Wall Street can — and will — turn against stocks the Club holds in high regard. In some cases, our move is to run toward the wreckage, not away from it. “I want to be greedy on the downside. I want to be giving on the upside,” Jim Cramer said on Tuesday’s edition of the “Homestretch.” “When I see a stock getting tossed out that I love, that is fantastic.” Building on Jim’s philosophy, we analyzed the Club’s portfolio to identify beaten-down stocks that trade at reasonable valuations. The specific circumstances around each stock vary, and impact our ultimate view on whether now is the time to buy. But in general, stocks that meet the following criteria may be the kinds of opportunities to consider taking further action on: The stock trades at least 15% below its 52-week high, as of Tuesday’s closing price. We used the 15% cutoff because the market is in overbought territory, based on Jim’s trusted S & P 500 Short Range Oscillator . In those situations, we have a higher threshold for determining a stock is worth buying on weakness. The stock has a forward price-to-earnings multiple under 18, which puts its valuation below the S & P 500’s forward P/E, as of Tuesday’s close. We found 10 Club holdings that met both measures, including Caterpillar (CAT) and Halliburton (HAL). Here’s a breakdown of the full list — plus our thinking on which stocks look like buys Wednesday. BHC 1Y mountain Bausch Health’s 12-month stock chart. 52-week high date: April 5, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 68.4% Forward P/E: 2.1 We continue to view troubled Bausch Health as a wait-and-see situation. Specifically, we’re awaiting fresh information on the pharmaceutical company’s legal fight over its patent for the drug Xifaxan. CTRA 1Y mountain Coterra’s stock performance over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: June 8, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 31.35% Forward P/E: 9.2 We want to see another pullback in the energy sector before thinking about committing more cash to Coterra Energy (CTRA) and other holdings in the group, which had a nice little rally off mid-March lows. In fact, we used that recent strength to exit our Devon Energy (DVN) position Tuesday. We are content with staying patient in Coterra. Management’s decision earlier this year to make stock buybacks a higher priority means we should steadily own more of the company without needing to buy additional shares. PXD 1Y mountain Pioneer Natural Resources’ 12-month stock performance. 52-week high date: May 31, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 26.94% Forward P/E: 9.5 Our view on Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) is similar to Coterra. We made two purchases at lower levels in March, most recently on March 20 at around $185 per share. But now after back-to-back strong weeks for the stock, we see no reason to add to our position up here around $209 per share Wednesday. WFC 1Y mountain Wells Fargo’s stock performance over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: April 11, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 26.66% Forward P/E: 7.6 For investors who believe the U.S. economy is not headed toward a steep recession, Wells Fargo (WFC) is a buy under $37 per share. Of course, bank stocks have fallen out of favor on Wall Street following the collapse of three U.S. lenders in March, and could remain a near-term headwind on WFC shares ahead of the firm’s April 14 earnings report. But the bank’s fundamental turnaround story is intact and will create value over time. That’s what makes the stock attractive here at less than 8 times earnings. HAL 1Y mountain Halliburton’s stock price over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: June 8, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 24.46% Forward P/E: 10.4 Like our two other energy stocks, we want to see another pullback in Halliburton shares before we’d add to our position. The stock is still trading above our most recent purchase price, at roughly $30 per share, on March 17 when Wall Street was dumping the oils. Big picture, the oilfield services’ company is still poised to benefit from a multiyear upcycle in investment activity. F 1Y mountain Ford Motor’s 12-month stock performance. 