A coalition of 54 consumer and environmental groups from 26 countries have written a letter to Toyota asking that the company phase-out fossil fuels globally by 2035, and in Europe by 2030. The letter is timed to coincide with the start of new CEO Koji Sato’s tenure at the company on April 1.
Toyota occupies a commanding role in global auto manufacturing. It is not only the largest company in Japan by a longshot, but also often the world’s number-one automaker (sometimes swapping this title with VW). As a result, the company’s actions can set the tone for the auto industry.
But under CEO Akio Toyoda, Toyota has lagged significantly on electric cars. The company has taken a long time to bring any EV to market, and its first full EV, the bZ4X, didn’t have the best launch. While those kinks have now been worked out after a lengthy recall, the company still sells EVs in very low volume in a world where EVs are becoming more and more front and center in virtually every automaker’s lineup.
As a leader in Japanese industry, Toyota’s (and the rest of the Japanese auto industry’s) intransigence on EVs has led some to warn that Japan’s economy could decline significantly if it doesn’t shape up.
But all of this happened under Akio Toyoda. And Toyota’s inability – or, perhaps more accurately, lack of desire – to adapt to the EV landscape seems to have been a factor in his stepping down. Toyoda seemed to acknowledge that he was unable to lead the company through the level of change needed to adapt for the future, stating:
To advance change at Toyota, I have reached the decision that it is best for me to support a new president while I become chairman.
The incoming CEO, Koji Sato, was previously brand chief at Lexus, where he led Lexus’s electrification efforts. Toyoda picked Sato for his ability to “promote change in an era in which the future is unpredictable.” He begins his tenure on April 1, and has already stated that he wants to get serious about EVs.
Open letter demands change at Toyota – drop fossils by 2035 globally, 2030 in US/EU
To coincide with the beginning of Sato’s tenure, 54 consumer and environmental groups representing millions of supporters in 26 countries have combined to ask that the new CEO, Mr. Sato, “commit to phase out all internal combustion engine vehicles in the U.S. and Europe by 2030, and globally by 2035.” The groups also demand that Toyota end its “anti-climate lobbying” immediately.
The effort was spearheaded by Public Citizen, a US-based nonprofit consumer advocacy group. Other notable signatories include the Japanese chapters of Greenpeace and the Rainforest Action Network, along with the Center for Biological Diversity, Electric Vehicle Association, GreenLatinos, Coltura, EarthJustice, and the Sierra Club. The letter lists the many other groups involved from around the world.
The letter does not mince words. While it does “ask” Toyota for these commitments, it also points out “decades of harm and deceit caused by Toyota” with respect to electric vehicle adoption, including cheating on emissions tests, which led to a record $180 million fine.
The letter points to research that fossil fuels are responsible for millions of deaths per year, accounting for one in five deaths around the globe. Personal vehicles are a primary contributor to this fossil fuel pollution, which harms human health everywhere.
While Toyota has a plan to increase electrification of its fleet, the company currently says that it plans to sell 3.5 million electric cars in 2030. This is only about a third of the company’s current yearly sales, though a huge increase from the 16,000 vehicles, or .2% of its global sales, from its last fiscal year. By comparison, all-electric competitor Tesla sold 1.3 million EVs last year. Even stodgy old GM targets 40-50% electric sales by 2030.
The letter closes by recognizing incoming CEO Sato’s actions to lead Lexus toward electrification, and recent pledges to lead the industry, but requests several specific commitments:
phase out internal combustion engine vehicles (including hybrids and plug-in hybrids) in the U.S. and Europe by 2030 and globally by 2035;
align advocacy and lobbying with the goal of phasing out internal combustion engines, and be a voice for 100% renewable energy economy-wide;
require 100% renewable energy use throughout your supply chains globally by 2035;
by 2025, sign a procurement commitment for fossil-free primary steel with a steel producer and additionally commit to source 100% fossil-free steel by 2050;
require responsible sourcing of your battery minerals, and develop battery design that allows for easy reuse and recycling of minerals;
establish a clear commitment to Indigenous Peoples’ right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent, which should be extended to your suppliers.
