Velotric is back with a brand-new electric bike design, this time focusing on a lightweight city ride. The new Thunder line actually comes in two variants, the Velotric Thunder 1 and the Thunder 1 ST.
Both bikes are streamlined, efficient pedal assist e-bikes designed to be both easy on your back and easy on your wallet. At just 36 lb. (16 kg), the Thunder 1 and Thunder 1 ST are practically featherweights in the budget e-bike industry and come with very little extra heft.
But that doesn’t mean that Velotric didn’t pack in extra features.
Both bikes include hydraulic disc brakes with adjustable brake levers, torque sensors for highly responsive pedal assist, 8-speed transmissions, automatically activating LED headlights, thru-axle hubs for higher strength and ruggedness, and internally routed cables running through the triple-butted 6061 aluminum frame.
The Thunder 1 also has a few fancier features that aren’t included in the slightly smaller Thunder 1 ST. The former has built-in GPS tracking for anti-theft, which works with the Velotric app to locate a stolen or misplaced e-bike. The app enables other features too such as ride tracking, and the bike also comes with fingerprint unlocking, automatic rider recognition, and compatibility with an optional range extender battery accessory for 50% more battery range.
While the Thunder 1 ST doesn’t have the same level of built-in anti-theft features, it does include Apple’s Find My integration, which works just like a built-in AirTag to find the bike if it wanders away. It only works in areas where people have Apple products such as iPhones, but that basically covers every urban area of the world.
If you plan on getting your bike stolen in the middle of a forest, you might want to opt for the Thunder 1’s GPS tracking. For anyone that lives and rides around people though, either model should be fairly easy to track if it goes missing.
As far as the drivetrain, both models share a 350W continuous and 600W peak-rated hub motor that gets powered by a built-in 352 Wh battery.
The Thunder 1 ST has a rated range of 50 miles (80 km), while the Thunder 1 has a higher range of 70 miles (112 km). There’s no throttle, but the five different levels of pedal assist along with the torque sensor and 8-speed derailleur should give riders plenty of pedaling options.
The top speed out of the box is 20 mph (32 km/h), which keeps the bike designated as a Class 1 e-bike. There’s an unlock option that can boost the top speed to 25 mph (40 km/h), which puts riders in Class 3 territory (and probably shaves a bit off the range).
The bikes don’t come with racks or fenders, but those will apparently become available from Velotric as add-on accessories.
The Thunder 1 has 700 x 38c tires while the Thunder 1 ST inexplicably has slightly wider 700 x 40c tires.
The Thunder 1 ST is launching at $1,499 and is available in sizes S and M, while the Thunder 1 carries a slight premium putting it at $1,799 and is available in sizes M and L. The former comes in a neutral Sand color as well as a vibrant Lava orange. The latter’s color options are a bit less in your face with a soft Frozen Blue gradient and a grayscale Crystal Black.
Electrek’s Take
If you aren’t a pedal assist fan, then these aren’t the bikes for you. I know a lot of American readers are “throttle or nothing, thank you very much.” But I’ve come to really appreciate pedal assist e-bikes for their lighter, more efficient designs, and so I love what I see here.
This looks like a slick frame and a nice collection of parts, including the hydraulic brakes and torque sensor. I wish the fenders and rear rack were included, but at least the bikes are built to accept them as accessories.
That GPS tracking is a HUGE deal, though even the Apple Find My integration is awesome. I’ve come to love AirTags for tracking all of my stuff, so the ability to have an AirTag’s guts essentially integrated as part of the bike is awesome.
Lastly, I’m head over heels for that Lava color. I know I went a bit overboard with my love for the bright yellow Mango color when I reviewed the Velotric Nomad 1 fat tire adventure bike, but I’m going to do it again here. The bright orange Lava is just a great look for a bike like this. Not only is it fun to have bright and expressive colors on bikes, but I also consider it a safety feature for being noticed by drivers on the road.
All in all, I’d say Velotric nailed it with the new Thunder 1 series. I’m looking forward to testing these bikes out myself, and I’ll be sure to let you know if they ride as good as they look.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Renewables increased their output by almost 10% and provided nearly a quarter of US electrical generation in 2024, according to newly released US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data.
Solar was still No 1
Solar remained the US’s fastest-growing source of electricity in 2024. Utility-scale and “estimated” small-scale (e.g., rooftop) solar combined increased by 26.9% in 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, according to the SUN DAY Campaign, which reviewed EIA’s “Electric Power Monthly” report data.
Utility-scale solar thermal and photovoltaic expanded by 32%, while small-scale solar increased by 15.3%. Together, solar was nearly 7% (6.91%) of total US electrical generation for the year.
In December alone, electrical generation by utility-scale solar expanded by 42% compared to December 2023.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Small-scale solar (systems <1 MW) accounted for 27.9% of all solar generation and provided 1.9% of the US electricity supply in 2024. In fact, small-scale solar PV generates over five times more electricity than utility-scale geothermal.
2024 renewables milestones
The electrical output of US wind farms in 2024 grew by 7.7% year-over-year. Wind remains the largest source of electrical generation among renewable energy sources, accounting for 10.3% of the US total.
Wind and solar combined provided more than 17.2% of US electrical generation during 2024. The mix of all renewables – wind, solar, hydropower, biomass, geothermal – provided 24.2% of total US electricity production in 2024 compared to 23.2% of electrical output a year earlier.
