Tesla (TSLA) is about to release Q1 2023 financial results today, Wednesday, April 19, after the markets close. As usual, a conference call and Q&A with Tesla’s management are scheduled after the results.
Here we’ll take a look at what both the street and retail investors are expecting for the quarterly results.
Tesla Q1 2023 deliveries
As usual, Tesla already disclosed its Q1 vehicle delivery and production numbers, which drive the vast majority of the company’s revenue.
Tesla also confirmed having produced 440,000 vehicles during the quarter – also a new record.
Delivery and production numbers are always slightly adjusted during earning results.
Tesla Q1 2023 revenue
For revenue, analysts generally have a pretty good idea of what to expect, thanks to the delivery numbers.
The Wall Street consensus for this quarter is $23.617 billion, and Estimize, the financial estimate crowdsourcing website, predicts a higher revenue of $24.048 billion.
Despite the new record number of deliveries, these estimates would represent a quarter-to-quarter decrease in revenue due to Tesla’s implementing large price cuts during the first quarter.
Nonetheless, it would be a massive year-over-year increase from $18 billion in revenue in Q1 2022.
Here are the predictions for Tesla’s revenue over the past two years, where Estimize predictions are in blue, Wall Street consensus is in gray, and actual results are in green:
Tesla Q1 2023 earnings
Tesla always attempts to be marginally profitable every quarter as it invests most of its money into growth, and it has been successful in doing so over the last two years now.
For Q1 2023, the Wall Street consensus is a gain of $0.85 per share, while Estimize’s prediction is higher with a profit of $0.94 per share.
The estimates have a wide range this quarter because of the price cuts Tesla implemented during the quarter. Analysts and investors are looking to see how badly it is going to affect Tesla’s margins and, ultimately, its profits.
Unsurprisingly, Tesla achieving the Wall Street consensus would be a big drop in earnings quarter-to-quarter, and the automaker would be flat on earnings year-over-year.
Here are the earnings per share over the last two years, where Estimize predictions are in blue, Wall Street consensus is in gray, and actual results are in green:
Other expectations for the TSLA shareholder’s letter and analyst call
The obvious thing is the gross margin. Investors are going to be looking for that number first. They want to know by how much it dropped and how much room there is since Tesla continued to drop prices after the end of the quarter.
If Tesla can stay in the mid to high teens, I think investors will be happy, but if it dips lower than that, they might have a problem.
Investors will also be looking at insights from management about the pricing strategy, which seems to be changing fast.
Tesla shareholders will also be looking on an update on Cybertruck production as the start of production gets closer, but knowing Tesla management, I wouldn’t expect much more than it being on track for a start of production this summer and volume production next year.
Cybertruck should not have a material impact on Tesla’s revenue in 2023.
I assume that amid margins going down, Tesla investors are going to want to have an update on Tesla’s self-driving program, which has helped margins in the past, but the program has been stalling for a while now.
According to the Say website, where investors can ask and upvote questions for the meeting, shareholders are particularly interested in Tesla Energy this quarter and its potential future impact on Tesla’s financials.
It has been a growing business for Tesla and with a ramp-up in Megapack production, it should be bigger in Q1, but I wouldn’t expect a massive jump in deployment until the second half of the year.
We will see what Tesla has to say about that.
You can join us live on Electrek this evening for intensive coverage of Tesla’s Q1 2023 financial results starting at around 4 p.m. ET for the results and through the evening for news coming out of the conference call and results.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
BYD’s luxury brand, Yangwang, has claimed a new Nürburgring Nordschleife record for a production electric vehicle with its U9 hypercar.
The automaker released video of the Yangwang U9 Xtreme, a limited-edition version of the car, completing a lap of the “Green Hell” in a blistering 6:59.157 last month.
It made the U9 the first production EV to break the 7-minute barrier at the legendary German track.
Today, the run, driven by German racer Moritz Kranz, was officially certified by Nürburgring officials.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
BYD announced:
Only weeks after becoming the fastest production car in history with a top speed of 496.22 km/h, the YANGWANG U9X has now conquered the Nürburgring Nordschleife in record time, completing the lap in 6:59.157, making it the fastest EV production vehicle around the track.
The production EV record at Nürburgring has been frequently broken over the last few years. It even changed hands several times in the same month at times – a testament to how rapidly EV technology is improving.
It is also a somewhat controversial title due to what people consider to be a “production vehicle”.
The Yangwang U9 Xtreme isn’t your average EV. It’s built on a 1200-volt platform and uses four electric motors (one at each wheel) to produce a combined output of nearly 3,000 hp. This is the same car that also claimed the world record for the fastest production car, hitting a top speed of 308 mph (496 km/h) last month.
It’s built in a limited-run production with only about 30 units reportedly planned – hence why some people might question the “production EV” part.
Electrek’s Take
I know there’s going to be some pushback on this, but regardless, a sub-7-minute lap in any car is serious business, and doing it in an EV is doubly impressive — credit where it’s due.
Does a Nürburgring lap time matter for 99.9% of EV buyers? Absolutely not. But it is an excellent showcase of the rapidly improving EV technology.
BYD and Yangwang are clearly utilizing the U9 platform to push their engineering capabilities, relying heavily on their “e⁴ Platform” and “DiSus-X” intelligent body control system to manage the immense power on a demanding track.
It’s impressive to see BYD produce something like the U9 at the very high end of the automotive spectrum, and then something like the $10,000 Seagull at the other end.
