Connect with us

Published

on

The Crown Jewels have been protected at the Tower of London since the 1660s, but their history remains controversial.

Known as the nation’s treasures, the Crown Jewels consist of over 100 items and over 23,000 gemstones, the Historic Royal Palaces website says.

A significant part of the Royal Collection, the Crown Jewels includes items such as orbs, sceptres and crowns – some of which the King and Queen held and wore during the coronation at Westminster Abbey.

The Cullinan diamond – the largest diamond ever found – is just one of the many diamonds that will be in the spotlight during the coronation ceremony.

It again entered the public eye when cuts of the original diamond sat atop the royal sceptre and in Queen Camilla’s crown, where it was substituted for the even more controversial diamond, the Koh-i-noor.

Here’s a look back at its history – and why those two jewels, in particular, are so controversial.

Who was Thomas Cullinan?

Thomas Cullinan, a businessman who worked in South Africa, is known for giving his name to the largest diamond ever discovered in the country.

He moved to Johannesburg in 1887, where he first became a bricklayer and after earning some money, he found an interest in sales and business.

In 1897, Cullinan moved to Parktown, where he discovered the Premier diamond fields a year later.

Cullinan soon became the co-founder of what came to be The Transvaal Chamber of Industries – a mining-industry employer organisation.

He continued to grow in his career and in 1910, Cullinan was knighted for his work in the diamond industry.

How did the diamond end up in the UK?

According to the Cape Town Diamond Museum, the diamond was first discovered at the Premier Mine in Pretoria, South Africa, by Fedrick Wells in 1905.

The Cullinan diamond was only a fragment of an even bigger stone that was still not yet discovered – it weighed 3,106 carats (621.2 grams).

The stone was carefully sent off to England and to keep it safe, detectives from London were asked to send out replicas and decoys in public to throw off potential thieves.

After the Anglo-Boer War, the South African Transvaal government bought the diamond from Cullinan and later presented and gifted it to Britain’s King Edward VII in 1907.

What are Cullinan I and Cullinan II?

The Imperial State Crown which contains the Cullinan II diamond
Image:
The Imperial State Crown which contains the Cullinan II diamond

The diamond was then entrusted to what is now known as The Royal Asscher Diamond Company.

King Edward VII invited the Asscher brothers to London to discuss cutting the diamond into different pieces.

The original diamond was “the size of a human heart”, the Royal Asscher website says.

After months of careful planning and studying, it was decided that Joseph Asscher who founded the company would cleave the Cullinan into nine major stones and 96 smaller stones.

There were two diamonds amongst those that weighed the most.

These were known as the Cullinan I and Cullinan II.

King Edward VII of England. Pic: AP
Image:
King Edward VII of England. Pic: AP


Cullinan I became known as the Star of Africa and Cullinan II became known as The Lesser Star of Africa.

In 1910, after King Edward’s death, King George V had the Cullinan I and Cullinan II set in the sovereign’s sceptre and Imperial State Crown respectively.

The 96 smaller stones were given to the Asschers as their fee for cutting the diamond.

‘The diamond’s gift in 1907 was controversial’

As the royals prepare their Crown Jewels for the upcoming ceremony, the question of right and wrong surrounds them – with growing calls for the royals to return the cuts of the diamond to their homeland.

Dr Matt Graham, a senior lecturer in African history at the University of Dundee, said: “The journey of this diamond [The Cullinan] from South Africa to the monarchy is part of imperial networks, empire, and colonial rule, where resources from across the world were extracted for the benefit of Britain.

“There are demands within South Africa for reparations and the return of the gem because it is a powerful symbol of empire.”

Read more on Sky News:

A brooch containing Cullinan cuts was on display at Buckingham Palace in 2012. Pic: Reuters
Image:
A brooch containing Cullinan cuts was on display at Buckingham Palace in 2012. Pic: Reuters

After the death of Queen Elizabeth II, both the Cullinan I and II were placed on display.

While the late Queen was laid to rest, criticism arose of the late monarch for never formally apologising for Britain’s colonial past in South Africa.

And so, the Cullinan diamond remains wrapped in the timeline of colonial history, which raises the question of whether the cuts of it should return to the land where the original stone was found.

Last year, activists in South Africa also petitioned for the cuts to be returned and placed in a South African museum instead.

Professor Saul Dubow from the faculty of history at the University of Cambridge told Sky News the Cullinan diamond was controversial, but it also played a role in the dispute within “white politics”.

He said: “The diamond’s gift in 1907 was controversial, but it was principally a matter of dispute within white politics, specifically, about the gift as a gesture to win the support of the Crown and British Liberal opinion in the aftermath of the Boer War.”

Queen's Mary Crown, which will contain cuts of the Cullinan diamond when it is worn by Camilla at her coronations, is seen in 1952
Image:
Queen Mary’s Crown, which will contain cuts of the Cullinan diamond when it is worn by Camilla at her coronation, is seen in 1952

Professor Dubow said the hope at the time was that “this would facilitate reconciliation between English and Dutch-speakers. Further Cullinan stones were gifted to Queen Mary by the new South African government of Louis Botha and Jan Smuts – both of whom had fought against British imperialism – on the achievement of independence from Britain in 1910.”

