Connect with us

Published

on

The government has published plans for how it wants to regulate AI technology which it says will “turbocharge” the growth of AI in the UK, while countering potential risks of rapidly emerging computer intelligence to society.

The regulations will apply to all applications of AI including powerful “language models” like the headline-grabbing Chat-GPT and image-generating software like Midjourney AI.

These algorithms’ abilities to pass exams and write poetry, as well as generate misinformation and fake images have instilled awe and anxiety in equal measure.

“We’re not denying the risks,” said Science, Innovation and Technology Secretary, Michelle Donelan. “That’s why we’ve got a proportionate framework in terms of this regulatory approach, one that can help the UK to seize the opportunities.”

Ms Donelan spoke to Sky News during a tour of UK AI company DeepMind, now owned by Google, which last year used its AlphaFold AI to solve the structure of almost every known protein. The development was a landmark moment for understanding biology, and could lead to faster and safer drug development.

AI has huge potential to increase the productivity of businesses, improve access to learning and public services and revolutionise healthcare. The government claims the sector was worth £3.7bn to the UK economy last year.

And it wants that to grow, by offering AI companies a regulatory environment with less legal and administrative red tape than rival economies.

More on Artificial Intelligence

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will this chatbot replace humans?

So, it’s not proposing new laws. Instead, it’s looking to existing regulators like the Health and Safety Executive and the Competition and Markets Authority, to apply key principles around safety, transparency, and accountability to emerging AI.

In a very Silicon Valley-sounding move, the government is even offering a £2m “sandbox” for AI developers to test how regulation will be applied to AI before they release it to market.

But is a “light touch” regulatory approach a mistake, in the face of looming concerns around AI that could either run out of control or be misused?

Examples are already emerging of text and image-based AI’s ability to generate misinformation, like entirely fake images of the arrest, and then triumphant escape of Donald Trump; or the Pope sporting a white puffer jacket.

That’s not to mention AI being used by hackers or scammers to write code for computer viruses or peddle ever more convincing online frauds.

In the face of that, the EU is proposing strong AI legislation and a “risk-based” approach to regulating AI.

Read more:
Spotify’s redesign isn’t going down well
‘It means that every day is the best day in surgery’: Robotic arm assists with knee replacement

‘If we legislate now, it will be out of date’

The UK government makes the not unreasonable point that it’s hard to know what an AI law should say, given we don’t know what the AI of tomorrow looks like.

“If we legislate now, it will be out of date,” said Ms Donelan. “We want a process that can be nimble, can be agile, can be responsible can prioritise safety can prioritise transparency, but can keep up with the pace of the change that’s happening in this sector.”

The government says it doesn’t rule out the possibility of legislation to regulate AI in the future and Donelan is unapologetic in trying to make the UK attractive to AI companies.

“Shouldn’t the UK be leading the way? Shouldn’t we be in securing the benefits for our public services for our NHS or our education system for our transport network?” she says.

But it’s proving very hard for the government to protect the privacy and the safety of children online. When it comes to AI, its regulatory battles with Big Tech are probably only just beginning.

“Many [Big Tech companies] to me seem honestly to want to do the best for humanity,” says Professor Anil Seth, a cognitive scientist at the University of Sussex. “Unfortunately, markets don’t work that way and companies are rewarded for their share price.”

Many experts point to the fierce battle right now between Google, which is rushing to release Bard, its AI chatbot, and Microsoft, which has already built OpenAI’s GPT4 language model into its Bing search engine.

These tools have the power to emulate and interpret natural human language, or “understand” images so well, even their developers appear to be unsure of how they might be used. Yet they’ve been released publicly for us to try. A commendably open and transparent way of introducing AI to the world, or a recipe for disaster?

“Good intentions are not enough,” says Professor Seth. “We do need good intentions coupled with wise and enforceable regulation.”

Continue Reading

UK

Government accused of ‘cover-up’ over collapse of China spy trial

Published

on

By

Government accused of 'cover-up' over collapse of China spy trial

Kemi Badenoch has accused the government of a “cover-up” over the collapse of a China spy trial.

The Tory leader said there were a “lot of questions to answer” as to why the trial involving two men did not proceed.

Politics latest: Starmer pledges support for Middle East peace plan

It is expected that ministers will have to answer questions about the case today, as parliament returns from recess.

In particular, there are questions around the role played by Jonathan Powell, the prime minister’s national security adviser, in the trial not going ahead.

Ministers have repeatedly said Mr Powell played no role in the decisions that led to the collapse of the trial – but Ms Badenoch said she was “worried that there is a cover up taking place”.

Speaking to broadcasters in Grantham today, Ms Badenoch said: “We will be making sure that we ask questions in parliament about exactly who knew what, where and when, but Jonathan Powell certainly has questions to answer.”

More on China

She refuted suggestions from ministers that Mr Powell had had no involvement in the collapse of the trial, saying: “We are seeing information that contradicts that.

“That is why it is very important that the government come clean about who knew what, where, when, and why this has happened.”

Former parliamentary researcher Christopher Cash, 30, of Whitechapel, east London, and teacher Christopher Berry, 33, of Witney, Oxfordshire, were charged with passing politically sensitive information to a Chinese intelligence agent between December 2021 and February 2023. They have both denied the allegations.

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

Over the past week, Sir Keir Starmer, his ministers and Mr Powell have faced accusations they were involved in the trial being dropped.

Last week Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions and the head of the Crown Prosecution Service, took the unusual step of sending MPs a letter to claim that the government repeatedly refused to provide evidence that China represented a national security threat at the time of the allegations.

Mr Parkinson said the CPS had tried “over many months” to get the evidence it needed to carry out the prosecution, but it had not been forthcoming from the government.

