Connect with us

Published

on

Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch has said palm oil is “a great product” after the new UK-Indo-Pacific trade deal was criticised for aiding the destruction of orangutan habitats.

The UK was accepted into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) on Friday after two years of negotiations.

Malaysia, the world’s second-largest palm oil producer after Indonesia, is one of the now 12-strong group that has reduced trade barriers and tariffs.

Reactions as UK signs biggest post-Brexit trade deal – live politics updates

Concerns had been raised ahead of the deal by environmental campaigners concerned that cutting palm oil tariffs would be an incentive for further destruction of forests where critically endangered orangutans live on the island of Borneo that is partly owned by Malaysia.

Ms Badenoch admitted to Sky News there will now be a 0% tariff on Malaysian palm oil after the country successfully demanded the former 12% tariff be cut entirely as a prerequisite for accession to the group.

A tariff on bananas, however, will remain although will be reduced to £62 per 1,000kg.

The trade secretary told Sky News: “Palm oil is actually a great product, it’s in so many of the things we use.

“This is not some illegal substance we’re talking about and actually there are other crops in the EU that are causing deforestation that fit within EU rules.”

She said “you have to make trade-offs” when doing a deal and said the UK currently buys 1% of Malaysia’s palm oil exports but “moving to 2% from 1% is not what is going to cause deforestation”.

Ms Badenoch added that the UK will have “more influence” on sustainability as part of the bloc.

In the document outlining the deal’s details on palm oil, it says the UK will “continue to work domestically and with partners internationally to pursue our ambitions for nature, climate, sustainable development, including in multilateral fora such as the WTO, COP28 and through the Forest, Agriculture and Commodity Trade Dialogue”.

Greenpeace has said the deal makes a “total mockery” of the UK’s attempts to tackle deforestation.

Daniela Montalto, forests campaigner at Greenpeace UK, said: “This is outrageous.

“Palm oil is still a major driver of deforestation in climate critical forests across Malaysia, Indonesia and Papua so cutting palm oil tariffs will only incentivise further destruction.

“It makes a total mockery of the UK government’s legislation to tackle deforestation in UK supply chains and runs completely counter to the government’s promise to put the environment at the very heart of trade.

“Prioritising people and the climate means introducing binding targets, legislation and fiscal measures to reduce production and consumption of products linked to forest destruction to allow these critical natural ecosystems to recover – crucial if we are to stay below 1.5C.”

How does palm oil production affect orangutans?

Forests are bulldozed to make way for palm oil plantations, displacing orangutans who then try to find food in the new plantation areas.

Between 1,000 and 5,000 orangutans are killed each year to protect the crops, the Orangutan Foundation International said.

Indonesia and Malaysia produce more than 85% of the world’s palm oil and are the only remaining home to orangutans, with fewer than 118,000 currently surviving, according to the World Wildlife Fund.

In 2022-2023, Malaysia produced 18.8 million metric tons of palm oil, which is used in about half of supermarket products from shampoo and cosmetics to chocolate, peanut butter and cereals.

A palm oil estate in Sabah, Borneo
Image:
A palm oil estate in Sabah, Borneo

Not all palm oil production affects orangutan habits, with more and more producers choosing to use sustainable palm oil.

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) was formed in 2004, setting production standards for growers including halting deforestation and protecting wildlife and the environment.

However, some campaigners have said sustainable palm oil is a “con” as it took 14 years for the RSPO to ban its members from destroying forests and have accused some members of continuing to do so while some big brands do not know where their palm oil comes from.

Continue Reading

World

Drone footage shows Russian invasion of Vovchansk as Ukrainian soldiers fight back

Published

on

By

Drone footage shows Russian invasion of Vovchansk as Ukrainian soldiers fight back

Watching a live drone feed, it was possible to make out three people running down a street in a frontline town in northeastern Ukraine.

“Are they Russians?” I asked a Ukrainian soldier, who was also on the ground in Vovchansk and was showing us the footage from a secret location as we spoke to him via video link from outside the town.

“Yes, yes,” said Denys, 42, the commander of a reconnaissance unit.

“They come in groups like this of three to five soldiers.”

Follow war latest: US confirms aid arriving on frontline

Other footage from Monday shared with Sky News appeared to be of more Russian troops inside the town – just three days after Russia launched a surprise assault across its border into Ukraine’s Kharkiv region.

Sky News has verified the location of the images.

“They are advancing in a residential area of Vovchansk and moving into people’s houses,” Denys said.

“This is just the first wave… They’re testing our defences, they’re preparing their artillery. When they completely enter the town, they’ll bring in their reserves.”

Russian troops inside Vovchansk in northeastern Ukraine
Image:
Sky News has verified the location of the images

Denys was speaking from a position where he and his team were operating their drone, hunting for Russian targets for Ukrainian forces to strike.

Asked what their main task was, he spun the camera he was speaking to us on around to let one of his soldiers – he described them as his “fellow hero brothers” – answer.

“We will fight under these difficult conditions by whatever means,” said the serviceman, called Andrii.

“We simply have no other choice because behind us are our homes, our families, our children.”

