If one were to compile a list of some of the most prestigious blue-chip UK employers, it would probably include NatWest, BP, Shell, Aviva, the John Lewis Partnership, Virgin Media O2, WPP, Phoenix Group, BT, PwC, EY, Schroders and AstraZeneca.
Were that list to be enhanced with prestigious foreign-owned businesses that are major employers in the UK, and which enjoy a meaningful UK presence, it would probably extend to take in names such as BMW, Mastercard, Ford, Fidelity, Jaguar Land Rover and JP Morgan.
All of those companies have either paused their engagement with the employers’ organisation or cancelled their membership altogether in the wake of the latest allegations consuming the CBI.
What made it worse was a report in The Guardian, the newspaper that first published details of the allegations against Mr Danker, that a former CBI employee had filed a complaint that she was raped at a party hosted by the organisation back in 2019.
That has now been made worse still by a second woman coming forward to say she had been raped by colleagues while working for the CBI.
More on Cbi
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:58
Former CBI boss: ‘I’m a fall guy’
It is not now over-exaggerating to say that this has become an existential crisis for the CBI.
An organisation that has in the past proved an extremely effective lobbyist for business has now been twice hobbled – first by government ministers distancing themselves from it and now by members distancing themselves from it.
Advertisement
It is no coincidence that among the first companies to announce today that they were pausing or cancelling their involvement with the CBI were ones led by women: NatWest, whose chief executive is Dame Alison Rose; Aviva, whose chief executive is Amanda Blanc and the John Lewis Partnership, chaired by Dame Sharon White.
All three are role models for women in business and for female entrepreneurs.
All have devoted significant time, energy and expertise to advancing career opportunities for women in the workplace.
All three will have been dismayed – to put it lightly – at some of the horrifying allegations now being aired concerning the CBI.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:45
CBI allegations a ‘wake up call’ to all businesses: former Siemens chief executive
The circumstances surrounding Mr Danker’s departure have not been properly explained by the CBI to the extent that Mr Danker himself gave an anguished interview with the BBC in which he effectively accused the organisation of subjecting him to a kangaroo court-style process.
This is partly because the organisation is currently rudderless.
Mr Danker’s successor, the former CBI chief economist Rain Newton-Smith, left more than a month ago to take up a senior position at Barclays and a date for her to return to the CBI has yet to be agreed. One wonders now if she will even do so.
It would be no surprise to learn that Ms Newton-Smith, who is currently mourning her father, the distinguished scientist William Newton-Smith, had decided to stay at Barclays after all. No one would blame her.
In the meantime, the organisation’s communications with the outside world have been fronted by its president Brian McBride, who gave an interview to the Financial Times last Saturday and one to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Wednesday.
Neither would be described, even by those retaining a modicum of sympathy for the CBI, as a triumph.
It is hard to see how the CBI comes back from this. A once-distinguished and influential organisation has seen its reputation reduced to rubble in a matter of days.
That is not to say that an organisation like the CBI will not emerge from its ashes.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
CBI feels ‘devastated’
Every advanced economy around the world boasts an organisation like the CBI, such as the US Chamber of Commerce, the Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie or the Keidanren in Japan. If the CBI did not exist, someone would have to invent it.
And, as it happens, some business people are already thinking along those lines.
Simon Walker, the highly respected former director-general of the Institute of Directors, called in The Times today for the UK’s five leading business lobby groups – the IoD, the CBI, the British Chambers of Commerce, Make UK and the Federation of Small Businesses – to come together to form a unified organisation representing businesses large and small rather as the TUC represents the entire trade union movement.
These organisations enjoy some able leaders, such as Stephen Phipson at Make UK and Shevaun Haviland at the BCC, both of whom are perfectly capable of heading such an integrated body. As, for that matter, is Mr Walker himself.
A merger of these groupings feels like an idea whose time has come.
However, thanks to the fearsome reputational battering it has received in recent days, the CBI feels like an organisation whose time is up.
Global financial markets have been on a rollercoaster ride over the past few days, but now, with President Donald Trump having paused his “retaliatory” tariffs, the situation should stabilise.
Here, we outline how the pound in your pocket has been affected.