Electrek’s Take
As I’ve said many times with respect to EV timelines: “Why not sooner?” But this time, this letter’s timeline is one I can actually agree with.
While many regions are looking to put requirements in place for full electrification by 2035, I don’t think this is early enough. Several automakers agree, and are planning to go full electric well before 2035. Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, Lotus, Bentley, Cadillac, Mercedes, Mini, Rolls-Royce, and Volvo have all committed to 2030, so it’s not like this timeline is impossible.
Oh, and of course, there’s one more brand with an all-electric 2030 target: Lexus. Which made the announcement while it was being led by none other than the incoming CEO of Toyota, Koji Sato.
All these automakers are smart to be ready for electrification before regulatory requirements come in. Electrification is happening fast, and once critical mass is reached, the shift can happen quickly. Norway was targeting 2025 for an end to gas car sales, but they’re already at close to zero a few years early.
Besides, electrification has taken several companies by surprise already. It takes time to build battery factories, distribution networks, charging networks, train (and convince) car dealers in how to sell EVs, and so on. Companies could have started on these efforts long ago, but many companies are only starting to build battery factories now. This has led companies with less foresight to be more affected by supply constraints. For one example, just this week, Ford CEO Jim Farley said “batteries are the constraint.”
So a faster route to electrification is not just smarter for every living being on Earth, but smarter for the company. Toyota is very late to the game already, and will have to work extremely hard to catch up. But if the new CEO knows what’s good for Toyota as a businessman, and what’s good for humanity as a human, he’ll put in that effort and realign his company to act responsibly, both for the world and for his shareholders.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Over the weekend, Tesla began offering many Cybertruck trade-in estimated values above the original purchase price, apparently due to a glitch in its system.
Tesla offers online trade-in estimates for individuals considering purchasing a vehicle from them.
Over the last few days, Cybertruck owners who submitted their vehicles through the system were surprised to see Tesla offering extremely high valuations on the vehicle, often above what they originally paid for the electric truck.
Here are a few examples:
Advertisement – scroll for more content
$79,200 for a 2025 Cybertruck AWD with 18,000 miles. Since this is a 2025 model year, it was eligible for the tax credit and Tesla is offering the same price as new without incentive.
Here Tesla offered $118,800 for a 2024 Cybertruck ‘Cyberbeast’ tri-motor with 21,000 miles.
In this example, Tesla offers $11,000 more than the owner originally paid for a 2024 Cybertruck.
So, trade in the Foundation Series Cybertruck AWD for $11k more than I paid for it originally, re-buy an AWD with FSD for $79,490 after the tax credit.
I’d lose free supercharging for life, Cyberwheels, and white interior.
The trade-in estimates made no sense. Tesla has been known to offer more attractive estimates online and then come lower with the official final offer, but this is on a whole different level.
Some speculated that Tesla’s trade-in estimate system was malfunctioning, while others thought Tesla was indirectly recalling early Cybertrucks.
It appears to be the former.
Some Tesla Cybertruck owners who tried to go through a new order with their Cybertruck as a trade-in were told by Tesla advisors that the system was “glitching” and they would not be honoring those prices.
Tesla told buyers that it would be refunding its usually “non-refundable” order fee.
Electrek’s Take
That’s a weird glitch. I assume that it was trying to change how the trade-in value would be estimated and the new math didn’t work for the Cybertruck for whatever reason.
It’s the only thing that makes sense to me.
The Cybertruck’s value is already quite weird due to the fact that Tesla still has new vehicles made in 2024, which are not eligible for the tax credit incentive, while the new ones made in 2025 are eligible.
There’s also the Foundation Series, which bundles many features for a $20,000 higher price.
All these things affect the value and can make it hard to compare with new Cybertrucks offered with 0% interest.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Like a 90s “gifted” kid that was supposed to be a lot of things, the electric Jeep Wagoneer S never really found its place — but when dealers started discounting the Jeep brands forward-looking flagship by nearly $25,000 back in June, I wrote that it might be time to give the go-fast Wagoneer S a second look.
