Connect with us

Published

on

For all its seaside delights, Margate in Kent is one of the most deprived parts of the UK. Amid the cost of living crisis, many families are struggling to make ends meet.

Falling ill can become a headlong plunge into poverty – as Kyra Lloyd, a 25-year-old shop assistant, discovered when she began experiencing agonising pain in her ankle and she was left unable to stand.

“I started getting some very horrible, horrible pains. My foot was completely swollen, I couldn’t move.”

Doctors told Kyra the metalwork holding her bones together since a childhood fracture had snapped – and without surgery she could end up permanently in a wheelchair.

During the long wait for treatment she was signed off work. But statutory sick pay barely covered half her rent – let alone any other living expenses.

“I’m in so much debt now because of it,” she says.

“I have about £3,000 in debt from borrowing from people and getting loans because I just couldn’t afford to live. I couldn’t pay my rent. It’s just not enough.

More from Politics

It’s embarrassing to ask people when you can’t even afford to eat.

“I ended up having just gravy and bread for dinner because I just couldn’t afford it – the question was do I have a roof over my head or food? No one should have to choose.

“Even things like washing your clothes… I was having to wash them in the bath at one point because I just couldn’t afford to use that much electricity. It’s so difficult. It’s not right.”

Kyra has now recovered and has a new job, but she’s constantly worried about the pain coming back.

“Every time I feel a slight twinge in my foot, I think – I can’t afford to go back on sick pay, I can’t afford another surgery. It’s a huge stress.”

Christopher Balmont
Image:
Statutory sick pay will only cover a quarter of Christopher Balmont’s normal income

Christopher Balmont, 57, has been working as a head chef in a restaurant for more than a decade. His partner is unable to work as she cares for their daughter, who has special educational needs.

Earlier this week, he was signed off work with depression and anxiety. Statutory sick pay will only cover a quarter of his normal income – and the stress of how to pay the bills is making his condition worse.

“I don’t sleep, I feel anxious most of the time, and this makes me even more anxious,” he says.

“I’m worried about the whole situation and the amount you get. I would have thought it would be more. I haven’t had to claim it before, so it’s just a bit of a shock. And I had no choice. If I had a choice I’d be at work.

“It’s not just me that’s suffering from my illness, it’s my family as well.”

Read More:
Call for more help to get millions of long-term sick back into employment

While around half of workers are offered more generous levels of sick pay by their employers, a third are only entitled to the legal minimum.

What is statutory sick pay and how does it work?

Statutory sick pay is currently £109.40 a week, which works out at around a third of the minimum wage.

It is only paid from the fourth consecutive day of illness – during COVID this was temporarily changed so workers were entitled to support from day one, but that stopped last year.

Your employer does not have to pay if your average weekly earnings are less than £123 a week.

This means two million of the country’s lowest paid workers receive no sick pay at all – a situation which particularly affects those in jobs like cleaning, caring and security where zero-hours contracts are common and staff often work shifts for multiple employers. Self-employed people are not covered either.

In 2019, the government pledged to improve and expand statutory sick pay to cover all low-paid workers for the first time.

The idea was strongly supported in the resulting public consultation, with 75% of respondents in favour, including large and small employers. But during the pandemic that promise was abandoned.

Research on minimum income standards

Matt Padley, from Loughborough University’s centre for research in social policy, has calculated the impact of falling ill and relying on statutory sick pay in the light of his research on minimum income standards.

He and his team produce the annual minimum income standard calculation, which determines the weekly budget needed by households to maintain a socially acceptable standard of living in the UK.

For a single person living outside London that figure in 2022 was £489.20 a week.

Under statutory sick pay, a worker’s earnings are less than 25% of what they would need just to meet that minimum standard.

In the first week of illness, when payment only begins from the fourth day, that figure is 10%.

Within a month, a single adult previously on average earnings of £630 a week would face a shortfall of £1,230 – in three months, it’s £3,862.

“Without any other support from the state, all workers receiving statutory sick pay or no sick pay would fall well short of what they need for a minimum socially acceptable standard of living,” Mr Padley says.

