Connect with us

Published

on

Whispers are growing louder among Republicans that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) has miscalculated in his battle with Disney — a struggle that has already gone on for more than a year and has no end in sight.

There are real dangers, they say, of his fight with the corporation becoming a distraction from his likely presidential campaign — and one that could make him seem petty and vindictive rather than strong or decisive.

Despite the fact many polls suggest GOP voters are sympathetic to DeSantis’s war on “wokeness” in general, there are also concerns among conservatives about a powerful elected official targeting a specific company for political reasons.

People close to former President Trump, DeSantis’s archrival if he should enter the 2024 race, are gleefully fanning those concerns.

“If you are allowing governors to dictate their own politics to private businesses, what is to stop a liberal governor from doing the same?” asked one source familiar with the former president’s thinking.

The Trump source complained about governors who “overstep their authority for their own political validation,” adding, “The conservative media attacked Gov. [Andrew] Cuomo and Gov. [Gretchen] Whitmer for doing the same thing during the lockdowns. You can’t have it both ways.”

Such commentary is not confined to pro-Trump circles, either. Related coverage from The Hill: McCarthy hits DeSantis on Disney prison quip: ‘Sit down and negotiate’ Rubio warns against Florida going after companies for ‘political purposes’ Justice jumps into race to unseat Manchin DeSantis-Disney feud heats up 19 Michigan state GOP lawmakers throw support behind DeSantis

One Republican strategist not aligned with any declared or likely 2024 candidate said that while it is true conservatives have “issues” with Disney, they also have “issues with government picking winners and losers.”

On a practical level, the strategist added: “I think DeSantis first got on the national radar by getting in a fight with Disney. I think his problem now is that he has to win it — and it is not clear that he can continue upping the ante.”

The latest twist in the long-running DeSantis-Disney saga came on Wednesday when the corporation sued DeSantis in federal court in Florida. 

The company’s filing alleged “a targeted campaign of government retaliation” that it said had been “orchestrated” by DeSantis. 

The alleged campaign, Disney contended, “threatens Disney’s business operations, jeopardizes its economic future in the region, and violates its constitutional rights.”

DeSantis, who has been on an international trade mission in recent days, responded from Israel. At a news conference, he argued that the Disney suit was “political” and had no “merit.”

The governor further argued that Disney was seeking special treatment in his state and was “upset that they are actually having to live by the same rules as everybody else.”

But now, DeSantis faces the prospect of being mired in a protracted legal struggle even as he is perceived to be making moves toward launching a presidential candidacy. 

The Disney saga has its roots in the Florida legislation passed with DeSantis’s support last year that prohibited teaching about gender identity or sexual orientation through the third grade.

The legislation, tagged somewhat hyperbolically as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill by critics, caused national controversy. Within weeks of its passage, Disney issued a statement expressing its opposition, adding that the bill “should never have been signed into law.”

DeSantis fired back in short order, moving to strip Disney of the significant level of autonomy it enjoyed in the area where Walt Disney World is. 

Then, there were further squabbles earlier this year over the makeup of the five-person board that runs the district.

DeSantis, with the backing of Florida Republicans, sought to appoint his own board. But the outgoing board then tried to outmaneuver him by making agreements at its last meeting that would have greatly constrained their replacements.

Earlier this month, DeSantis went even further, suggesting the state might build a prison near Disney’s theme parks, presumably as a means of exacting retribution.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released earlier this week found a clear majority of Republicans favoring DeSantis’s basic position but a significant majority dissenting.

Sixty-four percent of Republicans said DeSantis was “rightfully rolling back special treatment for Disney,” but 36 percent said he was “punishing Disney for exercising their right to free speech.”

Worryingly for the Florida governor — especially if he ever became the GOP nominee for president — independents broke heavily against him on that question, contributing to strong sympathy for Disney among the population at large.

Moreover, although 44 percent of Republicans said they had a more positive view of DeSantis because of the controversy, 19 percent said they had a more negative view. 

In potentially even worse news for DeSantis, majorities of Democrats, Republicans and independents said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who “supports or passes laws designed to punish a company for its political, social or cultural stances.”

The escalation of the controversy with Disney also comes as DeSantis has endured a bad time in his quasi-campaign, falling further behind Trump in the polls and having to mop up an assertion that the Ukraine-Russia war is a mere “territorial dispute.”

There will, of course, be many twists and turns in the presidential campaign, which will not see its first debates until August. No votes will be cast until early next year.