Stock markets, bonds and currencies moved sharply after Mr Trump put a 90-day pause on tariffs other than the base 10% tax slapped on almost all imports to the US. China still faces a levy of 125% on the goods it exports to the US.
But there have still been some impactful changes since his so-called “liberation day” tariff announcement last week.
So, what’s happened?
Well, last week two more interest rate cuts were expected by the end of this year, but now traders are pricing in three cuts by the Bank of England.
Borrowing will become cheaper as the interest rate is now anticipated to be brought down more than previously thought, to 3.75% by the end of 2025 from the current 4.5%.
It’s not exactly for a good reason, though. The trade war means the UK economy is forecast to grow less.
This lower growth is what’s making observers think the Bank will cut rates sooner – making borrowing cheaper can lead to more spending. Increased spending can stimulate economic growth.
What does this all mean for you?
Some debts, like credit card bills, will become a bit cheaper.
Mortgages
Crucially for anyone soon to re-fix their rate, this means mortgage costs are falling.
Already, the typical two and five-year fixed rate deals are coming down, according to data from financial information company Moneyfacts.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:42
Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know
After weeks where the average rate would fall only once or twice, there have been larger and daily falls, the data shows.
As of Thursday, the typical rate for a five-year deal is 5.14%, and 5.29% for the average two-year fixed mortgage.
If the interest rate expectations remain, by the end of the year, the average two-year fixed mortgage rate will fall to 4.3% if a person is borrowing 75% of the property’s value, according to analysts at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
Filling up your car
Another positive that’s motivated by a negative is the reduced fuel cost to the motorist of filling up their vehicle.
The oil price fell due to rising fears of a recession in the world’s biggest economy. Now that those concerns have somewhat subsided, the oil price has remained comparatively low at $63.75 for a barrel of the benchmark Brent crude.
It’s far below the average price of $80 from last year.
This lower cost is likely to filter down to cheaper prices at the pump within days as the sharp oil price drops hit at the end of last week.
Lower oil costs could help bring down costs overall, lowering inflation, as oil is still used in many parts of the supply chain.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Lower interest rates mean falling savings rates, so savers can expect to get less of a return in the coming months.
Anyone with a stocks and shares ISA (Individual Savings Account) is likely to get a shock when they see the decline in their returns.
Image: A display shows the sharp rise of the Nikkei stock index in Tokyo. Pic: AP
Holidays
It’s not the best time to be heading off on a trip to a country that uses the euro. The pound hasn’t strayed far from buying €1.16, a low last seen in August.
It means your pound doesn’t go as far, as you’re getting less euro.
Against the dollar, however, sterling has risen to $1.29.
The exchange rate had been higher in the immediate wake of Mr Trump’s tariff announcement as the dollar value sank. At that point, you could briefly have bought $1.32 for a pound.
Supermarket shopping
Helpfully, the UK’s biggest and most popular UK supermarket, Tesco, updated us that it expects tariffs will have a “relatively small impact”.
This is the term used periodically to describe investors who push back against what are perceived to be irresponsible fiscal or monetary policies by selling government bonds, in the process pushing up yields, or implied borrowing costs.
Most of the focus on markets in the wake of Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs on the rest of the world has, in the last week, been about the calamitous stock market reaction.
This was previously something that was assumed to have been taken seriously by Mr Trump.
During his first term in the White House, the president took the strength of US equities – in particular the S&P 500 – as being a barometer of the success, or otherwise, of his administration.
Image: Donald Trump in the Oval Office today. Pic: Reuters
He had, over the last week, brushed off the sour equity market reaction to his tariffs as being akin to “medicine” that had to be taken to rectify what he perceived as harmful trade imbalances around the world.
But, as ever, it is the bond markets that have forced Mr Trump to blink – and, make no mistake, blink is what he has done.
More from Money
To begin with, following the imposition of his tariffs – which were justified by some cockamamie mathematics and a spurious equation complete with Greek characters – bond prices rose as equities sold off.
That was not unusual: big sell-offs in equities, such as those seen in 1987 and in 2008, tend to be accompanied by rallies in bonds.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
17:12
What it’s like on the New York stock exchange floor
However, this week has seen something altogether different, with equities continuing to crater and US government bonds following suit.
