Connect with us

Published

on

LABUAN BAJO Indonesian President Joko Widodo had strong words for those who criticised the lack of progress in implementing a peace plan undertaken by Asean to resolve the Myanmar crisis.

Indonesia, the rotating chair of the regoinal bloc, said it had adopted a quiet non-megaphone policy in trying to end the violence in Myanmar. It made more than 60 engagements with various stakeholders, but detractors have lamented the slow progress and demanded stiffer action against Myanmars military regime.

Engagement does not mean recognition, which was why I had conveyed at the Asean meeting that Asean unity is very important. Without unity, it is easy for other parties to divide Asean and I am sure that no Asean country wants that, he said at a press conference on Thursday to close the two-day Asean Summit in Labuan Bajo, in East Nusa Tenggara province.

No party inside or outside Asean should take advantage of the internal conflict in Myanmar. Violence must be stopped, and the people must be protected, he added.

The five-point consensus was forged by Asean in April 2021 as a way of trying to resolve the crisis triggered by the Myanmar militarys coup in February that year, which has seen thousands of civilians killed and hundreds of thousands displaced.

It called for a dialogue among all parties, an immediate halt to violence in Myanmar, the appointment of an Asean special envoy to facilitate mediation, humanitarian assistance, and a visit by an Asean delegation to Myanmar to meet all concerned parties.

Chairing a retreat session earlier in the day, Mr Widodo called for unity in Asean to chart our way forward in resolving the crisis in military-controlled Myanmar. He acknowledged that no significant progress has been made in the peace plan.

However, I have to be honest… theres been no significant progress in the implementation of the five-point consensus, so unity in Asean is needed to chart our way forward, he told his counterparts.

Mr Widodo, or Jokowi as he is better known, acknowledged that Aseans credibility is at stake as the consensus not only called for engagement with all stakeholders, but also that inclusivity is upheld. Indonesia, as the 2023 rotating chair, is ready to talk to anyone including the junta and all stakeholders in Myanmar for the interests of Myanmar.

In fact, Indonesia has engaged many parties in Myanmar to look for solutions although we dont always talk about it, he stressed, adding that there were many parties with many interests involved.

We will continue to involve more stakeholders in Myanmar to create as many dialogues as possible, he said. We hope Myanmar also has political commitment to (hold) dialogue internally between them. I need to emphasise once again that engagement does not mean recognition. This is clear.

At the press conference, Mr Widodo said: Asean is a very strong family, its unity is very important to sail towards the same goal.

In the chairmans statement issued at the close of the summit, Asean leaders reiterated their unified position that the five-point consensus remains the blocs main point of reference.
The leaders also strongly condemned recent attacks on a humanitarian convoy in Myanmar.

Separately, Singapores Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told Singapore reporters on the sidelines of the summit that the plans still serve a purpose.

It signals that all is not well, that progress has to be made, that meanwhile, problems in Myanmar cannot hold back Aseans work and Aseans cooperation, and Aseans engagement with dialogue partners around the world. And this format, I think, has a symbolic purpose as well as important practical consequences. There is no reason to change this format, because no progress has been made, said PM Lee. PM Lee Hsien Loong speaking to Singapore reporters on the sidelines of the Asean Summit on May 11, 2023. ST PHOTO: GAVIN FOO Myanmar remains a member state of Asean, and it has been invited to participate in the blocs meetings at a non-political level, which PM Lee said was a wearable solution.

I think we should not just say, You dont want to talk, I dont want to talk we stand off forever.

You dont want to talk, I continue to want to talk to you, and we will try to make efforts to try and make it possible for you to come back to our deliberations at the political level. More On This Topic Asean a life raft for regions countries in a more troubled world: PM Lee Asean unity needed to achieve significant progress in peace plan for Myanmar, says Jokowi At the same time, there is also a need to engage with various parties in Myanmar. PM Lee said there is a need to try and influence things for the better so that these parties can talk to one another and humanitarian assistance can be given, if possible, so that the violence can stop.

Its very hard to do. It will take a long time, he added.

Indonesias Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi, who was at the press conference with Mr Widodo, said lack of progress on the implementation of the consensus does not mean Asean has to give up, especially give up the principle in the Asean Charter which, among other things, states that decision-making shall be based on consultation and consensus with member nations.