52-week high date: August 16, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 23.74% Forward P/E: 7.8 Many market participants are very negative on Ford Motor (F), due in part to fears the U.S. economy is entering a cyclical downturn that will crimp auto sales. However, the bears are too pessimistic. We see Ford as a buy here. On Tuesday, Ford said first-quarter vehicle sales rose roughly 10% compared with the year-ago period. Ford’s full first-quarter earnings report, set for May 2, should demonstrate the company’s earnings leverage as costs in its internal combustion division come down. QCOM 1Y mountain Qualcomm’s stock performance over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: July 22, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 21.93% Forward P/E: 11.7 Our sour attitude on Qualcomm (QCOM) remains, and we don’t want to allocate any funds to the chipmaker here. As Jim mentioned during the Club’s March edition of the “Monthly Meeting,” , we may look to exit our position in Qualcomm if the stock gets back to the $130 levels. CAT 1Y mountain Caterpillar’s stock performance over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: Jan. 27, 2023 Percent below 52-week high: 18.26% Forward P/E: 13.4 Caterpillar is a beaten-down stock worth buying. We acted on that view Tuesday, buying 20 shares at roughly $217 apiece. The stock remains on sale Wednesday, down about 2% to $213 per share. Caterpillar’s slide comes as mounting recession fears prompt Wall Street to buy defensive sectors like health care and sell traditionally cyclical sectors. However, our belief that Washington’s infrastructure spending is a multiyear boon to Caterpillar allows us to view this weakness as a buying opportunity. MS 1Y mountain Morgan Stanley’s stock performance over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: Feb. 14, 2023 Percent below 52-week high: 16.01% Forward P/E: 11.6 Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS) have fallen on hard times amid the fallout from the U.S. banking crisis. But we’re sticking with the firm because of its pivot toward asset management. We value the stability that asset management’s fee-based revenues bring compared with Morgan Stanley’s traditional investment banking operations. The stock looks cheap now at less than 12 times earnings, and over time its transformation should support a premium valuation. JNJ 1Y mountain Johnson & Johnson’s stock performance over the past 12 months. 52-week high date: April 25, 2022 Percent below 52-week high: 15.11% Forward P/E: 14.9 Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is a buy after the pharmaceutical giant agreed to pay $8.9 billion to settle allegations that the company’s talc products caused cancer. While the settlement with plaintiffs needs approval from a U.S. bankruptcy court judge, it is a great development for J & J shareholders . A series of unfavorable legal rulings this year have been a major overhang on the company’s stock price. Now there appears to be a resolution on the horizon, giving much-needed clarity to investors. Jim said Wednesday J & J has become his favorite Club stock. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
An employee assembles an excavator at the Caterpillar Inc. manufacturing facility in Victoria, Texas.
Callaghan O’Hare | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Wall Street can — and will — turn against stocks the Club holds in high regard. In some cases, our move is to run toward the wreckage, not away from it.
Mark Kay’s iconic Pink Cadillac awards are driving into the future for 2025. The company’s first-ever electric Pink Cadillac OPTIQ made its debut during the Mary Kay annual Seminar in Charlotte this weekend, symbolizing a “recharged vision” for the future of the popular brand.
Pioneers in monetizing friendships female empowerment and entrepreneurship, the Pink Cadillac is considered one the most coveted symbols of achievement for Mary Kay sales reps, signifying not just great sales (GM Authorityreported that it took ~$102,000 in annual sales to qualify back in 2001), but also leadership, a history of mentoring others, and a sustained reputation of excellence among their peers.
The women you see behind the wheel of the Pink Cadillac are the real deal, in other words, and the big Caddy really does mean something to people in the know.
The iconic pink Cadillac was born in 1968 when Mary Kay Ash purchased a Cadillac Coupe De Ville from a Dallas dealership and promptly had it painted to match the pale pink Mary Kay lip and eye palette. General Motors later named the color Mary Kay Pink Pearl, and the shade is exclusive to Mary Kay.
“For decades, the Mary Kay pink Cadillac has symbolized accomplishment, aspiration, and the power of recognition,” said Ryan Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Mary Kay. “With the introduction of the all-electric OPTIQ, we’re honoring that iconic legacy while driving into a transformative future—one grounded in our commitment to sustainability and dedication to inspiring and celebrating the achievements of our independent sales force for generations to come.”
Mary Kay announced its new Pink Cadillac with this video, below.
Same Legacy, New Energy
“The legacy continues with the new, all-electric (and still very pink) Cadillac Otiq [sic],” reads the official Mary Kay copy on YouTube. “The Optiq remains instantly recognizable with the pink pearl exterior, while modernizing with sleek, cutting-edge features. In addition, this vehicle showcases our commitment and dedication to sustainability by reducing our carbon footprint while continuing to inspire.”