He continued: “Political union was indeed achieved at the cost of black South Africans. But it is hard to see a direct connection between the gift of the diamond and the loss of African rights.

“Some campaigners are now arguing that the diamond should be restored to Africa because it came out of African soil and that the colonial government had no right to give it away in the first place.

“The crown’s designation of the Cullinan as the ‘Great Star of Africa’ may thus be an unintentional hostage to fortune!”

What is the Koh-i-noor diamond and why is it controversial?

Earlier this year, Buckingham Palace released a statement confirming the Koh-i-noor diamond would not be worn by the Queen Consort.

The East India Company seized the historic treasure in 1849 when it was presented to Queen Victoria and became part of the Crown Jewels.

The Koh-i-noor diamond, also known as “Mountains of Light” in Persian, has also been the centre of controversy over the years with political and legal disputes regarding its original owner.

In 2016 the All India Human Rights and Social Justice Front, a non-governmental organisation, filed a lawsuit seeking its return.

However, Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar told India’s Supreme Court in New Delhi it was given to Queen Victoria in 1850 by a 19th-century Sikh king.

“It was given voluntarily by Ranjit Singh to the British as compensation for help in the Sikh Wars. The Koh-i-noor is not a stolen object,” he said.

But the debate of ownership and its painful past continues to this day.

A spokesman for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party reportedly said last year – before the decision was made to remove it: “The coronation of Camilla and the use of the crown jewel Koh-i-noor brings back painful memories of the colonial past.

“Most Indians have very little memory of the oppressive past. Five to six generations of Indians suffered under multiple foreign rules for over five centuries.

“Recent occasions, like Queen Elizabeth II’s death, the coronation of the new Queen Camilla and the use of the Koh-i-noor does transport a few Indians back to the days of the British Empire in India,” he added.

The King’s Coronation

King Charles III is crowned with St Edward's Crown during his coronation ceremony in Westminster Abbey, London. Picture date: Saturday May 6, 2023. PA Photo. See PA story ROYAL Coronation. Photo credit should read: Victoria Jones/PA Wire
Image:
King Charles III crowned with St Edward’s Crown

Queen Camilla was crowned with Queen Mary’s Crown – reset with cuts of the Cullinan diamond – which was originally commissioned for the coronation of Mary of Teck as Queen Consort at the coronation of King George V in 1911.

Queen Camilla is crowned with Queen Mary's Crown during her coronation ceremony at Westminster Abbey, London. Picture date: Saturday May 6, 2023. PA Photo. See PA story ROYAL Coronation. Photo credit should read: Jonathan Brady/PA Wire
Image:
Queen Camilla crowned with Queen Mary’s Crown

The King was crowned with the St Edward’s Crown, a solid gold crown set with precious stones. The crown weighs 2.23kg (nearly 5 lbs).

The grand event will be celebrated on Saturday 6 May 2023, across the weekend, with 2,000 guests set to attend the ceremony at Westminster Abbey.

There will also be processions, a concert, and nationwide lunches to commemorate the historic crowning ceremony.

To find out more about what’s happening across the weekend – you can see full details here.

Continue Reading

UK

The father of Jihad al Shamie has called for unity, one week on from deadly attack

Published

on

By

The father of Jihad al Shamie has called for unity, one week on from deadly attack

The father of the Manchester synagogue attacker has called for unity, as the community marked one week on from the assault which claimed the lives of two men.

People gathered outside the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation in Crumpsall at 9.30am, the time of the attack last Thursday, to pray and mourn the victims.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Jihad al Shamie was shot dead by police after launching his car and knife attack as worshippers gathered on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.

In a statement posted on Facebook, al Shamie’s father Faraj wrote: “The recent tragic act of terror has brought deep pain – to our family and to the families of the victims. Our hearts and prayers are with them.

“No one should ever experience such suffering again. We must all stand together – united, vigilant and compassionate – to prevent such acts and protect the peace of our communities.”

Adrian Daulby, 53, is believed to have been shot dead by police while attempting to prevent al Shamie from entering the synagogue.

Mervyn Cravitz, 66, also died while trying to keep the attacker from entering the building. Three other people remain in hospital.

More on Manchester

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Manchester synagogue terrorist: what we know now

Rabbi Daniel Walker told the congregation that “evil will not prevail” and called for “deep resolve” from the community.

There was applause from the crowd for Greater Manchester Police, with a large presence of officers at the event, for their response on the day of the attack.

Raphi Bloom, a board member of the Jewish Representative Council, said there was a feeling of anger in the community as “we were screaming this would happen and no one listened”.

He told Sky News: “Our feelings are still of mourning, of fear and of isolation. We feel very alone. We’re very, very angry that this was allowed to happen and fearful that it will happen again.

“But we won’t be cowed and we won’t be beaten.”

Read more:
Attacker was ‘monster’ who ‘tried every door’
Ex-wife of man injured in attack says he ‘no longer wants to live in UK’

All six people who were arrested and questioned by police on suspicion of terrorism offences have now been released without charge.