Still, for now, there is no sign that DeSantis’s battle with Disney is letting up anytime soon. And that could be a hindrance, at a minimum, if a presidential campaign gets underway in earnest. MTA ends real-time service alerts on Twitter, says platform is ‘no longer reliable’ Watch live: Jeffries holds weekly press conference

“It’s just the fiercest legal tug-of-war between two titans in our state that we have seen, maybe in our lifetimes,” said Susan MacManus, a University of South Florida professor emerita and a prominent commentator on politics in the state. 

“There are no holds barred, and neither side is blinking.”

The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage.

Continue Reading

Environment

LiuGong brings battery electric construction equipment portfolio to bauma

Published

on

By

LiuGong brings battery electric construction equipment portfolio to bauma

Chinese equipment manufacturers LiuGong is showcasing its latest innovations in battery-electric construction equipment at bauma 2025 – including a new 870HE wheel loader (above), excavators, rigid mining trucks, and the the world’s first 25 ton electric grader.

LiuGong had a huge presence at the bauma construction equipment show in Munich, Germany this past week, with panels, hospitality booths, and more meant to reinforce the company’s position as global leader in electric wheel loader production and as a full-solution provider for the quarrying and mining sectors.

During a press conference hosted by the brand, LiuGong Chairman & CEO, Zeng Guang’an emphasized the company’s focus on globalization and comprehensive equipment solutions. “We will further expand our global footprint and establish new regional hubs in Italy, France, and Germany,” explained Guang’an. “At the same time, we will continue to deepen our collaboration with dealers to provide high-quality equipment and more efficient, professional localized services to our European customers.”

LiuGong at bauma 2025

The Chinese company displayed one of the industry’s most extensive electric construction equipment portfolios, presenting five advanced equipment options including the 870HE wheel loader (at top), the 924FE and 9018FE electric excavators, the DR50CE rigid mining truck, and the 4280DE electric motor grader — a world’s first in its class.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

4280DE Electric motor grader

4280DE electric motor grader; via LiuGong.

The 4280DE is a 25 ton all-electric motor grader designed for haul road maintenance at quarries and mines. The grader’s 423 kWh battery offers 8 to 10 hours of continuous runtime. LiuGong says it developed the first-of-its-kind machine in conjunction with customer feedback, and optimized it for power, precision, and the ability to seamlessly integrating it into existing equipment fleets.

924FE Electric excavator

The company’s electric excavators offer significant noise and air quality advantages in enclosed, underground environments where quiet, precise, and vibration-free operation is critical to the continued safety and efficiency of workers.

The 924FE features a 24,900 kg (approx. 55,000 lb.) operating weight and a standard cubic meter bucket capacity. It moves courtesy of a 165 kW (220 hp) electric motor that draws power from LiuGong’s “full size” 423 kWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery, which is rated for up to 9 hours of all-electric operation. An available connection to grid power enables it to continue operating while charging its batteries.

DR50CE rigid mining truck

Packing dual series electric motors that deliver over 9,700 lb-ft of torque, the DR50CE rigid electric haul truck from LiuGong.

Like other big electric haul trucks, it uses its massive 50,000 kg (over 55 ton) and 35 cubic meter payload capacity to its advantage – riding its regenerative brakes on 6-8% downhill grades for effectively zero energy operation. The truck presumably uses the same 423 kWh battery pack as the rest of the line, but it isn’t listed in the published specs.

Electrek’s Take

856H Electric wheel loader; via LiuGong North America.

If you’ve never heard of LiuGong, that’s OK. The brand is making waves in Europe right now, but it’s already one of the biggest players in the heavy equipment space globally. Most important for our North American readers, however, is probably the fact that the company is selling equipment in the US. That means you’ll probably be seeing its battery-powered construction equipment on a job site near you soon enough.

SOURCE | IMAGES: LiuGong North America.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump exempts select tech products from tariffs, crypto to benefit?

Published

on

By

Trump exempts select tech products from tariffs, crypto to benefit?

Trump exempts select tech products from tariffs, crypto to benefit?

United States President Donald Trump has exempted an array of tech products including, smartphones, chips, computers, and select electronics from tariffs, giving the tech industry a much-needed respite from trade pressures.

According to the US Customs and Border Protection, storage cards, modems, diodes, semiconductors, and other electronics were also excluded from the ongoing trade tariffs.

“Large-cap technology companies will ultimately come out ahead when this is all said and done,” The Kobeissi letter wrote in an April 12 X post.

Cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Price, Economics, Economy, United States, Donald Trump

US Customs and Border Protection announces tariff exemptions on select tech products. Source: US Customs and Border Protection

The tariff relief will take the pressure off of tech stocks, which were one of the biggest casualties of the trade war. Crypto markets are correlated with tech stocks and could also rally as risk appetite increases on positive trade war headlines.