Speaking of inspiration, I can’t hardly hear the words “Pink Cadillac” without thinking of the song. But, since “Bruce Springsteen” has become something of a trigger word for the MAGA snowflakes in the audience, I’ll post a different, but similarly great song about rose-tinted GM flagships from Dope Lemon. You can let me know what you think of it in the comments.
As ever, the Cadillac is not a “gift,” per se – but typically takes the form of a two year lease paid for by Mary Kay. No word yet on what the exact shape and form the OPTIQ deal will take.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
RBW, a British handcrafted electric car manufacturer, brought its cute little Roadster out to Santa Monica and invited us up for a drive.
RBW has built cars in the UK for a few years now, but is about to set up US manufacturing in Virginia. Along with that comes a version of its Roadster modified for the US market, and we got a sneak peek with a short drive in Santa Monica.
The RBW Roadster is a small, hand-built, retro-style EV, meant as a modern take on British classics. But it’s not an actual classic itself – it’s a newly-built vehicle, with a new body, modern safety features, and even some electronics, like CarPlay and Android Auto (but not much else – there’s no huge, cockpit-defining screen, just a 9″ one, with retro gauges in front of the driver. But it does have a backup camera!).
Our drive was short, just a quick trip up and down the most trafficky part of Pacific Coast Highway in Santa Monica, without much chance to really stretch the vehicle’s legs. So we can’t verify range or tell you how it handles on the limits, but we can tell you about the basic controls and feel of the vehicle.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
On a mostly smooth road, the car offered a comfortable ride dynamic. We didn’t get a sense of chassis noise because the top was down (which I surmised was an intentional effort by the company – I’ve used the same trick when showing off my car before).
The steering is tight and has a good weight to it, and the retro-style steering wheel felt great in my hands.
Of particular interest to me, as a long-time EV driver, is how the throttle pedal is tuned. Lots of EVs add some intentional delay or smoothing to throttle inputs, which ends up making the pedal feel mushy and indirect, reducing the control you have over the vehicle.
For reference, the cars I drive most often are the Tesla Roadster and Model 3, which both have excellent direct pedal feel.
And I’m happy to report that the RBW Roadster’s throttle pedal feels very similar to the cars I love to drive. The car feels quick, and responds exactly to what I want it to do, when I want it to do it. But it’s not excessively “punchy” like some of the more absurdly-powered EVs can be (like the Tesla Model S Plaid or the Macan Turbo S).
PCH with the top down is exactly where this car belongs. But maybe without the traffic.
It does not, however, have off-throttle regenerative braking, aka one-pedal driving. Pressing the brake pedal engages regen, but letting off the throttle lets you simply coast. I personally prefer one-pedal driving, but one consideration RBW had is that since the car does not have traction control, regenerative braking on the rear axle (where the motor is) could potentially present a safety issue on slippery roads. So, fair enough I guess, but I still do prefer one pedal.
Speaking of pedals, the brake pedal was placed quite far from the accelerator. This is a plus and a minus – a minus because it’s quite different from most vehicles these days, where the pedals are placed closer, for ease of reaching them with your right foot. A plus because higher separation might reduce the chance of “crossing the pedals” and accidentally pressing both with the same foot in an emergency situation, and because it enables left-foot braking, which is generally better for performance driving… in the hands of a trained driver, anyway.
That said, this isn’t exactly a performance car. It’s fun, it’s responsive, but it’s not powerful. The version we tested had a 0-60 time of only around 9 seconds, so it didn’t give you the “throw your head back” feeling that so many EVs on the road these days do. It’s responsive, but not fast.
RBW says the American version will have more motor power than the UK version, but it’s still trying to figure out exactly how to tune it. This should bring 0-60 times down by about a second. But we can’t help but think that it would be nice with even a little more power than that, which we think should be possible given the car’s 50kWh battery and ~2,900lb weight, specs that are similar to my similarly-sized Tesla Roadster (as you can see below – along with the GT version of the RBW, on the right).
Here’s an issue: all the specs we were given seem extremely fluid. While talking to the company, I got several different numbers for any given specification. It seems to me like the company is still figuring out exactly what changes it will make for its US models.
