Google zeroed in on these 3 categories of climate companies to boost
More Videos
Published
3 years agoon
By
admin
The Voltpost team.
Photo courtesy Voltpost and Google.
Thursday marked the third Demo Day for the Google for Startups Accelerator: Climate Change program, where startups in the program presented the status of their startup, capping off 10 weeks of programming and mentorship from Google’s robust network of in-house experts, training, and credits to use Google technology.
This year, the 12 companies mostly fell into three broad categories: Artificial intelligence, electric vehicle infrastructure, and providing companies with better data to decarbonize their operations. There are a couple exceptions: For example, Sesame Solar is decarbonizing disaster response, and Bodhi is improving the customer experience for home solar installations.
Google’s startup accelerator programs are all focused on using artificial intelligence, and some have industry themes like gaming or the cloud economy, particular geographies like India or Brazil, or underrepresented founders like Black founders or Latino founders. All the programs are equity free, meaning Google does not take a stake in the companies for participating, and so far 1,100 startups have participated since the programs launched in 2016.
For this latest cohort, all of the participants had to be somewhere between their seed and series A rounds of investment, already generating revenue or with an established user base, with five employees or more, and with the potential to benefit from Google’s Cloud, artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities.
Soupid Roy Chowdhury, founder of Eugenie AI
Photo courtesy Eugenie AI and Google
Matt Ridenour, Head of Startup Ecosystem at Google in the U.S., told CNBC he derives a sense of meaning in supporting climate change startups.
“I care about climate tech for many reasons, but most personally, having three young children, I often think about the world that they are inheriting. When I read the headlines about the dangers of the climate crisis, I feel a personal obligation to be a part of supporting innovative climate solutions to scale,” Ridenour told CNBC. “This is one of the greatest gifts I believe I can offer to my children and future generations.”
The programs are also good for Google business because they get early stage companies using the company’s technology, giving it an early edge over competitors like Amazon, Microsoft and Apple.
“Google sees value in supporting the best startups and founders around the world. As they work with our people, products and tools, we mutually benefit. And supporting early stage companies sparks further innovation in the ecosystem, providing further opportunities for developers to build their business on Google products — like Cloud and Android for example,” Ridenour told CNBC.
Google has hosted three climate change startup accelerators for North American companies in the last three years, and all 33 of the participants are all still operating, a spokesperson for Google told CNBC.
The Sesame Solar team.
Photo courtesy Sesame Solar and Google.
Using artificial intelligence to fight climate change
Alphabet-owned Google is itself in the midst of a company-wide push to focus on improving its product offerings with artificial intelligence. Many of the companies in the latest climate change accelerator employ AI and machine learning to help with various tasks such as agricultural soil monitoring, decarbonization of commercial buildings, and improving the process of recycling textiles.
“Teams are leaning deeper into developing AI and ML models to address climate change,” Ridenour told CNBC. “By partnering with emerging technologies like these, startups can have an outsized positive impact, developing solutions and innovations faster and more accurately than ever before.”
Agrology helps farmers adapt to climate change by providing field-level data on smoke, drought, irrigation optimization, microclimate weather forecasts from extreme weather, pest and disease outbreaks. Also, Agrology has a system to monitor the carbon content in soil to help farmers quantify carbon sequestration they achieve with regenerative farming practices and, if they are interested, participate in the carbon credit markets.
The Agrology team working on a farm.
Photo courtesy Agrology and Google.
During the Google accelerator, Agrology made its product more accurate.
“Through mentorship they received in the accelerator, Agrology was able to build a new, more efficient API that uses integrated Google Machine Learning products, increasing their training and testing dataset by over 400%, and reducing their error rate by 4x,” Ridenour told CNBC. “This will help them deliver more accurate data to farmers so they can grow better and more sustainably.”
Another startup within the cohort, Cambio, is using AI to help companies decarbonize large commercial buildings.
