been tracked to countries under US sanctions including Iran.
TankerTrackers.com, which monitors crude oil shipments, estimates Skipper has transported nearly 13 million barrels of Iranian and Venezuelan oil since 2021.
More on Nicolas Maduro
Related Topics:
And in 2022, the US Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) placed Skipper, then known as Adisa, on its sanctions list.
But that did not stop the ship’s activities.
Image: Skipper pictured from the Venezuelan shore. Source: TankerTrackers.com
In mid-November 2025, it was pictured at the Jose Oil Export Terminal in Venezuela, where it was loaded with more than one million barrels of crude oil.
Image: Skipper (R) loads up with crude oil at the Jose Oil Export Terminal in Venezuela. Source: Planet
It left Jose Oil Export Terminal between 4 and 5 December, according to TankerTrackers.com.
And on 6 or 7 December, Skipper did a ship-to-ship transfer with another tanker in the Caribbean, the Neptune 6.
Ship-to-ship transfers allow sanctioned vessels to obscure where oil shipments have come from.
The transfer with Neptune 6 took place while Skipper’s tracking system, known as AIS, was turned off.
Image: Skipper (R) and Neptune 6 in the Caribbean Sea during an AIS gap. Source: European Union Copernicus Sentinel and Kpler
Dimitris Ampatzidis, senior risk and compliance manager at Kpler, told Sky News: “Vessels, when they are trying to hide the origin of the cargo or a port call or any operation that they are taking, they can just switch off the AIS.”
Matt Smith, head analyst US at Kpler, said they believe the ship’s destination was Cuba.
Around five days after leaving the Venezuelan port, it was seized around 70 miles off the coast.
Datawrapper
This content is provided by Datawrapper, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Datawrapper cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Datawrapper cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Datawrapper cookies for this session only.
Skipper has tried to go unnoticed by using a method called ‘spoofing’.
This is where a ship transmits a false location to hide its real movements.
“When we’re talking about spoofing, we’re talking about when the vessel manipulates the AIS data in order to present that she’s in a specific region,” Mr Ampatzidis explained.
“So you declare false AIS data and everyone else in the region, they are not aware about your real location, they are only aware of the false location that you are transmitted.”
When it was intercepted by the US, it was sharing a different location more than 400 miles away from its actual position.
Image: The distance between Skipper’s spoofed position on AIS (towards the bottom right hand corner) and its real position when seized by the US. Source: MarineTraffic
Skipper was manipulating its tracking signals to falsely place itself in Guyanese waters and fraudulently flying the flag of Guyana.
“We have really real concerns about the spoofing events,” Mr Ampatzidis told Sky News.
“It’s about the safety on the seas. As a shipping industry, we have inserted the AIS data, the AIS technology, this GPS tracking technology, more than a decade back, in order to ensure that vessels and crew on board on these vessels are safe when they’re travelling.”
Dozens of sanctioned tankers ‘operating off Venezuela’
Skipper is not the only sanctioned ship off the coast of Venezuela.
According to analysis by Windward, 30 sanctioned tankers were operating in Venezuelan ports and waters as of 11 December.
Image: About 30 sanctioned tankers are currently operating in Venezuelan waters. Source: Windward Maritime AI Platform
The tanker seizure is a highly unusual move from the US government and is part of the Trump administration’s increasing pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
In the past, Mr Ampatzidis explained, actions like sanctions have had a limited effect on illegally operating tankers.
But the seizure of Skipper will send a signal to other dark fleet ships.
“From today, they will know that if they are doing spoofing, if they are doing dark activities in closer regions of the US, they will be in the spotlight and they will be the key targets from the US Navy.”
The Data X Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.