Palace threatened to bring in lawyers after becoming ‘frustrated’ with News Group Newspapers over settling phone-hacking claims, court documents reveal
Palace officials negotiating with the backing of the Queen threatened to bring in lawyers to secure a private phone-hacking settlement with News Group Newspapers (NGN), court documents have revealed.
Staff at the palace suggested bringing in legal experts after becoming increasingly “frustrated” with a lack of response from Rupert Murdoch’s top news executives in 2018.
They sent emails expressing an “institutional appetite” to reach an out-of-court deal with the group over claims royal family members had their phones hacked by the now-defunct News Of The World.
In the messages, palace officials revealed how the Queen was “aware” of the talks and had given her “full authority”.
The emails were shared in court as part of Prince Harry’s own claim against NGN – which also publishes The Sun – over alleged unlawful information gathering at its two titles.
The group is bringing a bid to have Harry’s case thrown out, along with a similar claim by actor Hugh Grant, at a three-day hearing in London which started on Tuesday.
NGN argues that the claims have been brought too late.
Image: Hugh Grant arrives at court on Thursday
The emails involve discussions in December 2017 between the Queen’s former press secretary, Sally Osman, News UK chief Rebekah Brooks and Robert Thomson – the chief executive of the Rupert Murdoch-owned News Corp.
In one email, sent by Ms Osman, she expressed a desire to reach an agreement which would “draw a line under such matters between our two institutions”.
Advertisement
“The fact that we can have this conversation, with The Queen’s full authority and knowledge of the scale and effect of hacking and surveillance on her family, their staff, associates, friends and family, is important with a view to resolution in the near future,” she added.
However, having organised a meeting between the two sides, Ms Osman expressed her “disappointment” that no progress had been made by March 2018.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
She wrote: “Assuming you received my email of 11 December last year, following our very genial and I thought constructive meeting, I was somewhat disappointed not to receive an acknowledgement, let alone a reply.
“I do, of course, appreciate, that business is busy. However, there is also an increasing sense of frustration here at the lack of response or willingness to engage in finding a resolution to what is considered outstanding business between the Royal Household and News Corporation.
“The hope is still to find a resolution without involving lawyers.”
As the Royal Family prepares for the coronation, Prince Harry prepares for another court case
Harry hasn’t made it to court, but we know he’s followed proceedings closely.
Watching every word via the High Court video-link.
This is his case against The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, accusing them of phone hacking, and blagging private information for years and years.
We’ve heard how it made him suffer depression and paranoia.
But through the latest documents he’s released, we’ve also learnt how much the late Queen was initially involved with the claims.
Prince Harry has revealed the frustrated email exchanges between the palace and newspaper executives.
The palace wanted an apology for the hacking of members of the family, their close friends, and some working in the royal household.
But despite repeated emails, to those at the very top of News Corp and News Group Newspapers, things aren’t resolved.
In one final email, we read how the late Queen’s director of communications, fears the request “is not being taken seriously”.
Prince Harry, we know, takes the hacking issue very seriously. He wants to fight the tabloids all the way and is determined to show there is a case to answer.
News Group Newspapers strongly disagree, arguing time has run out, and the judge should strike out the case.
But it doesn’t end here.
As the Royal Family prepares for the coronation, Prince Harry is preparing for his next big case. His trial against the publishers of the Mirror starts the day after the celebrations end.
The email prompted apologetic replies from both Ms Brooks and Mr Thomson – who put the missed email down to the latter’s busy schedule and a “mountain” of daily memos.
However, Ms Osman pushed for a resolution again in May, expressing an “institutional appetite to expedite things and start having a more tangible dialogue”.
“We are still very much of the mind that we don’t want this to become embroiled in legal negotiation but it would clearly assist if our lawyers now spoke to yours,” she added.
Image: Rebekah Brooks
On Thursday, David Sherborne, representing Harry, said in court that the late Queen was previously involved in “discussions and authorisation” that the Royal Family would not pursue claims against NGN until after the conclusion of the litigation over hacking.
Mr Sherborne said in written arguments that the agreement “meant that the claimant could not bring a claim against NGN for phone hacking at that time”.
He added: “It was agreed directly between these parties, as opposed to their lawyers… that at the conclusion of the Mobile Telephone Voicemail Interception Litigation (MTVIL) News would admit or settle such a claim with an apology.