“Once companies have set their climate pledges, they find that data tracking and decarbonization across any real estate, whether it’s owned or occupied, is the hardest part of their sustainability journey. Implementation remains a blackbox,” Stephanie Grayson, a co-founder of Cambio, said on Thursday during the demo day.
Cambio provides a baseline carbon footprint for a building, and then uses AI based on previous building projects and recommendations from leading building scientists and data scientists to provide the customer with a path on how to get that building to net-zero. “The bottom line is we’re democratizing best in class building science across the industry at large,” Grayson said.
Leia de Guzman and Stephanie Grayson, co-founders of Cambio.
Photo courtesy Cambio and Google.
“During the accelerator, Cambio was able to connect with Google’s real estate team to get direct product feedback and discuss the topic of decarbonizing buildings,” Ridenour told CNBC. “Armed with Cambio’s ML models, managers can plot an entire real estate portfolio’s path to net zero, a near-term requirement for publicly-traded companies as part of the SEC’s latest carbon emissions transparency proposal.”
Another example is Refirberd, which is using spectroscopy and artificial intelligence to sort recycled textiles, remove buttons and zippers, and send processed textiles to the recycler that can best manage that particular batch of textiles.
Eugenie.AI uses artificial intelligence to help heavy manufacturers track their emissions, report that data for any relevant compliance standards and reduce those emissions with recommendations on how to solve a particular problem.
Refiberd co-founders, Sarika Bajaj and Tushita Gupta.
Photo courtesy Refiberd and Google.
Electric vehicle infrastructure
“As cars become more and more electrified, a variety of startups are tackling the massive EV industry opportunity in creative ways,” Ridenour told CNBC. Indeed, 14% of new cars sold in 2022 that were electric, up from 9% in 2021 and less than 5% in 2020, according to the International Energy Agency.
Batt Genie, one of the startups Google picked for its most recent climate change cohort, was spun out of Venkat Subramanian’s labs at the University of Washington and uses software to improve the function and efficiency of lithium ion batteries, which are used in consumer electronics, electric vehicles and grid storage battery applications.
The battery management system, or BMS, in a lithium ion battery monitors how much charge is left and regulates charging. Batt Genie’s software aims to makes the BMS system more efficient and productive. If a traditional electric vehicle battery lasts for about six years, the same battery can last for 12 years with Batt Genie’s improved BMS, CEO Manan Pathak said on Thursday.
The Electric Fish team.
Photo courtesy Electric Fish and Google.
Another startup within the cohort, ElectricFish Energy, is making an energy storage system that both charges electric vehicles quickly which have smart chargers that store cheap, clean power from the grid when it is available.
“The current state of electric grid is fundamentally broken,” Anurag Kamal, CEO ElectricFish, said on Thursday. “We are the only ones who understands that EV charging is incredibly connected to feeding energy back to the grid itself,” meaning that the ElectricFish device can serve as a source of backup power.
Another company working to improve EV infrastructure is Voltpost, which converts lampposts into electric vehicle chargers. Voltpost has partnered with the New York City Department of Transportation to pilot its lamp posts into EV chargers. And Voltpost is also conducting a pilot at the Detroit Smart Parking Lab in Michigan. During the accelerator, Voltpost connected with the Google Maps team to discuss whether electric vehicle charging locations could be added to Google Maps or Android Auto.
Decarbonization data and reporting
The third area of focus for the startups included in the climate change cohort was improving the data companies use to track their own emissions.
“As governments require more carbon emissions reporting, companies need better data to track their emissions. Startups are offering better analysis and tracking to help customers and consumers understand their emissions and gain actionable recommendations on how to operate more sustainably,” Ridenour told CNBC.
For example, Cleartrace provides auditable emissions data for companies.
“The issue is data around the electricity space, the energy space, and the environmental reporting space, is very hard to come by, very siloed, very error prone,” CEO Lincoln Payton said on Thursday. Before starting Cleartrace, Payton was the head of investment banking for BNP Paribas Americas. “I retired from that to address the biggest issue I saw, which is the quality data available in the transfer to the renewable energy world.”