That’s quite a range.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
According to the latest “US Wind Energy Monitor” report from Wood Mackenzie and the American Clean Power Association (ACP), developers installed 593 megawatts (MW) of new wind capacity in Q2 2025 – a 60% drop from the same quarter last year. But the US wind industry is expected to rebound fast, with 51% of forecasted capacity to come online in Q4 and full-year installations projected to hit 7.7 gigawatts (GW).
Onshore developers are in a race
The onshore wind market outlook rose 3.6% quarter-over-quarter (2.4 GW) as developers push to complete projects before federal tax credits expire.
“We are seeing this uptick in the near term because many projects are shovel-ready or under construction, fully permitted, and with a turbine order in place,” said Leila Garcia da Fonseca, director of research at Wood Mackenzie. “However, we will face uncertainty later in this decade due to tariff investigations and permitting challenges.”
Federal policy uncertainty has created a lot of headaches for the wind industry in H1 2025. While the Treasury Department’s guidance on tax credit eligibility provided a 7% boost to near-term installations, new tariff investigations could negatively impact two-thirds of the supply chain for wind turbine components. The Department of Commerce’s national security probe into imported turbine components threatens to raise project costs by as much as one-third, potentially delaying or derailing late-decade projects.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
“We’re seeing policy whiplash,” Garcia da Fonseca added. “Treasury guidance helps the advanced development pipeline, but tariff investigations and permitting hurdles are creating uncertainty beyond 2027.”
Western states are expected to lead wind activity through 2029, accounting for 31% of new capacity, followed by the Midwest. Illinois is set to overtake Texas with the most new onshore capacity in 2027, with more than 1.8 GW expected to come online.
Offshore wind’s five-year outlook
The offshore sector continues to face headwinds of federal stop-work orders and regulatory uncertainty. Even so, Wood Mackenzie projects 5.9 GW of offshore capacity will come online by 2029, with most of it arriving in 2026 and 2027.
“Recent federal stop-work orders and regulatory uncertainty have disrupted the offshore wind sector, weakening already fragile offtake opportunities and exposing the high investment risk in US offshore wind development,” Garcia da Fonseca said. “However, our five-year outlook remains unchanged, and 70% of forecasted capacity is already under construction.”
The next big year for US wind
Wood Mackenzie expects average annual installations of 9.1 GW over the next five years across onshore, offshore, and repowering projects. By the end of 2029, total installed wind capacity is projected to hit 196.5 GW, including about 35.5 GW from new onshore builds, 6 GW offshore, and 4.5 GW from repowering.
A major spike is expected in 2027, when shovel-ready projects are slated to connect at a record pace, adding 12.3 GW of new capacity.
“Despite political headwinds, wind projects are demonstrating market resilience,” said Garcia da Fonseca. “Wind continues to secure interconnection service agreements in 2025 despite anti-wind rhetoric. The technology maintains meaningful market presence even as solar and storage lead interconnection activity, with leadership concentrated in SPP and ERCOT.”
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
General Motors today pulled the plug on its BrightDrop electric delivery van program, announcing it will permanently end production at its CAMI Assembly plant in Ingersoll, Ontario.
This is a disappointing reversal for a program that was supposed to be a cornerstone of GM’s commercial EV ambitions.
In a statement, the company blamed a “slower than expected” commercial EV market, a “changing regulatory environment,” and the elimination of US tax credits for the decision. Production will not be moved elsewhere; the BrightDrop Zevo line is, for all intents and purposes, dead.
The move comes just two years after GM, with $500 million in Canadian government support, celebrated opening CAMI as Canada’s “first full-scale EV manufacturing plant.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The company delivered a marginal 146 vans in the US in 2022 and just 497 in all of 2023.
But things were finally picking up this year despite a production pause in April.
Data from 2025 shows the ramp was finally hitting its stride, with sales reportedly jumping to 2,384 units in the third quarter alone—a massive 869% increase year-over-year. The company was on track to sell around 4,000 units this year.
That’s not a massive number, but it was heading in the right direction.
GM, however, sees it differently. As noted by industry observers, GM executives are comparing BrightDrop’s 4,000 sales to the 60,000+ sales of its ancient, gas-guzzling Chevy Express and GMC Savana vans, a platform that dates back to the 1990s.
While GM’s official statement to the CBC was that the decision was “simply a demand and a market-driven response,” the Unifor auto union isn’t buying it. The union, which represents the 1,200 laid-off workers, squarely blamed the “dangerous and destabilizing auto policies” of the Trump administration for undoing EV supports.
Furthermore, vehicle programs that cross the US-Canada border have faced significant challenges in 2025 due to the trade war launched by the Trump administration against Canada.
Electrek’s Take
It’s another EV pullback partly based on government actions.
But we can’t blame everything on Trump. GM is quick to pull back its EV programs due to political considerations, which do drive demand.
The company took half a billion dollars in taxpayer money to retool a factory, only to abandon it less than 36 months after the first van rolled off the line. They are abandoning what will undoubtedly be a growing market in the long term, ceding ground to Ford’s E-Transit and Rivian’s van, and blaming “low demand” at the very moment sales were beginning to spike.
Brightdrop’s lineup was a bit bigger than other commercial electric vans, which might have limited its market, but I still think that long-term, there will be a singnifcant market for electric vans in this segment.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.