This is somewhat to be expected of a small, hand-built manufacturer, especially since buyers can ask for certain modifications or personalizations (seat height, for example, which is important in a small car like this). But it does make it tough to write an article about it.
Nevertheless, the car drives well, and RBW seems to have gotten a lot right about the dynamics of the vehicle. It executes well on its goal – a fun, small British-style roadster, a great weekend car for those who have the means.
As for the means, the RBW Roadster will start in the $140-150k range, so it’s not cheap. But if you’re looking for something like this, it’s just about the only game in town, and it’s a good execution of the feel of a nimble roadster for weekend cruising.
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Canadian startup Beachman has just unveiled its latest electric two-wheeler, the ’64, a vintage-styled electric motorcycle that looks like it rolled straight out of the 1960s. With throwback café racer design and a respectable top speed of 45 mph (72 km/h), it’s a slick little ride with a curious twist: it calls itself an e-bike.
It’s not just a casual reference, but it’s baked into the name. The full model name on Beachman’s website is the ’64 E-Bike.
While I’d generally be inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, since many motorcyclists refer to electric motorcycles as “e-bikes” and the term has a broad definition in colloquial usage, the company is obviously casting more in the “electric bicycle” end of the spectrum. They even say on their website that it is “rideable as either a Class II E-Bike or a Registered Moped (in most states).”
Despite lacking pedals entirely – and clearly designed more like a lightweight electric motorcycle – the Beachman ’64 comes with a selectable “E-Bike Mode” that limits it to 20 mph (32 km/h). The implication? That riders can use this obvious motorcycle in bike lanes like a Class 2 e-bike. Legally speaking, that’s a stretch, to put it mildly. In fact, I’m not currently aware of any state where that’s explicitly legal, though it could probably pass in many states due to the current state of enforcement we usually see.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
According to Beachman, the ’64 has three ride modes:
E-Bike Mode: 20 mph (32 km/h) top speed, which the company says is “perfect for bike lanes.”
Moped Mode: 30 mph (48 km/h) top speed, which does match legal definitions for mopeds in some jurisdictions, even without pedals.
Off-Road Mode: 45 mph (72 km/h) top speed, no pretense – just a motorcycle.
In practice, I don’t think it’s a stretch of the imagination to assume that most riders will likely keep it in Off-Road Mode, where the bike delivers its full 3,000W performance and offers the most fun. And specced with decently large batteries, it could actually do some modest commuting, even at higher speeds. The ’64 comes with a removable 2.88 kWh battery (or optional 3.6 kWh upgrade), and range is estimated at 55–70 miles, depending on configuration. It charges to 80% in three hours and even features regenerative braking.
The company leans heavily on its “timeless design” messaging, and to their credit, the ’64 nails the aesthetic. It looks great. The frame, tank, and seat all channel classic motorcycle vibes while skipping the modern digital overload – no apps or touchscreens here. Just a clean, simple throttle and some retro charm.
But for all the cool factor, the classification confusion raises eyebrows. Calling a 45 mph, pedal-less motorcycle an “e-bike” in any meaningful legal sense is a misfire. Some states allow low-speed mopeds in bike lanes, but others draw the line at motorized vehicles without pedals. The ’64 might get away with it in limited cases, but most jurisdictions will (rightfully) require it to be registered and insured as a motor vehicle. And it’s unclear if explaining to the officer, “But I had it in 20 mph mode…” will help much on the side of the road.
Still, Beachman is aiming at a particular rider who wants motorcycle style and speed without all the baggage. With a starting price of $4,800, the ’64 could be an appealing step-up for e-bike riders looking to graduate into something faster without committing to a full-sized gas bike.
Just don’t expect to blend in on the bike path.
Electrek’s Take
Look: The bike looks fantastic and probably rides well, but come on, it’s a 230 lb (105 kg) motorcycle.
Let’s stop calling every throttle-only EV an e-bike just because it’s got two wheels, a battery, and a button that neuters it to 20 mph. This has gotten silly. You built a great-looking bike. But it’s a bike in the way a motorcycle rider refers to his “bike.” It’s not a bicycle, and it’s not a bike lane vehicle any more than a Sur Ron is. At least not if you respect your fellow two-wheel riders around you.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.