The Cleartrace team.
Photo courtesy Cleartrace and Google.
Cleartrace is particularly focused on measurement techniques for Scope 3 emissions — emissions associated with a company’s entire supply chain or value chain, which can be fiendishly difficult to track. It’s also looking at helping companies certify how green their operations are, particularly for processes like direct air capture of CO2 emissions and hydrogen production.
Another data-focused company is Finch, which puts sustainability scores on products to help consumers make more climate-conscious shopping decisions. Finch has a browser extension that works on Amazon and Target websites and gives products a sustainability rating between zero and ten, then suggests a more sustainable alternative if applicable.
“For most of the population who believes in climate change and wants to do something about it, but doesn’t necessarily have more than seven minutes to research it online, this is a perfect solution,” Lizzie Horvitz, the founder and CEO of Finch said on Thursday.
Finch sells the data it gathers from consumer behavior to clients, including manufacturers and investors, Horvitz said.
“We are able to see who is buying what and why — that women, for instance, between the ages of 35 and 40 are twice as likely to buy aluminum-free deodorant as men of the same age and location,” said Horvitz.
This kind of data closes what Horvitz calls the “say and do gap,” meaning the difference between what consumers say they will do in a focus group, and what they actually do at checkout.

You may like
Technology
The $500 billion Nvidia question, and 4 others, CEO Jensen Huang must answer tonight
Published
1 hour agoon
November 19, 2025By
admin
Nvidia earnings, the most important report of the quarter, will be out after Wednesday’s close, and AI rockstar CEO Jensen Huang will be on the hot seat to answer tough questions about the spiraling artificial intelligence spending promises and how these tech companies — big and not so big — are going to pay for them all. Club stock Nvidia has gained about 35% year to date, as of Tuesday’s close, trading around $181 each. That’s nearly double their lowest close of 2025 on April 4, just days after President Donald Trump first announced his so-called reciprocal tariffs. There have been a lot of twists and turns in U.S. trade policy since then, with Trump making tariff deals with several countries and still working to reach one with China. Shares of Nvidia, which have largely benefited from Trump’s trade pacts and its own blockbuster AI dealmaking, closed at a record high of $207 on Oct. 29 and marked their first close above a $5 trillion market cap. NVDA YTD mountain Nvidia YTD Along with the incredible rise in the stock price, Nvidia’s earnings have kept pace. As a result, the stock still trades at about 27 times fiscal 2027 earnings estimates, the lower end of the range over the past decade. The forward price-to-earnings multiple is that far out because Nvidia’s earnings calendar has the company releasing Wednesday evening its fiscal 2026 third quarter, which ended in October. Unlike other recent quarters, Nvidia stock is not red-hot going into the print, and expectations are more reasonable. That’s because the concerns about AI valuations that have hit the overall stock market have crept into the Nvidia trade. The stock has dropped 12% from its record close and trades around a $4.4 trillion market cap. What to expect — and why According to the consensus analyst estimates compiled by LSEG, Nvidia is expected to report a 53% year-over-year increase in fiscal Q3 earnings per share (EPS) to $1.25 on revenue of $54.92 billion, which would be a 56% increase over the year-ago period. Wall Street analysts, per FactSet data, are looking for a 59% October quarter rise in data center segment revenue to $49.04 billion. Looking to the current fiscal fourth quarter, which ends in January, analysts are looking for management to guide revenue to about $62.17 billion, with a roughly 74% gross margin. An additional indication that demand is strong came on Nov. 10, when we learned that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had reached out to key semiconductor manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor , asking that it increase wafer production. We believe this action was a clear indication that Huang expects the strong demand for Nvidia’s AI chips to continue and align with his “$500 billion in order visibility” comment he made at the company’s GTC event a few weeks ago. While there is a lot riding on Nvidia’s report, we do have a good sense of what it might say as it relates to the outlook for 2026. After all, the three