Connect with us

Published

on

On Wednesday, Google previewed what could be one of the largest changes to the search engine in its history.

Google will use AI models to combine and summarize information from around the web in response to search queries, a product it calls Search Generative Experience.

related investing news

Google redeems itself with an impressive A.I. showcase as it scrambles to catch up to Microsoft

CNBC Investing Club
Google's 'full frontal A.I. attack' at developers conference boosts analyst confidence in its long-term dominance

CNBC Pro

Instead of “ten blue links,” the phrase that describes Google’s usual search results, Google will show some users paragraphs of AI-generated text and a handful of links at the top of the results page.

The new AI-based search is being tested now for a select group of users and isn’t widely available yet. But website publishers are already worried that if it becomes Google’s default way of presenting search results, it could hurt them by sending fewer visitors to their sites and keeping them on Google.com.

The controversy highlights a long-running tension between Google and the websites it indexes, with a new artificial intelligence twist. Publishers have long worried that Google repurposes their verbatim content in snippets on its own website, but now Google is using advanced machine learning models that scrape large parts of the web to “train” the software to spit out human-like text and responses.

Rutledge Daugette, CEO of TechRaptor, a site focusing on gaming news and reviews, said that Google’s move was made without considering the interests of publishers and Google’s AI amounts to lifting content.

“Their focus is on zero-click searches that use information from publishers and writers who spend time and effort creating quality content, without offering any benefit other than the potential of a click,” Rutledge told CNBC. “Thus far, AI has been quick to reuse others’ information with zero benefit to them, and in cases like Google Bard doesn’t even offer attribution as to where the information it’s using came from.”

Luther Lowe, a longtime Google critic and chief of public policy at Yelp, said that Google’s update is part of a decades-long strategy to keep users on the site for longer, instead of sending them to the sites that originally hosted the information.

“The exclusionary self-preferencing of Google’s ChatGPT clone into search is the final chapter of bloodletting the web,” Lowe told CNBC.

According to SearchEngineLand, a news website that closely tracks changes to Google’s search engine, the AI-generated results are displayed above the organic search results in testing so far.

SGE comes in a differently colored box — green in the example — and includes boxed links to three websites on the right side. In Google’s primary example, all three of the website headlines were cut off.

Google says that the information isn’t taken from the websites, but is instead corroborated by the links. SearchEngineLand said the SGE approach was an improvement and a “healthier” way to link than Google’s Bard chatbot, which rarely linked to publisher websites.

Some publishers are wondering if they can prevent AI firms such as Google from scraping their content to train their models. Companies such as the firm behind Stable Diffusion are already facing lawsuits from data owners, but the right to scrape web data for AI remains an undecided frontier. Other companies, such as Reddit, have announced plans to charge for access to their data.

Leading the charge in the publishing world is Barry Diller, Chairman of IAC, which owns websites including All Recipes, People Magazine and The Daily Beast.

“If all the world’s information is able to be sucked up into this maw, and then essentially repackaged in declarative sentences, in what’s called chat, but it isn’t chat — as many grafs as you want, 25 on any subject — there will be no publishing, because it will be impossible,” Diller said last month at a conference.

“What you have to do is get the industry to say that you cannot scrape our content, until you work out systems where the publisher gets some avenue towards payment,” Diller continued, saying that Google will face this problem.

Diller says he believes publishers can sue AI firms under copyright law and that current “fair use” restrictions need to be redefined. The Financial Times reported on Wednesday that Diller is leading a group of publishers “that is going to say we are going to change copyright law if necessary.” An IAC spokesperson declined to make Diller available for an interview.

One challenge facing publishers is confirming that their content is being used by an AI. Google did not reveal training sources for its large language model that underpins SGE, PaLM 2, and Daugette says while he’s seen examples of quotes and review scores from competitors repurposed on Bard without attribution, it’s hard to tell when the information is from his site without directly linked sources.

Google didn’t respond to a request for comment. “PaLM 2 is trained on a wide range of openly available data on the internet and we obviously value the health of the web ecosystem. And that’s really part of the way we think about how we build our products, to ensure that we have a healthy ecosystem where creators are a part of that thriving ecosystem,” Google VP of Research Zoubin Ghahramani said in a media briefing earlier this week.