At a doorstop after the press conference, Ms Retno told reporters that some progress has been achieved in implementing the peace plan, like access to stakeholders in the distribution of humanitarian assistance.

Now access has been given, so they can make consultations with other stakeholders… and we will continue to extend the delivery of human assistance.

In response to a question by The Straits Times on the division of views among leaders in handling the crisis, Ms Retno said it is very normal that there are different points of view.

But what seems clear is that all leaders agree on the importance of the urgency to implement the five-point consensus. We are still united and strong in seeing the urgency in implementing it, she added.

She said: Not having reached common ground does not mean there will be no solution. We will try again and again. And the well-being of the people is the priority. More On This Topic Asean must stay cohesive and united, given troubled external environment, says PM Lee Asean leaders want immediate end to violence in Myanmar, urge inclusive talks

Continue Reading

Politics

Bill preventing children from ‘doom scrolling’ to get govt backing – but plan watered down

Published

on

By

Bill preventing children from 'doom scrolling' to get govt backing - but plan watered down

A Labour MP’s bill to prevent children from “doom scrolling” on social media is expected to get government backing today, after its proposals were watered down.

Josh MacAlister, a former teacher, has been campaigning for tighter limits on younger teenagers spending hours a week on apps such as TikTok and Snapchat.

He told Sky News that today’s bill, which will be debated by MPs, was a “meaningful first step” towards making children safer online and hoped it would be “just the start” of government action on the issue.

The MP had originally called for a smartphone ban in schools, tougher action by Ofcom and raising the “digital age of consent” at which children can use most social media to 16.

But in the face of ministerial opposition, his bill now just calls for chief medical officers to review the evidence on screen-based harms – which was last looked at in 2019 – within a year.

File pic: PA
Image:
File pic: PA

When that review is complete, the government must decide whether there is a case to raise the age at which children can use social media from the current age of 13.

Mr MacAlister said: “We’ve managed to persuade lots of MPs and make a big noise about this issue, which is that for too many children, smartphones and social media are really addictive and taking a lot of their time and attention.

More on Online Safety Bill

“That issue for too long hasn’t been debated in parliament. My private members’ bill will get the government to come back within a year on the question of raising the age of digital consent, and that would be a really important step forward in this campaign to make sure that parliament takes these issues seriously.

“We chose 13 a long, long time ago. Is that right? You know, in Norway it’s 15. In France it’s 15. I’m asking them to consider, ‘should we be setting it at a higher age?’

“Different countries are trying different things out, but they all start with the same common problem, which is kids spending lots of time online that they used to spend in real life outdoors, doing things with their friends.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From December: Government cracks down on social media

Charities urge minister to back bill

Asked if he was disappointed that ministers had not been willing to go further, he said: “This is just the start. If you look back at previous debates about smoking or car seatbelts, often it was dozens of pieces of legislation that led to the conclusion.”

Mr MacAlister, the MP for Whitehaven and Workington, will tell MPs that changing the age at which a child can consent for their data to be shared online to 16 would give parents more control, and force platforms to enforce more rigorous age verification.

A minister will respond to the plans, which have attracted cross-party support. It’s expected that the government will agree to take the proposals further.

Ten children’s charities, including Barnardo’s and the NSPCC, have written to Peter Kyle urging him to support the bill, saying that the online world poses “significant risks to children” and that “current legislation does not go far enough” in restricting screen time.

Read more:
Loophole in law on apps ‘leaves kids vulnerable to abuse’
Websites hosting pornographic content must have age checks by July – Ofcom

It’s understood that the tech secretary wanted to make sure the Online Safety Act, which was passed by MPs in 2023 and is being implemented in stages this year, is completed first. It intends to protect young people from illegal and harmful content.

The government has opposed a smartphone ban in schools, saying this should be up to headteachers.

Today, the most extensive polling of young people aged 16-24 shows that 62% of this age group say social media does more harm than good, both men and women.

Only 22% of the 2,000 young adults polled by the company More in Common think it does more good than harm.

Four in five of this age group also say they would try to keep their own children off social media for as long as possible.

Half of this generation, who grew up with smartphones, agree they spent too much time on their phones and social media during childhood.

Read more from Sky News:
Killer convicted of raping ex-girlfriend before murdering her
Nigel Farage hits back at one of his own Reform MPs

‘This isn’t just parents’

Anna McShane, director of The New Britain Project, which commissioned the polling, said: “This isn’t just parents worrying about their kids, young people themselves are saying social media has become more addictive, more negative, and more harmful.