Counter Terrorism Policing North West Assistant Chief Constable Rob Potts said: “This does not mean our investigation has concluded.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Police: Synagogue attacker ‘made 999 call’

Police have confirmed that al Shamie dialled 999 during the attack, claiming responsibility and pledging allegiance to Islamic State.

They have reiterated that he had never been referred to the government’s anti-terror Prevent programme and was not known to counter-terror policing.

“This remains a live counter terrorism investigation,” they said.

Events have been taking place across the country to mark one week on from the attack.

Continue Reading

UK

Phones creating ‘epidemic of disconnection’ in families, says Princess of Wales

Published

on

By

Phones creating 'epidemic of disconnection' in families, says Princess of Wales

The Princess of Wales has said smartphones and computer screens create “an epidemic of disconnection” within families.

Kate’s words – in an essay co-written with a Harvard professor – come ahead of a visit to Oxford to highlight her work on early years education and support.

In the piece, she says that “while new technology has many benefits, we must also acknowledge that it plays a complex and often troubling role in this epidemic of disconnection”.

“While digital devices promise to keep us connected, they frequently do the opposite,” writes the princess.

“Our smartphones, tablets, and computers have become sources of constant distraction, fragmenting our focus and preventing us from giving others the undivided attention that relationships require.”

Emphasising how she believes technology can interfere in family life, she adds: “We sit together in the same room while our minds are scattered across dozens of apps, notifications, and feeds.

“We’re physically present but mentally absent, unable to fully engage with the people right in front of us.

More on Princess Of Wales

“This technological interference strikes at something fundamental: our undivided attention is the most precious gift we can give another person. Yet, increasingly, it’s the most difficult gift to offer.”

The Prince and Princess of Wales have previously spoken about the potentially harmful effects of social media.

Kate says technology is increasingly interfering in family life
Image:
Kate says technology is increasingly interfering in family life

In a recent interview, Prince William revealed that their three children, George, Charlotte and Louis, currently don’t have mobile phones, and that they try to have dinner together.

Kate’s essay, titled The Power of Human Connection in a Distracted World, was released by her Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood and written in collaboration with Professor Robert Waldinger.

Read more from Sky News:
William hints at ‘changes’ to come when he is king
William says he misses late Queen and Prince Philip

Kate first met the Harvard academic in 2022 and he’s worked closely with the Royal Foundation ever since.

“We live increasingly lonelier lives, which research shows is toxic to human health, and it’s our young people (aged 16 to 24) that report being the loneliest of all, the very generation that should be forming the relationships that will sustain them throughout life,” write the princess and the professor.

Later today, the princess will visit Home‑Start Oxford to meet volunteers and families, and talk about how they are using resources and films produced by the Centre for Early Childhood to help parents and children.

Continue Reading

UK

Murderer jailed for attacking Glasgow man with ‘napalm cocktail’ before stabbing him in heart

Published

on

By

Murderer jailed for attacking Glasgow man with 'napalm cocktail' before stabbing him in heart

A murderer who threw “prison napalm” over a man before stabbing him in the heart has been jailed for at least 20 years.

Gavin Gallagher, 33, claimed he was acting in self-defence when he launched the boiling water and sugar mix over Stephen Gray, 23, before knifing him.

However, he was convicted of murder and accused of staging the crime scene in an attempt to cover his tracks.

In his sentencing statement, Judge Lord Mulholland told Gallagher: “I was not surprised that the jury rejected self-defence and provocation.

“It seemed to me that your defence of self-defence was staged, and your lies unravelled.”

Stephen Gray. Pic: Police Scotland
Image:
Stephen Gray. Pic: Police Scotland

The fatal attack occurred at a block of flats in Glasgow’s Southcroft Street on 3 November 2023.

Lord Mulholland said Mr Gray was bare chested when Gallagher threw the boiling water and sugar mix over him.

More on Crime

The concoction is often referred to as “prison napalm” due to being used by inmates during assaults.

The judge said the vast majority of burns were to Mr Gray’s back.

Lord Mulholland said: “He was bare chested, and the burns caused by what you did must have been very painful. You can see that from the photographs of his injuries.”

Gallagher then stabbed Mr Gray twice with a large kitchen knife.

The judge said: “One of these blows penetrated his heart and caused massive bleeding which led to his death. This injury was unsurvivable.

“You then did what you could to set up a defence of self-defence in an attempt to cover your tracks.

“You placed a knife alongside his dying body and said to a neighbour that it was the deceased’s knife.

“You told anyone who would listen that you killed him in self-defence.”

Read more from Sky News:
Sentencing of ‘evil Jesus’ postponed
Man arrested over deadly California fire

Gallagher was convicted of murder at the High Court in Glasgow last month.

He returned to the dock for sentencing on Wednesday, when he was handed a life sentence with at least 20 years in jail.

Detective Superintendent Hannah Edward said: “Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Stephen and while we know nothing can change what has happened, I hope this brings them some degree of closure as they try to move forward.

“This was a shocking attack and Gallagher will now face the consequences of his despicable actions.”

Continue Reading

Trending