“In 2017, the claimant and the institution began to push for the outstanding claim to be resolved.
“However, News filibustered in relation to this until, in 2019, the claimant had enough and issued his claim.”
The barrister told Mr Justice Fancourt, hearing the case, that what Harry did know by 2012 was that “an agreement [had been] reached between the institution and News Group”.
He added: “It is precisely because of the secret agreement that no claim was brought before 2019.”
Harry’s lawyers also argue that NGN’s bid to have his claim thrown out is an attempt to go behind the “secret agreement”.
Mr Sherborne also told the court that Harry’s brother, Prince William, had “recently settled his claim against NGN behind the scenes”.
The hearing is due to end on Friday, when the judge will determine whether their claims will progress to a trial – which is due to be heard in January next year.
The claim is one of a number of legal actions currently being brought by the Duke of Sussex, who appeared in person at the High Court last month for a preliminary hearing against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), publisher of The Mail and Mail On Sunday.
He is also expected to give evidence at a trial over allegations of unlawful information against tabloid publisher Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), due to begin next month, with Harry due to appear in court in June.
NGN closed The News of the World in 2011 in the aftermath of the phone-hacking scandal but has consistently denied that any unlawful information-gathering took place at The Sun.
An emergency bill to save British Steel’s Scunthorpe blast furnaces has become law.
The urgent legislation gives ministers the power to instruct British Steel to keep the plant open.
The bill was rushed through the House of Commons and House of Lords in one day, with MPs and peers being recalled from recess to take part in a Saturday sitting for the first time in over 40 years.
Image: An emergency bill to save British Steel’s Scunthorpe blast furnaces has passed. Pic: Reuters
After passing through both houses of parliament, the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill was granted royal assent by the King.
The bill gives the government the power to take control of British Steel – or any other steel asset – “using force if necessary”, order materials for steelmaking and instruct that workers be paid. It also authorises a jail sentence of up to two years for anyone breaching this law.
Sir Keir Starmer hailed the legislation for “turning the page on a decade of decline”, adding “all options are on the table to secure the future of the industry”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:18
What is the future of British Steel?
It will mean the steel plant in Scunthorpe will continue to operate as the government decides on a long-term strategy, and steelmaking in the UK more broadly.
Officials from the Department for Business and Trade arrived at the site before the bill had even passed, Sky News understands.
Earlier, staff from the plant’s ousted Chinese owners Jingye were denied access, with police called over a “suspected breach of peace” – though officers found “no concerns”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:13
The role of steel in the UK economy
Ministers took the unusual step of recalling parliament from its recess to sit on Saturday after negotiations with Jingye appeared to break down.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the measures within the bill were “proportionate and necessary” to keep the Scunthorpe blast furnaces open and protect both the UK’s primary steelmaking capacity and the 3,500 jobs involved.
The emergency legislation stops short of full nationalisation of British Steel, but Mr Reynolds told MPs that public ownership remained the “likely option” for the future.
During the debate, several Conservative MPs, Reform UK’s deputy leader Richard Tice and the Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader Daisy Cooper all spoke in favour of nationalisation.
MPs had broken up for the Easter holidays on Tuesday and had not been due to return until Tuesday 22 April.
The business secretary accused Jingye of failing to negotiate “in good faith” after it decided to stop buying enough raw materials to keep the blast furnaces at Scunthorpe going.
But the Conservatives said the government should have acted sooner, with shadow leader of the house Alex Burghart accusing ministers of making “a total pig’s breakfast” of the situation regarding British Steel.
The government was also criticised for acting to save the Scunthorpe plant but not taking the same action when the Tata Steel works in Port Talbot were threatened with closure.
A major incident has been declared in Nottinghamshire after a gas explosion caused a house to collapse.
There is still a “substantial emergency service presence” in place after the explosion in John Street, Worksop just after 7.30pm on Saturday.
Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service (NFRS) declared it a “major incident” and said “multiple houses in and around John Street have been evacuated”. Nearby Crown Place Community Centre has been opened as a “place of safety”, the service said. Around 20 people have sought refuge there, Sky News camera operator James Evans-Jones said from the scene.
Videos posted on social media showed the front of a terraced house blown out with the roof collapsed, while neighbouring houses had their windows damaged.
NFRS said in a statement late on Saturday: “This has now been declared a major incident, and we are likely to be on scene throughout the night and even into Sunday morning.”
