Only 17% of headliners at the UK’s top festivals this year are female, Sky News analysis has found.
Women are seen as too much of a “risk” for the top slots because of a perception festivalgoers prefer watching men, as well as the pool of female talent still being too small, music industry experts say.
Industry figures also called on Glastonbury to do more to bridge the gender divide.
Across 104 festivals this summer, only a fifth (20%) of headline acts are fronted by women, compared with almost four-fifths (78%) by men and 2% by non-binary people.
At the biggest festivals, with over 30,000 capacity, this is even lower for women at one in six (17%).
And if you count the total number of performers on stage during headline slots, only one in 10 (11%) are women.
According to our research, while women are still behind men across the board, they are more popular with fans on YouTube, Google and the radio, than they are with festival promoters when booking headliners.
Meanwhile, the likes of Glastonbury, Isle of Wight Festival and Latitude don’t have a single female-fronted headliner on their main stages this year.
Glastonbury, which is releasing its final 2023 tickets, faced a backlash in March after it revealed the Arctic Monkeys, Guns n Roses and Sir Elton John will headline its famous Pyramid Stage this year.
Folk rocker, Cat Stevens, is also booked for the Sunday afternoon “legends” slot despite rumours Blondie was due to take it.
Organiser Emily Eavis said the female headliner they had planned, widely rumoured to be Taylor Swift, had to pull out due to a tour clash.
Image: Glastonbury’s famous Pyramid Stage
Women ‘too much of a risk’
Eve Horne is a producer, singer-songwriter and founder of Peak Music UK, which mentors female and non-binary artists and producers. She is also on UK Music’s Diversity Taskforce and is a board member of Moving The Needle, which works to improve female inclusion in the industry.
She says there was hope that the devastating impact of COVID would make industry bosses prioritise inclusion and diversity.
“If anything it did a 360 and went backwards,” she tells Sky News.
“Everyone started going for the money again and saying there’s too much risk in putting women as headliners.”
Eve claims promoters repeatedly tell her that festivalgoers of all genders prefer watching men perform more than women.
“It’s about money at the end of the day and we still have old white men gatekeeping the industry,” she adds.
Image: Eve Horne says diversity in music has gone backwards since COVID. Pic: We Are The Unheard
John Rostron, chief executive of the Association of Independent Festivals, which represents 105 UK events, says the problem stems from there being a smaller pool of female artists for promoters to pick from.
“A headline slot might be the pinnacle of an artist’s live career.
“There are plenty of barriers for any artist to get there, but for women there are maybe triple the number of barriers, so the talent pool at the top is smaller.
“We have to wait for them to come up and then be open to booking them.”
The problem gets worse at larger festivals where big acts charge high fees and promoters have to meet those costs with ticket sales – and are also accountable to shareholders.
“You can’t say that a male band sells more tickets because they’re men,” he adds. “But you can say that they sell more tickets than another band when that’s been proven to be true.”
YouTubers and radio DJs choosing more women
Sky News looked at YouTube views and radio play to see how popular female-fronted artists are on those platforms. “Female-fronted” refers to acts with a female lead performer.
They were far better represented on both platforms than they were at the top of festival billboards.
On YouTube, in the 12 months to the end of March, female-fronted artists made up 35% of total music views, while their male counterparts were 65%. Non-binary-fronted acts were at fewer than 1%.
Almost half (24) of the 50 most searched for artists on Google in the same period were also female.
Both data sets suggest fans do want to consume female-fronted artists.
On the radio, they have averaged roughly a third (32%) of plays between 2019 and now, with male acts at just under two-thirds (65%) and non-binary at 3%.
So far in 2023, the gender balance has been almost equal, with female and male artists both at 48%, with the remainder non-binary.
Six of the top 10 songs played on the radio so far this year are by female solo artists including Miley Cyrus’s Flowers – the most popular song of 2023 so far.
Increases in non-binary representation are largely down to a small number of artists, such as Sam Smith and Olly Alexander.
At festivals there are signs of progress. Across all stages almost three in 10 (29%) acts are female-fronted – up by almost 2% on the five-year average.
But that progress isn’t reflected in headline slots.
Image: Festival crowds are thought to prefer watching male artists perform.
‘Glastonbury can afford inclusion managers’
By contrast, the Mighty Hoopla, a 25,000-person festival in south London, has had no male-fronted headliners since 2018.
Olly Alexander headlined in 2018 and is returning this year.
It offers a “platform to LGBTQ+ performers” and ensures at least 50% of performers are female and non-binary across the whole line-up.
Cassie Leon, who heads-up inclusion for the festival, says with their audience, it’s “relatively easy” to commit to a diverse line-up.