biggest hyperscale cloud players – Club names Amazon and Microsoft , and Alphabet ‘s Google, as well as Club holding Meta Platforms – all made it quite clear that the spending they’re doing on AI infrastructure not only won’t slow down in 2026 but will increase. They all raised their spending outlooks, citing the need for far more computing power than currently available. In addition to the public companies forecasting more spending on AI infrastructure ahead, OpenAI is going around making massive commitments for more power and compute. Last week, we also learned that Amazon -backed Anthropic committed to building out $50 billion in data center infrastructure nationwide. Then, on Tuesday, Microsoft announced new partnerships with Anthropic and Nvidia. Anthropic pledged to buy $30 billion in Azure cloud capacity from Microsoft and additional compute from Nvidia’s Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin systems. In exchange, Microsoft will invest $5 billion into Anthropic, and Nvidia will put $10 billion into the startup. Sure, most, if not all, of these names are working internally on their own specialized chips. But we fully expect their spending with Nvidia to grow alongside their internal initiatives. There are still many benefits to working on a platform that is not only the industry standard for AI software development but also general-purpose in nature. It provides more flexibility and can support a wider range of applications, which is key to ensuring the capacity being built is able to be used no matter how customers’ needs and preferences may shift. That Nvidia flexibility can be seen when we look at what’s taking place with the neocloud players, like CoreWeave . In previewing CoreWeave’s quarter, analysts at Loop Capital noted that their checks before the release found “up to 8-year neocloud contracts being signed for Ampere,” in some cases at up to 90% of the original cost. That’s pretty shocking given that Nvidia’s Ampere is the predecessor to Hopper, which is the predecessor to Blackwell. In other words, the neocloud cohort is seeing so much demand against such a tight graphics processing unit (GPU) supply environment that they’re even willing to take chips originally released in mid-2020. That should ease any concerns over obsolescence, as it is clear that even two-generation-old chips have a place in today’s compute-starved world. In some cases, the older chips may even make more sense. According to Loop analysts, “While it’s true that Blackwell is more power efficient … it’s also true that Blackwell requires greater gross-power and that Ampere data centers are built in lower-power areas … and are constructed for air cooling. As such, it is more efficient to extend Ampere as is as opposed to taking the six months to retrofit the data centers for liquid cooling [needed for Blackwell] and lose the productivity while still being in a lower power area.” When reporting its quarter last Wednesday, CoreWeave reported a 134% increase in revenue and 271% increase in the revenue backlog, with CEO Michael Intrator calling out an operating environment that was “highly supply-constrained” due to “insatiable customer demand.” On the post-earnings call, Intrator backed Loop’s findings that older generation chips are still in high demand. “In Q3, we saw our first 10,000-plus H100 contract approaching expiration. Two quarters in advance, the customer proactively re-contracted for the infrastructure at a price within 5% of the original agreement. This is a powerful indicator of customer satisfaction as well as the long-term utility and differentiated value of the GPUs run on CoreWeave’s platform,” he said. CoreWeave CFO Nitin Agrawal added, “Demand remains robust for not just the Blackwell platform, but across our GPU portfolio. In the third quarter, we signed a number of deals for older generations of GPUs, adding new customers and re-contracting existing capacity.” To be sure, CoreWeave did have problems with some new data centers from a subcontractor that slammed the stock 16% on Nov. 11. Including that post-earnings slide, Tuesday was the sixth straight session of declines for CoreWeave. Intrator defended the quarter on CNBC, telling Jim Cramer that “every single part of this quarter went exactly as we planned, except for one delay at a singular data center.” Last Wednesday, we also heard from Advanced Micro Devices CEO Lisa Su after she addressed at an analyst day event earlier that week and forecasted companywide revenue would grow at a roughly 35% annual rate over the next three to five years. Su said on CNBC, “In the last 12 months, we’ve seen every one of our largest customers say, ‘We can see the inflection point now Lisa, like we can see that demand is accelerating because people are now starting to get real productivity out of the AI use cases,’ and you know we have all of the largest hyperscales in the world saying they’re investing more in capex because they can see the return on the other side of it.” 5 questions for Nvidia With the hyperscaler capex commentary, along with Huang’s request from Taiwan Semi, neocloud contracts indicating that Nvidia’s older offerings still have immense value, and Nvidia’s closest competitor, AMD, calling for significant growth in the years ahead, here are the five questions we have as we head into Nvidia’s quarterly release. 