That equates to more than 12 million people.

People are being forced onto benefits system

The campaign group Safe Sick Pay, a coalition of charities and trade unions, is calling for statutory sick pay to be increased in line with the minimum wage, for all employees to be covered, and for payments to begin on the first day of illness.

“Currently if these workers fall sick, they either have to go into work sick – making their condition worse and potentially infecting other people – or they stay at home and do the right thing, but then they’re left unable to pay the bills,” says campaign director Amanda Walters.

She argues low rates of statutory sick pay are forcing people onto the benefits system – as levels of support are significantly higher.

“If you fall sick and you only get the legal minimum sick pay then very quickly you’re going to fall out of the workforce, going onto benefits and to universal credit. And the longer you’re on universal credit, the harder it is to get back into the workforce.

“That is why we want to see a link between those that are sick and their employer not pushing them onto universal credit.

“A lot of these people want to remain in work. They don’t want to go onto universal credit. And at the moment, the current system is costing the taxpayer £55bn.”

‘Sick pay reform is overdue’

Encouraging people to return to employment after a period of long-term sickness was a key priority of the chancellor’s “Back to Work” budget in March.

But statutory sick pay was not mentioned, and some senior Tories, including former cabinet minister Sir Robert Buckland, argue sick pay reform has to be part of the strategy.

Robert Buckland
Image:
Sir Robert Buckland is calling for sick pay reform

“Now’s the time for action,” he says.

“We’re talking about hundreds of thousands of people who, through no fault of their own, might get ill and who end up staying off work for longer because of the disincentives that are caused at the moment by the lack of reach of statutory sick pay.

“We need a range of measures to combat economic inactivity and lack of productivity. And it seems to me that a reform to stop sick pay is overdue.

‘A win-win for employers’

“It’s not just a compassionate move, it’s a common-sense move. It’s a pro-business move. It’s a productivity enhancing move.

“It’s a win-win for employers, because at the moment there’s a disincentive to even announce any illness at all, and that can lead to further problems down the line. And very often longer-term absence is disastrous for small employers who really get hit hard by that.”

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said the government has a “strong track record” of getting people off benefits and back into work, and that the number of people who are economically inactive is going down.

“We are implementing a range of initiatives supporting disabled people and people with health conditions not just to start, but to stay and succeed in work,” they added.

Continue Reading

Business

Donald Trump has finally blinked – but it’s not the stock markets that have forced him to act

Published

on

By

Donald Trump has finally blinked - but it's not the stock markets that have forced him to act

Chalk this one up to the bond vigilantes.

This is the term used periodically to describe investors who push back against what are perceived to be irresponsible fiscal or monetary policies by selling government bonds, in the process pushing up yields, or implied borrowing costs.

Most of the focus on markets in the wake of Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs on the rest of the world has, in the last week, been about the calamitous stock market reaction.

This was previously something that was assumed to have been taken seriously by Mr Trump.

During his first term in the White House, the president took the strength of US equities – in particular the S&P 500 – as being a barometer of the success, or otherwise, of his administration.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks, as he signs executive orders and proclamations in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 9, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard
Image:
Donald Trump in the Oval Office today. Pic: Reuters

He had, over the last week, brushed off the sour equity market reaction to his tariffs as being akin to “medicine” that had to be taken to rectify what he perceived as harmful trade imbalances around the world.

But, as ever, it is the bond markets that have forced Mr Trump to blink – and, make no mistake, blink is what he has done.

More from Money

To begin with, following the imposition of his tariffs – which were justified by some cockamamie mathematics and a spurious equation complete with Greek characters – bond prices rose as equities sold off.

That was not unusual: big sell-offs in equities, such as those seen in 1987 and in 2008, tend to be accompanied by rallies in bonds.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What it’s like on the New York stock exchange floor

However, this week has seen something altogether different, with equities continuing to crater and US government bonds following suit.