“Part of queer culture is trying to uplift women as much as possible,” she adds.
Image: The Mighty Hoopla prides itself on its diverse line-up. Pic: www.lukedyson.com
Asked how other festivals should improve female representation, she says more staff should be hired specifically to promote inclusion.
“It’s everybody’s issue, from the agents to the festivals to the places finding the talent,” she says.
Specifically on Glastonbury, she adds: “If you can afford Elton John, you can afford inclusion managers.”
While Britain’s biggest festival might be less profit-focused than others, raising funds for charities and reportedly paying artists a fraction of their usual fees, smaller festivals still seem to do better at booking female-fronted headliners.
Jungle and drum and bass artist Nia Archives is headlining two indie festivals this year – We Out Here in Dorset and Outlook in Croatia – as well as playing at Glastonbury.
“It’s a hard one for me,” she says “because I know I’m being given those opportunities but also recognise that not everybody has those opportunities.”
Image: Rock and metal festival Download has had no female-fronted headliners since 2018
Heavy metal and rock among worst offenders
Other than the Mighty Hoopla, no festival in our database has had more than a third female-fronted headline acts between 2018 and now.
Six have had none at all since then – Isle of Wight, Download, Kendal Calling, TRNSMT, Slam Dunk Festival and Bloodstock Open Air.
With half of the worst offenders coming under rock and heavy metal, John Rostron, of AIF, which represents Bloodstock Open Air, says things are “particularly difficult” across those genres as there is a “much smaller talent pool”.
Bloodstock’s festival director Adam Gregory shares his view.
“There is a shortage of female-fronted bands coming through the ranks,” he says, adding that headline slots are booked according to the “strongest available offering”.
John also points to the way some major festivals sign up artists exclusively – preventing them from playing other events.
“Someone playing third at Reading might be perfect to headline one of our smaller festivals, but they can’t. Both organisers and artists have a responsibility to say no to exclusives.”
‘Ethical’ promoters
There are groups trying to make a difference.
Not Bad For A Girl, a DJ collective based in Manchester and London, formed four years ago to “create a platform for female and non-binary DJs” – running their own events, performing at others, and on the radio.
Image: Pic: Not Bad For A Girl
They wear signature pink balaclavas in a bid to “eliminate conventional beauty standards” after members were denied opportunities on account of their gender.
Founder Martha Bolton says they actively support diverse talent, for example by “having two events and using one as a cash cow, so the other can promote an up-and-coming artist”.
She adds that big organisations like Glastonbury have a responsibility to set the standard for the industry.
“It needs to be the bigger people taking that jump for the rest of us who can’t afford the risk.”
No accountability
There is no official regulator of the music industry in the UK, so no official means of accountability when it comes to gender diversity.
UK Music, which has its own diversity taskforce, acts as a trade union, and connects smaller associations that represent specific parts of the industry.
Keychange is an EU-funded diversity programme that asks its 600 signatories (41% of which are festivals) to commit to at least 50% female inclusion. By the end of 2021, 64% of signatories had met the target.
But neither body is legally binding.
Image: Lizzo at Glastonbury 2019. Pic: James McCauley/Shutterstock
In an interview with The Guardian in March, Emily Eavis said Lizzo, who will perform just before Guns N Roses on the Pyramid Stage, could “totally headline” but the rock band were already booked.
She reiterated that female inclusion is “top of our agenda”, having committed to 50:50 representation in 2020 and secured more than half female and non-binary acts for 2023 so far.
In its diversity statement the festival says it is “working alongside experts in equality and anti-discrimination” on an internal review.
“We try our best and we obviously aim for 50:50. Some years, it’s more, some years, it’s less,” Eavis told the BBC earlier this year, adding it’s “looking like we’ve got two female headliners” for 2024.
But she added that despite being the biggest festival in the country, it is not just down to her to make change.
“We’re trying our best so the pipeline needs to be developed. This starts way back with the record companies, radio. I can shout as loud as I like but we need to get everyone on board.”
Sky News has contacted Glastonbury for further comment.
Football and the royals are two subjects which have always attracted very outspoken fans. Now, aged 90, Lord Norman Foster is attempting to please both.
One of the one of the world’s most important living architects, he is known for being the vision behind some of the world’s most iconic designs – including London’s “Gherkin” building, the Millennium Bridge and the British Museum’s spectacular Great Court.
Arguably, however, two of his most talked about designs are yet to be built.
In June, his firm Foster + Partners was announced as having won the commission to build a national memorial in honour of the late Queen Elizabeth II.
Image: A conceptual image of what the new Manchester United stadium could look like. Pic: Foster + Partners/PA
Image: Pic: Foster + Partners/PA
‘A galvanising project’
“The fan base is incredible,” Lord Foster said of his excitement at being commissioned to work on the new ground.