Russian forces have unleashed a ferocious barrage of fire against the town, using a combination of airstrikes, gliding bombs, armed drones and heavy artillery.

Another feed, shared by Denys, captured apocalyptic scenes of smoke spiralling into the air from multiple impact sites across Vovchansk.

“The town was not prepared for this bombardment,” he said.

Drone footage shows the Russian assault on the border town of Vovchansk, Ukraine.
Image:
Drone footage shows the Russian assault on Vovchansk

Asked how dangerous it was for him and his team, Denys panned around his makeshift base.

“If they target us with a guided bomb… it’ll be a mass grave,” he said, smiling.

Denys had been a senior police officer and then a lawyer before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Then, like many civilians, he volunteered to serve to defend his country and has been fighting ever since.

But, in an unusual move for a member of the military, Denys has publicly expressed frustration at what he believes was a failure by his own side to ensure Ukraine’s northeastern border with Russia was better defended by landmines and fortifications.

This was despite the Ukrainian military repelling an initial assault by Russia against the Kharkiv region in the first months of the war.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

On Friday “we saw the first breaches of the state border line by enemy armoured vehicles – the initial rush,” he said. “They passed without encountering any mined positions.”

Explaining why he had chosen to speak out about his concerns, he said: “We’re fighting for freedom and truth. We defend our interests, the interests of our state, voluntarily. And we believe that this truth needs to be spoken.”

Having fought to defend Kharkiv once already, Denys said he and his team now “feel some deja vu”.

He added: “It’s shocking. We’re having to defend ourselves again – losing territory and the lives of soldiers.”

He also said, this time around, the Russians were more prepared.

“The enemy prepared their FPV [attack drone] forces,” he said. “They loaded up with an incredible amount of MLRS [multiple launch rocket systems] and artillery.”

As well as capturing images of Russian troops on the ground, the drone footage also showed Ukraine fighting back.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Russian forces bear down on Vovchansk

One clip was of what Denys said was a group of Russian troops on the edge of Vovchansk, carrying a wounded soldier on a stretcher.

His team relayed the coordinates of the location to another unit. Moments later, what looks to be a Ukrainian strike chugs up smoke in the area of the Russian position.

Read more:
Russia ‘advancing from multiple positions’
Putin seizes chance to hit Kharkiv

As he prepared to fight into the night, Denys had a message for Ukraine’s top commanders.

“Trust your soldiers, your officers. Trust those on the ground. Give them the opportunity, give them help, give them the chance to defend this land,” he said.

“There are many people here who voluntarily came to give their lives for this country. The command should respect them, trust them, and allow them to do their job.”

Continue Reading

World

Deepfakes and influencers: The digital election in India

Published

on

By

Deepfakes and influencers: The digital election in India

Divyendra Jadoun is proud of his professional alias: the Indian Deepfaker. 

“I know we do deepfakes,” he tells Sky News. “Why would I use something else?”

And Jadoun’s services have been in demand recently, as India holds elections – often billed as the biggest democratic election on the planet.

Deepfakes have been a feature, in some surprising ways. On occasion, they have been malicious. Bollywood actors have been falsely depicted criticising PM Narendra Modi, or endorsing a political party.

Jadoun says: “We received a lot of requests, from November, October. And out of those requests, around 45 to 50% requests were for unethical [deepfakes]. And these are two kinds of requests.

“One is to swap the face of the political leader and put it into some controversial video that might harm his image. The second type of unethical [deepfake] is to create the clone of, the voice of the opponent leader and make him say something that he has never said.”

“This is the first time that we are going to see the deployment of deepfakes on a large scale. Even for us, it’s a new thing.

More on Artificial Intelligence

“We do not know how much it will impact or whether it will have an impact or not.”

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

Others point to the low numbers of views those deepfake videos tend to receive, along with the speed at which they get debunked – and say that the impact of deepfakes has been, perhaps unexpectedly, positive.

“There was a fear that deepfake type of things would be more used for adversarial content, whereas what we are seeing is the opposite,” explains Joyojeet Pal, associate professor of information at the University of Michigan.

“The artificially generated content is much more being used by the campaigns of politicians in their own interest.”

Witness the resurrection of M Karunanidhi, a politician who died in 2018. A deepfake of him was created by technologist Senthil Nayagam and subsequently put on the campaign trail, endorsing various candidates.

“We accidentally started the trend with this video,” Nayagam tells Sky News.

Read more from Sky News:
India and Canada relations at their lowest point
Narendra Modi reported to Electoral Commission

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

The Indian Deepfaker has worked on another system that shows the potential innovation of deepfakes.

“We are doing a conversational agent where you will get a call in the voice of a leader. It will be saying that I am an AI-generated avatar of this leader, and he will be taking the name of the person,” he says.

“He will be asking ‘What are your local issues in your area?’ or ‘What are your suggestions to the government?’ – and every call will be recorded.

“It will then be transcribed and it will be filtered out based on different questions, so that the government or the political parties can make manifestos or can create schemes according to the problem.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From April: Is India’s Narendra Modi popular?

