NatWest, Meta, BT, BMW, ITV and Unilever have joined a growing list of big corporate names in terminating their membership of the CBI or suspending collaboration due to the scandal engulfing the business lobby group.
The rush for the exit door came after the Guardian newspaper reported that a second woman had made a rape allegation – against two male CBI co-workers – building on the series of historic serious misconduct claims to have engulfed the body in recent weeks.
A NatWest Group spokesperson said: “Following careful consideration, and having previously paused all activity, NatWest Group has today withdrawn its membership of the CBI with immediate effect.
“British business needs a strong representative voice. Given the extremely serious allegations made against the CBI, we no longer have confidence that it can fulfil this role at the present time.”
A spokesperson for Facebook owner Meta also confirmed that they had paused engagement with the CBI while the investigation is ongoing.
BT Group said: “In light of the appalling allegations made, BT Group has decided to suspend its membership of the CBI with immediate effect.”
Carmaker BMW joined the exodus late on Friday, saying they were “concerned by the allegations relating to the CBI. The Group has therefore decided to terminate its membership with immediate effect.”
More from Business
They were joined by Rolls-Royce, who said: “In light of the recent allegations, which are deeply concerning, we are suspending all interaction with the CBI with immediate effect.
“We will await the completion of its ongoing investigations before making a final decision on our membership.”
Advertisement
A spokesperson for ITV told Sky News that the broadcaster “will pause engagement with the CBI with immediate effect and will not renew our contract with them.”
Unilever also confirmed that they were severing ties, saying: “Due to the very serious and ongoing allegations, we can confirm that we have suspended our membership of the CBI.”
The John Lewis Partnership had earlier cited “further very serious and ongoing allegations” as the reason for quitting the organisation.
It’s not exaggerating to call this an existential crisis for the CBI
If one were to compile a list of some of the most prestigious blue-chip UK employers, it would probably include NatWest, BP, Shell, Aviva, the John Lewis Partnership, Virgin Media O2, WPP, Phoenix Group, BT, PwC, EY, Schroders and AstraZeneca.
Were that list to be enhanced with prestigious foreign-owned businesses that are major employers in the UK, and which enjoy a meaningful UK presence, it would probably extend to take in names such as BMW, Mastercard, Ford, Fidelity, Jaguar Land Rover and JP Morgan.
That underlines the crisis now engulfing the CBI. All of those companies have either paused their engagement with the employers organisation or cancelled their membership altogether in the wake of the latest allegations consuming the CBI.
It was bad enough that the CBI felt obliged to dismiss its former director-general, Tony Danker, amid allegations of workplace misconduct.
What made it worse was a report in The Guardian, the newspaper that first published details of the allegations against Mr Danker, that a former CBI employee had filed a complaint that she was raped at a party hosted by the organisation back in 2019.
That has now been made worse still by a second woman coming forward to say she had been raped by colleagues while working for the CBI.
It is not now over-exaggerating to say that this has become an existential crisis for the CBI.
Insurer Aviva was first to reveal its hand on Friday, just moments after Sky News reported that abrdn, the FTSE 100 fund manager, was also considering its position with the organisation.
Fellow insurers Phoenix Group and Zurich swelled the exodus alongside the industry body the ABI while Virgin Media O2 also confirmed it had terminated its membership.
Asda, accountancy giant PwC and National Grid later confirmed they had suspended all activity with the business lobby group while Lloyds Banking Group was also understood to have done the same.
An AstraZeneca spokesperson said: “Following these grave allegations, we have decided to pause our engagements with the CBI while these are investigated.”
“In light of the very serious allegations made, and the CBI‘s handling of the process and response, we believe the CBI is no longer able to fulfil its core function – to be a representative voice of business in the UK,”, Aviva said.
“We have therefore regrettably terminated our membership with immediate effect.”
CBI president Brian McBride had previously admitted that a “handful” of its 190,000 members had departed since the crisis began.
They are known to have included, before Friday, the British Insurance Brokers’ Association.
Shell is understood to have suspended dealings with the CBI last week.
The potential departure of abrdn would be acutely embarrassing for Mr McBride personally as he currently serves as a non-executive director at the firm.
Sky’s City editor Mark Kleinman reported that the board had been debating whether to terminate its status as a CBI member once a CBI-commissioned review of sexual abuse allegations against staff members had been completed.
A source said that alternatively it could decide not to renew its membership when it expires at the end of this year.
A string of blue-chip companies, including Rolls-Royce and Marks & Spencer, have raised public concerns about the crisis.
Last week, the CBI sacked Tony Danker, its director general, after saying it had lost confidence in his ability to lead the organisation amid claims about his personal conduct.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:43
Tony Danker was sacked on 11 April
Mr Danker told the BBC this week he had been “thrown under the bus” and said the allegations against him did not merit his dismissal.
He also apologised for making a number of CBI employees “uncomfortable”.
Business leaders have lined up in recent weeks to denounce its handling of the crisis, saying it had been too slow to apologise and had erred by appointing an insider, Rain Newton-Smith, as Mr Danker’s successor.