1. Can the market sustain 40% capex growth through the end of the decade? This is really going to depend on end market demand – which will itself depend on use cases – and Nvidia’s customers’ (like the cloud providers) ability to monetize that demand. While currently in a situation where the cloud players need to invest ahead of monetization to build out initial infrastructure, whether these levels of capex continue should be tied to the monetization trends. The last thing we want is for names like Meta to forget just how brutal Wall Street can be when spending to the high heavens without a clear path toward a positive return on investment. Meta learned that the hard way when the stock tanked 11% post-earnings and has generally moved lower since. 2. What did Huang mean about China winning the AI race, which was later softened? The answer here may be tied to the CEO’s style of “running scared,” meaning that despite all his success, Huang still seeks to innovate as fast as possible, lest anyone catch up or surpass Nvidia’s chip platforms. Is that what he was getting at? Trying to get the U.S. government to increase its sense of urgency as it relates to the AI arms race with China? We suspect so, but will look for him to clarify on the call. 3. What are the plans for free cash flow – capital returns to shareholders, more deals? Nvidia is a cash printing machine at the moment. Free cash flow is expected to increase by about 67% its fiscal 2026 third quarter. On a full fiscal year 2026 basis, the Street expects Nvidia’s cash flow to grow by about 60% and another 48% in fiscal 2027. With net debt estimated to be negative – meaning Nvidia is sitting on more in cash and equivalents than it owes to the tune of about $70 billion – investors are curious as to how management plans to deploy that cash. Share buybacks are always an option, but so are acquisitions or investments in other companies, which Nvidia has been doing at a furious pace. Any thoughts on that from management would be key. 4. How can we get clarity on the $500 billion of orders for Blackwell and Rubin? While we believe that number to include networking revenue related to these platforms, we will be listening for clues as to the timing of when this revenue will be realized, as well as management’s confidence in the financial standing of the customers placing these orders. 5. What about margins? Margins are always of interest since they tell us how much the top line we should expect to show up in earnings. That’s especially true when a new product is ramping, as that initial phase of production can often crunch profit margins. That said, we don’t think there will be the same margin hit going from Blackwell to Vera Rubin as we saw in transitioning from Hopper to the latest Blackwell platform. That’s because those two used different rack architectures. In contrast, the new Vera Rubin platform will use the same rack architecture as the Blackwell. Still, any commentary on margin dynamics is sure to be scrutinized by investors. AI spending concerns We would be remiss not to highlight some concerns we have as it relates to Nvidia. The major one is funding – not the funding of Nvidia’s needs, but rather the needs of its customers. While the hyperscaler customers plus Meta have previously funded their data center ambitions with free cash flow, we have started to see even these monstrously large players tap the debt markets. We must watch this new wrinkle to ensure that management teams haven’t forgotten about the value investors place on operating efficiency and disciplined spending, and that the borrowing doesn’t start to balloon. The Club also has concerns about the sheer dollar size of the commitments being made by names like Oracle, OpenAI, and SoftBank, the latter of which recently divested its stake in Nvidia to fund its commitment to OpenAI. We don’t view the SoftBank sale as a negative for Nvidia, as Nvidia needs OpenAI to make good on its spending commitments more than it needs the investment from