There are still pitfalls. Jadoun is worried about deepfakes spreading through the messaging system WhatsApp rather than the open internet, where they are easier to debunk. WhatsApp is where more traditional misinformation has spread, according to Amber Sinha.

“I think it’s also been early days, in terms of [the deepfake] use case in India,” he tells Sky News.

“There have been other modes of content, for instance, doctored images, Photoshopped images that have been prevalent, particularly on WhatsApp groups, for much longer in India.”

WhatsApp is, for many people in India, simply the internet. Platforms that dominate in other democracies remain niche. Take ad spending on Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram (and WhatsApp, although it doesn’t show ads).

The ruling BJP is clearly dominating, according to the data provided by Who Targets Me. But compare that to US spending.

The US isn’t even holding an election – at least not yet – and it is comfortably outspending India.

And Pal argues that other platforms have now caught up with WhatsApp.

“WhatsApp groups were the big player in the fairly recent elections as well,” he says. “YouTube is either at par or more important than WhatsApp right now.”

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The most novel digital development of this election, he argues, is the emergence of YouTube influencers.

Earlier this month, for example, Curly Tales, a food blogger with more than three million followers, featured the chief minister of Maharashtra on her channel. And politicians have been making concerted attempts to woo influencers across the board.

File pic: AP
Image:
AP file pic

“The most surprising thing about the campaign has been the emergence of digital influencers over professional journalists as the interviewers in the campaigns themselves,” Pal says.

“As opposed to a professional journalist who might be fairly educated about policy and can ask a politician aggressive questions about what is or is not working about their platform, a digital influencer doesn’t have that ability.”

For all the innovation, deepfakes and influencers do perhaps open up an information gap – one where doubt and misinformation can spread, inadvertently or not.

Continue Reading

World

‘I wasn’t aware’: Far-right regional leader of Germany’s AfD in court for final day of Nazi slogan trial

Published

on

By

'I wasn't aware': Far-right regional leader of Germany's AfD in court for final day of Nazi slogan trial

One of Germany’s most prominent far right politicians is expected to hear if he has been found guilty of using a banned Nazi slogan.

Björn Höcke, one of the leading figures of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, is due in court in Halle for the final day of his trial.

He is charged with knowingly using a Nazi slogan at a rally in 2021, an act which is forbidden under German law.

The trial heard Höcke used the slogan “Alles für Deutschland” (Everything for Germany) at the AfD event in May 2021.

The phrase is associated with the SA or Storm Troopers, the paramilitary wing of the National Socialist party also known as the Brownshirts.

They played a significant role in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in the 1920s and early 1930s.

The AfD's Björn Höcke marching with supporters

Prosecutors claim he knew the phrase was banned but he told the court he is “completely innocent”.

More on Germany

The 52-year-old has led the AfD’s regional branch in Thuringia since 2013, the year the party was founded, and is due to lead its campaign in a state election set for 1 September.

It is one of three branches that Germany’s domestic intelligence agency has under official surveillance as a “proven right-wing extremist” group.

At their recent annual general meeting, Höcke told Sky News he believed the legal case was politically motivated.

“I’m seeing something similar in the USA. Donald Trump is also on trial there and he too is being slowed down. He is hampered in all his development opportunities. I think that’s the point. So for me, the whole thing is a political conspiracy,” he said.

Björn Höcke speaks to Sky News' Siobhan Robbins

“But as a former history teacher were you not aware of the Nazi links?” I asked.

“No, I wasn’t aware. It’s a commonplace saying which unfortunately was once burned by the Nazis,” he replied.

He once called the Holocaust memorial in Berlin a “monument of shame” and called for Germany to perform a “180-degree turn” in how it remembers its past.

A party tribunal in 2018 rejected a bid to have him expelled.

Anti-AfD protestors have been gathering outside the court during the trial.

“Together against fascism,” they shouted as the hearings took place.

Protestors against AfD's Björn Höcke outside a courtroom where he is on trial for using a Nazi slogan
Protestors against AfD's Björn Höcke outside a courtroom where he is on trial for using a Nazi slogan

“We must not tolerate slogans that we know are leading us in the wrong direction historically,” Lennard Giessenberg told reporters.

“I hope he gets the maximum penalty and that a sign will be sent,” added Sven.

This case is among a string of controversies facing the AfD.

Earlier this year there were mass protests across Germany after a leaked report revealed some members attended a meeting where the mass deportation of migrants was discussed.

Last month, an AfD aide was accused of spying for China.

Despite this, the party is still second in the polls and many back Höcke.

“Björn Höcke is one of the best and most sincere patriots and politicians we have in this party,” said Eric Engelhardt, a member AfD’s youth wing in Thuringia.

He believes Höcke is exactly what Germany needs.

While a guilty verdict could in theory mean a prison sentence, a fine is a more likely punishment.

The outcome of the trial is unlikely to impact Höcke’s support among the hardcore which seemingly remains undented.

On Monday, a German high court ruled domestic security services could continue to treat the AfD as a potentially extremist party, meaning they retain the right to keep it under surveillance.

The party said it would appeal.

Continue Reading

Trending