Whether we’re talking about Mercedes-Benz, Cerberus, Fiat, or even Enzo Ferrari, outsiders have labeled Jeep as a potentially premium brand that could, “if managed properly,” command luxury-level prices all over the globe. That hasn’t happened, and Stellantis is just the latest in a long line of companies to sink massive capital into the brand only to realize that people will not, in fact, spend Mercedes money on a Jeep.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
That said, the Jeep Wagoneer S is not a bad car (and neither is its totally different, hideously massive, ICE-powered Wagoneer sibling, frankly). Built on the same Stellantis STLA Large vehicle platform that underpins the sporty Charger Daytona EVs, the confusingly-named Wagoneer S packs dual electric motors putting out almost 600 hp. That’s good enough to scoot the ‘ute 0 to 60 mph in a stomach-turning 3.5 seconds and enough, on paper, to convince Stellantis executives that they had developed a real, market-ready alternative to the Tesla Model Y.
With the wrong name and a sky-high starting price of $66,995 (not including the $1,795 destination fee), however, that demand didn’t materialize, leaving the Wagoneer S languishing on dealer lots across the country.
That could be about to change, however, thanks to big discounts on Wagoneer S being reported at CDJR dealers in several states:
Jeff Belzer’s in Minnesota has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,790 MSRP for $39,758 ($28,032 off)
Troncalli CDJR in Georgia has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,590 MSRP for $42,697 ($24,893 off)
Whitewater CDJR in Minnesota has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,790 MSRP for $43,846 ($23,944 off)
Antioch CDJR in Illinois has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,790 MSRP for $44,540 ($23,250 off)
“Stellantis bet big on electric versions of iconic American brands like Jeep and Dodge, but consumers aren’t buying the premise,” writes CDG’s Marcus Amick. “(Stellantis’ dealer body) is now stuck with expensive EVs that need huge discounts to move, eating into already thin margins while competitors focus on [more] profitable gas-powered vehicles.”
All of which is to say: if you’ve found yourself drawn to the Jeep Wagoneer S, but couldn’t quite stomach the $70,000+ window stickers, you might want to check in with your local Jeep dealer and see how you feel about it at a JCPenneys-like 30% off!
Jeep Wagoneer S gallery
Original content from Electrek; images via Stellantis.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Multinational equipment brand SANY just launched a clever new 50-ton reach stacker that pairs gravity and an F1-style KERS system to generate electricity, improve operating efficiency, and reduce costs. The best part: they’re putting that smart tech to work by helping clean up (and shore up) the grid.
Short for Kinetic Energy Recovery System, KERS was a staple of Formula 1 in the late aught and 2010s. Essentially an advanced form of regenerative braking, KERS captured the kinetic energy of a car at speed that would normally be lost as heat when the brake pads pressed against the brake discs. Instead of heat, KERS converted that energy into electricity (storing it in a battery or flywheel), to be deployed later.
Sebastian Vettel explains KERS
4x WDC Sebastian Vettel explains KERS.
In practice, KERS gave drivers an extra boost of horsepower at the push of a button, enabling them to attack or defend their position on track and adding a fresh strategic element to the sport. In SANY’s case, that stored power is fed back into the reach stacker’s electric hydraulic system, reducing pressure loss across the high-pressure setup by 50%, and lowering the machine’s overall energy consumption by more than 60%.
Energy recovery is a key feature. The potential energy of the boom, lifting gear and energy storage cabinets during the boom’s descent can be recovered efficiently with an overall recovery efficiency of over 65%. That means every 1 kWh of consumption in lifting can be recovered by 0.4 kWh during descent.
The 50t reach stacker is available with a 512 kWh swappable battery pack that’s compatible with other SANY heavy equipment assets, and supports both DC fast charging when swapping isn’t practical or (for whatever reason) desirable.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
On a single charge and backed by the onboard KERS, that’s good enough for the machine can lift and move containers for more than 7 continuous hours, which SANY claims significantly reducing downtime for charging compared to other, similar equipment assets.
The new SANY reach stacker can stack six 50-ton containers, greatly enhancing a site’s container and battery storage density within a limited space. The first units will reach unnamed customers building out a utility-scale energy storage project by the end of this month.
Regardless of which one you choose, it seems like the available options for reach stacker operators are just getting better and better!
SOURCE | IMAGES: SANY.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.