“They’ve grown up with it, and now they’re warning us about its dangers.”

A Department for Technology spokesperson added: “We are committed to keeping young people safe online whilst also ensuring they can benefit from the latest technology.

“By the summer, robust new protections for children will be in force through the Online Safety Act to protect them from harmful content and ensure they have an age-appropriate experience online.

“The government’s response to the private members’ bill will follow during second reading of the bill, as per parliamentary process.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves: ‘People want to talk me down… I’ll prove I can do it’

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves: 'People want to talk me down... I'll prove I can do it'

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Beth’s been to 11 Downing Street to talk to the chancellor for Electoral Dysfunction.

She took some of your questions (and a couple of Electoral Dysfunction mugs) with her.

Rachel Reeves reflects on her first few months in the job, explains what she thinks of the “Rachel from Accounts” label and shares her own money-saving tip which she tries to do every day when at Downing Street.

She also hints on what might come in her Spring Statement with some strong words on the need for welfare reform.

Email us at electoraldysfunction@sky.uk, post on X to @BethRigby, or send a WhatsApp voice note on 07934 200 444.

And remember, you can also watch us on YouTube!

Continue Reading

Technology

Cryptocurrencies decline as Trump’s U.S. bitcoin reserve plan falls short of expectations

Published

on

By

Cryptocurrencies decline as Trump's U.S. bitcoin reserve plan falls short of expectations

Jakub Porzycki | Nurphoto | Getty Images

Cryptocurrencies fell Thursday night after President Donald Trump signed an executive order creating a strategic bitcoin reserve for the United States and, separately, a “digital asset stockpile.”

The price of bitcoin was last lower by 3% at $87,586.86, according to Coin Metrics. Shortly after the news broke, it fell to as low as $84,688.13.

Earlier losses in other coins – specifically those that rallied at the beginning of the week after Trump said they would be included in the strategy – also eased. Ether was down 2%, trading at $2,184.08. XRP and Solana’s SOL token retreated 1% and 3%, respectively. Cardano’s ADA token tumbled 13%.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Bitcoin (BTC)

White House crypto and AI czar David Sacks detailed in a post on X that the bitcoin reserve will include bitcoin already owned by the U.S. government that it seized from past law enforcement actions – a move, he emphasized, that will “not cost taxpayers a dime.” The U.S. currently owns more than 198,000 bitcoins worth about $17 billion, according to Arkham.

The stockpile of other coins will include “digital assets other than bitcoin forfeited in criminal or civil proceedings.” Sacks said the government will not acquire additional assets for it “beyond those obtained through forfeiture proceedings.” Arkham data shows the U.S. government owns about 56 ether tokens worth almost $119 million. It does not list XRP or the Solana or Cardano tokens.

Investors initially dumped their coins at the notion of the U.S. having no immediate planned purchases of bitcoin, per the order, against the backdrop of major weakness in equities.

“It is good news, but not what the market wanted in the short term,” said Steven Lubka, head of private clients and family offices at Swan Bitcoin. “People were hoping for near-term buy pressure.”

Sacks did point out that the Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce are authorized to develop “budget-neutral strategies for acquiring additional bitcoin, provided that those strategies have no incremental costs on American taxpayers,” and that there’s no plan to accumulate additional assets for the crypto stockpile beyond what’s already been obtained by the government.

The announcement came days after Trump teased new details on the highly anticipated bitcoin reserve that had become one of his biggest promises to the crypto industry on his campaign trail, and on the eve of the first White House Crypto Summit.

The crypto market has been rocked this week by the tariff war and inflation concerns, which have largely overshadowed the speculative excitement around the bitcoin reserve. JPMorgan on Wednesday said it doesn’t expect a big move higher in crypto in the near term, given the broader economic uncertainty and weakening demand.

Bitcoin briefly returned to the key $90,000 level earlier this week and is now hovering just below it. Investors and analysts have warned that until bitcoin can meaningfully hold above it, it’s at risk of a bigger pullback toward $70,000.

James Lavish of Bitcoin Opportunity Fund reacts to proposed U.S. strategic crypto reserve

Don’t miss these cryptocurrency insights from CNBC Pro:

Continue Reading

Trending