SoftBank. However, the move does signal just how large the investment commitments are getting. The final, perhaps greatest, concern relating to funding in the AI space is that the major players are becoming increasingly interconnected with every new deal. That’s even more concerning when you consider that one of the biggest spenders, OpenAI, isn’t even pubic, which means we don’t have a clear picture of its financial standing and ability to make good on its commitments. Tuesday’s big news from another growing non-public player, Anthropic, raises the stakes. As noted earlier, Nvidia and Microsoft intend to invest in Anthropic, which itself has committed to spending on Microsoft’s Azure cloud and Nvidia’s GPUs. So, let’s sketch this out: A and B (Microsoft and Nvidia) invest in C (Anthropic), while C agrees to buy from A and B. One can see how this all starts to feel risky in the sense that if one domino falls, it’s going to have potentially massive ripple effects throughout the AI cohort. We expect the nature of the deals to come up during Nvidia’s post-earnings Q & A session, and we want to hear management explain why they think the concerns are overblown. Bottom line Ultimately, these concerns do keep us cautious in terms of putting new money to work in the data center theme. At the same time, signs of accelerating demand – which serve to support the committed increase in spending, much of that coming Nvidia’s way – keep us in the stock. We believe that while there may be hiccups along the way, long-term investors would do well to maintain a core position in Nvidia, the company at the heart of the entire AI investment cycle, and Jim’s mantra through the years on Nvidia: “Own it, don’t trade it.” (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long NVDA, AMZN, MSFT, META. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Technology
Blip, dip, pullback or the beginning of the end? Global investors weigh in on stock sell-off
Published
2 hours agoon
November 19, 2025By
admin

Global investor sentiment for artificial intelligence remains buoyant, despite on the ongoing stock sell-off.
European and Asia markets have seen days of consecutive losses, tracking their U.S. counterparts lower as pressures mount on AI-related stocks and their valuations. The pan-European Stoxx 600 on Tuesday notched its lowest level in a month, with major bourses opening mixed on Wednesday, while Asia-Pacific markets fell.
Stateside, stock futures were little changed overnight after major U.S. indexes extended their losses. AI-related stocks such as Nvidia, Palantir, and Microsoft are among those feeling the pressure.
“We do think this is an AI specific pullback. We don’t think this is the beginning of the bear market,” Emma Wall, head of investment analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”
When considering whether this is the “beginning of the end” or a moment marking “the big pullback,” Wall argued that while we are overdue a “major global market correction,” the current downturn is yet to bring this shift.
Many markets outside of the U.S. — particularly in Europe and the U.K. — already reflect much of the negative news, she said, adding that she sees the pressure as sector specific.

It is, however, an opportunity to rebalance portfolios, as “even taking into consideration this week, most people have had a really good run, even in AI stocks,” Wall said.
Mike Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist and chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley, echoed this sentiment. He said markets have been in a correction for the past six weeks but “it’s not the end of the AI cycle.”
All eyes are on Nvidia, considered the bellwether of AI, as it’s due to post third-quarter earnings after the closing bell on Wednesday.
“Whatever happens tonight is, if it is a blip, is a pullback, it’s probably a dip to be bought. But I think we are in the midst of somewhat of a correction right now,” Wilson told CNBC’s “Inside India,” adding that he thinks it’s the middle-inning.
“The credit part of this spending is just beginning, meaning we’re just starting to raise money in the credit markets. It’s not like that money is going to sit there and they’re not going to spend it, which means there’s probably time on the clock with these intermittent kind of pullbacks,” he added.

Companies and investors are engaged in a delicate dance.
On one side, AI labs and their partners are making big promises and aggressive plays, according to Jason Thomas, head of global research and investment strategy at Carlyle. “But it’s not incumbent upon investors to believe them,” he told CNBC’s Julianna Tatelbaum, from the firm’s annual conference.
