Connect with us

Published

on

The Scottish government has been accused of attempting to “interfere in the independence of the judiciary” amid a row over plans to pilot juryless rape trials.

Lawyers across the country are expected to join what looks set to be a unanimous boycott of the scheme, which was proposed last month as part of a new justice reform bill.

All rape and attempted rape trials in Scotland are currently held before a jury of 15 people, who listen to the evidence and decide whether the accused is innocent, guilty, or the charges not proven.

Under the new proposals being put forward, ministers will have the power to carry out a pilot of rape trials being conducted by a single judge without a jury.

Although more than 80% of criminal trials in Scotland are already conducted without a jury, according to the Scottish government, lawyers across the country intend to boycott Holyrood’s plans to introduce the scheme to rape cases.

The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association has confirmed at least 10 groups have voted against the proposals.

President Julia McPartlin said lawyers in Aberdeen, Airdrie, Dumfries, Dundee, Edinburgh, Falkirk, Glasgow, Hamilton, Highland and Moray, and Paisley will boycott the plans.

More on Aberdeen

In a statement, the association said: “The proposed pilot is a clear attempt to interfere in the independence of the judiciary and the court process by the Scottish government.

“The motivation behind this pilot is to increase the conviction rate for rape at any cost.

“The bill proposes that judges appointed to the pilot court can be removed apparently without reason.

“Security of tenure is a fundamental safeguard against interference by the government in the independence of the judiciary.

“Furthermore, the workings of the pilot court will be subject to review. These are unprecedented proposals.”

The Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill aims to address a number of issues around serious sexual offences, including a bid to scrap the controversial “not proven” verdict.

It also proposes to reduce the size of criminal juries from 15 to 12 – the same number as those in England.

Former senior judge Lord Uist previously described the plans for single-judge rape trials as “constitutionally repugnant” and accused ministers of “treating the courts as forensic laboratories in which to experiment with their policies”.

Speaking to Sky News on Monday, Aberdeen Bar Association vice president Ian Woodward-Nutt told Sky News: “It is a danger. This level of political meddling is something that we should all be deeply concerned about.”

Mr Woodward-Nutt said using juries in the most serious cases means they are “protected from public scrutiny” and bring a “breadth of real-life experience” to their decision-making.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Bill to scrap ‘not proven’ verdict published

Read more:
Scotland’s ‘not proven’ verdict to be scrapped
‘Not proven’ verdict needs review to boost low rape conviction rates

Aberdeen lawyers join Glasgow and Edinburgh in boycott of juryless rape trials pilot

In the most recent figures, conviction rates for rape and attempted rape were 51%, compared with 91% for all other crimes.

Mr Woodward-Nutt said the lower conviction rate is not “down to some defect in the system”.

He explained that in rape cases it’s rare to have an independent witness and it’s normally the account of a complainer against an accused – which means it is “very difficult” for the prosecution to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt.

Mr Woodward-Nutt noted that the plans were being brought in to increase the number of convictions.

He said: “That’s an astonishing starting point for any programme of this type.”

The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association highlighted that the jury selection process protects against prejudice or misconceptions that might be held by a minority, and jurors are free to make decisions without pressure or undue influence.

Jurors are also given specific directions by judges and a jury manual used by judges to form their directions to the jury also contains detailed instructions on the many situations where consent is an issue.

The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association said: “We are of the view that existing measures and the jury selection process are sufficient to ensure a fair consideration of the evidence presented in rape trials.”

Scotland’s Justice Secretary Angela Constance said: “It is disappointing that some criminal defence lawyers oppose a recommendation of a review carried out by Lady Dorrian, Scotland’s second most senior judge, to improve how the justice system treats rape victims by piloting judge-only rape trials.

“There is overwhelming evidence that jurors are subject to preconceptions about rape that can impact the verdicts they reach – which is not the case in other serious crime trials.

“Over 80% of criminal trials in Scotland are already conducted without a jury. We have worked closely with the legal sector and will continue to do so during the development and evaluation of the pilot.”

Continue Reading

UK

Ex-officer breaks down after Manchester bomb plotter’s prison assault

Published

on

By

Ex-officer breaks down after Manchester bomb plotter's prison assault

An alleged attack by the Manchester Arena bomb plotter on prison officers at a high-security jail “will stick with” those impacted “for the rest of their lives”, a former officer and colleague of the victims has said.

Hashem Abedi is accused of violently assaulting officers at HMP Frankland in Durham last weekend, using hot cooking oil and an improvised, or homemade, weapon.

He was serving his sentence in a separation unit, known as a “jail within a jail”, after being found guilty of 22 counts of murder for helping his brother Salman Abedi carry out a suicide bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in 2017.

The attack has raised fresh questions about the safety of prison staff.

Inmates inside separation units had access to cooking facilities, which has now been suspended.

Hashem Abedi
Image:
Abedi was moved back to Belmarsh after the alleged attack

‘It will stick with them for life’

Matthew, who only wants to be referred to by his first name, worked with the officers who were hospitalised following the attack.