Three employees have been suspended, while a police investigation is under way.
The CBI said this week that the second phase of an inquiry by the law firm Fox Williams would conclude imminently.
“The board will be communicating its response to this and other steps we are taking to bring about the wider change that is needed early next week,” the group said on Thursday.
Four suspects have so far been identified by police investigating possible criminal charges in the Post Office scandal, Sky News has learned.
Sources have said that among the offences being considered are perverting the course of justice and perjury.
Hundreds of sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted for stealing from their branches between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon software caused accounting errors.
The Metropolitan Police is a so-called core participant in the Post Office public inquiry and has been monitoring and assessing material submitted.
It is expected that the number of suspects being investigated by police could rise in the next six to 12 months.
More than a million documents are believed to be being sifted through and the number of police officers investigating the scandal has also risen from 80 to 100, with work across every single police force.
More from Money
It is not expected, however, that any charges will be brought before 2027/28, and that time frame could be extended.
A Sky News source said the number of suspects was seemingly “just a starting point”.
Advertisement
A meeting took place this weekend between more than 150 sub-postmasters, including Sir Alan Bates, and the Metropolitan Police.
Sir Alan said he had been told by officers that “it was going to take a few years” and that there are “no restrictions on how high investigations will take them”.
He also said the priority for sub-postmasters was financial redress and then, after that, victims will be “looking for people to be held to account”.
A Metropolitan police spokesperson said: “Yesterday [17 November] we met with Alan Bates and some of the affected sub-postmasters to provide a brief on our progress and next steps.
“Our investigation team, comprising around 100 officers from forces across the UK, is now in place and we will be sharing further details in due course.
“Initially four suspects have been identified and we anticipate this number to grow as the investigation progresses.”
Energy bills are to rise again next year, according to a respected forecaster.
Costs from January to March are projected to rise another 1% to £1,736 a year for the average user, according to research firm Cornwall Insight.
The energy price cap, which sets a limit on how much companies can charge per unit of electricity, is also expected to rise, costing typical households an extra £19 a year.
After the latest hike, there were hopes of a fall in the new year, but volatile wholesale gas and electricity markets are still above historic average costs.
Prices have gone up due to supply concerns arising from Russia‘s war in Ukraine, and maintenance of Norwegian gas infrastructure.
More on Cost Of Living
Related Topics:
But spring is expected to herald a reduction as is October 2025, Cornwall Insight said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:25
‘Energy prices make me depressed’, pensioner Roy Roots said in August
Every three months energy regulator Ofgem revises the cap based on wholesale costs.
Advertisement
The official January price cap announcement will be made on Friday.
It comes as millions of pensioners lost their automatic winter fuel allowance payment after the government means-tested the benefit.
Meanwhile, Cornwall Insight’s principal consultant Dr Craig Lowrey warned “millions” of households won’t heat their homes to “recommended temperatures, risking serious health consequences” with bills on the rise.
“With it being widely accepted that high prices are here to stay, we need to see action,” he said, suggesting options like cheaper rates for low-income homes, benefit restructuring, or other targeted support for the vulnerable “must be seriously considered”.
The energy price cap system is being reviewed by Ofgem with possible changes to the standing charge coming over the next year.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
The owners of Scotland’s only oil refinery have rejected a US-led approach about a possible bid for it months before its scheduled closure.
Sky News has learnt that a consortium said to be led by Robert McKee, an American energy industry veteran, wrote to Petroineos, the owner of the Grangemouth site, to express an interest in buying it.
The approach, which is understood to have been made earlier this month, was rejected by Petroineos, which is 50%-owned by the petrochemicals empire founded by the Manchester United FC shareholder Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
The consortium is understood to comprise The Canal Group, which is reportedly developing a green energy refinery in Texas, and Trading Stack, a Middle East-based commodities trader.
Mr McKee spent nearly four decades with ConocoPhillips, one of the biggest energy companies in the US.
Sources close to the situation said that Petroineos had rebuffed the offer in order to concentrate on a publicly announced plan to transform the century-old plant into a finished fuels import terminal.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
They added that the nature of the consortium’s approach had raised questions about its access to financing and expertise in operating an asset of this kind.
More from Money
The Grangemouth refinery, which employs about 450 people, loses about £200m annually.
Its other shareholder is the state-backed Chinese energy giant PetroChina.
A person close to the consortium insisted that its financing was robust and said it would assess the feasibility of building a new refinery elsewhere in the area.
They added that the consortium had had “positive interactions” with trade union officials, and believed that there was scope to rapidly make Grangemouth’s refinery operations profitable.
On Monday, a spokesman for Petroineos said: “Since the Petroineos joint venture was formed 13 years ago, our shareholders have invested nearly £1bn in the refinery, only to absorb losses of £600m.
“Last week, the refinery lost £385,000 on average each day and we expect to lose more than £150m in total during the course of this year.
“We have not received any credible or viable bids for the refinery.”
A spokesman for the consortium declined to comment.