For the renowned architect it is a homecoming of sorts, given Lord Foster’s working-class roots, having grown-up in Manchester.
Was he excited to be involved?
“You bet,” he exclaims.
“It’s a galvanising project… and so many things can naturally ride on the back of that sporting, emblematic kind of team.”
Set to cost around £2bn – with its three tall masts acting as a vast umbrella over Old Trafford – the design is part of a larger regeneration project which Lord Foster claims could be completed in five years.
Image: The stadium design is part of a larger regeneration project.
Pic: Foster + Partners/PA
It is described as a “master plan that will create streets, squares, neighbourhoods and connect with the heart of Manchester.”
Asked whether it will feel unlike any other British stadium, he said: “Manchester United is different and therefore its stadium’s going to be different… and better, of course.”
And what of the QEII memorial?
He says his design to remember the late monarch in London’s St James’ Park will be “more of all the good things”.
His plans include a statue of Queen Elizabeth II standing next to her husband Prince Philip, and a semi-glass bridge which is a nod to her wedding tiara.
Image: The royal gardens design. Pic: Foster+Partners and Malcolm Reading Consultants/PA
As for those who’ve questioned whether maintaining its sparkle might prove to be problematic, Lord Foster insists it’ll be “less maintenance, more joy”.
He says his hope is “to address the many millions who traverse that [park], the daily commuters and many tourists, and to make that more human, to make it a better experience and a reminder of the legacy of the most extraordinary long-serving monarch”.
After collecting the London Design Festival’s prestigious lifetime achievement medal earlier this week, with six decades of experience under his belt, Lord Foster says he finds Britain’s inability to invest in infrastructure frustrating.
Image: Lord Foster speaks at the awards ceremony
“I lamented, like so many, the cancellation of HS2,” he says. The long-delayed rail route’s northern leg to Manchester was scrapped by Rishi Sunak in 2023.
“That was about levelling-up. It wasn’t about getting from one place in lightning speed, it was taking the burden off the regional network so it would serve local communities better.”
He says “connectivity is the answer to many of the social issues that we talk about”.
The tendency of politicians, he says, to prioritise short-term issues doesn’t help when it comes to seeing the bigger picture.
“There is not the awareness of the importance of design and planning… you do need a political awareness,” he says.
“The city is not static, it’s dynamic. It’s always changing, evolving, adapting to change, and it can do that well, or it can do it badly. But it needs planning, it needs anticipation.”
Donald Trump has claimed Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night talk show was pulled off the air because of “bad ratings”.
Kimmel’s programme on US network ABC was axed after he criticised the US president and his allies for their response to the assassination of the right-wing influencerCharlie Kirk.
The decision led to accusations that free speech was under attack in the US, with Democrats including former US president Barack Obama and a number of celebrities sounding an alarm.
Mr Trump said: “Well, Jimmy Kimmel was fired because he had bad ratings, more than anything else.”
“And he said a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk.”
Speaking at a news conference alongside Sir Keir Starmer, Mr Trump added: “Jimmy Kimmel is not a talented person. He had very bad ratings, and they should have fired him a long time ago.
“So, you know, you could call that free speech or not. He was fired for lack of talent.”
More on Charlie Kirk
Related Topics:
Image: Donald Trump attends a news conference with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Pic: Reuters
Aboard Air Force One, Mr Trump said: “When a host is on network television, there is a license. … I think maybe their license should be taken away.”
He said whether ABC’s license could be taken away over Mr Kimmel’s comments “will be up to Brendan Carr”, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission.
The US president also said that Mr Kimmel’s “ratings were worse than cold air. I think they got rid of cold air, which is a good thing to do. Look, that’s something that we should be talking about for licensing, too”.
The latest season of Jimmy Kimmel Live averaged 1.57 million viewers per episode, according to media research firm Nielsen – and the show’s YouTube channel has almost 21 million subscribers.
What did Kimmel say?
Kimmel made the controversial remark on Monday night.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:39
Jimmy Kimmel’s Charlie Kirk monologue
He said:“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Speaking about Mr Trump, he added: “This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish.”
“Many in MAGA land are working very hard to capitalise on the murder of Charlie Kirk,” he continued.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:28
Kimmel: Chairman of FCC hints at legal action
Free speech under attack?
Disney-owned ABC then said the show would be taken off air indefinitely, and with immediate effect, after network operator Nexstar – which operates a number of ABC affiliates – said it would stop broadcasting it.
But the move – months after fellow CBS late-night show host Stephen Colbert saw his programme cancelled – sparked concern over the state of freedom of speech in the country.