The fire service said it was called to the scene at 7.39pm.
Image: The back of the property where the explosion happened in Worksop. Pic: YappApp
Image: Pic: YappApp
“This is a gas explosion involving a house that has been significantly damaged,” the service said in a previous statement.
More on Nottinghamshire
Related Topics:
One person posted on Facebook that they heard “a terrific bang, like a very loud firework” as they turned into Gladstone Street from Gateford Road.
“I thought the back end had blown off my car,” they said. “A house in John Street has had, presumably, a gas explosion!”
Image: Emergency services at the scene on Saturday. Pic: YappApp
NFRS said it was also called to a separate incident shortly afterwards but does not believe the two are connected.
Ten fire engines were sent to the scene of the industrial fire in nearby Holgate Road in The Meadows, Nottingham.
“The building has been severely damaged but there are no reports of any injuries,” NFRS said.
Having been called to the incident at 8.11pm, NFRS said at around 10.30pm that it was scaling its response down with the flames “now under control”.
NFRS’s group manager Leigh Holmes said from the scene just after 11pm: “We will begin to relax the cordon in the next hour as we continue to scale down this incident.”
Image: A damaged building at The Meadows in Nottingham. Pic: NFRS
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Sir Keir Starmer was flying the flag for domestic steel production on Saturday as his government passed emergency legislation to give itself extraordinary powers to intervene in the running of the steel works in Scunthorpe and elsewhere.
He wants voters to notice that his intervention-friendly government has stepped in to save virgin steel production which was days away from dying out for good because of what ministers call the bad faith behaviour of Chinese owners.
The politics and optics of Saturday’s intervention seem relatively simple. What happens next, however, is not.
Even before the emergency bill had made its way through parliament, officials had turned up at British Steel in Scunthorpe.
There’s a nervousness about what happens next. As one person close to the talks told me, keeping the blast furnaces alive is far from a foregone conclusion and there are difficult times to come.
More on Sir Keir Starmer
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:06
Emergency steel bill receives King’s approval
“We’re in for a very hard few days and week while government and UK management secure and ensure the vital loads of raw materials needed,” said a source.
“You can’t just do next day delivery on Amazon. Until this is in the blast furnaces keeping them going this won’t be a job done.”
It stands to reason the government will pull out all the stops and the furnace for now will be kept alive, whatever the cost, because the political cost of failure at this point is too high.
Future not secure
But the medium term prospects for virgin British steel are far from secure.
The blast furnaces being saved only have a few years life at best – but it remains unclear who will fund a transition to the new-style electric blast furnaces.
Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, said: “The action I seek to take today is not a magic wand or a panacea.
“The state cannot fund the long term transformation of British Steel itself, nor would it want to do so.”
Nor would he say that steel production is an overriding national security issue, effectively guaranteeing future production. The wiggle room will be noted in Scunthorpe and beyond.
The government has provided a sticking plaster not a solution.
But this is about so much more than what’s going on in Lincolnshire, this is about Britain’s place in the world – and its resilience.
Is dependence on China inevitable?
Can our domestic steel industry survive if Trump continues to impose 25% tariffs on steel going from the UK to the US?
Can we make our own weapons for years to come – as part of Mr Starmer‘s newfound commitment to spend 3% of GDP on defence – without British steel?
Is the eventual dependence on Chinese steel an inevitability?
Yet one of the fascinating features of Saturday’s debate was the most strident attack on a Chinese entity by a minister – the toughest assault since Mr Starmer’s government entered office.
Mr Reynolds said: “Over the last few days, it became clear that the intention of Jingye was to refuse to purchase sufficient raw materials to keep the blast furnaces running.
“In fact, their intention was to cancel and refuse to pay for existing orders. The company would therefore have irrevocably and unilaterally closed down primary steelmaking at British Steel.
“Their intention has been to keep the downstream mills, which colleagues will know are fundamental to our construction steel industry, and supply them from China rather than from Scunthorpe.”
This attack – at a time when ministers (most recently Ed Miliband) have been heading to Beijing to repair relations.
However, the accusation that a Chinese entity has been acting in bad faith in order to effectively scupper domestic steel production is a serious charge.
It also comes before we find out whether Donald Trump is going to make it harder for allies to trade with China.
The government has succeeded in protecting the domestic manufacturer of virgin steel for the short term.
But what happens in the long term, and where we might get it from, remains as murky today as it did before.