What does the nation really think about the future of our monarchy?

Published

2 years ago

April 30, 2023

admin

With the passing of Elizabeth II, what is our relationship with the monarchy and the new King?

That was the question I hoped to answer as I travelled the length of the land for our documentary My King, My Country?

And I was as much seeking an answer from myself as I was from the rest of the kingdom.

Growing up in southwest Scotland I really didn’t have much of a relationship with the monarchy; partly, I presume, because of the distance between Buck House (as it is sometimes known in newsrooms) and Ayr; partly, because I really didn’t think about them that much.

I certainly was aware of their existence – I may have been in the kids’ room on Christmas Day but I knew my older relatives were next door watching the Queen deliver her message.

Later in life, the drama and tragedy of Princess Diana’s life and passing were obviously topics of conversation with friends and family.

But I didn’t feel the sense of loss that others clearly did at her passing, again most likely for the reasons mentioned above.

And while as an adult and a journalist (some will disagree with either or both of those descriptions) I’ve been tasked with reporting on “royal events”, most recently of course presenting aspects of our coverage of the Queen’s death, actively thinking about the Royal Family and its members, its institutions and practices, was a rarity.

Then I spent a month on the road thinking about little else.

Others have spent far longer.

‘This is not appropriate in a democratic society’

“Well, I’ve always been opposed to the monarchy,” says Graham Smith, chief executive of the anti-monarchy campaign group Republic.

“I remember I was 12 years old the year Andrew and Sarah Ferguson got married. And I objected to the idea of having to sit in the classroom and watch the wedding.

“And as I got older, it just made more sense that this is not appropriate in a democratic society.”

And there are more people who agree with Graham in Scotland than anywhere else in the United Kingdom.

I travelled to Edinburgh to speak to Tommy Sheppard, an SNP MP and prominent republican north of Gretna Green. In something of an irony, his constituency has not one but three royal palaces within it.

In the shadow of Craigmillar Castle, best known for its association with the ill-fated Mary, Queen of Scots, he explained his antipathy.

“I mean, I think it’s an anachronism,” he told me. “It’s a relic of bygone days that has no place in a modern democratic constitution, to be honest.

“You know, the question is, can we do better? And I think we can do better.”

For Kehinde Andrews, Professor of Black Studies at Birmingham City University, there is an almost visceral dislike of both the institution and its figureheads.

He said: “It is entirely unreasonable to justify this almost exclusively white family. And we saw it when they put a black woman in the family because it is chaos.

“But how can we possibly justify this family being the representative not just of Britain, but of 13 other countries… which are almost exclusively black and brown?

“What that does psychically, what that does emotionally, is to put whiteness on a pedestal. That’s the role. So if you’re serious about it, you have to say we have to abandon this role.”

The level of affection for Charles and Camilla was a surprise

Yet for every Graham, Tommy and Kehinde, the clear majority of those who spoke to me around the country were far more positive about the monarchy as an institution.

The level of affection for the Queen was not a surprise. The level of affection for Charles and Camilla certainly was.

Take Kathy Lette, Aussie funny woman and self-proclaimed republican herself. She has known them both pretty well for years, and has not a bad word to say.

“Well, you take people as you find them,” purrs Kathy. “You know, princes are supposed to be charming and he is charming.

“And also, I think he was so prescient. I mean, he was way ahead of his time on all those environmental issues, which I can connect with him on that big time.

“So, you know, you can’t help liking them. I would say Charles’s charm is more disarming than a UN peacekeeping force.”

And make no mistake, Kathy is not alone in her view.

At every event to which Republic sent demonstrators, they were outnumbered by hundreds to one.

They spoke of feeling a personal connection to both King and crown; the outpouring of sympathy and emotion towards Charles, both in the immediate aftermath of his mother’s death and on every public appearance since, is unmissable.

Take the residents of Nansleden, Charles’s pet housing project in Cornwall.