At the beginning of the week yields on 10-year US Treasury bonds, traditionally seen as the safest of safe haven investments, were at 4.00%.

By early yesterday, they had risen to 4.51%, a huge jump by the standards of most investors. This is important.

The 10-year yield helps determine the interest rate on a whole clutch of financial products important to ordinary Americans, including mortgages, car loans and credit card borrowing.

By pushing up the yield on such a security, the bond investors were doing their stuff. It is not over-egging things to say that this was something akin to what Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng experienced when the latter unveiled his mini-budget in October 2022.

And, as with the aftermath to that event, the violent reaction in bonds was caused by forced selling.

Sky graphic showing the US 30-year treasury yield

Now part of the selling appears to have been down to investors concluding, probably rightly, that Mr Trump’s tariffs would inject a big dose of inflation into the US economy – and inflation is the enemy of all bond investors.

Part of it appears to be due to the fact the US Treasury had on Tuesday suffered the weakest demand in nearly 18 months for $58bn worth of three-year bonds that it was trying to sell.

But in this particular case, the selling appears to have been primarily due to investors, chiefly hedge funds, unwinding what are known as ‘basis trades’ – in simple terms a strategy used to profit from the difference between a bond priced at, say, $100 and a futures contract for that same bond priced at, say, $105.

In ordinary circumstances, a hedge fund might buy the bond at $100 and sell the futures contract at $105 and make a profit when the two prices converge, in what is normally a relatively risk-free trade.

So risk-free, in fact, that hedge funds will ‘leverage’ – or borrow heavily – themselves to maximise potential returns.

The sudden and violent fall in US Treasuries this week reflected the fact that hedge funds were having to close those trades by selling Treasuries.

More from Sky News:
What a global recession would mean
Is there method to the madness?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump freezes tariffs at 10% – except China

Confronted by a potential hike in borrowing costs for millions of American homeowners, consumers and businesses, the White House has decided to rein back its tariffs, rightly so.

It was immediately rewarded by a spectacular rally in equity markets – the Nasdaq enjoyed its second-best-ever day, and its best since 2001, while the S&P 500 enjoyed its third-best session since World War Two – and by a rally in US Treasuries.

The influential Wall Street investment bank Goldman Sachs immediately trimmed its forecast of the probability of a US recession this year from 65% to 45%.

Sky graphic showing the Nasdaq composite across the past fortnight

Of course, Mr Trump will not admit he has blinked, claiming last night some investors had got “a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid”.

And it is perfectly possible that markets face more volatile days ahead: the spectre of Mr Trump’s tariffs being reinstated 90 days from now still looms and a full-blown trade war between the US and China is now raging.

But Mr Trump has blinked. The bond vigilantes have brought him to heel. This president, who by his aggressive use of emergency executive powers had appeared to be more powerful than any of his predecessors, will never seem quite so powerful again.

Continue Reading

Business

News Corp to take stake in London-listed marketing group Brave Bison

Published

on

By

News Corp to take stake in London-listed marketing group Brave Bison

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation is in advanced talks to take a stake in a London-listed marketing specialist backed by Lord Ashcroft, the former Conservative Party treasurer.

Sky News has learnt that the media tycoon’s British subsidiary, News UK, is close to agreeing a deal to combine its influencer marketing division – which is called The Fifth – with Brave Bison, an acquisitive group run by brothers Oli and Theo Green.

Sources said the deal could be announced as early as Thursday morning.

News UK publishes The Sun and The Times, among other media assets.

If completed, the transaction would involve Brave Bison acquiring The Fifth with a combination of cash and shares that would result in News UK becoming one of its largest shareholders.

The purchase price is said to be in the region of £8m.

The Fifth has worked with the television host and model Maya Jama on a campaign for the energy drink Lucozade, and Amelia Dimoldenberg, the YouTube star.

More on Rupert Murdoch

Its other clients include Samsung and Tommee Tippee.