Daugette says that Google’s moves make being an independent publisher tough.

“I think it’s really frustrating for our industry to have to worry about our hard work being taken, when so many colleagues are being laid off,” Daugette said. “It’s just not okay.”

CNBC’s Jordan Novet contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

Technology

Chinese autonomous driving firm Pony.ai sees shares drop 12% in Hong Kong debut

Published

on

By

Chinese autonomous driving firm Pony.ai sees shares drop 12% in Hong Kong debut

A Pony.ai autonomous car.

Pony.ai

China’s Pony.ai on Thursday saw its shares drop over 12%, while rival WeRide fell nearly 8% as the autonomous driving companies began trading in Hong Kong.

Pony.ai and WeRide, which are already listed in the U.S., raised 6.71 billion Hong Kong dollars (about $860 million) and HK$2.39 billion, respectively in their initial public offerings.

The companies are striving to keep pace with larger competitors such as Baidu‘s Apollo Go in China and Alphabet‘s Waymo in the U.S. amid growing interest in autonomous technologies.

Pony.ai and WeRide, both headquartered in Guangzhou, China, stated that funds would go toward scaling efforts, and the development of Level 4 autonomous driving — a measure of driving automation that does not require human monitoring or intervention under specific environments. 

WeRide CEO Tony Xu Han told CNBC that proceeds from the latest fundraising would also be used to boost the company’s artificial intelligence capabilities and data center capacity.

The listings in Hong Kong come as the companies seek to expand outside of China, where they have already begun operating fully autonomous robotaxis in some cities. 

The new regions include the Middle East, Europe and Asian countries such as Singapore. They have yet to receive full approvals to operate their robotaxis in most of those regions.

In the U.S., both companies are aiming for a partnership with California-based Uber to allow them to deploy their robotaxis on the firm’s ride-hailing platform after receiving regulatory approval.  

However, their U.S. plans face headwinds as earlier this year the government finalized a rule effectively banning Chinese technology in connected vehicles, including self-driving systems. 

“With the uncertainty in the markets around the world and the fact that there would be intense scrutiny on a Pony or WeRide trying to enter the U.S. market, a dual listing is a lot about risk mitigation,” said Tu Le, founder and managing director at Sino Auto Insights. 

He added that the listings were also an acknowledgement that it’s gonna take a lot of capital and an endorsement of a market outside the U.S. for Pony.ai and WeRide to succeed.

In U.S. trading on Wednesday, shares Pony.ai closed down about 2%, while WeRide fell 5.3%.

Hong Kong IPO shift

Pony.ai and WeRide’s competing listings highlight a recent trend of Chinese companies seeking dual listings in Hong Kong, which has been a bounce-back year for the city’s IPO market.  

The companies received approval from Hong Kong regulators to dual list in mid-October. 

“For the HK stock exchange, clustering the listing at the same time helps to reinforce investor perception of HK as a tech-hub for Asia-focused technology companies,” Rolf Bulk, equity research analyst at New Street Research told CNBC. 

In May, Chinese battery manufacturer and technology company CATL completed a secondary listing in Hong Kong, raising $5.2 billion in the world’s largest IPO so far this year.

The growing trend emerges amid geopolitical tensions and regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. 

According to New Street Research’s Bulk, the Hong Kong listings for Pony.ai and WeRide will help the companies gain access to Asia-based capital and expand their presence in China and the region.

“However, it will do nothing to advance the progress of their technology stack and regulatory approvals in Western markets. If anything, gaining approval in Western markets may be more challenging with a HK secondary listing,” he added. 

The listings could also help the firms keep up with competitors such as Baidu‘s Apollo Go in China and Alphabet‘s Waymo in the U.S., which currently have larger fleets. 

“Pony and WeRide are right up there among the global leaders,” said Sino Auto Insights’ Le. “WeRide has diversified their service portfolio a bit more but they both see Uber and the Middle East as two viable partners in their ability to get more pilots launched outside of China.”

“Investors should pay special attention to how their technology evolves with AI and other new tools becoming more mainstream,” Le said.