“Investors, of course, have to ensure that they are getting compensated for the risk that things don’t work out quite as planned, and I think that there’s a sense that perhaps there’s been some assets in the space that have been priced to best case scenarios. So I think that that’s the reassessment that’s going on right now,” he said.
Hyperscalers’ rising capex
The sell-off comes as the pace of debt dealmaking picks up, fueling speculation that it may have unsettled investors, many of whom have remained bullish on AI as long as companies post sound earnings. Google-owner Alphabet and Meta have issued bonds, for example.
“It’s not a problem, as long as the funding markets are there, meaning they’re raising the debt,” Wilson added. “I mean, there’s investors lined up,” he said.
It does however, become a problem when this is no longer the case, but “we haven’t seen that yet,” he said.
AI has fundamentally changed the strategy for many Big Tech firms, particularly when it comes to U.S. hyperscalers, which have morphed into capex-heavy companies from once asset-light businesses. Global investors are now assessing this new dynamic. Bank of America‘s latest Global Fund Managers Survey found that, for the first time in two decades, fund managers are concerned about hyperscalers “overinvesting.“
“[Hyperscalers] traded at very high price-to-book ratios, which made a lot of sense. You don’t value a money-printing machine based on the cost of the paper or based on the cost of the printing press. And that’s essentially what they were, these massive money printing machines where most of their assets were intangible, proprietary technology, the digital platforms,” said Carlyle’s Thomas.
“Now they’ve actually started to invest so much that 70% of their cash flow is being consumed by capital spending and, if you look at their book value now, 70% actually consists of property, plant and equipment, largely data centers. That’s a four-fold increase from a decade ago,” he added.
Technology
Dutch halt state intervention at Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia, paving way for exports to resume
Published
3 hours agoon
November 19, 2025By
admin
This photograph shows a general view of Nexperia headquarters in Nijmegen on November 6, 2025.
John Thys | Afp | Getty Images
The Dutch government on Wednesday said it suspended its intervention at Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia, following constructive talks with Chinese authorities.
“We see this as a show of goodwill,” Dutch Economy Minister Vincent Karremans said in a statement, posted on social media platform X.
In a separate letter to parliament, Karremans said it had become clear Beijing now appeared to be permitting companies from European and other countries to export Nexperia chips, adding that “this is an important step.”
The development appears to bring an end to a bitter dispute between the Netherlands and China, one that had prompted global automotive groups to raise the alarm over a worsening chip shortage.
The Dutch economic affairs ministry said the country considered it to be “the right moment to take a constructive step” by suspending the order under the so-called Goods Availability Act. It added that it would continue to hold talks with Chinese authorities over the coming weeks.
CNBC has reached out to Nexperia, which is based in the Netherlands but owned by the Chinese company Wingtech, and the Chinese embassy in the U.K. for comment.
The situation involving Nexperia began in September, when the Dutch government invoked a Cold War-era law to effectively take control of the company. The highly unusual move was reportedly made after the U.S. raised security concerns.
In making the decision, the Dutch government cited fears that technology from the company — which specializes in the high-volume production of chips used in automotive, consumer electronics and other industries — “would become unavailable in an emergency.”
China responded by blocking exports of the firm’s finished products.
European Union trade chief Maros Sefcovic on Wednesday welcomed the Dutch government’s decision to suspend its intervention at Nexperia, saying the move will help to stabilize strategic supply chains.
“Continued constructive engagement with partners remains essential to securing reliable global flows. I stay in close contact with all my counterparts,” Sefcovic said in a post on X.
Shares of Europe’s auto giants were trading mixed on Wednesday morning. Milan-listed Stellantis, the parent of Jeep, RAM, Dodge and Chrysler, was last seen up 0.1%.
Germany’s Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz Group and BMW, meanwhile, were all trading slightly lower at 11:12 a.m. London time (6:12 a.m. ET).
— CNBC’s Michael Wayland contributed to this report.
Trending
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024