At the beginning of the week yields on 10-year US Treasury bonds, traditionally seen as the safest of safe haven investments, were at 4.00%.
By early yesterday, they had risen to 4.51%, a huge jump by the standards of most investors. This is important.
The 10-year yield helps determine the interest rate on a whole clutch of financial products important to ordinary Americans, including mortgages, car loans and credit card borrowing.
By pushing up the yield on such a security, the bond investors were doing their stuff. It is not over-egging things to say that this was something akin to what Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng experienced when the latter unveiled his mini-budget in October 2022.
And, as with the aftermath to that event, the violent reaction in bonds was caused by forced selling.
Now part of the selling appears to have been down to investors concluding, probably rightly, that Mr Trump’s tariffs would inject a big dose of inflation into the US economy – and inflation is the enemy of all bond investors.
Part of it appears to be due to the fact the US Treasury had on Tuesday suffered the weakest demand in nearly 18 months for $58bn worth of three-year bonds that it was trying to sell.
But in this particular case, the selling appears to have been primarily due to investors, chiefly hedge funds, unwinding what are known as ‘basis trades’ – in simple terms a strategy used to profit from the difference between a bond priced at, say, $100 and a futures contract for that same bond priced at, say, $105.
In ordinary circumstances, a hedge fund might buy the bond at $100 and sell the futures contract at $105 and make a profit when the two prices converge, in what is normally a relatively risk-free trade.
So risk-free, in fact, that hedge funds will ‘leverage’ – or borrow heavily – themselves to maximise potential returns.
The sudden and violent fall in US Treasuries this week reflected the fact that hedge funds were having to close those trades by selling Treasuries.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:20
Trump freezes tariffs at 10% – except China
Confronted by a potential hike in borrowing costs for millions of American homeowners, consumers and businesses, the White House has decided to rein back its tariffs, rightly so.
It was immediately rewarded by a spectacular rally in equity markets – the Nasdaq enjoyed its second-best-ever day, and its best since 2001, while the S&P 500 enjoyed its third-best session since World War Two – and by a rally in US Treasuries.
The influential Wall Street investment bank Goldman Sachs immediately trimmed its forecast of the probability of a US recession this year from 65% to 45%.
Of course, Mr Trump will not admit he has blinked, claiming last night some investors had got “a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid”.
And it is perfectly possible that markets face more volatile days ahead: the spectre of Mr Trump’s tariffs being reinstated 90 days from now still looms and a full-blown trade war between the US and China is now raging.
But Mr Trump has blinked. The bond vigilantes have brought him to heel. This president, who by his aggressive use of emergency executive powers had appeared to be more powerful than any of his predecessors, will never seem quite so powerful again.
Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation is in advanced talks to take a stake in a London-listed marketing specialist backed by Lord Ashcroft, the former Conservative Party treasurer.
Sky News has learnt that the media tycoon’s British subsidiary, News UK, is close to agreeing a deal to combine its influencer marketing division – which is called The Fifth – with Brave Bison, an acquisitive group run by brothers Oli and Theo Green.
Sources said the deal could be announced as early as Thursday morning.
News UK publishes The Sun and The Times, among other media assets.
If completed, the transaction would involve Brave Bison acquiring The Fifth with a combination of cash and shares that would result in News UK becoming one of its largest shareholders.
The purchase price is said to be in the region of £8m.
The Fifth has worked with the television host and model Maya Jama on a campaign for the energy drink Lucozade, and Amelia Dimoldenberg, the YouTube star.
More on Rupert Murdoch
Related Topics:
Its other clients include Samsung and Tommee Tippee.
The deal will be the third struck by Brave Bison this year, with the previous transactions including the purchase of Engage Digital, a key digital partner to sporting properties including the Men’s T20 Cricket World Cup.
The Green brothers took over the Brave Bison in 2020, and have overseen a sharp strategic realignment and improvement in its performance.
In 2023, it bought the podcaster and entrepreneur Steven Bartlett’s social media and influencer agency, SocialChain.
In total, the company has struck six takeover deals since the Greens assumed control.
At Wednesday’s stock market close, Brave Bison had a market capitalisation of about £31m.