— CNBC’s Elaine Yu contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Technology

Microsoft letting employees raise concerns about products after Middle East controversy

Published

on

By

Microsoft letting employees raise concerns about products after Middle East controversy

Microsoft President Brad Smith speaks at a press conference at the Representation of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia about future visions for the development and application of artificial intelligence in education in NRW in Berlin on June 4, 2025.

Soeren Stache | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

Microsoft is giving employees a way to raise concerns about the uses of its technology after controversy emerged over the company’s work in the Middle East.

An internal portal for Microsoft’s 200,000-plus workers now includes an option to request a “Trusted Technology Review,” Brad Smith, the company’s president, wrote in a memo that was disclosed in a securities filing on Wednesday. It’s designed for bringing up misgivings about the ways Microsoft builds and uses technology, he said.

“Our standard non-retaliation policy applies, and you can raise concerns anonymously,” Smith wrote.

The move comes weeks after Microsoft stopped providing some services to an Israeli defense unit. In August, The Guardian said the Israeli Defense Forces’ Unit 8200 had built a system in Microsoft’s Azure cloud for tracking Palestinians’ phone calls as part of the country’s invasion of Gaza, leading Microsoft to investigate the newspaper’s assertions.

Employees protested the company’s work with Israel, leading to firings and resignations.

Microsoft’s business has been on a tear, with its stock reaching a record last week, as OpenAI and other companies have deepened their reliance on Azure for running artificial intelligence models. Yet there’s been internal stress due to layoffs, return-to-office mandates and controversy surrounding Microsoft’s contracts.

A media report in July also described the U.S. Defense Department’s dependence on Microsoft engineers located in China.

Microsoft, which celebrated its 50th birthday in April, now sees opportunities to boost its governance.

“We are working to strengthen our existing pre-contract review process for evaluating engagements that require additional human rights due diligence,” Smith wrote.

WATCH: Microsoft sees ‘huge’ challenge and great opportunity as global economy enters a new phase, president says

Microsoft president: 'Huge' challenge and great opportunity as global economy enters a new phase

Continue Reading

Technology

Doordash stock sinks 9% as company misses earnings, says it expects further spending

Published

on

By

Doordash stock sinks 9% as company misses earnings, says it expects further spending

A DoorDash bag on a bicycle in New York, US, on Tuesday, May 6, 2025.

Yuki Iwamura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

DoorDash reported third-quarter earnings that missed analyst expectations and said it expects to spend “several hundred million dollars” on new initiatives and development in 2026.

The stock sank 9% following the report.

Here’s how the company did compared to LSEG estimates:

  • Earnings: 55 cents per share vs 69 cents per share expected
  • Revenue: $3.45 billion vs $3.36 billion expected.

“We wish there was a way to grow a baby into an adult without investment, or to see the baby grow into an adult overnight, but we do not believe this is how life or business works,” the company wrote in its earnings release to explain the boosted spending.

DoorDash said it is developing a new global tech platform that progressed in 2025 but is expected to accelerate in 2026, noting the direct and opportunity costs in the near term. The company announced its Dot autonomous delivery robot in September.

The food delivery platform’s revenue increased 27% from a year earlier.

DoorDash posted net income of $244 million, or 55 cents per share, in Q3, up from $162 million, or 38 cents per share, a year ago.

Read more CNBC tech news

Total orders grew 21% over the prior year to 776 million during the quarter that closed Sept. 30, just above the 770.13 million expected by FactSet.

The company expects Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter in the range of $710 million to $810 million, a midpoint of $760 million. Analysts polled by FactSet expected $806.8 million for Q4.

DoorDash closed its acquisition of British food delivery company Deliveroo on Oct. 2, a deal that valued the UK company at about $3.9 billion.

The company expects a depreciation and amortization expense of $700 million for the fiscal year, exclusive of the acquisition. A stock-based compensation expense of $1.1 billion is also expected for fiscal 2025.

DoorDash expects Deliveroo to add $45 million to adjusted EBITDA in Q4 and about $200 million to adjusted EBITDA in 2026.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Doordash one-day stock chart.

Continue Reading

Trending