Downing Street also said today it was “entirely false” to suggest the government influenced the collapse of the case because of concerns Beijing could withdraw investment in the UK.

Asked about reports in the Sunday Times which suggested a decision was taken high up in government to abandon the case, the prime minister’s official spokesman told reporters: “It is entirely false. The CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) decision to drop the case was entirely a matter for the CPS.

“There was no role for any member of this government, no minister, or special adviser, to take any decision in relation to this case. That is entirely for the CPS.”

The government had argued that China needed to have been branded an “enemy” during the period it was accused of spying for the prosecution to go ahead – effectively blaming the previous Conservative government.

The Conservatives claim the government’s rationale is an excuse because it had said many times Beijing was a national security threat while it was in government.

Read more from Sky News:
Dozens dead after bus crash in South Africa
Man charged with stalking after allegedly targeting Lib Dem leader

The prime minister has said he wanted to be “absolutely clear no ministers were involved” in any decisions relating to the case, but notably sidestepped answering whether Mr Powell was involved.

Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, yesterday gave the government’s most definitive answer yet about whether Mr Powell was part of the reason the case was dropped weeks before they were set to go on trial.

Asked on Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips if she could assure him that the national security adviser played no role in the decision, Ms Phillipson said: “Yes, I can give that assurance.

“We’re very disappointed that the CPS were not able to take forward the prosecution.”

The Liberal Democrats have called on the government to hold an inquiry into the collapse of the case.

Calum Miller, the party’s foreign affairs spokesman, said the case had “exposed appalling gaps in our government’s ability and willingness to challenge China’s espionage efforts”.

“We cannot let the government sweep this case under the rug in its efforts to cosy up to President Xi. An inquiry – preceded by rigorous scrutiny through parliament – would provide the answers the public deserves.”

Continue Reading

UK

Tommy Robinson refused to give phone pin to police as he drove his Bentley to Benidorm, court hears

Published

on

By

Tommy Robinson refused to give phone pin to police as he drove his Bentley to Benidorm, court hears

Tommy Robinson refused to hand over his phone pin when police stopped his Bentley on the way to Benidorm, a court has heard.

He allegedly told officers “Not a chance, bruv” and said he was a journalist when they pulled him aside at the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone in July 2024.

Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is accused of “frustrating” counter-terrorism powers by refusing to give access to the phone.

He denies the charge.

The right-wing political activist was flanked by security guards as he arrived at Westminster Magistrates Court for the opening of the trial on Monday.

The 42-year-old faces three months in prison and/or a £2,500 fine if found guilty.

Robinson had £13,000 and 1,900 euros on him when he was stopped and told police he was going to Benidorm in Spain for a few days, said prosecutor Jo Morris.

More on Tommy Robinson

He allegedly refused to give the pin as he claimed the phone had sensitive “journalist material” on it.

He’s said to have told police: “It’s my work, I’m a journalist,” claiming it contained information about “vulnerable girls”.

The court heard Robinson was stopped in his silver Bentley SUV because he gave “short, vague replies” about what he was doing and “made no eye contact”.

PC Mitchell Thorogood told the court it was also “unusual” he bought tickets on the day rather than in advance and was in an expensive car not registered in his name.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

When police took Robinson into an interview room and demanded his phone, he allegedly told them: “Not a chance bruv… you look like a c*** so you ain’t having it.”

Officers said they recognised Robinson when they stopped him and his lawyer, Alisdair Williamson KC, suggested the stop may have been “discriminatory” against his political beliefs.

Police can stop anyone at a UK port and hold them for six hours if they suspect they may be involved in planning or committing acts of terrorism.

They are legally obliged to answer questions and must give access to their electronic devices or face a criminal charge.

In a video on X before the hearing, Robinson said Elon Musk had “picked up the legal bill” for “this absolute state persecution”.

The case comes a month after Robinson led a huge rally in central London under the banner ‘Unite the Kingdom’.

The trial continues.

Continue Reading

UK

Man arrested over 1994 murder of 13-year-old Lindsay Rimer

Published

on

By

Man arrested over 1994 murder of 13-year-old Lindsay Rimer

A man has been arrested on suspicion of the 1994 murder of 13-year-old Lindsay Rimer.

Police said the man was arrested at an undisclosed prison where he is serving a sentence for other offences.

The man, who is being interviewed today and tomorrow, is expected to be bailed and returned to prison while enquires continue.

Officers are also interviewing a number of potential witnesses in the Hebden Bridge and wider Halifax area.

Lindsay left her home to buy a box of corn flakes late during the evening of 7 November, 1994, but didn’t return home.

Her body was then found in a canal close to her home six months later.

Following today’s arrest, senior investigating officer, detective chief inspector James Entwistle, said: “We remain very firmly committed to doing everything we can to get justice for Lindsay, and to give her family the answers they still so desperately need after all these years.

Lindsay Rimer's body was found in a canal close to her home six months later. Pic: West Yorkshire Police
Image:
Lindsay Rimer’s body was found in a canal close to her home six months later. Pic: West Yorkshire Police

“The arrest we have made today comes as a result of our continued focus on progressing the investigation.

“We are keeping Lindsay’s family updated and, while we appreciate the understandable public interest that today’s arrest will bring, we do not anticipate any immediate developments at this stage.

“Although it is now more than thirty years since Lindsay was murdered, we remain convinced there is someone out there who has vital information that could finally help to ease her family’s pain, and we urge them do the right thing and tell us what they know.”

Anyone with further information has been urged to contact police by calling 101 quoting Operation Posemill, or sending a text or voicemail to 07707147314.

Continue Reading

Trending