“I’ve spoken to ex-colleagues who I’m still friends with,” he told Sky News.

“They’ve not discussed the specifics of the incident, but they’ve said it will stick with them for the rest of their lives.”

Matthew broke down as he described the “obscene” and “ludicrous” levels of violence that staff face inside prison.

He’s worked at a number of different jails.

“I’ve been there when you’re mopping your colleagues’ blood… when you’ve seen a serious assault, and you don’t know if they’re gonna be OK, and then 10 minutes later, you’ve got to get back on with your day, you’ve got to carry on running the regime,” he said.

“It is difficult, and it is awful.”

Matthew worked with the officers who were hospitalised following the attack by Hashem Abedi at HMP Frankland
Image:
Matthew worked with the officers who were hospitalised

‘No adequate protection’

There were 10,496 assaults against prison staff in England and Wales in the 12 months to September – a 19% rise on the previous year.

“The reality is there’s no adequate protections for prison staff, and that’s a great frustration,” the general secretary of the Prison Officers’ Association union, Steve Gillan, told Sky News.

Having visited HMP Frankland earlier in the week, and spoken to many of the officers who were involved, Mr Gillan described the mood among colleagues as one of “anger, frustration, and sadness”.

The association, which represents prison officers, is calling for a “reset” – and for staff to be given stab-proof vests and tasers in “certain circumstances”.

Read more:
Prisons now 98.9% full
Fewer criminals to be jailed

General Secretary of the Prison Officers’ Association, Steve Gillan
Image:
Steve Gillan

‘The entire system needs to change’

Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she shared “the country’s shock and anger” at the attack.

The government has launched a review that will look at how it was able to happen, and will also consider how separation centres are run.

The Prison Service is also conducting a “snap” review into whether protective body armour should be available to frontline staff.

But ex-officer Matthew said “nobody is ever truly safe” in the prison service, with staff facing “impossible challenges every day”.

“The entire system needs to change,” he added. “From the ground up.”

Continue Reading

UK

The British economy has lost out – and questionable meat and cheese ban is a reminder of why

Published

on

By

The British economy has lost out - and questionable meat and cheese ban is a reminder of why

Unwary travellers returning from the EU risk having their sandwiches and local delicacies, such as cheese, confiscated as they enter the UK.

The luggage in which they are carrying their goodies may also be seized and destroyed – and if Border Force catch them trying to smuggle meat or dairy products without a declaration, they could face criminal charges.

The new jeopardy has come about because last weekend, the government quietly “extended” its “ban on personal meat imports to protect farmers from foot and mouth”.

This may or may not be bureaucratic over-reaction.

It’s certainly just another of the barriers EU and UK authorities are busily throwing up between each other and their citizens – at a time when political leaders keep saying the two sides should be drawing together in the face of Donald Trump’s attacks on European trade and security.

Starmer and Macron meeting at Chequers last month. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Keir Starmer’s been embarking on a reset with European leaders. Pic: Reuters

The ban on bringing back “cattle, sheep, goat, and pig meat, as well as dairy products, from EU countries into Great Britain for personal use” is meant “to protect the health of British livestock, the security of farmers, and the UK’s food security.”

There are bitter memories of previous outbreaks of foot and mouth disease in this country, in 1967 and 2001.

In 2001, there were more than 2,000 confirmed cases of infection resulting in six million sheep and cattle being destroyed. Footpaths were closed across the nation and the general election had to be delayed.

In the EU this year, there have been five cases confirmed in Slovakia and four in Hungary. There was a single outbreak in Germany in January, though Defra, the UK agriculture department, says that’s “no longer significant”.

The UK imposed bans on personal meat and dairy imports from those countries, and Austria, earlier this year.

Authorities carry disinfectant liquid near a farm during an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Dunakiliti, Hungary. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Authorities carry disinfectant near a farm in Dunakiliti, Hungary. Pic: Reuters

Better safe than sorry?

None of the cases of infection are in the three most popular countries for UK visitors – Spain, France, and Italy – now joining the ban. Places from which travellers are most likely to bring back a bit of cheese, salami, or chorizo.

Could the government be putting on a show to farmers that it’s on their side at the price of the public’s inconvenience, when its own measures on inheritance tax and failure to match lost EU subsidies are really doing the farming community harm?

Many will say it’s better to be safe than sorry, but the question remains whether the ban is proportionate or even well targeted on likely sources of infection.

Read more: The products you can’t bring into Britain from the EU

Gourmet artisan chorizo sausages on display on a market stall. File pic: iStock
Image:
No more gourmet chorizo brought back from Spain for you. File pic: iStock

A ‘Brexit benefit’? Don’t be fooled

The EU has already introduced emergency measures to contain the disease where it has been found. Several thousand cattle in Hungary and Slovenia have been vaccinated or destroyed.