It may all feel a little bit Truman Show to the cynical journalistic outsider with its perfect pastel-coloured houses, but they truly love living there.

It’s a similar tale in my own part of the world, where Charles’s saving of Dumfries House has been warmly welcomed by locals (many of whom, including some I know, you’d hardly describe as arch monarchists).

I will admit that the Duchy of Cornwall’s relationship with the Isles of Scilly did give me pause; the amounts of money being made from what are essentially feudal arrangements merits at the bare minimum wider knowledge and discussion.

So too the ability of the monarchy to intervene in law-making that directly affects their financial interests.

But as I type this, while the country feels like it is about to begin a proper conversation about the future of the monarchy – and the news that the public will be asked to swear an oath of fealty has prompted a furious reaction from far more than the usual suspects – it is clear there remains a majority in favour of the institution persisting.

As for me… well, I never quite got around to answering that question for myself.

The privilege of being a broadcast journalist is never having to make your mind up on a topic – publicly, at least.

Yet the privileges of being royal, of being King, are of a different order.

And for all that there is a clear majority in favour of the institution, I suspect that the number for whom that privilege sits uneasily is growing. And growing rapidly.

Sky’s special My King, My Country? coronation documentary airs at 8pm tonight on Sky News.

UK

Huge surge in online hate crimes targeting footballers revealed

Published

59 mins ago

October 8, 2025

admin

Huge surge in online hate crimes targeting footballers revealed

Suspected online hate crimes referred to police have quadrupled already this season in English football, Sky News can reveal.

And we have learned that the football policing unit has urged the government to form a new unit to address racism in the sport.

We have also uncovered new details about the police investigation into the hate received by England star Jess Carter, who revealed to me after the Euros final win that the abuse nearly forced her to stop playing at the tournament.

But the scale of racism facing footballers is highlighted by the abuse received by Kira Rai – a British Sikh Punjabi – after signing for Peterborough United last month.

They play in the fourth tier, far from the spotlight of the Women’s Super League, but that does not limit the venom targeted at Rai on social media.

She told Sky News: “There were some racial slurs about my heritage, where I come from, that I don’t belong in this country, that I should go back to X country and just sorts of things along those lines.

“I think that’s probably quite difficult to read about yourself at the end of the day.

“It should be a moment for me to celebrate, I’ve just joined a new club.”

What an impact she has made at her new club, scoring an incredible five-minute hat-trick in the FA Cup on Sunday on her home debut.

But the joy is tinged with sadness when we meet the next day.

‘A reflection of society’

“I’ve been in football since I was six, so for people to question whether I belong in football purely based on the colour of my skin, I think is something that’s really difficult to get your head round,” she said.

“It’s probably a reflection of what’s going on in society right now and how prevalent racism has become, and I think football is quite clearly a reflection on society.

“In society, over the last weeks, months, I think there’s almost an underlying tension that’s perhaps not been there in recent years.”

‘Depressing’ rise in racism

The is felt by the police unit that has overseen football issues for the last two decades, with racism in stadiums and online rising.

Social media is a growing concern, with 170 referrals already this season of online racism compared to 54 in the first three months of the 2022-23 season and 41 in 2023-24.

“We’re seeing more reports, which is depressing,” Chief Constable Mark Roberts said in an exclusive interview.

“I think we’re also seeing that the number of those reports that actually meet the criminal threshold has increased.”

It’s up to 154 already this season.

Incidents ‘creeping back’ into stadiums

“There’s an awful lot in the political sphere that people are saying that probably a few years ago just wouldn’t have been thought of, so I think it taps into that broader societal piece which makes it challenging,” the National Police Chiefs Council’s football lead added.

“Sadly that seems to have gone backwards a bit. The lower league grounds now, we are seeing incidents creep back into the games which obviously we’ve got to be really keen to clamp down on and make sure that people face consequences.

“Now whether that’s been driven by people being able to say things or feel that they can say things online and that’s now leaking into the actual stadiums, there is a definite trend to see more of it.”