Read more business news
Could Trump’s tariffs tip the world into recession?
Unilever faces investor revolt over new chief’s pay package

The deal will be the third struck by Brave Bison this year, with the previous transactions including the purchase of Engage Digital, a key digital partner to sporting properties including the Men’s T20 Cricket World Cup.

The Green brothers took over the Brave Bison in 2020, and have overseen a sharp strategic realignment and improvement in its performance.

In 2023, it bought the podcaster and entrepreneur Steven Bartlett’s social media and influencer agency, SocialChain.

In total, the company has struck six takeover deals since the Greens assumed control.

At Wednesday’s stock market close, Brave Bison had a market capitalisation of about £31m.

News UK and Brave Bison declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Is there method to the madness amid market chaos? Why Trump would have you believe so

Published

on

By

Is there method to the madness amid market chaos? Why Trump would have you believe so

Is there method to the madness? Donald Trump and his acolytes would have you believe so. 

The US president is standing firm among all the market chaos.

Just this weekend, after US stock markets suffered their sharpest falls since the onset of the pandemic, Trump reposted a video on his social media platform Truth Social. This was its title: “Trump is purposefully CRASHING the market.”

Tariffs latest: ‘BE COOL’, Trump says as trade war escalates

The video claimed the president was engineering a flight to US government bonds, also known as treasuries – a safe haven in turbulent times. The video suggested Trump was deliberately throwing the stock market into chaos so investors would take their money out and buy bonds instead.

Why? Because demand for treasuries pushes up the price of the bonds, and that, in turn, lowers the yield on those bonds.

The yield is the interest rate on the debt, so a lower yield pushes down government borrowing costs. That would provide some relief for a government that has $9.2trn of government debt to refinance this year. Consumers also stand to benefit as the US Federal Reserve, the US central bank, would likely follow suit, feeling the pressure to cut interest rates.

A trader works on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
Image:
A trader works on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange. Pic: Reuters

Trump and his treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, have made it a key policy priority to lower yields. For a while, it looked like the plan was working. As stock markets tumbled in response to Trump’s tariffs agenda, investors ploughed their money into bonds instead.

However, Trump may have spoken too soon. On Monday, the markets had a change of heart and rapidly started selling government bonds. Thirty-year treasury yields hit 4.92% on Wednesday, their biggest three-day jump since 1982. That means government borrowing costs are rising – and not just in the US. The sell-off has spiralled to government bonds worldwide.

Rachel Reeves will be watching anxiously.­ Yields on ­Britain’s 30-year government bonds, also known as gilts, hit their highest level since May 1998. They registered a 27 basis point jump to 5.642% today – that’s on track to be the largest one-day move since the aftermath of former prime minister Liz Truss’ “mini-budget” in October 2022.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘These countries are dying to make a deal’

This is a big deal. It is the sharpest sell-off in the US bond market since the pandemic. Back then, investors also rushed into bonds before dumping them and the motivations, on one level, are similar.

In 2020, investors sold bonds because they had to cover losses elsewhere in their portfolios. When markets fall, as they have done over the past few days, lenders can demand that an investor who has borrowed money stump up more cash against the value of their loan because the collateral against those loans has fallen in value. This is known as a “margin call”. Government bonds are easy to sell as investors “dash for cash”.

There are signs that this may be happening again and central banks, which had to step in last time, are alert.

The Bank of England warned today of the growing risks to financial stability. “A sharp increase in government bond yields could crystallise relatively quickly,” it said.

There are other forces weighing on government bonds. With policy uncertainty unfolding in the US, investors could also be signalling that US debt isn’t the safe haven it once was. That loss of confidence also seems to have hurt the dollar, one of the world’s safest places to park your money. It’s had a turbulent journey but is down 1.15% against a basket of safe haven currencies since Trump announced widespread tariffs on 2 April.

Some are even wondering if China could be behind some of this, dumping US government debt as a revenge tactic to hurt a president who has explicitly said he wants bond yields to come down. The country holds $761bn of US government bonds, second only to Japan. If this is the case, then the US-China trade war could rapidly be evolving into a financial war.

Continue Reading

Trending