Following news of the tariff exemptions, the price of Bitcoin (BTC) broke past $85,000 on April 12, a signal that crypto markets are already responding to the latest macroeconomic development.

Related: Billionaire investor would ‘not be surprised’ if Trump postpones tariffs

Markets hinge on Trump’s every word during macroeconomic uncertainty

President Trump walked back the sweeping tariff policies on April 9 by initiating a 90-day pause on the reciprocal tariffs and lowering tariff rates to 10% for countries that did not respond with counter-tariffs on US goods.

Bitcoin surged by 9% and the S&P 500 surged by over 10% on the same day that Trump issued the tariff pause.

Macroeconomic trader Raoul Pal said the tariff policies were a negotiation tool to establish a US-China trade deal and characterized the US administration’s trade rhetoric as “posturing.”

Bitcoin advocate Max Keiser argued that exempting select tech products from import tariffs would not reduce bond yields or further the Trump administration’s goal of lowering interest rates.

Cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Price, Economics, Economy, United States, Donald Trump

Yield on the 10-year US government bond spikes following sweeping trade policies from the Trump administration. Source: TradingView

The yield on the 10-year US Treasury Bond shot up to a local high of approximately 4.5% on April 11 as bond investors reacted to the macroeconomic uncertainty of a protracted trade war.

“The concession just given to China for tech exports won’t reverse the trend of rates going higher. Confidence in US bonds and the US Dollar has been eroding for years and won’t stop now,” Keiser wrote on April 12.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Magazine: Trump’s crypto ventures raise conflict of interest, insider trading questions

Continue Reading

UK

Brother of Manchester Arena bomber attacks prison officers, union says

Published

on

By

Brother of Manchester Arena bomber attacks prison officers, union says

Three prison officers have been attacked by the brother of the Manchester Arena bomber.

The Prison Officers Association (POA) said 28-year-old Hashem Abedi – the brother of Salman Abedi – threw hot cooking oil over the guards before stabbing them with homemade weapons.

He was sentenced in 2020 to at least 55 years in prison after being found guilty of 22 counts of murder over the 2017 atrocity.

The three officers were taken to hospital after the attack at category A Frankland prison, in County Durham, shortly before 11am on Saturday.

Salman Abedi killed 22 innocent people
Image:
Salman Abedi killed 22 innocent people

A female officer is understood to have now been discharged.

The POA said they suffered “life-threatening injuries” including burns, scalds and stab wounds.

Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said on X: “I am appalled by the attack of three brave officers at HMP Frankland today. My thoughts are with them and their families.

More on Hashem Abedi

“The police are now investigating. I will be pushing for the strongest possible punishment. Violence against our staff will never be tolerated.”

The POA said the attack happened in a separation centre, a small unit sometimes referred to as a “prison within a prison”, usually used to house dangerous prisoners and those deemed a risk of radicalising other inmates.

The union’s national chair Mark Fairhurst called for a review of the freedoms granted to those prisoners.

“I am of the opinion that allowing access to cooking facilities and items that can threaten the lives of staff should be removed immediately,” he said.

“These prisoners need only receive their basic entitlements and we should concentrate on control and containment instead of attempting to appease them. Things have to change.”

HASHEM ABEDI ATTACKS PRISON OFFICER ON 11 MAY 2020
Image:
Abedi attacked Belmarsh officer in 2020

General Secretary Steve Gillan added: “This is a disgraceful and cowardly attack on prison officers at Frankland prison who were carrying out their duties.”

Durham police said: “An investigation is underway following a serious assault which occurred at Frankland prison, Durham today.

“Three victims were taken to hospital to be treated where two remain with serious injuries and a third has been discharged.”

Read more from Sky News:
Newcastle head coach admitted to hospital
Smartphones and laptops excluded from tariffs

Hashem Abedi was previously found guilty, along with two other convicted terrorists, of attacking a prison officer at south-east London’s Belmarsh prison in 2020.

The officer was hit with a chair, repeatedly punched and kicked when he was set upon by Hashem Abedi, Parsons Green Tube bomber Ahmed Hassan and Muhammed Saeed, who spoke about carrying out a knife attack in London.

Hashem Abedi was found guilty by a jury of 22 counts of murder, attempted murder and plotting to cause an explosion likely to endanger life over the Manchester Arena bombing.

The court heard he helped source, buy, stockpile and transport the components for his brother’s bomb using a number of phones, vehicles and addresses in preparation for the attack.

Twenty-two people were killed when suicide bomber Salman Abedi detonated an explosive as people were leaving an Ariana Grande concert at the venue.

He died in the attack, while hundreds of others were injured.

Continue Reading

Trending