One of the unit’s most high-profile investigations has been into the racism that led Carter to speaking out during England’s run to Euro 2025 and stepping away for a time from social media.

While two arrests have been announced, Sky News can reveal a third person has been arrested. A fourth suspect has also been identified, and six people overseas are under suspicion.

Carter previously told Sky News: “I wasn’t sure I was going to be able to come back on the pitch and be me.”

No one has been charged.

‘Slippage’ with Musk’s X

Three cases are pending with Elon Musk’s X.

And whether it’s X or Meta-owned Instagram, there is no agreement on the “grossly offensive legal threshold” with policies more tolerable than British law.

Mr Roberts said: “There has been some slippage recently with X that we’re working with them to try to get back to those standards. And I think one of the factual issues we sometimes struggle with is our perception of what is clearly a criminal offence.

“They can sometimes suggest that it doesn’t meet the threshold for their community guidelines, which I find difficult to reconcile really because surely if it meets the criminal prosecution threshold, surely it should breach [their guidelines], and we sometimes have a wrangle about securing information from them.”

A challenge is dealing with international police forces with two-thirds of referrals of racism generated overseas – beyond the jurisdiction of the football policing unit.

While not naming particular countries, Mr Roberts said abuse posted from Eastern Europe and Asia is the main problem.

“The level of interest from some countries varies,” he said. “Some just aren’t interested. We won’t get a response. Others will try and take positive action.”

The approach of English football can seem somewhat disjointed if different campaigns and anti-racism investigations run by different parts of the game.

For Mr Roberts, that could ideally be enhanced.

“I would like a joint function to tackle online hate with ourselves, the football bodies, Kick It Out and others, ideally supported by government, so that we can do it in a really coherent, joined-up way,” he said in our interview at Cheshire Police HQ.

“I think that would make a massive difference, whether it’s education, whether in-stadium hate, whether it’s online hate.

“The way we’re going to tackle this most effectively is by doing it in a joined-up way where we’re mutually supportive. So I think that’s something we’d be keen to pursue.”

So would those who have been the target of abuse just for doing what they love – playing football.

‘No one wants to talk about this’

Kira Rai, a role model for British South Asians in football, said: “Perhaps there needs to be an overhaul, everyone needs to come together and actually deal with these uncomfortable conversations because they’re not necessarily fun conversations that we have.

“No one really wants to talk about this, and I can understand why. For real change, for genuine change to actually occur, you have to have these difficult conversations.

“You have to listen to player stories, to fan stories, to anyone’s stories in football, in society, to actually get to the bottom of it.”

And as some players showed last weekend in the Women’s Super League, change doesn’t come by taking a knee, but taking a stand.

UK

Millions of people could each get hundreds of pounds in compensation over car loan mis-selling

Published

7 hours ago

October 7, 2025

admin

Millions of people could each get hundreds of pounds in compensation over car loan mis-selling

Up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700 in compensation due to car loan mis-selling, the financial services regulator has said.

Nearly half (44%) of all car loan agreements made between April 2007 and November 2024 could be eligible for payouts, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.

Those eligible for the compensation will have had a loan where the broker received commission from a lender.

Lenders broke the law by not sharing this fact with consumers, the FCA said, and customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.

A scheme is seen by the FCA as the best outcome for consumers and lenders, as it avoids the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, therefore minimising delay, uncertainty and administration costs.

The scheme will be funded by the dozens of lenders involved in the loans, and cost about £8.2bn, on the lower end of expectations, which had been expected to reach as much as £18bn.

The figure was reached by estimating that 85% of eligible applicants will take part in the scheme.

What if you think you’re eligible?

Anyone who believes they have been impacted should contact their lender and has a year to do so. Compensation will begin to be paid in 2026, with an exact timeline yet to be worked out.

The FCA said it would move “as quickly as we can”.

People who have already complained do not need to take action. Complaints about approximately four million loan agreements have already been received.