The UK’s ability to impose the ban is not “a benefit of Brexit”. Member nations including the UK were perfectly able to ban the movement of animals and animal products during the “mad cow disease” outbreak in the 1990s, much to the annoyance of the British government of the day.

Since leaving the EU, England, Scotland and Wales are no longer under EU veterinary regulation.

Northern Ireland still is because of its open border with the Republic. The latest ban does not cover people coming into Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey, or the Isle of Man.

Rather than introducing further red tape of its own, the British government is supposed to be seeking closer “alignment” with the EU on animal and vegetable trade – SPS or “sanitary and phytosanitary” measures, in the jargon.

Various types of cheese. Pic: iStock
Image:
A ban on cheese? That’s anything but cracking. Pic: iStock

UK can’t shake ties to EU

The reasons for this are obvious and potentially make or break for food producers in this country.

The EU is the recipient of 67% of UK agri-food exports, even though this has declined by more than 5% since Brexit.

The introduction of full, cumbersome, SPS checks has been delayed five times but are due to come in this October. The government estimates the cost to the industry will be £330m, food producers say it will be more like £2bn.

With Brexit, the UK became a “third country” to the EU, just like the US or China or any other nation. The UK’s ties to the European bloc, however, are much greater.

Half of the UK’s imports come from the EU and 41% of its exports go there. The US is the UK’s single largest national trading partner, but still only accounts for around 17% of trade, in or out.

The difference in the statistics for travellers are even starker – 77% of trips abroad from the UK, for business, leisure or personal reasons, are to EU countries. That is 66.7 million visits a year, compared to 4.5 million or 5% to the US.

And that was in 2023, before Donald Trump and JD Vance’s hostile words and actions put foreign visitors off.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: ‘Europe is free-loading’

More bureaucratic botheration

Meanwhile, the UK and the EU are making travel between them more bothersome for their citizens and businesses.

This October, the EU’s much-delayed EES or Entry Exit System is due to come into force. Every foreigner will be required to provide biometric information – including fingerprints and scans – every time they enter or leave the Schengen area.

From October next year, visitors from countries including the UK will have to be authorised in advance by ETIAS, the European Travel and Authorisation System. Applications will cost seven euros and will be valid for three years.

Since the beginning of this month, European visitors to the UK have been subject to similar reciprocal measures. They must apply for an ETA, an Electronic Travel Authorisation. This lasts for two years or until a passport expires and costs £16.

The days of freedom of movement for people, goods, and services between the UK and its neighbours are long gone.

The British economy has lost out and British citizens and businesses suffer from greater bureaucratic botheration.

Nor has immigration into the UK gone down since leaving the EU. The numbers have actually gone up, with people from Commonwealth countries, including India, Pakistan and Nigeria, more than compensating for EU citizens who used to come and go.

Focaccia sandwiches with prosciutto. Pic: iStock
Image:
Editor’s note: Hands off my focaccia sandwiches with prosciutto! Pic: iStock

Will European reset pay off?

The government is talking loudly about the possible benefits of a trade “deal” with Trump’s America.

Meanwhile, minister Nick Thomas Symonds and the civil servant Mike Ellam are engaged in low-profile negotiations with Europe – which could be of far greater economic and social significance.

The public will have to wait to see what progress is being made at least until the first-ever EU-UK summit, due to take place on 19 May this year.

Hard-pressed British food producers and travellers – not to mention young people shut out of educational opportunities in Europe – can only hope that Sir Keir Starmer considers their interests as positively as he does sucking up to the Trump administration.

Continue Reading

UK

Paria Veisi: Police investigating disappearance of woman in South Wales find her body – as man charged with murder

Published

on

By

Paria Veisi: Police investigating disappearance of woman in South Wales find her body - as man charged with murder

Police investigating the disappearance of a woman who was last seen leaving work have found her body – as a man has been charged with murder.

Paria Veisi, 37, was reported missing after leaving work in Cardiff at around 3pm on 12 April.

Her disappearance was described by police as “totally out of character” and prompted a widespread search.

Her Mercedes GLC 200 was later found on Dorchester Avenue in the Penylan area of Cardiff on the evening of Tuesday 15 April.

Her body was discovered at an address in Penylan on Saturday, South Wales Police said.

Read more from Sky News:
Sky News uncovers new evidence on aid workers attack
The Godfather-style gang war gripping two cities

A 41-year-old man from Penylan has been charged with murder, preventing lawful and decent burial of a dead body and assaulting a person occasioning them actual bodily harm.

A 48-year-old woman from London has been charged with preventing a lawful and decent burial of a dead body and conspiring to pervert the course of justice.

They both appeared at Cardiff Magistrates’ Court on Saturday.

“This brings our search for Paria to a sad and tragic end,” said Detective Chief Inspector Matt Powell.

“Paria’s family, all those who knew her, and those in her local community, will be deeply saddened and shocked by these latest developments.

“Family liaison officers are continuing to support Paria’s family.”

Continue Reading

Trending