Between January and December, electrical generation by renewables grew by 9.6% compared to the same period the year before – nearly three times the growth rate of natural gas (3.3%) and over 10 times that of nuclear power (0.9%).
In December alone, electrical generation by renewables grew by 10.1% compared to December 2023.
Wind and solar together produced 15.9% more electricity than coal and came close to matching nuclear power’s share of total generation (17.2% vs. 17.8%).
The mix of renewables reinforced their position as the second largest source of electrical generation, behind only natural gas.
“Renewable energy sources now provide a quarter of the nation’s electricity,” said the SUN DAY Campaign’s executive director, Ken Bossong. “Consequently, the rash efforts of the Trump Administration to undermine wind, solar, and other renewables will have serious negative consequences for the nation’s electricity supply and the economy.”
If you live in an area that has frequent natural disaster events, and are interested in making your home more resilient to power outages, consider going solar and adding a battery storage system. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
However, we suspected that this would not be “unsupervised self-driving’ in customer vehicles like Tesla has been promising since 2016, but an internal fleet with teleoperation support in a geo-fenced area for ride-hailing services, much like Waymo has been doing for years.
With the focus on Austin in June, Tesla stopped talking about California, which was announced to happen at the same time as Texas last year.
Now, Bloomberg reports that Tesla has applied for a ride-hailing permit in California:
The electric vehicle manufacturer applied late last year for what’s known as a transportation charter-party carrier permit from the California Public Utilities Commission, according to documents viewed by Bloomberg. That classification means Tesla would own and control the fleet of vehicles.
But this application is for a regular ride-hailing service, like Uber, albeit for an internal fleet rather than vehicles operated by customers.
Tesla has yet to apply for a permit to operate driverless vehicles:
In its communications with California officials, Tesla discussed driver’s license information and drug-testing coordination, suggesting the company intends to use human drivers, at least initially. Tesla is applying for the same type of permit used by Waymo, Alphabet Inc.’s robotaxi business. While Tesla has approval to test autonomous vehicles with a safety driver in California, it doesn’t have, nor has applied for, a driverless testing or deployment permit from the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles, according to a spokesperson.
Musk claimed that he believes Tesla will be able to achieve “unsupervised self-driving” in California by “the end of the year”, but he has claimed that every year for the past decade.
This is just a step for Tesla to test ride-hailing services ahead of autonomy. A nothing burger, really, since ride-hailing has obviously been solved already by several companies, Lyft, Uber, Didi, etc.
What needs to be solved is autonomous driving.
As I have been saying for the last year, I am sure Tesla will be able to launch an internal fleet with teleoperation support in a geo-fenced area for a ride-hailing service in California later this year like it plans to do in Austin in June, but that’s nowhere near what Tesla promised since 2016.
It’s a moving of the goal post, and it’s basically just proving that Tesla is able to do something similar to Waymo – 5 years later.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The feature is called “Autopilot automatic assisted driving on urban roads” as Tesla seems more cautious about using the term “Full Self-Driving” in China, but it is a feature known for being in the FSD package everywhere else.
Tesla has been facing a lot of issues in releasing FSD features in China. The automaker has been limited in its neural net training due to restrictions about data coming in and out of the country, and it found it difficult to adapt to regulations regarding bus lanes and other China-specific road rules.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
CEO Elon Musk warned that FSD in China would be a problem during Tesla’s earnings call last month due to the different rules. He mentioned bus lanes as an example:
By the way, were about the biggest challenges in making FSD work in China is the bus lanes are very complicated. And there’s like literally like hours of the day that you’re allowed to be there and not be there. And then if you accidentally go in that bus lane at the wrong time, you get an automatic ticket instantly. So, it’s kind of a big deal, bus lanes in China.
The automated ticketing system is not just for bus lanes and Tesla owners are learning about it the hard way.
Tesla owners have been testing out the features in live streams on social media and some of them are reporting getting numerous tickets for using FSD.
For example, this Tesla driver received 7 tickets in the space of a single drive because the FSD drove in bike lanes and made illegal maneuvers:
Car News China tracked several live streams and customer feedback on Chinese social media, and the consensus appears to be that it’s “pretty good, but with lots of bugs”.
The drivers are particularly impressed with how “natural” FSD drives, but they also noted that it still
Where the system lacks is the understanding of local traffic rules (such as no use of shoulder/bike lanes on turns, similar to the bus lane rules that Elon talked about in the most recent earnings call) and the sporadic use of wrong lanes (e.g. going straight in a left or right turn only lane) or navigation showing the vehicle in one lane when in fact it’s in another or wrong perception of objects (red balloons as traffic lights). Many of the live streams counted the number of traffic violations from the vehicle and the number of points that would have been taken off or licenses suspended (12 points = suspension) as a result.
Chinese media websites are now getting flooded with Tesla vehicles running red traffic lights, failing to recognize green lights, and driving on restricted lanes, like the video above.
The report also highlights how Tesla is facing strong competition in ADAS in China, with competitors like Nio, Xpeng, BYD, and others launching competitive products, which is not necessarily the case in other markets for Tesla.
Electrek’s Take
I feel like this is likely going to result in bad PR for Tesla in China. You can’t have drivers losing their licenses because FSD doesn’t recognize bike lanes.
Now, of course, Tesla will say that the driver remains responsible, but I don’t know how good Tesla’s messaging is on that front in China.
It’s going to be an interesting story to track in the coming months.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.