There’s no need to contact a solicitor or claims management firm, the FCA said, as it aimed for the scheme to be as easy as possible.

A lender won’t have to pay, however, if it can prove the customer could not have got cover anywhere else.

The number of people who will get a payout is not known. While there are 14.2 million agreements identified by the FCA, the same person may have taken out more than one loan over the 17-year period.

More expensive car loans?

Despite the fact many lenders have to contribute to redress, the FCA said the market will continue to function and pointed out the sector has grown in recent years and months.

In delivering compensation quickly, the FCA said it “can ensure that some of the trust and confidence in the market can be repaired”.

It could not, however, rule out that the scheme could mean fewer offers and more expensive car loans, but failure to introduce a scheme would have been worse.

The FCA said: “We cannot rule out some modest impacts on product availability and prices, we estimate the cost of dealing with complaints would be several billion pounds higher in the absence of a redress scheme.

“In that scenario, impacts on access to motor finance and prices for consumers could be significantly higher with uncertainty continuing for many more years.”

UK

Kemi Badenoch repeatedly refuses to say whether she admires Nigel Farage

Published

10 hours ago

October 7, 2025

admin

Kemi Badenoch repeatedly refuses to say whether she admires Nigel Farage

Kemi Badenoch has repeatedly refused to say whether she admires Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.

Speaking to Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby, the Tory leader said she did not “understand the question” when asked if she held her rival in high regard.

Politics latest: Education secretary won’t say if Jewish students are safe on campus

Asked what she thought of Mr Farage, whose party is currently leading in the polls, Ms Badenoch replied: “I think it’s very interesting that a lot of the media in Westminster is very interested about asking about Nigel Farage.

“I’m not interested in Nigel Farage, I’m interested in the Conservative Party.”

Ms Badenoch was speaking against the backdrop of the Conservative Party conference in Manchester, where the party has announced a string of policies, including a promise to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and “ICE-style” deportations if she wins the next election.

The announcements have been interpreted as an attempt to respond to the threat posed by Reform, who have already announced plans to leave the ECHR and carry out mass deportations.

Last month, they also vowed to scrap indefinite leave to remain, which gives people the right to settle, work and study in the UK and claim benefits, and to make obtaining British citizenship the only route to permanent residence in Britain.

However, the Conservatives have sought to use their conference to distinguish themselves from Reform, branding their spending plans “socialist”.

It comes despite a poll of Tory members by YouGov showing that 64% support an electoral pact with Reform, while almost half of Tory members – 46% – would support a full-blown merger.

Speaking to Sky News, Ms Badenoch admitted there was “a lot we could do better” given the Conservatives had dropped in the polls from 26% to 17% and her personal poll ratings stood at -47.

But she said: “I don’t let these things distract me. The fact of the matter is that last year we lost in a historic defeat. We never had so few MPs, and it’s going to take time to come back from that.

“I am absolutely determined to get our party out of this, but I always said that things would get worse before they got better because we’d be out of government.”

The conference has been dominated by questions of collaboration with Reform, after 20 Tory councillors announced they were defecting to Reform – on top of the eight who have moved to Nigel Farage’s party since March.

On Monday, Tory MP Andrew Rosindell said he believed the Conservatives and Reform needed to work together.

“I’ve made it clear all the way through, and nothing has changed, that I am for the Conservatives and Reform working together,” he told GB News.

“We need right-of-centre unity to defeat the left.

“If that means the Conservatives and Reform working together, we should do it. I don’t see Reform as our enemies. It’s a split on the right, and we need to come together.”

Put to her that the Tories may need to work with Reform, Ms Badenoch ruled out a pact and told Beth Rigby: “I’m not interested in doing pacts. I was not elected to have a pact with Reform.

“I was elected to change the Conservative Party, make it clear what we stand for and that’s what I’ve done at this conference.

“Robert Jenrick is not the leader of the Conservative Party, neither is Andrew Rosindell. I am.”