Former US president Barack Obama wrote on X: “After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like.
“This is precisely the kind of government coercion that the First Amendment was designed to prevent, and media companies need to start standing up rather than capitulating it.”
Image: Barack Obama on Jimmy Kimmel Live in 2016. Pic: Susan Walsh/AP
A string of high-profile celebrities, including actor Ben Stiller, criticised the decision. Mr Stiller reacted to another post on the news, replying: “This isn’t right.”
Actress Alison Brie said in an Instagram story: “This is unreal. And very scary.”
Actress Jean Smart and comedian Alex Edelman also attacked the move.
Image: Ben Stiller was among celebrities who rallied around Mr Kimmel. (Pic: Reuters)
The American Federation of Musicians, Directors Guild of America, IATSE and Sag Aftra have also condemned the ABC’s decision in a joint statement.
“The indefinite removal of Jimmy Kimmel Live under government pressure is not an isolated incident. It is part of a disturbing trend of increasing interference in creative expression,” the unions said.
“This kind of political pressure on broadcasters and artists chills free speech and threatens the livelihoods of thousands of working Americans.”
What happened
Kimmel’s comments led to the Trump backer Mr Carr threatening to “take action” against Disney and ABC.
In an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson, he said: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.”
After the show was pulled, he then praised Nexstar’s broadcasting division, saying “it is important for broadcasters to push back on Disney programming that they determine falls short of community values”.
Image: Mr Trump, currently on a UK state visit, welcomed the move. (Pic: Reuters)
Kimmel’s suspension has triggered outrage from Democrats like California Governor Gavin Newsom, who posted on X: “The @GOP [Republican Party] does not believe in free speech. They are censoring you in real time.”
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer called for people “across the political spectrum… to stop what’s happening to Jimmy Kimmel”.
A representative for Kimmel did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
He has not issued any statement since the show’s withdrawal.
Sinclear, the largest ABC affiliate group in the US, has called on Mr Kimmel to “issue a direct apology to the Kirk family” and “make a meaningful personal donation to the Kirk Family and Turning Point USA” in a statement on Thursday.
The company said its ABC stations will air a special in remembrance of Mr Kirk during Jimmy Kimmel Live’s timeslot on Friday.
Both Disney and Nexstar have FCC business ahead of them. Disney is seeking regulatory approval for ESPN’s acquisition of the NFL Network and Nexstar needs the Trump administration go-ahead to complete its $6.2bn purchase of broadcast rival Tegna.
Mr Kirk’s suspected killer, Tyler Robinson,appeared in court for the first time on Tuesday. Prosecutors said he had expressed negative views about Mr Kirk, an influential media figure in the MAGA movement.
Sally Rooney says she could not come to the UK to pick up an award earlier this week because she can “no longer safely enter the UK without facing arrest”.
Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK on 5 July.
The 34-year-old had won a Sky Arts Award, in the literature category, for her latest novel, Intermezzo, beating fellow writers Alan Hollinghurst and Gwyneth Lewis.
Rooney’s editor, Alex Bowler, attended the ceremony on Tuesday at London’s Roundhouse on her behalf.
Accepting the award, he read a statement from Rooney, which said: “I’m so touched and grateful to receive this prize.
“I truly loved writing Intermezzo, and it means the world to me to think that it found some small place in the lives of its readers. Thank you.
More on Palestine Action
Related Topics:
“I wish that I could be with you this evening to accept the honour in person, but because of my support for non-violent anti-war protest, I’m advised that I can no longer safely enter the UK without potentially facing arrest.
“In that context, I want to thank you all the more warmly for honouring my work tonight and to reiterate my belief in the dignity and beauty of all human life and my solidarity with the people of Palestine.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:57
Why was Palestine Action proscribed?
Rooney previously told the Irish Times that if backing the group “makes me a ‘supporter of terror’ under UK law, so be it”.
She has said she will use the proceeds of her work and her public platform to continue her support for Palestine Action and “direct action against genocide in whatever way I can”.
Palestine Action was banned under terrorism legislation in the UK, but not under Irish law.
Rooney currently lives in the west of Ireland.
More than 700 people have been arrested in relation to alleged support of Palestine Action since it was banned – including 522 during a protest in central London on 9 July.
The group was proscribed after the group claimed responsibility for damage to jets at RAF Brize Norton and was also linked to “allegations of a serious assault on staff”.
Israel’s foreign ministry said it “categorically rejects this distorted and false report” and called for the commission to be abolished.
On Wednesday night, stars including Richard Gere, Florence Pugh, Damon Albarn and Louis Theroux all appeared at the Together for Palestine concert, at Ovo Arena Wembley, which raised £1.5m to support Palestinian humanitarian organisations.